60:
20:
is a way of enforcing that the data does not enter an impossible state because of a previous state. For example, it should not be possible for a person to change from being "married" to being "single, never married". The only valid states after "married" might be "divorced", "widowed", or "deceased".
101:
35:
is a property that governs every valid transition from a state of the model to a successor state. It can be viewed as complementary to the
94:
125:
120:
87:
36:
28:
71:
59:
39:
that pertain to states per se but have no bearing on transitions between successive states.
114:
48:
67:
24:
This is the database-centric interpretation of the term.
75:
49:Modelling Transition Constraints (ResearchIndex)
95:
8:
102:
88:
7:
56:
54:
74:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
58:
1:
142:
53:
31:in computer security, a
70:-related article is a
33:transition constraint
18:transition constraint
83:
82:
133:
104:
97:
90:
62:
55:
141:
140:
136:
135:
134:
132:
131:
130:
111:
110:
109:
108:
45:
12:
11:
5:
139:
137:
129:
128:
126:Database stubs
123:
113:
112:
107:
106:
99:
92:
84:
81:
80:
63:
52:
51:
44:
41:
37:state criteria
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
138:
127:
124:
122:
121:Data modeling
119:
118:
116:
105:
100:
98:
93:
91:
86:
85:
79:
77:
73:
69:
64:
61:
57:
50:
47:
46:
42:
40:
38:
34:
30:
29:formal models
25:
22:
19:
76:expanding it
65:
32:
26:
23:
17:
15:
115:Categories
43:References
68:database
66:This
72:stub
27:In
117::
16:A
103:e
96:t
89:v
78:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.