Knowledge (XXG)

Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA

Source đź“ť

354:, wrote a second concurring and dissenting opinion. They argued that the EPA should not be able to regulate the larger sources of greenhouse emissions by using those regulations: "The Clean Air Act was developed for use in regulating the emission of conventional pollutants and is simply not suited for use with respect to greenhouse gases." He cited two scenarios of incompatibility between greenhouses gases and normal pollutants, which eventually caused the EPA to declare that officials may disregard some provisions in the Act or to give authorities "a great deal of discretion." 42: 321:
pollutants, not greenhouse emissions. When the EPA attempted to apply the same standards to any source of greenhouse emissions, the Court objected that "would radically expand those programs, making them both unadministrable and unrecognizable to the Congress that designed them." Instead, the EPA adopted a different threshold for sources of greenhouse emissions, 100,000 tons per year. However, the Court stated, "An agency has no power to 'tailor' legislation to bureaucratic policy goals by rewriting unambiguous statutory terms."
344:. Breyer argued that the EPA should have been allowed to interpret the "any air pollutant" language broadly to include greenhouse emissions as well: "I do not agree with the Court that the only way to avoid an absurd or otherwise impermissible result in these cases is to create an atextual greenhouse gas exception to the phrase 'any air pollutant.'" 324:
On the other hand, the Court ruled that the EPA could regulate the large sources of greenhouse emissions if they were already being regulated for emitting conventional pollutants. Scalia wrote that the "EPA may... continue to treat greenhouse gases as a 'pollutant subject to regulation'" under the
320:
imposes specific requirements on stationary sources of pollution that have the potential to emit 250 tons per year of "any air pollutant" or 100 tons per year for certain types of sources. Furthermore, the "any air pollutant" language in that section of the law specifically refers to regulated air
312:
joined in full. The Court ruled that the EPA can regulate greenhouse emissions on power plants and other large stationary sources of pollution but that it overstepped its authority when it started to use the same regulations on smaller stationary sources like shopping centers, apartment buildings,
119:
neither compels nor permits EPA to adopt an interpretation of the Act requiring a source to obtain a PSD or Title V permit on the sole basis of its potential greenhouse-gas emissions. (2) EPA reasonably interpreted the Act to require sources that would need permits based on their emission of
280:
emissions from light and heavy vehicles as well as generators and industrial and utility sources. A coalition of power companies challenged the legality of the regulations by arguing that the science used by the EPA in deciding the regulations was inaccurate.
1145: 1876: 747: 817: 1081: 285: 801: 771: 1357: 1896: 1043: 1027: 879: 371: 1161: 951: 1501: 1598: 1129: 1113: 1097: 1089: 1035: 1777: 703: 1413: 809: 1839: 1756: 1744: 1591: 1051: 895: 1319: 637: 376: 94: 1664: 1567: 1881: 1407: 1537: 1519: 1177: 1137: 1649: 871: 779: 1659: 903: 825: 1886: 1669: 1641: 696: 1604: 1584: 887: 1525: 841: 833: 1891: 927: 919: 1277: 1240: 689: 1901: 1812: 1674: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 445: 1767: 1610: 1507: 1495: 1169: 971: 1855: 1376: 1153: 676: 400: 1555: 1513: 1827: 1679: 989: 849: 475: 276:
if it determined that the emissions endangered public health. In 2010, the EPA introduced a new set of regulations designed to control
1549: 1313: 1073: 1011: 981: 720: 552: 46: 1382: 1325: 1289: 1121: 791: 1807: 1787: 1654: 1543: 1489: 1364: 426: 1443: 1400: 712: 248: 204:
Scalia, joined by Roberts, Kennedy; Thomas, Alito (Parts I, II–A, and II–B–1); Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (Part II–B–2)
66: 17: 1734: 1714: 1425: 1370: 1252: 1019: 1001: 763: 1343: 861: 317: 252: 230: 116: 1307: 1772: 1719: 1689: 1572: 1394: 289: 1199: 1762: 1699: 1578: 1561: 1431: 1337: 1301: 1850: 1845: 1782: 1105: 273: 1630: 1437: 1295: 1750: 1739: 1624: 1617: 1331: 1207: 739: 641: 380: 89: 1283: 453: 1833: 959: 911: 268: 258:
In a divided decision, the Court largely upheld the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse emissions.
1729: 1724: 1246: 731: 333: 163: 755: 666: 1792: 1419: 1349: 1265: 1709: 244: 648: 1388: 1225: 1063: 943: 351: 337: 309: 179: 155: 151: 288:
unanimously rejected those challenges. In 2013, the case was accepted for review by the
1802: 383: 329: 301: 277: 167: 143: 78: 1870: 1817: 1797: 1704: 347: 305: 175: 135: 681: 1822: 341: 187: 1258: 1146:
Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council
1531: 1271: 1189: 101: 657: 1877:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit cases
272:
that the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate
818:
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council
401:"Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to E.P.A. Rules on Gas Emissions" 1358:
Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission
120:
conventional pollutants to comply with BACT for greenhouse gases.
1044:
Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
1028:
Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon
685: 634:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
617:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
605:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
590:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
578:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
540:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
528:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
513:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
501:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
372:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
240:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
41: 35:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
18:
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
1162:
National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
1114:
National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife
1036:
National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife
952:
HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Association
1130:
Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
1098:
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection
1090:
South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe
1778:
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
810:
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy
476:"Supreme Court Ruling Backs Most EPA Emission Controls" 446:"E.P.A. greenhouse gas rules face new legal challenges" 1897:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
1052:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club
896:
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
772:
Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
592:, 573 U. S., (Breyer, concur/dissent slip op., at 6-7) 1568:
Alien Species Prevention and Enforcement Act of 1992
1688: 1640: 1408:
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
1222: 1188: 1062: 1000: 970: 860: 790: 719: 619:, 573 U. S., (Alito, concur/dissent slip op., at 5) 607:, 573 U. S., (Alito, concur/dissent slip op., at 8) 224: 216: 208: 200: 195: 124: 109: 84: 74: 60: 53: 34: 1538:Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act 1592:Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. EPA 553:"Justices Uphold Emission Limits on Big Industry" 427:"Justices Uphold Emission Limits on Big Industry" 332:wrote a concurring/dissenting opinion, joined by 1650:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 1414:Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act 780:BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 1660:National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 904:Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen 826:Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen 304:authored the majority opinion, which Justices 1670:United States Environmental Protection Agency 1320:Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act 697: 600: 598: 8: 880:Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council 212:Breyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan 65:Utility Air Regulatory Group, Petitioner v. 1526:Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act 842:Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council 834:Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 1882:Climate change policy in the United States 1520:Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 928:American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut 920:Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp. 872:Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council 787: 704: 690: 682: 31: 1278:North Pacific Fur Seal Convention of 1911 1247:Forest Service Organic Administration Act 888:Whitman v. American Trucking Associations 523: 521: 394: 392: 266:In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 251:'s regulation of air pollution under the 1241:Yellowstone National Park Protection Act 444:Volcovici, Valerie (February 27, 2012). 1675:United States Fish and Wildlife Service 667:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived) 363: 1768:National Ambient Air Quality Standards 1611:Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 1508:Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1496:Hazardous Materials Transportation Act 1170:County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund 316:In his opinion, Scalia noted that the 1856:Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action 1377:Environmental Quality Improvement Act 1154:Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. 764:Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation 29:2014 United States Supreme Court case 7: 1887:United States environmental case law 1585:Energy Independence and Security Act 1556:National Environmental Education Act 284:In 2012, a three-judge panel of the 1828:Significant New Alternatives Policy 1680:U.S. Global Change Research Program 990:Southern Union Co. v. United States 936:Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA 850:Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms 1605:America's Water Infrastructure Act 1595:(D.C. Cir. Court of Appeals, 2012) 1314:Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 1074:United States v. Riverside Bayview 1012:Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill 982:City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey 47:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 1892:United States Supreme Court cases 1621:(5th Cir. Court of Appeals, 2022) 1383:National Environmental Policy Act 1361:(2nd Cir. Court of Appeals, 1965) 1122:Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper Inc. 1082:SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers 644:302 (2014) is available from: 399:Liptak, Adam (October 15, 2013). 1808:Presidential Climate Action Plan 1788:New Source Performance Standards 1655:Council on Environmental Quality 1544:Emergency Wetlands Resources Act 40: 1444:Water Resources Development Act 1401:Coastal Zone Management Program 713:United States environmental law 249:Environmental Protection Agency 67:Environmental Protection Agency 1902:2014 in United States case law 1735:Environmental impact statement 1715:Corporate average fuel economy 1599:Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act 1020:Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 580:, 573 U. S., (slip op., at 29) 542:, 573 U. S., (slip op., at 21) 515:, 573 U. S., (slip op., at 11) 425:Liptak, Adam (June 23, 2014). 1: 530:, 573 U. S., (slip op., at 7) 503:, 573 U. S., (slip op., at 3) 243:, 573 U.S. 302 (2014), was a 1514:Toxic Substances Control Act 1773:National Climate Assessment 1720:Discharge Monitoring Report 1573:Food Quality Protection Act 1395:Coastal Zone Management Act 290:United States Supreme Court 1918: 1550:Global Change Research Act 1200:United States v. Bestfoods 658:Oyez (oral argument audio) 1823:Section 608 Certification 1763:Maximum contaminant level 1700:Best available technology 1346:(1963, 1970, 1977, 1990) 1326:Air Pollution Control Act 1290:Migratory Bird Treaty Act 229: 129: 114: 39: 1851:Toxicity category rating 1846:Total maximum daily load 1783:National Priorities List 1665:Office of Surface Mining 1490:Federal Noxious Weed Act 1391:(1972, 1977, 1987, 2014) 1365:Solid Waste Disposal Act 1106:Rapanos v. United States 433:– via NYTimes.com. 274:greenhouse gas emissions 54:Argued February 24, 2014 1813:Renewable Fuel Standard 1631:Inflation Reduction Act 1438:Safe Drinking Water Act 480:The Wall Street Journal 325:provisions in the Act. 220:Alito, joined by Thomas 1426:Endangered Species Act 1371:Endangered Species Act 1253:Rivers and Harbors Act 802:United States v. SCRAP 748:Vermont Yankee v. NRDC 677:Coverage on SCOTUSblog 1751:Executive Order 13990 1745:Executive Order 13432 1740:Environmental justice 1625:CHIPS and Science Act 1332:Fish and Wildlife Act 1208:Guam v. United States 740:Sierra Club v. Morton 104:372; 82 U.S.L.W. 4535 100:134 S. Ct. 2427; 189 56:Decided June 23, 2014 1834:State of the Climate 1502:Magnuson–Stevens Act 1308:McSweeney-McNary Act 960:West Virginia v. EPA 912:Massachusetts v. EPA 269:Massachusetts v. EPA 1798:Not-To-Exceed (NTE) 1730:Environmental crime 1725:Effluent guidelines 1486:, 2014, 2016, 2022) 1226:federal legislation 732:Missouri v. Holland 247:case regarding the 164:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 1618:Louisiana v. Biden 1532:CERCLA (Superfund) 1440:(1974, 1986, 1996) 756:Hughes v. Oklahoma 557:The New York Times 431:The New York Times 405:The New York Times 286:D.C. Circuit court 140:Associate Justices 1864: 1863: 1793:New Source Review 1579:Energy Policy Act 1562:Oil Pollution Act 1432:Oil Pollution Act 1420:Noise Control Act 1350:Acid Rain Program 1338:Oil Pollution Act 1302:Oil Pollution Act 1296:Clarke–McNary Act 1218: 1217: 1178:Sackett v. EPA II 236: 235: 16:(Redirected from 1909: 1710:Clean Power Plan 1642:Federal agencies 1284:Weeks–McLean Act 1138:Sackett v. EPA I 788: 706: 699: 692: 683: 671: 665: 662: 656: 653: 647: 620: 614: 608: 602: 593: 587: 581: 575: 569: 568: 566: 564: 549: 543: 537: 531: 525: 516: 510: 504: 498: 492: 491: 489: 487: 472: 466: 465: 463: 461: 456:on March 6, 2016 452:. Archived from 441: 435: 434: 422: 416: 415: 413: 411: 396: 387: 368: 245:US Supreme Court 125:Court membership 44: 43: 32: 21: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1860: 1692: 1684: 1636: 1389:Clean Water Act 1233: 1232:and lower court 1231: 1229: 1224: 1214: 1184: 1058: 996: 966: 944:Michigan v. EPA 856: 786: 723: 715: 710: 669: 663: 660: 654: 651: 645: 629: 624: 623: 615: 611: 603: 596: 588: 584: 576: 572: 562: 560: 559:. June 23, 2014 551: 550: 546: 538: 534: 526: 519: 511: 507: 499: 495: 485: 483: 482:. June 23, 2014 474: 473: 469: 459: 457: 443: 442: 438: 424: 423: 419: 409: 407: 398: 397: 390: 369: 365: 360: 298: 264: 180:Sonia Sotomayor 178: 166: 156:Clarence Thomas 154: 152:Anthony Kennedy 105: 55: 49: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1915: 1913: 1905: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1889: 1884: 1879: 1869: 1868: 1862: 1861: 1859: 1858: 1853: 1848: 1843: 1840:Tailoring Rule 1837: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1803:PACE financing 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1760: 1754: 1748: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1696: 1694: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1667: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1646: 1644: 1638: 1637: 1635: 1634: 1628: 1622: 1614: 1608: 1602: 1596: 1588: 1582: 1576: 1570: 1565: 1559: 1553: 1547: 1541: 1535: 1529: 1523: 1517: 1511: 1505: 1499: 1493: 1487: 1441: 1435: 1429: 1423: 1417: 1411: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1392: 1386: 1380: 1374: 1368: 1362: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1341: 1335: 1329: 1323: 1317: 1311: 1305: 1299: 1293: 1287: 1281: 1275: 1269: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1250: 1244: 1237: 1235: 1220: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1213: 1212: 1204: 1195: 1193: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1182: 1174: 1166: 1158: 1150: 1142: 1134: 1126: 1118: 1110: 1102: 1094: 1086: 1078: 1069: 1067: 1060: 1059: 1057: 1056: 1048: 1040: 1032: 1024: 1016: 1007: 1005: 998: 997: 995: 994: 986: 977: 975: 968: 967: 965: 964: 956: 948: 940: 932: 924: 916: 908: 900: 892: 884: 876: 867: 865: 858: 857: 855: 854: 846: 838: 830: 822: 814: 806: 797: 795: 785: 784: 776: 768: 760: 752: 744: 736: 727: 725: 717: 716: 711: 709: 708: 701: 694: 686: 680: 679: 673: 672: 628: 627:External links 625: 622: 621: 609: 594: 582: 570: 544: 532: 517: 505: 493: 467: 436: 417: 388: 362: 361: 359: 356: 297: 294: 278:carbon dioxide 263: 260: 234: 233: 227: 226: 222: 221: 218: 217:Concur/dissent 214: 213: 210: 209:Concur/dissent 206: 205: 202: 198: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 168:Stephen Breyer 144:Antonin Scalia 141: 138: 133: 127: 126: 122: 121: 112: 111: 107: 106: 99: 86: 82: 81: 76: 72: 71: 62: 61:Full case name 58: 57: 51: 50: 45: 37: 36: 28: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1914: 1903: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1857: 1854: 1852: 1849: 1847: 1844: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1818:Right to know 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1661: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1645: 1643: 1639: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1569: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1557: 1554: 1551: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1521: 1518: 1515: 1512: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1348: 1347: 1345: 1344:Clean Air Act 1342: 1339: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1227: 1221: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1006: 1003: 999: 992: 991: 987: 984: 983: 979: 978: 976: 973: 969: 962: 961: 957: 954: 953: 949: 946: 945: 941: 938: 937: 933: 930: 929: 925: 922: 921: 917: 914: 913: 909: 906: 905: 901: 898: 897: 893: 890: 889: 885: 882: 881: 877: 874: 873: 869: 868: 866: 863: 859: 852: 851: 847: 844: 843: 839: 836: 835: 831: 828: 827: 823: 820: 819: 815: 812: 811: 807: 804: 803: 799: 798: 796: 793: 789: 782: 781: 777: 774: 773: 769: 766: 765: 761: 758: 757: 753: 750: 749: 745: 742: 741: 737: 734: 733: 729: 728: 726: 722: 721:Supreme Court 718: 714: 707: 702: 700: 695: 693: 688: 687: 684: 678: 675: 674: 668: 659: 650: 643: 639: 635: 631: 630: 626: 618: 613: 610: 606: 601: 599: 595: 591: 586: 583: 579: 574: 571: 558: 554: 548: 545: 541: 536: 533: 529: 524: 522: 518: 514: 509: 506: 502: 497: 494: 481: 477: 471: 468: 455: 451: 447: 440: 437: 432: 428: 421: 418: 406: 402: 395: 393: 389: 385: 382: 378: 374: 373: 367: 364: 357: 355: 353: 349: 345: 343: 339: 335: 331: 326: 322: 319: 318:Clean Air Act 314: 313:and schools. 311: 307: 303: 295: 293: 291: 287: 282: 279: 275: 271: 270: 261: 259: 256: 254: 253:Clean Air Act 250: 246: 242: 241: 232: 231:Clean Air Act 228: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 196:Case opinions 194: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132:Chief Justice 131: 130: 128: 123: 118: 117:Clean Air Act 113: 108: 103: 97: 96: 91: 87: 83: 80: 77: 73: 70: 68: 63: 59: 52: 48: 38: 33: 27: 19: 1832: 1705:Citizen suit 1693:and concepts 1616: 1590: 1356: 1206: 1198: 1176: 1168: 1160: 1152: 1144: 1136: 1128: 1120: 1112: 1104: 1096: 1088: 1080: 1072: 1050: 1042: 1034: 1026: 1018: 1010: 988: 980: 958: 950: 942: 935: 934: 926: 918: 910: 902: 894: 886: 878: 870: 848: 840: 832: 824: 816: 808: 800: 778: 770: 762: 754: 746: 738: 730: 633: 616: 612: 604: 589: 585: 577: 573: 561:. Retrieved 556: 547: 539: 535: 527: 512: 508: 500: 496: 484:. Retrieved 479: 470: 458:. Retrieved 454:the original 449: 439: 430: 420: 408:. Retrieved 404: 386: (2014). 370: 366: 350:, joined by 346: 327: 323: 315: 299: 283: 267: 265: 257: 239: 238: 237: 225:Laws applied 183: 176:Samuel Alito 171: 159: 147: 136:John Roberts 93: 64: 26: 1690:Regulations 460:October 19, 410:October 19, 188:Elena Kagan 1871:Categories 1259:Refuse Act 358:References 262:Background 75:Docket no. 1272:Weeks Act 1266:Lacey Act 1234:decisions 1230:treaties, 724:decisions 338:Sotomayor 102:L. Ed. 2d 85:Citations 1757:LDV Rule 632:Text of 334:Ginsburg 328:Justice 300:Justice 296:Decision 201:Majority 115:(1) The 69:, et al. 1397:(1972) 1255:(1899) 563:July 1, 486:July 1, 450:Reuters 310:Kennedy 306:Roberts 110:Holding 79:12-1146 1842:(2010) 1759:(2010) 1753:(2022) 1747:(2007) 1633:(2022) 1627:(2022) 1613:(2021) 1607:(2018) 1601:(2016) 1587:(2007) 1581:(2005) 1575:(1996) 1564:(1990) 1558:(1990) 1552:(1990) 1546:(1986) 1540:(1986) 1534:(1980) 1528:(1978) 1522:(1977) 1516:(1976) 1510:(1976) 1504:(1976) 1498:(1975) 1492:(1975) 1434:(1973) 1428:(1973) 1422:(1972) 1416:(1972) 1410:(1972) 1385:(1970) 1379:(1970) 1373:(1969) 1367:(1965) 1340:(1961) 1334:(1956) 1328:(1955) 1322:(1954) 1316:(1934) 1310:(1928) 1304:(1924) 1298:(1924) 1292:(1918) 1286:(1913) 1280:(1911) 1274:(1911) 1268:(1900) 1249:(1897) 1243:(1872) 1211:(2021) 1203:(1998) 1190:CERCLA 1181:(2023) 1173:(2020) 1165:(2018) 1157:(2016) 1149:(2013) 1141:(2012) 1133:(2009) 1125:(2009) 1117:(2007) 1109:(2006) 1101:(2006) 1093:(2004) 1085:(2001) 1077:(1985) 1055:(2021) 1047:(2018) 1039:(2007) 1031:(1995) 1023:(1992) 1015:(1978) 993:(2012) 985:(1978) 963:(2022) 955:(2021) 947:(2015) 939:(2014) 931:(2011) 923:(2007) 915:(2007) 907:(2004) 899:(2004) 891:(2001) 883:(1984) 875:(1975) 853:(2010) 845:(2008) 837:(2004) 829:(2004) 821:(1983) 813:(1983) 805:(1973) 783:(2021) 775:(2000) 767:(1990) 759:(1979) 751:(1978) 743:(1972) 735:(1920) 670:  664:  661:  655:  652:  649:Justia 646:  375:, 352:Thomas 340:, and 330:Breyer 302:Scalia 186: 184:· 182:  174: 172:· 170:  162: 160:· 158:  150: 148:· 146:  1223:Major 1192:cases 1066:cases 1004:cases 974:cases 864:cases 794:cases 640: 379: 348:Alito 342:Kagan 92:302 ( 1484:2007 1480:2000 1476:1999 1472:1996 1468:1992 1464:1990 1460:1988 1456:1986 1452:1976 1448:1974 972:RCRA 792:NEPA 642:U.S. 565:2014 488:2014 462:2013 412:2013 381:U.S. 308:and 95:more 90:U.S. 88:573 1064:CWA 1002:ESA 862:CAA 638:573 384:302 377:573 1873:: 1482:, 1478:, 1474:, 1470:, 1466:, 1462:, 1458:, 1454:, 1450:, 636:, 597:^ 555:. 520:^ 478:. 448:. 429:. 403:. 391:^ 336:, 292:. 255:. 1446:( 1228:, 705:e 698:t 691:v 567:. 490:. 464:. 414:. 98:) 20:)

Index

Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
12-1146
U.S.
more
L. Ed. 2d
Clean Air Act
John Roberts
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Clean Air Act
US Supreme Court
Environmental Protection Agency
Clean Air Act
Massachusetts v. EPA
greenhouse gas emissions
carbon dioxide
D.C. Circuit court
United States Supreme Court
Scalia
Roberts
Kennedy
Clean Air Act

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑