Knowledge (XXG)

Undervalue transaction

Source 📝

28: 671:. There is also a requirement for the company to have been insolvent when the transaction was entered into, or for the company to have become insolvent as a result of the transaction. This is presumed for a 'connected person', which may be rebutted, but must be proven by the liquidator or administrator in all other cases. There is a defence which the recipient of the transaction can rely on under section 238(5) of the Insolvency Act 1986 which applies where a transaction was entered in 27: 751:
Where the parties were not dealing at arm's length, then the trustee must prove that the transaction was at an undervalue and that either the transfer occurred during the one year before the initial bankruptcy event or the bankruptcy occurred in the five years before the initial bankruptcy event and
747:
with the debtor. Where the parties were at arm's length, the trustee must prove that the transaction was at an undervalue, it occurred during the one year before the initial bankruptcy event, the debtor company was insolvent at the time of the transaction or was made insolvent because of it, and the
591:
The effect of a successful application to have a transaction declared as an undervalue transaction varies. Inevitably the other party to the transaction who received the benefit has to return the benefit (or account for it) it to the liquidator. In some countries the assets are treated in the normal
587:
The vulnerability period is the period of time immediately prior to the company going into bankruptcy. The length of the vulnerability period varies between countries, and some countries apply different vulnerability periods in different circumstances.
702:
in the same circumstances as the company would not have entered into the transaction with regard to the benefits and detriments to the company, the benefits to any other party to the transaction, and any other relevant matter. Section 588FB(2) of the
569:
provided by either side. However, if a company is in real peril of going bankrupt, many legal systems provide for a mechanism which allows these transactions to be unwound, so as to prevent prejudice to the creditors of the company.
916:
A person who is 'connected' to a company is defined for these purposes in section 249 of the Insolvency Act 1986 as a director or shadow director of the company, an associate of a director or shadow director, or an associate of the
780:, or the disposition occurred within two years of the sequestration of the estate and the person who received the disposition cannot prove that immediately after the transaction, the assets of the debtor exceeded his liabilities. 707:
provides that there is no requirement for a creditor of the company to be party to the transaction and that there can still be an uncommercial transaction where it was the result of an Australian court order or agency direction.
640:
or liquidator of the company. The transaction must have been a gift, or a transaction where the company received consideration of money or money's worth which was significantly lower in value than the asset was worth. In
686:. These are listed in section 241 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and include returning the property to the company, returning the proceeds of sale to the company, and the discharge of any security. 667:
must be satisfied. The transaction must have occurred within the relevant period of two years. The period is calculated by reference to the period of time immediately preceding the onset of
577:
the consideration received by the company in the transaction, in money or money's worth is significantly less than the value, in money or money's worth, provided by the company;
583:
at the time of the transaction, the company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due, or became unable to pay its debts as they fell due as a result of the transaction.
660:
the court held that it may be appropriate to consider the details of a series of linked transactions when determining whether the transaction was for an undervalue.
752:
the company was insolvent at the time of the transaction or was made insolvent because of it and the company intended to "defraud, defeat or delay" a creditor.
331: 387: 611:
Many jurisdictions which have prohibitions on undervalue transactions also provide for an exception in the case of transactions entered into in the
316: 187: 675:, for the purpose of carrying on the business, and there were reasonable grounds when it was entered to believe that it would benefit the company. 443: 54: 653: 357: 516: 182: 604:). However, some countries have "ring-fenced" recoveries of unfair preferences so that they are made available to the pool of assets for 619:
are of a view that it is for the benefit of the company, and such transactions are usually either validated or presumed to be validated.
773: 79: 651:
could not be considered an undervalue transaction as it does not deplete or diminish the value of the assets of the company. In
412: 573:
Normally, for a transaction to be set aside as an undervalue transaction, the liquidator or equivalent must demonstrate that:
382: 736: 711:
The vulnerability period for an uncommercial transaction is two years, or four years where there is a 'connected person'.
633: 407: 402: 367: 59: 761: 397: 612: 850:
test of insolvency to undervalue transactions, either as an alternative to the cash-flow test, or in addition to it.
744: 695: 463: 352: 794: 720: 509: 392: 377: 362: 347: 233: 490: 480: 433: 321: 259: 110: 89: 930: 643: 986: 827: 704: 549:. This can occur where the transaction was seriously disadvantageous to the company and the company was 428: 326: 218: 202: 156: 135: 130: 438: 44: 991: 981: 769: 664: 637: 502: 372: 764:
can be set aside by the court under section 26 of the Insolvency Act 1936. This occurs where the
648: 616: 605: 458: 249: 166: 951: 789: 728: 699: 597: 485: 468: 453: 300: 228: 120: 69: 593: 542: 295: 264: 161: 125: 601: 280: 64: 663:
In order for a transaction at an undervalue to be proved, the test in section 240 of the
962: 823: 678:
If it is proven that there was a transaction at an undervalue, then the transaction is
743:. The trustee has different legal requirements where the party was or was not dealing 975: 566: 534: 197: 772:
of his estate and it can be proven that immediately after the disposition, debtor's
905: 562: 94: 74: 723:
where there is a transfer of property or the provision of services for which the
683: 668: 254: 84: 813:
Some legal systems also apply undervalue transactions to insolvent individuals
740: 672: 550: 538: 474: 49: 19: 831: 192: 942:
A connected person is defined in section 64B of the Corporations Act 2001.
679: 546: 290: 151: 115: 732: 580:
the transaction was entered into during the "vulnerability period"; and
541:
which the court orders be set aside, usually upon the application of a
846:
test of insolvency. Some jurisdictions (although not many) apply the
765: 724: 448: 777: 727:
company gives a consideration of nil or conspicuously less than
285: 822:
See for example, section 238 of the Insolvency Act 1986 in the
565:, the courts will not generally look into the adequacy of the 682:
at the court's discretion and there are a number of possible
26: 748:
company intended to "defraud, defeat or delay" a creditor.
768:
made such a disposition more than two years before the
735:must bring an application under section 96 of the 600:which catches the assets (characteristically, a 863:(1997) BCC 282, now superseded by legislation. 510: 8: 553:or in immediate risk of becoming insolvent. 517: 503: 15: 806: 739:for the court to declare a transaction 420: 339: 308: 272: 241: 210: 174: 143: 102: 36: 18: 872:Insolvency Act 1986, ss 238(1) and (2) 698:occurs if it could be expected that a 647:, the court held that the granting of 903:Phillips v Brewin Dolphin Bell Lawrie 654:Phillips v Brewin Dolphin Bell Lawrie 7: 861:Re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd 719:A transfer at undervalue occurs in 533:is a transaction entered into by a 632:A transaction at an undervalue in 14: 545:for the benefit of the debtor's 760:A disposition without value in 694:An uncommercial transaction in 1: 881:Insolvency Act 1986, s 238(4) 737:Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 592:way, and may be taken by any 561:Under ordinary principles of 762:South African insolvency law 826:, and section 558FB of the 623:In individual jurisdictions 613:ordinary course of business 537:who subsequently goes into 1008: 636:can only be pursued by an 963:Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 696:Australian insolvency law 464:History of bankruptcy law 795:Voidable floating charge 234:Voidable floating charge 721:Canadian insolvency law 481:Pre-packaged insolvency 434:Bankruptcy alternatives 322:Cross-border insolvency 260:Trading while insolvent 111:Insolvency practitioner 90:Provisional liquidation 644:Re MC Bacon Ltd (No 1) 531:undervalue transaction 224:Undervalue transaction 31: 927:Corporations Act 2001 828:Corporations Act 2001 705:Corporations Act 2001 429:Anti-deprivation rule 327:Insolvency Regulation 219:Fraudulent conveyance 203:Scheme of arrangement 157:Preferential creditor 136:Trustee in bankruptcy 131:Referee in Bankruptcy 30: 665:Insolvency Act 1986 634:U.K. insolvency law 606:unsecured creditors 183:Administration (UK) 459:Financial distress 332:UNCITRAL Model Law 250:Fraudulent trading 167:Unsecured creditor 32: 790:Unfair preference 729:fair market value 700:reasonable person 598:security interest 594:secured creditors 527: 526: 486:Sovereign default 469:List of bankrupts 439:Creditors' rights 301:Security interest 229:Unfair preference 211:Avoidance regimes 121:Regulatory agency 999: 966: 960: 954: 949: 943: 940: 934: 924: 918: 914: 908: 900: 894: 888: 882: 879: 873: 870: 864: 857: 851: 840: 834: 820: 814: 811: 519: 512: 505: 296:Second lien loan 265:Wrongful trading 162:Secured creditor 16: 1007: 1006: 1002: 1001: 1000: 998: 997: 996: 972: 971: 970: 969: 961: 957: 950: 946: 941: 937: 925: 921: 915: 911: 901: 897: 891:Re MC Bacon Ltd 889: 885: 880: 876: 871: 867: 858: 854: 841: 837: 821: 817: 812: 808: 803: 786: 758: 745:at arm's length 717: 692: 630: 625: 602:floating charge 559: 523: 317:Chapter 15 (US) 281:Floating charge 188:Chapter 11 (US) 65:Conservatorship 12: 11: 5: 1005: 1003: 995: 994: 989: 984: 974: 973: 968: 967: 955: 944: 935: 919: 909: 895: 883: 874: 865: 852: 835: 824:United Kingdom 815: 805: 804: 802: 799: 798: 797: 792: 785: 782: 757: 754: 716: 713: 691: 688: 629: 628:United Kingdom 626: 624: 621: 585: 584: 581: 578: 558: 555: 525: 524: 522: 521: 514: 507: 499: 496: 495: 494: 493: 488: 483: 478: 471: 466: 461: 456: 451: 446: 444:Chapter 9 (US) 441: 436: 431: 423: 422: 418: 417: 416: 415: 410: 408:United Kingdom 405: 400: 395: 390: 385: 380: 375: 370: 365: 360: 355: 350: 342: 341: 337: 336: 335: 334: 329: 324: 319: 311: 310: 306: 305: 304: 303: 298: 293: 288: 283: 275: 274: 270: 269: 268: 267: 262: 257: 252: 244: 243: 239: 238: 237: 236: 231: 226: 221: 213: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 200: 195: 190: 185: 177: 176: 172: 171: 170: 169: 164: 159: 154: 146: 145: 141: 140: 139: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 105: 104: 100: 99: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 77: 72: 67: 62: 57: 55:Chapter 7 (US) 52: 47: 45:Administration 39: 38: 34: 33: 23: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1004: 993: 990: 988: 985: 983: 980: 979: 977: 964: 959: 956: 953: 948: 945: 939: 936: 932: 928: 923: 920: 913: 910: 907: 904: 899: 896: 892: 887: 884: 878: 875: 869: 866: 862: 856: 853: 849: 848:balance-sheet 845: 839: 836: 833: 829: 825: 819: 816: 810: 807: 800: 796: 793: 791: 788: 787: 783: 781: 779: 776:exceeded his 775: 771: 770:sequestration 767: 763: 755: 753: 749: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 714: 712: 709: 706: 701: 697: 689: 687: 685: 681: 676: 674: 670: 666: 661: 659: 656: 655: 650: 646: 645: 639: 638:administrator 635: 627: 622: 620: 618: 614: 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 589: 582: 579: 576: 575: 574: 571: 568: 567:consideration 564: 556: 554: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 520: 515: 513: 508: 506: 501: 500: 498: 497: 492: 491:Subordination 489: 487: 484: 482: 479: 477: 476: 472: 470: 467: 465: 462: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 447: 445: 442: 440: 437: 435: 432: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 419: 414: 413:United States 411: 409: 406: 404: 401: 399: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 349: 346: 345: 344: 343: 338: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 314: 313: 312: 309:International 307: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 289: 287: 284: 282: 279: 278: 277: 276: 271: 266: 263: 261: 258: 256: 253: 251: 248: 247: 246: 245: 240: 235: 232: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 216: 215: 214: 209: 204: 201: 199: 198:Restructuring 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 180: 179: 178: 175:Restructuring 173: 168: 165: 163: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 149: 148: 147: 142: 137: 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 107: 106: 101: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 42: 41: 40: 35: 29: 25: 24: 21: 17: 987:Business law 958: 947: 938: 926: 922: 912: 902: 898: 890: 886: 877: 868: 860: 855: 847: 843: 842:This is the 838: 818: 809: 759: 756:South Africa 750: 718: 710: 693: 684:court orders 677: 662: 657: 652: 642: 631: 610: 590: 586: 572: 563:contract law 560: 530: 528: 473: 398:South Africa 223: 95:Receivership 75:Examinership 774:liabilities 669:liquidation 596:who have a 403:Switzerland 255:Misfeasance 85:Liquidation 70:Dissolution 992:Insolvency 982:Bankruptcy 976:Categories 952:BIA, s 96. 673:good faith 615:where the 543:liquidator 539:bankruptcy 475:Pari passu 340:By country 126:Liquidator 50:Bankruptcy 20:Insolvency 893:BCLC 324. 844:cash-flow 832:Australia 801:Footnotes 690:Australia 617:directors 551:insolvent 547:creditors 378:Hong Kong 353:Australia 193:Cram down 144:Claimants 103:Officials 37:Processes 917:company. 784:See also 680:voidable 649:security 557:Overview 348:Anguilla 291:Mortgage 273:Security 242:Offences 152:Creditor 116:Tribunal 965:, s 26. 931:s 588FB 733:trustee 535:company 454:Default 388:Ireland 929:(Cth) 906:UKHL 2 778:assets 766:debtor 725:debtor 715:Canada 449:Debtor 393:Russia 368:Cayman 363:Canada 421:Other 383:India 373:China 859:See 741:void 731:. A 286:Lien 830:in 529:An 358:BVI 80:IVA 60:CVA 978:: 608:. 933:. 658:, 518:e 511:t 504:v

Index

Insolvency

Administration
Bankruptcy
Chapter 7 (US)
CVA
Conservatorship
Dissolution
Examinership
IVA
Liquidation
Provisional liquidation
Receivership
Insolvency practitioner
Tribunal
Regulatory agency
Liquidator
Referee in Bankruptcy
Trustee in bankruptcy
Creditor
Preferential creditor
Secured creditor
Unsecured creditor
Administration (UK)
Chapter 11 (US)
Cram down
Restructuring
Scheme of arrangement
Fraudulent conveyance
Undervalue transaction

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.