388:, an agreement by two companies to stay out of each other's way and reduce competition in the agreed-upon territories. Also known as 'market sharing', a practice in which businesses geographically divide or allocate customers using contractual agreements that include non-competition on established customers, not producing the same goods or services and/or selling within specific regions. Boral and CSR formed a pre-mix concrete cartel and were penalized for bid rigging, price fixing and market sharing at an amount over $ 6.6million and a maximum of $ 100,000 on each of the 6 executives involved. The companies had agreed to recognize clients as belonging to suppliers without competition over regular meetings and phone conversations. Company market shares were monitored to ensure the agreement was not breached - this led to over-charging on construction quotes which were used by federal, state and local government projects.
796:
predict the relevant encouragement. This article explained the relevant variables in determining the extent of anti-competitive markets too. In perfectly competitive markets, anti-competitive practices are not necessary, since each business already have full information on their competitors pricing, strategy and major actions. However, in the monopolist market system, anti-competitive practices are a useful method to reduce the manipulation of business giants and potential colluding actions. Furthermore, the research emphasized the market conduct of state monopolies is no different from that of other firms and market power serves as the motivation for anti-competitive behavior of firms.
360:, also known as predatory pricing, is a commercial strategy for which a company sells a product at an aggressively low price in a competitive market at a loss. A company with large market share and the ability to temporarily sacrifice selling a product or service at below average cost can drive competitors out of the market, after which the company would be free to raise prices for a greater profit. For example, many developing countries have accused China of dumping. In 2006, the country was accused of dumping silk and satin in the Indian markets at a cheaper rate which affected the local manufacturers adversely.
394:, where products that are not naturally related must be purchased together. This incumbent strategy forces the buyer to purchase an unnecessary product from a separate market, implicitly lessening competition in various markets by increasing unnatural barriers to entry as entrants are unable to compete on a full line of products nor on price. In 2006, Apple iTunes iPod lost a $ 10 million 10 year antitrust case when iPods were sold between September 2006 to March 2009 that were only compatible with tracks from the iTunes Store or those downloaded from CDs.
400:, when a manager sells to a distributor, the resale price is agreed to not fall below a specified minimum value. However, when the retail price decreases, the manufacturer does sell more products. This is interesting from a management perspective. This strategy is controversial, and the benefits are to protect some inefficient small stores or manufacturers from competition threats. But at the same time, this strategy can easily lead to the level price cartel of brand operators.
521:
871:
engage in fair competition, they act within government regulations and laws. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that anti-competitive practices can dramatically reduce the phenomenon of black market, hence improving the investment incentives on aggregate demands. In general, with the effective implementation of anti-competitive practices, the whole economy will expand into a further prosperity with less crowding out effects.
382:, e.g., two companies agree not to use a certain vendor. In 2010, Cabcharge refused, on commercial terms, to allow its non-cash payment instruments to be accepted and processed electronically by Travel Tab/Mpos' system for the payment of taxi fares. Travel Tab/Mpos requested access to the instruments but Cabcharge refused twice. Penalties for the first and second refusal were $ 2 million and $ 9 million respectively.
51:
810:
324:; and provide more choices for consumers. In order to obtain greater profits, some large enterprises take advantage of market power to hinder survival of new entrants. Anti-competitive behavior can undermine the efficiency and fairness of the market, leaving consumers with little choice to obtain a reasonable quality of service.
376:, where companies collude to set prices, effectively dismantling the free market by not engaging in competition with each other. In 2018, travel agency giant, Flight Centre was fined $ 12.5 million for encouraging a collusive price fixing plan between 3 international airlines from between 2005 and 2009.
635:
Reduce competition: Anticompetitive practices lead to less competition in the marketplace, which leads to limited choice for consumers, higher prices, and less innovation. When firms engage in anticompetitive practices that eliminate or reduce competitors, such as collusion, abuse of market power, or
588:
that would elude smaller firms. Again, very large firms, whether quasi-monopolies or oligopolies, may achieve levels of sophistication e.g. in business process and/or planning (that benefit end consumers) and that smaller firms would not easily attain. There are undoubtedly industries (e.g. airlines
342:
Anti-competitive behavior can be grouped into two classifications. Horizontal restraints regard anti-competitive behavior that involves competitors at the same level of the supply chain. These practices include mergers, cartels, collusions, price-fixing, price discrimination and predatory pricing. On
334:
Anti-competitive behavior is used by business and governments to lessen competition within the markets so that monopolies and dominant firms can generate supernormal profits and deter competitors from the market. Therefore, it is heavily regulated and punishable by law in cases where it substantially
870:
Anti-competitive practices are also a useful approach to sustain a stabilized economic development and national welfare. With the implementation of anti-competitive practices, it will effectively remove the market inefficiencies and eliminate the dead weight loss from an economic viewpoint. As firms
755:
Exclusive deals or tie-in arrangements: Companies may enter into exclusive deals or tie-in arrangements that require customers or suppliers to trade with them exclusively or purchase one product or service in order to obtain another. These practices can limit consumer choice and limit competition by
576:
firm within the market to the extent where their action will have a significant influence on market behavior. If the firm engages in such behavior has a position of substantial market share, so much so that they are able to generate supernormal profits and force smaller companies out of the industry
403:
This type of monopoly occurs when a firm can efficiently supply the entire market due to economies of scale, where larger production leads to lower costs. For example, in some cases, utilities (such as those providing electricity or water) may operate as natural monopolies due to high infrastructure
639:
Distorted market dynamics: Anticompetitive behavior distorts market dynamics and undermines the level playing field for all market participants. When some companies engage in unfair or anti-competitive practices, it can create an uneven playing field that puts small businesses or new entrants at a
495:
Horizontal merger refers to improving efficiency by reducing consumer distortion of firm choice and price heterogeneity. When two companies with similar products or product characteristics merge horizontally, there is less competition. However, a net social benefit can be created, because when the
795:
Based on research from Long in 2018, anti-competitive practices are not only an industry regulation behavior, but also a modern industry characteristic for stakeholders to compete in within an fair market system. Meanwhile, the research results also significantly involved the economic theories to
751:
Mergers and acquisitions that harm competition: Mergers and acquisitions that result in a significant reduction in market competition may be considered anticompetitive. This may include actions such as acquiring a competitor to eliminate or reduce competition, or merging to form a dominant market
338:
Anti-competitive practices are commonly only deemed illegal when the practice results in a substantial dampening in competition, hence why for a firm to be punished for any form of anti-competitive behavior they generally need to be a monopoly or a dominant firm in a duopoly or oligopoly who has
555:
are often examined closely by government regulators to avoid reducing competition in an industry. Although anti-competitive practices often enrich those who practice them, they are generally believed to have a negative effect on the economy as a whole, and to disadvantage competing firms and
643:
To mitigate the negative effects of anti-competitive behavior, effective competition laws and regulatory mechanisms are needed to promote fair competition, protect consumer interests and maintain a level playing field for all market participants. Enforcement of competition law, promotion of
600:. However, the companies in these niches tend to believe that they should avoid regulation, as they are entitled to their monopoly position by fiat. In some cases, anti-competitive behavior can be difficult to distinguish from competition. For instance, a distinction must be made between
747:
Anticompetitive agreements: Firms may enter into agreements that limit competition, such as agreements to fix prices, limit production or supply, or divide markets. These agreements harm competition, reduce consumer choice and lead to higher prices or lower quality products or
347:
which implements restraints against competitors due to anti-competitive practice between firms at different levels of the supply chain e.g. supplier-distributor relationships. These practices include exclusive dealing, refusal to deal/sell, resale price maintenance and more.
550:
are often accused of, and sometimes found guilty of, anti-competitive practices. Anti-competitive incentives can be especially prominent when a corporation's majority shareholders own similarly sized stakes in the company's industry competitors. For this reason, company
407:
Technology monopoly， This type of monopoly occurs when one company has exclusive control over a particular technology or innovation, thus enabling them to dominate the market. For example, a company that owns a patent for a breakthrough technology may have a technology
411:
Legal loopholes，This type of monopoly occurs when the government grants a company exclusive rights or privileges to operate in a particular market. For example, patents and
Copyrights provide temporary monopolies to inventors and creators to encourage innovation and
571:
A key distinguishing factor that separates anti-competitive behavior from innovative marketing and fair competition is that most of the aforementioned types of anti-competitive behavior are only deemed unlawful if the firm that is committing the behavior is a
563:
The argument that anti-competitive practices have a negative effect on the economy arises from the belief that a freely functioning efficient market economy, composed of many market participants each of which has limited market power, will not permit
496:
two companies fight a continuous price war due to fierce competition, it will strongly distort the choices of consumers. Horizontal mergers can also easily lead to a monopoly, reducing consumers' choices and indirectly harming consumers' interests.
1026:
636:
mergers and acquisitions, it may result in reduced competition and discourage new competitors from entering the market. This can lead to higher prices, lower product or service quality and less incentive to innovate.
315:
ensure businesses do not engage in competitive practices that harm other, usually smaller, businesses or consumers. These laws are formed to promote healthy competition within a free market by limiting the abuse of
1135:
370:. In 1999, Dentsply entered a 7 years court complaint by the U.S, the dental wholesaler had been successfully sued for using monopoly power to restrain trade using exclusive dealings within contract requirements.
1275:
Katsuyama, Neil. "The economics of occupational licensing: Applying antitrust economics to distinguish between beneficial and anticompetitive professional licenses." S. Cal. Interdisc. LJ 19 (2009): 565.
676:. Antitrust violations constituting unfair competition occur when one competitor attempts to force others out of the market (or prevent others from entering the market) through tactics such as
744:, which occurs when one competitor convinces a party having a relationship with another competitor to breach a contract with, or duty to, the other competitor is also prohibited at common law.
512:. A chain of monopolists under can cause prices that extract beyond consumer surplus as wholesalers mark up prices, retailers have the power to transfer this cost price onto the retail price.
644:
competition and fostering a culture of competition in the business environment help to ensure that markets are competitive, innovative and beneficial to consumers and the economy as a whole.
690:, which occur when the maker of a product uses a name, logo, or other identifying characteristics to deceive consumers into thinking that they are buying the product of a competitor. In the
113:
327:
Anticompetitive behavior refers to actions taken by a business or organization to limit, restrict or eliminate competition in a market, usually in order to gain an unfair advantage or
584:
believe that the realities of the marketplace are sometimes more complex than this or similar theories of competition would suggest. For example, oligopolistic firms may achieve
589:
and pharmaceuticals) in which the levels of investment are so high that only extremely large firms that may be quasi-monopolies in some areas of their businesses can survive.
366:, where a retailer or wholesaler is obliged by contract to only purchase from the contracted supplier. This mechanism prevents retailers to lessen profit maximisation and/or
652:
Unfair competition includes a number of areas of law involving acts by one competitor or group of competitors which harm another in the field, and which may give rise to
831:
1079:
291:
429:
from government which allow a firm to function without being profitable, giving them an advantage over competition or effectively barring competition
885:
423:, where a powerful firm effectively co-opts or swallows its competitor rather than see it either compete directly or be absorbed by another firm
724:
to obtain economically advantageous information in the possession of another. In the United States, this type of activity is forbidden by the
784:
1423:
331:
the market. These practices are often considered illegal or unethical and can harm consumers, other businesses and the broader economy.
1408:
1157:
640:
disadvantage and leads to market distortions, reduced competition and potentially harmful consequences for consumers and the economy.
568:
to be earned...and consequently prices to consumers will be lower, and if anything there will be a wider range of products supplied.
1366:
857:
260:
977:
1274:
738:, the spreading of false information about the quality or characteristics of a competitor's products, is prohibited at common law.
1285:
556:
consumers who are not able to avoid their effects, generating a significant social cost. For these reasons, most countries have
926:
98:
946:
835:
729:
284:
203:
581:
956:
505:
820:
508:
argues that vertical mergers, usually formed under anti-competitive intention, may be pro-competitive to eliminate
67:
839:
824:
951:
761:
725:
474:
31:
905:
880:
783:, each member state must regulate unfair business practices in accordance with the principles laid down in the
397:
357:
277:
1087:
308:
683:
632:) reject the term, seeing all "anti-competitive behavior" as forms of competition that benefit consumers.
621:
509:
484:
177:
741:
597:
573:
468:
328:
265:
560:
to prevent anti-competitive practices, and government regulators to aid the enforcement of these laws.
320:
power. Competition allows companies to compete in order for products and services to improve; promote
1310:
931:
915:
385:
220:
215:
103:
1409:
https://web.archive.org/web/20031224114200/http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/0299/ijee/klein.htm
1109:
1202:
1052:
779:
may be considered unfair competition, if they give one competitor an advantage over others. In the
625:
478:
344:
1257:
1249:
593:
585:
239:
161:
1362:
910:
773:
769:
677:
520:
363:
225:
210:
93:
81:
1318:
1241:
936:
920:
900:
705:
605:
601:
456:
391:
234:
188:
184:
86:
680:
or obtaining exclusive purchase rights to raw materials needed to make a competing product.
435:
which place costly restrictions on firms that less wealthy firms cannot afford to implement
941:
890:
673:
657:
629:
565:
557:
379:
367:
312:
193:
172:
118:
42:
1383:
1314:
985:
780:
669:
536:
141:
123:
1286:
Gellhorn, Walter. "The abuse of occupational licensing." U. CHi. l. rev. 44 (1976): 6.
1417:
1261:
1184:
691:
613:
609:
452:
438:
230:
198:
1355:
27:
Practices that prevent or reduce competition in a market by a business or government
709:
532:
477:
which prevents owners from selling used media, as would normally be allowed by the
446:
373:
244:
157:
108:
1008:
660:. The most common actions falling under the banner of unfair competition include:
50:
17:
895:
809:
735:
687:
547:
432:
167:
1158:"Cartels case studies & legal cases: Queensland pre-mixed concrete cartel"
699:
695:
617:
321:
756:
preventing competitors from entering major distribution channels or markets.
713:
665:
528:
464:
426:
146:
76:
596:, and believe that the inability to allow full competition is balanced by
1012:
776:
543:
420:
317:
72:
1253:
1323:
1298:
717:
442:
471:; or using such legal devices to gain advantage in an unrelated market
1245:
552:
460:
152:
1229:
1185:"Glossary of industrial organisation economics and competition law"
765:
721:
653:
519:
1299:"Efficiency-enhancing horizontal mergers in spatial competition"
1207:
United States
District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
1080:"Flight Centre has been fined $ 12.5 million for 'price fixing'"
698:
and by state statutes, and governed at the federal level by the
1338:"Antitrust Regulators Release New Vertical Merger Guidelines".
803:
307:
are business or government practices that prevent or reduce
49:
881:
Amazon.com controversies § Anti-competitive practices
694:, this form of unfair competition is prohibited under the
535:
gave when asked whether he disliked competition at the
30:"Unfair competition" redirects here. For the film, see
1116:. AustFederal Court of Australiaralian Competition Law
1230:"Resale price maintenance: A managerial perspective"
449:
which give firms insulation from competitive forces
1354:
752:player who may engage in anticompetitive behavior.
421:Absorption of a competitor or competing technology
1357:J. Pierpont Morgan: Industrialist and Financier
592:Many governments regard these market niches as
1162:Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
1031:Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
285:
8:
838:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
525:"I Like a Little Competition"—J. P. Morgan
292:
278:
38:
1322:
1183:Shapiro, Daniel M; Khemani, R. S (1993).
858:Learn how and when to remove this message
253:Enforcement authorities and organizations
1203:"Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation"
1009:"China faces Indian dumping allegations"
886:Anti-competitive practices of Apple Inc.
800:Effectiveness for national stabilization
712:, which occurs when one competitor uses
604:, which is a legal market strategy, and
577:then it is most likely deemed unlawful.
1057:The United States Department of Justice
968:
343:the other hand, the second category is
339:significant influence over the market.
252:
131:
59:
41:
1228:Blair, Roger; Whitman, Joseph (2018).
1053:"U.S. v. Dentsply International, Inc"
785:Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
7:
1384:"Externalities and the Common Owner"
1138:. Competition Commission (Hong Kong)
836:adding citations to reliable sources
1007:Windle, Charlotte (July 31, 2006).
787:, subject to transitional periods.
459:, such as fraudulently obtaining a
25:
1234:Managerial and Decision Economics
531:. Cartoon relating to the answer
261:International Competition Network
1201:Ware, James (22 December 2008).
1110:"ACCC v Cabcharge Australia Ltd"
808:
927:Embrace, extend, and extinguish
1382:Condon, Madison (2020-03-01).
947:European Union competition law
730:Economic Espionage Act of 1996
266:List of competition regulators
1:
1078:Pash, Chris (4 April 2018).
978:"What is Predatory Pricing?"
957:United States antitrust law
791:In different market systems
506:Chicago school of economics
1440:
1424:Anti-competitive practices
1303:Papers in Regional Science
1114:Australian Competition Law
1084:Business Insider Australia
305:Anti-competitive practices
133:Anti-competitive practices
99:Herfindahl–Hirschman index
68:History of competition law
29:
952:Unfair business practices
762:unfair business practices
726:Uniform Trade Secrets Act
475:Digital rights management
32:Unfair Competition (film)
1361:. Capstone. p. 93.
906:Parker immunity doctrine
398:Resale price maintenance
1353:Michael Burgan (2007).
1297:Ralph M, Braid (2017).
1164:. ACCC. 24 January 2013
622:Neoclassical economists
404:and distribution costs.
1033:. ACCC. 9 January 2013
684:Trademark infringement
664:Matters pertaining to
540:
510:double marginalisation
485:Occupational licensing
178:Occupational licensing
54:
1388:Washington Law Review
742:Tortious interference
598:government regulation
523:
469:intellectual property
416:Also criticized are:
53:
1342:: 1–3. 21 July 2020.
988:on 30 September 2020
932:Planned obsolescence
916:Price discrimination
832:improve this section
626:heterodox economists
616:capitalism (such as
612:. Some advocates of
386:Dividing territories
335:affects the market.
221:Occupational closure
216:Dividing territories
204:Essential facilities
104:Market concentration
1315:2017PRegS..96..881B
1027:"Exclusive Dealing"
976:Hemingway, Carole.
479:first sale doctrine
467:, or other form of
1324:10.1111/pirs.12228
1090:on 7 November 2020
668:law, known in the
594:natural monopolies
586:economies of scale
541:
491:Horizontal mergers
345:vertical restraint
240:Regulatory capture
55:
18:Unfair competition
1340:CRS Legal Sidebar
911:Predatory pricing
868:
867:
860:
770:misrepresentation
678:predatory pricing
654:criminal offenses
608:, which violates
364:Exclusive dealing
302:
301:
231:Misuse of patents
226:Predatory pricing
211:Exclusive dealing
94:Barriers to entry
82:Coercive monopoly
16:(Redirected from
1431:
1396:
1395:
1379:
1373:
1372:
1360:
1350:
1344:
1343:
1335:
1329:
1328:
1326:
1294:
1288:
1283:
1277:
1272:
1266:
1265:
1246:10.1002/mde.2920
1225:
1219:
1218:
1216:
1214:
1198:
1192:
1191:
1189:
1180:
1174:
1173:
1171:
1169:
1154:
1148:
1147:
1145:
1143:
1136:"Market sharing"
1132:
1126:
1125:
1123:
1121:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1095:
1086:. Archived from
1075:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1064:
1049:
1043:
1042:
1040:
1038:
1023:
1017:
1016:
1004:
998:
997:
995:
993:
984:. Archived from
973:
937:Enshittification
921:Trade regulation
901:Natural monopoly
863:
856:
852:
849:
843:
812:
804:
706:Misappropriation
658:causes of action
602:product bundling
566:monopoly profits
558:competition laws
500:Vertical mergers
457:copyright misuse
294:
287:
280:
185:Product bundling
87:Natural monopoly
39:
21:
1439:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1414:
1413:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1369:
1352:
1351:
1347:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1284:
1280:
1273:
1269:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1212:
1210:
1209:. C 05-00037 JW
1200:
1199:
1195:
1187:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1167:
1165:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1141:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1119:
1117:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1093:
1091:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1062:
1060:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1036:
1034:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1006:
1005:
1001:
991:
989:
975:
974:
970:
965:
942:Category killer
891:Competition law
877:
864:
853:
847:
844:
829:
813:
802:
793:
674:competition law
650:
630:Austrian school
518:
502:
493:
380:Refusal to deal
368:consumer choice
354:
298:
194:Refusal to deal
173:Tacit collusion
119:Relevant market
43:Competition law
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1437:
1435:
1427:
1426:
1416:
1415:
1412:
1411:
1404:
1403:External links
1401:
1398:
1397:
1374:
1367:
1345:
1330:
1309:(4): 881–895.
1289:
1278:
1267:
1240:(7): 751–760.
1220:
1193:
1175:
1149:
1127:
1101:
1070:
1059:. 25 June 2015
1044:
1018:
999:
967:
966:
964:
961:
960:
959:
954:
949:
944:
939:
934:
929:
924:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
883:
876:
873:
866:
865:
816:
814:
807:
801:
798:
792:
789:
781:European Union
774:unconscionable
758:
757:
753:
749:
745:
739:
733:
720:, or outright
703:
681:
670:European Union
649:
648:Common actions
646:
537:Pujo Committee
517:
514:
501:
498:
492:
489:
488:
487:
482:
472:
450:
436:
430:
424:
414:
413:
409:
405:
401:
395:
389:
383:
377:
371:
361:
353:
350:
313:Antitrust laws
300:
299:
297:
296:
289:
282:
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
263:
255:
254:
250:
249:
248:
247:
242:
237:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
207:
206:
201:
191:
182:
181:
180:
175:
170:
165:
155:
144:
142:Monopolization
136:
135:
129:
128:
127:
126:
124:Merger control
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
90:
89:
84:
70:
62:
61:
60:Basic concepts
57:
56:
46:
45:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1436:
1425:
1422:
1421:
1419:
1410:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1378:
1375:
1370:
1368:9780756519872
1364:
1359:
1358:
1349:
1346:
1341:
1334:
1331:
1325:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1293:
1290:
1287:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1271:
1268:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1224:
1221:
1208:
1204:
1197:
1194:
1190:. p. 83.
1186:
1179:
1176:
1163:
1159:
1153:
1150:
1137:
1131:
1128:
1115:
1111:
1105:
1102:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1074:
1071:
1058:
1054:
1048:
1045:
1032:
1028:
1022:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1003:
1000:
987:
983:
979:
972:
969:
962:
958:
955:
953:
950:
948:
945:
943:
940:
938:
935:
933:
930:
928:
925:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
878:
874:
872:
862:
859:
851:
841:
837:
833:
827:
826:
822:
817:This section
815:
811:
806:
805:
799:
797:
790:
788:
786:
782:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
754:
750:
746:
743:
740:
737:
734:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:trade secrets
707:
704:
701:
697:
693:
692:United States
689:
685:
682:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
662:
661:
659:
655:
647:
645:
641:
637:
633:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:laissez-faire
611:
610:antitrust law
607:
606:product tying
603:
599:
595:
590:
587:
583:
582:robber barons
580:Opponents of
578:
575:
569:
567:
561:
559:
554:
549:
545:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
515:
513:
511:
507:
499:
497:
490:
486:
483:
480:
476:
473:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:Patent misuse
451:
448:
444:
440:
439:Protectionism
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
419:
418:
417:
410:
406:
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
375:
372:
369:
365:
362:
359:
356:
355:
351:
349:
346:
340:
336:
332:
330:
325:
323:
319:
314:
311:in a market.
310:
306:
295:
290:
288:
283:
281:
276:
275:
273:
272:
267:
264:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
205:
202:
200:
199:Group boycott
197:
196:
195:
192:
190:
186:
183:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
154:
151:Formation of
150:
149:
148:
145:
143:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
130:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
74:
71:
69:
66:
65:
64:
63:
58:
52:
48:
47:
44:
40:
37:
33:
19:
1391:
1387:
1377:
1356:
1348:
1339:
1333:
1306:
1302:
1292:
1281:
1270:
1237:
1233:
1223:
1211:. Retrieved
1206:
1196:
1178:
1166:. Retrieved
1161:
1152:
1140:. Retrieved
1130:
1118:. Retrieved
1113:
1104:
1092:. Retrieved
1088:the original
1083:
1073:
1061:. Retrieved
1056:
1047:
1035:. Retrieved
1030:
1021:
1002:
990:. Retrieved
986:the original
981:
971:
869:
854:
845:
830:Please help
818:
794:
759:
651:
642:
638:
634:
591:
579:
570:
562:
542:
533:J. P. Morgan
524:
503:
494:
415:
374:Price fixing
341:
337:
333:
326:
304:
303:
245:Rent-seeking
158:Price fixing
132:
109:Market power
36:
982:LegalVision
896:Loss leader
736:Trade libel
688:passing off
618:Monetarists
548:oligopolies
433:Regulations
309:competition
168:Bid rigging
1213:25 October
1168:23 October
1142:22 October
1120:22 October
1094:18 October
1063:19 October
1037:18 October
992:18 October
963:References
848:March 2024
700:Lanham Act
696:common law
656:and civil
624:, and the
544:Monopolies
412:creativity
322:innovation
235:copyrights
114:SSNIP test
1262:158821430
819:does not
777:contracts
748:services.
714:espionage
666:antitrust
529:Art Young
465:copyright
427:Subsidies
408:monopoly.
147:Collusion
77:oligopoly
1418:Category
1254:26608277
1013:BBC News
875:See also
764:such as
760:Various
728:and the
574:dominant
329:dominate
318:monopoly
73:Monopoly
1394:(1): 1.
1311:Bibcode
840:removed
825:sources
718:bribery
628:of the
620:, some
553:mergers
516:Effects
443:tariffs
358:Dumping
153:cartels
1365:
1260:
1252:
772:, and
461:patent
447:quotas
1258:S2CID
1250:JSTOR
1188:(PDF)
766:fraud
722:theft
392:Tying
352:Types
189:tying
162:cases
1363:ISBN
1215:2020
1170:2020
1144:2020
1122:2020
1096:2020
1065:2020
1039:2020
994:2020
823:any
821:cite
686:and
546:and
504:The
455:and
445:and
233:and
187:and
75:and
1319:doi
1242:doi
923:law
834:by
708:of
672:as
527:by
1420::
1392:95
1390:.
1386:.
1317:.
1307:96
1305:.
1301:.
1256:.
1248:.
1238:39
1236:.
1232:.
1205:.
1160:.
1112:.
1082:.
1055:.
1029:.
1011:.
980:.
768:,
716:,
463:,
441:,
1371:.
1327:.
1321::
1313::
1264:.
1244::
1217:.
1172:.
1146:.
1124:.
1098:.
1067:.
1041:.
1015:.
996:.
861:)
855:(
850:)
846:(
842:.
828:.
732:.
702:.
539:.
481:.
293:e
286:t
279:v
164:)
160:(
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
