Knowledge (XXG)

United States v. Microsoft Corp.

Source đź“ť

638:. The ad was presented as "An Open Letter to President Clinton from 240 Economists on Antitrust Protectionism." It said in part, "Consumers did not ask for these antitrust actions – rival business firms did. Consumers of high technology have enjoyed falling prices, expanding outputs, and a breathtaking array of new products and innovations. ... Increasingly, however, some firms have sought to handicap their rivals by turning to government for protection. Many of these cases are based on speculation about some vaguely specified consumer harm in some unspecified future, and many of the proposed interventions will weaken successful U.S. firms and impede their competitiveness abroad." 49: 590:, suggesting that the effects might have been falsified. Allchin admitted that the blame for the tape problems lay with some of his staff. "They ended up filming it—grabbing the wrong screen shot", he said of the incident. Later, Allchin re-ran the demonstration and provided a new videotape, but in so doing Microsoft dropped the claim that Windows is slowed down when IE is removed. Mark Murray, a Microsoft spokesperson, berated the government attorneys for "nitpicking on issues like video production". 594: 4493: 3950: 788:
Nine states and the District of Columbia (which had been pursuing the case together with the DOJ) did not agree with the settlement, arguing that it did not go far enough to curb Microsoft's anti-competitive business practices. On June 30, 2004, the D.C. Circuit Court approved the settlement with the Justice Department, rejecting the states' claims that the sanctions were inadequate.
809:
licensing, and stated that if the government later wished to extend those aspects of the settlement as far as 2012, it would not object. The government made clear that the extension was intended only to give the relevant part of the settlement "the opportunity to succeed for the period of time it was
746:
Jackson's response was that Microsoft's conduct itself was the cause of any "perceived bias"; Microsoft executives had, according to him, "proved, time and time again, to be inaccurate, misleading, evasive, and transparently false. ... Microsoft is a company with an institutional disdain for both the
722:
that gives the Supreme Court jurisdiction to hear direct appeals from the District Court level in certain antitrust cases initiated by the federal government, if "the district judge who adjudicated the case enters an order stating that immediate consideration of the appeal by the Supreme Court is of
701:
On June 7, 2000, the District Court ordered a breakup of Microsoft as its remedy. According to that judgment, Microsoft would have to be split into two separate units, one to produce the operating system and one to produce other software components. Microsoft immediately appealed the judgment to the
609:
onto a Windows PC. Microsoft's videotape showed the process as being quick and easy, resulting in the Netscape icon appearing on the user's desktop. The government produced its own videotape of the same process, revealing that Microsoft's videotape had conveniently removed a long and complex part of
557:
reported that "early rounds of his deposition show him offering obfuscatory answers and saying 'I don't recall' so many times that even the presiding judge had to chuckle. Many of Gates's denials and pleas of ignorance were directly refuted by prosecutors with snippets of e-mails Gates both sent and
866:
for dealing with Microsoft's behavior in March 1999. He has suggested, for instance, that Microsoft shall be required to publish complete documentation of all interfaces between software components, all communications protocols, and all files. Shortly speaking, not releasing any implementations for
613:
When the judge suggested that Microsoft offer a version of Windows that did not include Internet Explorer, Microsoft responded that the company would offer manufacturers a choice: one version of Windows that was obsolete, or another that did not work properly. The judge asked, "It seemed absolutely
799:
that took effect in 2001 and a Final Judgment entered in 2002. These proceedings imposed various constraints on our Windows operating system businesses. These constraints include limits on certain contracting practices, mandated disclosure of certain software program interfaces and protocols, and
787:
other software with Windows in the future. On August 5, 2002, Microsoft announced that it would make some concessions towards the proposed final settlement ahead of the judge's decision. On November 1, 2002, Judge Kollar-Kotelly released a ruling that accepted most of the proposed DOJ settlement.
621:
were so worried about the outcome of the case that they discussed leaving Microsoft "if they really screw the company that badly, really just split it up in a totally irrational way," Gates recalled. Microsoft defended itself in the public arena, arguing that its attempts to "innovate" were under
846:
wrote in 1999 that the antitrust case against Microsoft set a dangerous precedent that foreshadowed increasing government regulation of an industry that had been relatively free of government intrusion, and that future technological progress in the industry will be impeded as a result. After the
867:
undocumented interfaces. He has also noted that Microsoft should refrain from certifying any hardware as working with Microsoft software, unless the hardware's complete specifications have been published, so that an alternative software to support the same hardware can be implemented freely.
851:
wrote that, contrary to Friedman's forecasts, the case had to that point had little effect on Microsoft's behavior. The fines, restrictions, and monitoring imposed were not enough to prevent it from "abusing its monopolistic power and too little to prevent it from dominating the software and
830:
who assisted Judge Jackson in drafting the findings of fact at the initial District Court trial, wrote that the settlement gave Microsoft "a special antitrust immunity to license Windows and other 'platform software' under contractual terms that destroy freedom of competition." Law professor
502:
and competition, that the two were now the same product and inextricably linked, and that consumers were receiving the benefits of IE for free. Opponents countered that IE was still a separate product that did not need to be tied to Windows, since a separate version of IE was available for
782:
with third-party companies and appoint a panel of three people who would have full access to Microsoft's systems, records, and source code for five years in order to ensure compliance. However, the DOJ did not require Microsoft to change any of its code nor did it prevent Microsoft from
742:
for American judges. The Circuit Court judges accused Jackson of unethical conduct and determined that he should have recused himself from the case. Thus the Circuit Court adopted a "drastically altered scope of liability" due to Jackson's conduct, which was favorable for Microsoft.
581:
A number of videotapes were submitted as evidence by Microsoft during the trial, including one that demonstrated that removing Internet Explorer from Microsoft Windows caused slowdowns and malfunctions in Windows. In the videotaped demonstration of what then-Microsoft vice president
800:
rights for computer manufacturers to limit the visibility of certain Windows features in new PCs. We believe we are in full compliance with these rules. However, if we fail to comply with them, additional restrictions could be imposed on us that would adversely affect our business.
614:
clear to you that I entered an order that required that you distribute a product that would not work?" David Cole, a Microsoft vice president, replied, "In plain English, yes. We followed that order. It wasn't my place to consider the consequences of that."
533:. The suit began on May 18, 1998, with the Department of Justice joined by the Attorney Generals of twenty U.S. states and the District of Columbia. The case organized by the Department of Justice was focused less on interoperability, and more on 4517: 610:
the procedure and that the Netscape icon was not placed on the desktop, requiring a user to search for it. Brad Chase, a Microsoft vice president, verified the government's tape and conceded that Microsoft's own tape was falsified.
474:
integration. The central issue was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its IE web browser software with its Windows operating system. Bundling the two products was allegedly a key factor in Microsoft's victory in the
750:
Ultimately, the Circuit Court overturned Jackson's holding that Microsoft should be broken up as an illegal monopoly. However, the Circuit Court did not overturn Jackson's findings of fact, and held that traditional
551:. He argued over the definitions of words such as "compete", "concerned", "ask", and "we"; certain portions of the proceeding would later provoke laughter from the judge when an excerpted version was shown in court. 804:
Microsoft's obligations under the settlement, as originally drafted, expired on November 12, 2007. However, Microsoft later "agreed to consent to a two-year extension of part of the Final Judgments" dealing with
747:
truth and for rules of law that lesser entities must respect. It is also a company whose senior management is not averse to offering specious testimony to support spurious defenses to claims of its wrongdoing."
728: 703: 352: 305: 59: 431:
began an inquiry in 1990 over whether Microsoft was abusing its monopoly in the PC operating system market. The commissioners deadlocked with a 2–2 vote in 1993 and closed the investigation, but the
2437:(injunction including final settlement terms approved by the court) (note that the copy posted on the district court's web site is actually an earlier version that the court declined to approve). 2166: 771:
The Department of Justice announced on September 6, 2001 that it was no longer seeking to break up Microsoft and would instead seek a lesser antitrust penalty. Microsoft decided to draft a
530: 344: 1573: 839:
and protocols was useful only for “interoperating with a Windows Operating System Product”, not for implementing support of those APIs and protocols in any competing operating system.
714:
After Microsoft filed its appeal, the U.S. government and the states in the suit requested a process that would skip the intermediate Circuit Court and send the case directly to the
1983: 1035: 970: 947: 404:
operating system ... "Our strategies and energies as a company are totally committed to Windows, in the same way that we're committed to operating-system kernels like MS-DOS and
159: 140: 1441: 727:
at the Supreme Court, requesting the same direct appeal process without going through the Circuit Court. The Supreme Court rejected these requests and sent the appeal to the
852:
operating system industry." For that reason, Microsoft remained dominant and monopolistic after the trial, and it continued to stifle competitors and innovative technology.
2774: 874:, argued that the U.S. government recognized the benefits of including a web browser with an operating system. At the appellate level, the government dropped the claim of 31: 1028: 1961: 1847: 878:
given that—as laid out in Section 1 of the Sherman Act—it would have had to prove that more harm than good resulted from the type of tying carried out by Microsoft.
4527: 3550: 487:), since it typically took extra time to buy and install the competing browsers. Underlying these disputes were questions of whether Microsoft had manipulated its 1002: 3515: 513:
himself denied that Microsoft was a monopoly, stating "Microsoft follows the rules. Microsoft is subject to the rules." He further compared the situation with
541:; the DOJ built upon the allegation that Microsoft forced computer makers to include its Internet browser as a part of the installation of Windows software. 3986: 2280:
John Lopatka and William Page, Antitrust on Internet Time: Microsoft and the Law and Economics of Exclusion, 7 Supreme Court Economic Review 157–231 (1999)
827: 4532: 1371: 988: 479:
of the late 1990s, as every Windows user had a copy of IE. It was further alleged that this restricted the market for competing web browsers (such as
4522: 4542: 3453: 3196: 2295:
Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine, Preserving Monopoly: Economic Analysis, Legal Standards, and the Microsoft Case, 7 Geo. Mas. L. Rev. 617 (1999)
1944: 1053: 965: 2030: 2016: 1298: 1590: 3020: 2405: 2374: 2349: 2326: 2248: 907: 778:
On November 1, 2001, the DOJ reached an agreement with Microsoft to settle the case. The proposed settlement required Microsoft to share its
586:
stated to be a seamless segment filmed on one PC, the government noticed that some icons mysteriously disappeared and reappeared on the PC's
491:
to favor IE over third-party browsers. The government also questioned Microsoft's conduct in enforcing restrictive licensing agreements with
795:
Lawsuits brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, 18 states, and the District of Columbia in two separate actions were resolved through a
4274: 4145: 3474: 2488: 1524: 2089: 400:
Although Gates says that he isn't trying to dominate the industry with sheer numbers, his strategy for dominance involves Microsoft's new
3637: 2551: 1991: 1463: 575: 432: 1775: 3191: 1757: 715: 48: 2445: 1433: 507:. They also asserted that IE was not really free because its development and marketing costs may have inflated the price of Windows. 4284: 4279: 4130: 4003: 3446: 2725: 779: 488: 377:
is widely recognized as the most influential company in the microcomputer-software industry. Claiming more than a million installed
297: 2214: 1200: 622:
attack by rival companies jealous of its success, and that government litigation was merely their pawn. A full-page ad appeared in
2286:
John Lopatka and William Page, Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington Law Review 829-59 (2001)
1494: 447:
but remained free to integrate additional features into the operating system. In the years that followed, Microsoft insisted that
4347: 4253: 3503: 2708: 1622: 1546: 4171: 3979: 3678: 3333: 2277:
Kenneth Elzinga, David Evans, and Albert Nichols, United States v. Microsoft: Remedy or Malady? 9 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 633 (2001)
1016: 492: 325: 2053: 1402: 734:
On June 28, 2001, the Circuit Court overturned Judge Jackson's rulings against Microsoft. This was partly because Jackson had
408:," says Gates. "We're also saying that only applications that take advantage of Windows will be competitive in the long run." 4435: 4352: 3410: 3015: 3005: 863: 571: 2497: 2380: 1802: 4537: 3460: 3380: 3229: 2988: 1855: 348: 2289:
Alan Meese, Monopoly Bundling In Cyberspace: How Many Products Does Microsoft Sell ? 44 Antitrust Bulletin 65 (1999)
2182: 4150: 4125: 3212: 2714: 2460: 2455: 1121: 1957: 3100: 2283:
John Lopatka and William Page, The Dubious Search For Integration in the Microsoft Trial, 31 Conn. L. Rev. 1251 (1999)
1068: 823: 752: 601:
Microsoft later submitted a second inaccurate videotape into evidence. The issue was how easy or difficult it was for
4496: 4099: 3972: 3577: 3420: 2880: 724: 386: 822:
believed a breakup was not possible, and that "now the only way Microsoft can die is by suicide." Andrew Chin, an
4382: 4332: 4092: 3481: 3340: 2920: 1349: 900: 635: 4238: 4085: 3884: 3249: 2925: 859: 667: 428: 337: 2017:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210707231429/https://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/files/library/jsr20060512.pdf
1675: 1179: 132: 121: 4299: 4289: 4155: 3622: 3488: 3425: 3415: 2945: 2544: 2187: 806: 772: 526: 440: 356: 192: 759:. The case was remanded back to the D.C. District Court for further proceedings on this matter, with Judge 367:
By 1984 Microsoft was one of the most successful software companies, with $ 55 million in 1983 sales.
4397: 4243: 3759: 3372: 2998: 1154: 1107: 1096: 760: 99: 1379: 1057: 4233: 4140: 3754: 3259: 3095: 2696: 2366: 2167:
Microsoft’s Monopoly: Anti-Competitive Behavior, Predatory Tactics, And The Failure Of Governmental Will
1744: 1039: 974: 951: 933: 923: 695: 283: 214: 163: 144: 578:
and to "cut off Netscape's air supply" by giving away a clone of Netscape's flagship product for free.
2299: 2038: 662:, and that Microsoft had taken actions to crush threats to that monopoly, including applications from 324:, primarily through the legal and technical restrictions it put on the abilities of PC manufacturers ( 17: 4392: 4367: 4337: 4228: 4068: 4063: 3874: 3809: 3794: 3764: 3719: 3689: 3437: 3144: 2960: 2779: 2576: 2571: 2012: 1249: 1101: 893: 593: 4058: 4053: 4048: 4043: 4038: 4033: 4028: 4023: 4018: 3864: 3545: 3279: 2651: 624: 587: 484: 246: 238: 234: 1644: 1276: 443:
on July 15, 1994, in which Microsoft consented not to tie other Microsoft products to the sale of
4294: 3953: 3844: 3834: 3789: 3612: 3244: 3222: 3025: 2950: 2893: 2813: 2800: 2537: 2518: 1924: 819: 810:
intended to cover", rather than being due to any "pattern of willful and systematic violations".
719: 630: 606: 480: 390: 333: 2485: 2215:
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=njtip
1532: 2082: 4470: 3995: 3879: 3647: 3642: 3557: 3395: 3347: 3269: 3181: 3122: 3105: 3085: 2983: 2955: 2930: 2843: 2823: 2666: 2479: 2401: 2370: 2345: 2322: 2244: 1581: 538: 534: 448: 444: 329: 321: 242: 2502: 2135: 1958:"Microsoft Corporation Form 10-K Annual Report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 (pg. 14)" 1471: 1223: 4362: 4186: 3839: 3779: 3774: 3744: 3709: 3652: 3602: 3572: 3467: 3385: 3297: 3264: 3234: 3217: 3176: 2908: 2898: 2758: 2626: 2450: 1879: 1126: 1088:, a 2001 film about "NURV", a large software company that presents a fictionalized Microsoft 1084: 1072: 875: 855: 784: 756: 691: 655: 548: 467: 459:
that it was allowed to add to Windows, although the DOJ did not agree with this definition.
250: 230: 210: 2465: 2302:, Antitrust Divestiture in Network Industries, 68 University of Chicago Law Review 1 (2001) 1902: 1718: 1502: 181: 4377: 4191: 3859: 3672: 3667: 3582: 3535: 3312: 3307: 3302: 3254: 3239: 3186: 3171: 3139: 3090: 3075: 2935: 2913: 2631: 2492: 843: 739: 687: 647: 420: 411:
Gates claimed that Microsoft's entrance into the application market with such products as
394: 347:
ruled that Microsoft's actions constituted unlawful monopolization under Section 2 of the
174: 30:
This article is about the 2001 antitrust lawsuit. For other cases with similar names, see
4460: 2226: 2110: 1984:"Microsoft Consent Decree Compliance Advisory - August 1, 2003 : U.S. V. Microsoft" 1828: 4465: 4387: 4322: 4317: 4258: 3824: 3804: 3769: 3734: 3080: 3051: 2853: 2838: 2752: 2730: 2656: 2646: 2641: 2503:
An Interview with Marc Andreessen about Microsoft antitrust litigation and browser wars
2470: 2271: 2143: 977: 954: 796: 675: 563: 504: 416: 313: 254: 1695: 1614: 690:, holding that Microsoft had engaged in monopolization, attempted monopolization, and 4511: 4423: 4342: 4135: 3931: 3694: 3400: 3274: 2940: 2903: 2691: 2682: 2661: 2620: 2431: 1323: 1208: 1042: 723:
general public importance in the administration of justice." The states also filed a
618: 517:
thirty years prior: "People who feared IBM were wrong. Technology is ever-changing."
301: 2192: 397:. Some insiders say Microsoft is attempting to be the IBM of the software industry. 4478: 4418: 4413: 4357: 3849: 3739: 3704: 3058: 3035: 2808: 2747: 2636: 2064: 1410: 1091: 735: 679: 553: 476: 1761: 1550: 385:
has decided to certify Microsoft's jump on the rest of the industry by dominating
2360: 2315:
Digital Phoenix; Why the Information Economy Collapsed and How it Will Rise Again
4327: 3869: 3819: 3684: 3662: 3632: 3617: 3354: 3134: 2863: 2858: 2848: 2828: 2106: 1806: 832: 583: 567: 471: 317: 178: 171: 129: 118: 2440: 2338:
The Microsoft Antitrust Cases - Competition Policy for the Twenty-first Century
2292:
Alan Meese, Don't Disintegrate Microsoft (Yet), 9 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 761 (2001)
4203: 3889: 3799: 3724: 3627: 3562: 3530: 3040: 3030: 2833: 2720: 2604: 2599: 2508: 1780: 1112: 862:, advocating for computing freedom, has provided suggestions to Ralph Nader's 755:
analysis was not equipped to consider software-related practices like browser
663: 544: 510: 499: 436: 382: 2362:
Winners, losers & Microsoft: competition and antitrust in high technology
1585: 1357: 547:
was called "evasive and nonresponsive" by a source present at his videotaped
213:
its Internet browser and operating system, was monopolistic behavior per the
4248: 4208: 4105: 3829: 3784: 3749: 3607: 3597: 3592: 3567: 3361: 2888: 2560: 2341: 2318: 2031:"The Once and Future King: Now the Only Way Microsoft Can Die is by Suicide" 1158: 412: 369: 309: 206: 1201:"Microsoft Drafts Settlement Proposal, Hoping to Resolve Antitrust Lawsuit" 4518:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit cases
3914: 3699: 3117: 2993: 2702: 671: 659: 2529: 2241:
Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application
4372: 4213: 4198: 4176: 3904: 3894: 3714: 3540: 3045: 2818: 2522: 2509:"How Microsoft Internet Explorer Almost Became The Default Web Browser" 570:, a senior Microsoft vice president, as having stated an intention to " 401: 1547:"Retracing the Missteps in Microsoft's Defense at Its Antitrust Trial" 498:
Microsoft argued that the merging of Windows and IE was the result of
3921: 3899: 3814: 3729: 3657: 3587: 3405: 3112: 1928: 1906: 1679: 1299:"The Microsoft case by the numbers: comparison between U.S. and E.U." 1280: 1183: 378: 125: 3964: 2398:
The Microsoft Case: Antitrust, High Technology, and Consumer Welfare
775:
proposal allowing PC manufacturers to adopt non-Microsoft software.
359:
in which Microsoft agreed to modify some of its business practices.
355:
partially overturned that judgment. The two parties later reached a
885: 462:
The government alleged that Microsoft had abused monopoly power on
306:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
60:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
4428: 4223: 4218: 3909: 3854: 2978: 1645:"Antitrust Division | U.S. V. Microsoft: Court's Findings Of Fact" 738:
with the news media while it was still in progress, violating the
683: 592: 559: 463: 405: 4181: 3926: 3390: 3010: 2870: 2513: 189: 96: 3968: 2533: 889: 650:
on November 5, 1999, holding that Microsoft's dominance of the
439:, opened its own investigation later that year, resulting in a 3129: 836: 651: 602: 514: 2498:
Nader 0, Microsoft 0 at Upside Magazine of December 31, 1997
2111:"Free Software Matters: Shaking Up The Microsoft Settlement" 1776:"Overview of Supreme Court's cert. before judgment practice" 872:
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
2480:
Bill Gates deposition video at Microsoft on August 27, 1998
2183:"Free-Software Advocate Offers Remedies for Microsoft Case" 2456:
ZDnet story on 4th anniversary of Microsoft antitrust case
835:
noted that the way Microsoft was required to disclose its
1883:, 5 J. Competition L. & Econ. 581, 621–22 (2009). 531:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
345:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
1725:. International Committee of the Fourth International. 1252:. United States Department of Justice. August 14, 2015 944:
International Business Machines Corp. v. United States
2359:
Liebowitz, S. J.; Margolis, Stephen (March 1, 2001).
1803:"Judiciary Policies And Procedures: Codes Of Conduct" 2466:
Antitrust & the Internet: Microsoft case archive
2441:
The United States DOJ's website on U.S. v. Microsoft
4453: 4406: 4310: 4267: 4164: 4118: 4077: 4011: 4002: 3523: 3514: 3436: 3371: 3325: 3290: 3205: 3164: 3157: 3068: 2969: 2879: 2799: 2792: 2767: 2740: 2675: 2613: 2592: 2585: 2521:from the original on December 11, 2021 – via 2451:
Wired news timeline of the Microsoft antitrust case
2336:Gavil, Andrew I.; First, Harry (December 9, 2014). 2164:Gregory T. Jenkins & Robert W. Bing, 1848:"Judge Jackson Exits Microsoft Discrimination Case" 1464:"Buggy Video and More, Microsoft Is Going Backward" 686:, and others. On April 3, 2000, Jackson issued his 277: 261: 226: 221: 199: 151: 110: 105: 91: 83: 75: 65: 55: 41: 2775:Global LGBTQIA+ Employee & Allies at Microsoft 2482:(Windows Media, Ogg Theora and Ogg Vorbis formats) 1589: 1250:"Memorandum Opinion : U.S. V. Microsoft Corp" 718:. Such an action is permitted by a section of the 2446:Microsoft's Antitrust Case, Microsoft News Center 2083:"DECODING MICROSOFT: A FIRST PRINCIPLES APPROACH" 1877:J. Gregory Sidak & David J. Teece, 1736: 1734: 1732: 293:United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation 70:United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation 32:United States v. Microsoft Corp. (disambiguation) 2170:, 5 J. Bus. & Econ. Research 222 (2007). 1030:Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde 634:on June 2, 1999, created by a think tank called 2272:Decoding Microsoft: A First Principles Approach 2239:Areeda, Phillip E.; Hovenkamp, Herbert (2015). 793: 495:who were required to include that arrangement. 375: 2471:"A Case of Insecure Browsing" by Andrew Chin. 1115:interface that featured numerous allusions to 1004:Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States 3980: 2545: 1434:"Microsoft Attacks Credibility of Intel Exec" 1372:"Gates deposition makes judge laugh in court" 901: 791:In its 2008 Annual Report, Microsoft stated: 466:-based personal computers in its handling of 8: 2486:The Center for the Advancement of Capitalism 2396:Page, William H.; Lopatka, John E. (2009). 2136:"The Business Community's Suicidal Impulse" 1690: 1688: 1432:Chandrasekaran, Rajiv (November 13, 1998). 828:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 818:After the 2002 settlement, industry pundit 268: 4008: 3987: 3973: 3965: 3520: 3161: 2796: 2589: 2552: 2538: 2530: 2243:(4th ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer. 908: 894: 886: 525:The case was initially tried before Judge 353:U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 47: 38: 1719:"U.S. Judge Orders Break-up of Microsoft" 990:United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. 1615:"Open Letter on Antitrust Protectionism" 694:in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the 2095:from the original on November 24, 2021. 1523:McCullagh, Declan (February 16, 1999). 1138: 966:International Salt Co. v. United States 725:petition for certiorari before judgment 137:direct appeal denied, pet. cert. denied 4528:Microsoft criticisms and controversies 4353:Microsoft Java Virtual Machine (MSJVM) 1625:from the original on February 17, 2022 1493:McCullagh, Declan (February 2, 1999), 296:, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a 18:United States Microsoft antitrust case 2134:Friedman, Milton (March–April 1999). 1892: 1890: 1572:Leibovich, Mark (December 31, 2000). 1444:from the original on February 5, 2012 1401:Neuborne, Ellen (November 30, 1998). 1199:Wilke, John R. (September 10, 2001). 423:product was not a big-time operation. 7: 2274:, 40 Wake Forest Law Review 1 (2005) 1880:Dynamic Competition in Antitrust Law 1293: 1291: 1289: 1194: 1192: 1169: 1167: 1144: 1142: 2461:ZDnet story on proposed concessions 2383:from the original on March 20, 2015 2052:Chin, Andrew (September 30, 2004). 1988:United States Department of Justice 1378:. November 16, 1998. Archived from 1324:"Gates stands tough - Mar. 3, 1998" 847:resulting settlement, the magazine 576:Netscape Communications Corporation 1964:from the original on June 14, 2019 1470:. February 3, 1999. Archived from 1348:Kawamoto, Dawn (August 28, 1998). 1111:, a 1998 video game parodying the 780:application programming interfaces 489:application programming interfaces 25: 4285:Integrated Windows Authentication 2340:. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: 2181:Jo Foley, Mary (March 10, 1999). 1990:. August 14, 2015. Archived from 1846:Thurrott, Paul (March 14, 2001). 1829:"Microsoft Judge Ripped in Court" 1525:"Compaq: It Was All a Big Mix-Up" 1495:"Feds Accuse MS of Falsification" 1350:"Gates deposition called evasive" 4533:United States antitrust case law 4492: 4491: 4444:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 4333:Channel Definition Format (.cdf) 3949: 3948: 1941:Massachusetts v. Microsoft Corp. 1920:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1898:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1741:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1671:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1272:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1222:Caruso, Denise (April 2, 1984). 1175:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1150:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1117:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1054:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 849:Business & Economic Research 597:Bill Gates during his deposition 493:original equipment manufacturers 205:Business practices conducted by 156:Microsoft Corp. v. United States 115:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 42:United States v. Microsoft Corp. 27:2001 American antitrust law case 4523:United States computer case law 4383:Server Gated Cryptography (SGC) 3679:High Heat Major League Baseball 2400:. University of Chicago Press. 2081:Chin, Andrew (March 21, 2005). 1613:Theroux, David (June 2, 1999). 617:Gates and his successor as CEO 387:applications, operating systems 381:machines, founder and chairman 332:and use other programs such as 186:aff'd in part and rev'd in part 4543:2001 in United States case law 3334:Where do you want to go today? 2417:The Microsoft Antitrust Appeal 1224:"Company Strategies Boomerang" 864:Consumer Project on Technology 605:users to download and install 566:, called as a witness, quoted 308:. The U.S. government accused 1: 3381:Bundling of Microsoft Windows 2054:"A case of insecure browsing" 1717:Ingram, Mike (June 9, 2000). 736:improperly discussed the case 704:D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals 349:Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 1122:Removal of Internet Explorer 1017:United States v. Loew's Inc. 870:Chris Butts, writing in the 4141:Browser Helper Object (BHO) 3447:Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft 2473:Raleigh News & Observer 1903:231 F. Supp. 2d 144 1277: 98-CV-1232, 98-CV-1233 1069:United States antitrust law 184:(D.D.C. 2002) (on remand), 4559: 3745:Nokia Devices and Services 3638:Fast Search & Transfer 3578:The Blue Ribbon SoundWorks 3504:Microsoft v. United States 3496:United States v. Microsoft 3011:C/AL a.k.a Navision Attain 343:At the initial trial, the 29: 4487: 3944: 3482:Microsoft v. MikeRoweSoft 2567: 2013:ATR-SV-DIV401;MDE;15906;7 1676:97 F. Supp. 2d 59 1619:The Independent Institute 1403:"Microsoft's Teflon Bill" 1180:87 F. Supp. 2d 30 1065: 1050: 1025: 1013: 999: 985: 962: 941: 931: 921: 654:-based personal computer 646:Judge Jackson issued his 636:The Independent Institute 328:) and users to uninstall 282: 266: 204: 46: 4239:Temporary Internet Files 3507:(2018 data privacy case) 2313:Abramson, Bruce (2005). 2298:Howard A. Shelanski and 2165: 1878: 1723:World Socialist Web Site 860:Free Software Foundation 429:Federal Trade Commission 3623:Double Fine Productions 3461:Microsoft v. Commission 2415:Reynolds, Alan (2001). 2227:"Sherman Antitrust Act" 2188:The Wall Street Journal 1205:The Wall Street Journal 807:communications protocol 527:Thomas Penfield Jackson 4398:Windows Desktop Update 4348:Internet Mail and News 4244:Vector Markup Language 3760:Obsidian Entertainment 3653:GIANT Company Software 2676:Senior leadership team 2491:July 31, 2013, at the 1211:on September 19, 2001. 1108:Microshaft Winblows 98 1097:Criticism of Microsoft 802: 761:Colleen Kollar-Kotelly 710:Appeals Court decision 598: 574:" and "smother" rival 537:strategies and market 425: 269: 3755:Nuance Communications 3499:(2001 antitrust case) 3260:Outercurve Foundation 2697:Carolina Dybeck Happe 2561:Microsoft Corporation 2517:. September 6, 2019. 2367:Independent Institute 2041:on November 25, 2015. 1008:, 345 U.S. 594 (1953) 696:Sherman Antitrust Act 658:market constituted a 596: 433:Department of Justice 284:Sherman Antitrust Act 215:Sherman Antitrust Act 4538:Microsoft litigation 4393:Windows Address Book 4268:Software and engines 3875:Vermeer Technologies 3810:Revolution Analytics 3720:Massive Incorporated 3690:inXile Entertainment 3475:Microsoft v. Lindows 2921:Open source software 2780:Microsoft and unions 2688:Takeshi Numoto (CMO) 2475:, September 30, 2004 2109:(January 28, 2002). 1931: Nov. 12, 2002). 1858:on December 21, 2020 1835:. February 28, 2001. 1594:on December 25, 2016 1535:on October 31, 2020. 1382:on September 2, 1999 1302:Le Concurrentialiste 1102:Microsoft litigation 1020:, 371 U.S. 38 (1962) 814:Impact and criticism 521:District Court trial 393:and, most recently, 79:February 26–27, 2001 4338:Comic Chat/Chat 2.0 3865:Twisted Pixel Games 3850:Winternals Software 3546:Activision Blizzard 3280:Activision Blizzard 3230:Digital Crimes Unit 2652:Carlos A. Rodriguez 2419:. Hudson Institute. 2195:on October 26, 2018 2070:on October 6, 2021. 1706:. November 4, 2002. 1505:on January 15, 2011 1474:on November 3, 1999 1438:The Washington Post 1413:on December 2, 1999 1304:. February 10, 2014 1283: Nov. 5, 1999). 1155:253 F.3d 34 994:, 334 US 131 (1948) 625:The Washington Post 247:A. Raymond Randolph 239:Douglas H. Ginsburg 235:Stephen F. Williams 177:(D.D.C. 2002); 231 4430:Eolas v. Microsoft 4419:Second Browser War 4275:Administration Kit 4259:XHR/XDomainRequest 3613:Consumers Software 3454:Apple v. Microsoft 3213:Engineering groups 2951:Visual Studio Code 2623:(Chairman and CEO) 2614:Board of directors 2432:Final Judgment in 2213:Butts, Chris 2010 2029:Cringely, Robert. 1947:(D.C. Cir., 2004). 820:Robert X. Cringely 729:D.C. Circuit Court 720:United States Code 716:U.S. Supreme Court 688:conclusions of law 631:The New York Times 607:Netscape Navigator 599: 481:Netscape Navigator 152:Subsequent history 4505: 4504: 4471:Dean Hachamovitch 4414:First Browser War 4114: 4113: 3996:Internet Explorer 3962: 3961: 3940: 3939: 3880:Visio Corporation 3558:Altamira Software 3489:Microsoft v. Shah 3396:Internet Explorer 3348:Mojave Experiment 3321: 3320: 3270:Xbox Game Studios 3153: 3152: 3123:LinkedIn Learning 3101:Developer Network 2788: 2787: 2667:Padmasree Warrior 2434:U.S. v. Microsoft 2407:978-0-226-64464-6 2376:978-0-945999-84-3 2351:978-0-262-02776-2 2328:978-0-262-51196-4 2250:978-0-7355-6428-2 1994:on April 22, 2021 1809:on March 13, 2014 1698:U.S. v. Microsoft 1651:. August 14, 2015 1079: 1078: 858:, founder of the 826:professor at the 656:operating systems 539:barriers to entry 449:Internet Explorer 330:Internet Explorer 289: 288: 243:David B. Sentelle 168:pet. cert. denied 16:(Redirected from 4550: 4495: 4494: 4437:Sun v. Microsoft 4363:MSN for Mac OS X 4009: 3989: 3982: 3975: 3966: 3952: 3951: 3780:Playground Games 3775:Perceptive Pixel 3730:Mobile Data Labs 3710:Lionhead Studios 3603:Compulsion Games 3521: 3468:FTC v. Microsoft 3298:Microsoft campus 3162: 2797: 2627:John W. Thompson 2590: 2554: 2547: 2540: 2531: 2526: 2420: 2411: 2392: 2390: 2388: 2355: 2332: 2300:J. Gregory Sidak 2254: 2231: 2230: 2223: 2217: 2211: 2205: 2204: 2202: 2200: 2191:. Archived from 2178: 2172: 2171: 2169: 2161: 2155: 2154: 2152: 2150: 2131: 2125: 2124: 2122: 2120: 2115: 2103: 2097: 2096: 2094: 2087: 2078: 2072: 2071: 2069: 2063:. Archived from 2061:newsobserver.com 2058: 2049: 2043: 2042: 2037:. Archived from 2026: 2020: 2010: 2004: 2003: 2001: 1999: 1980: 1974: 1973: 1971: 1969: 1954: 1948: 1938: 1932: 1922: 1916: 1910: 1900: 1894: 1885: 1884: 1882: 1874: 1868: 1867: 1865: 1863: 1854:. Archived from 1843: 1837: 1836: 1825: 1819: 1818: 1816: 1814: 1805:. Archived from 1799: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1788: 1774:Russell, Kevin. 1771: 1765: 1764: 1754: 1748: 1747:(D.C. Cir. 2001) 1738: 1727: 1726: 1714: 1708: 1707: 1692: 1683: 1673: 1667: 1661: 1660: 1658: 1656: 1641: 1635: 1634: 1632: 1630: 1610: 1604: 1603: 1601: 1599: 1593: 1588:. Archived from 1569: 1563: 1562: 1560: 1558: 1549:. Archived from 1543: 1537: 1536: 1531:. Archived from 1520: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1510: 1501:, archived from 1490: 1484: 1483: 1481: 1479: 1460: 1454: 1453: 1451: 1449: 1429: 1423: 1422: 1420: 1418: 1409:. Archived from 1398: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1368: 1362: 1361: 1360:on May 24, 2012. 1356:. Archived from 1345: 1339: 1338: 1336: 1334: 1320: 1314: 1313: 1311: 1309: 1295: 1284: 1274: 1268: 1262: 1261: 1259: 1257: 1246: 1240: 1239: 1237: 1235: 1230:. pp. 80–83 1219: 1213: 1212: 1207:. Archived from 1196: 1187: 1177: 1171: 1162: 1152: 1146: 1127:US antitrust law 1073:Tying (commerce) 1031: 1005: 991: 934:Clayton Act 1914 924:Sherman Act 1890 916:Sources on tying 910: 903: 896: 887: 856:Richard Stallman 648:findings of fact 468:operating system 272: 251:Judith W. Rogers 231:Harry T. Edwards 222:Court membership 195:(D.C. Cir. 2004) 166:952 (2001) ( 147:1301 (2000). 51: 39: 21: 4558: 4557: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4501: 4483: 4449: 4402: 4378:Outlook Express 4311:Implementations 4306: 4280:Developer Tools 4263: 4192:HTML Components 4160: 4110: 4073: 3998: 3993: 3963: 3958: 3936: 3860:Tellme Networks 3840:Sunrise Atelier 3668:Groove Networks 3536:Access Software 3510: 3432: 3367: 3317: 3313:Microsoft Japan 3308:Microsoft India 3303:Microsoft Egypt 3286: 3255:.NET Foundation 3201: 3149: 3091:Microsoft Learn 3064: 2971: 2965: 2875: 2784: 2768:Employee groups 2763: 2736: 2671: 2632:John W. Stanton 2609: 2581: 2563: 2558: 2507: 2493:Wayback Machine 2428: 2423: 2414: 2408: 2395: 2386: 2384: 2377: 2358: 2352: 2335: 2329: 2312: 2309: 2267: 2261: 2259:Further reading 2251: 2238: 2235: 2234: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2212: 2208: 2198: 2196: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2148: 2146: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2092: 2085: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2067: 2056: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2011: 2007: 1997: 1995: 1982: 1981: 1977: 1967: 1965: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1939: 1935: 1925: 98-CV-1232 1918: 1917: 1913: 1896: 1895: 1888: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1861: 1859: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1812: 1810: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1786: 1784: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1745:253 F.3d 34, 48 1739: 1730: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1694: 1693: 1686: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1654: 1652: 1649:www.justice.gov 1643: 1642: 1638: 1628: 1626: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1597: 1595: 1578:Washington Post 1571: 1570: 1566: 1556: 1554: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1508: 1506: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1477: 1475: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1447: 1445: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1416: 1414: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1385: 1383: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1332: 1330: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1307: 1305: 1297: 1296: 1287: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1255: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1233: 1231: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1198: 1197: 1190: 1173: 1172: 1165: 1148: 1147: 1140: 1135: 1080: 1075: 1061: 1046: 1029: 1021: 1009: 1003: 995: 989: 981: 958: 937: 927: 917: 914: 884: 844:Milton Friedman 816: 769: 740:code of conduct 712: 644: 562:Vice-president 523: 451:(IE) was not a 395:book publishing 365: 135:(D.D.C. 2000), 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 4556: 4554: 4546: 4545: 4540: 4535: 4530: 4525: 4520: 4510: 4509: 4503: 4502: 4500: 4499: 4488: 4485: 4484: 4482: 4481: 4476: 4473: 4468: 4466:Thomas Reardon 4463: 4457: 4455: 4451: 4450: 4448: 4447: 4440: 4433: 4426: 4421: 4416: 4410: 4408: 4404: 4403: 4401: 4400: 4395: 4390: 4385: 4380: 4375: 4370: 4365: 4360: 4355: 4350: 4345: 4340: 4335: 4330: 4325: 4323:Active Desktop 4320: 4318:Active Channel 4314: 4312: 4308: 4307: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4292: 4287: 4282: 4277: 4271: 4269: 4265: 4264: 4262: 4261: 4256: 4251: 4246: 4241: 4236: 4231: 4226: 4221: 4216: 4211: 4206: 4201: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4189: 4179: 4174: 4168: 4166: 4162: 4161: 4159: 4158: 4153: 4148: 4143: 4138: 4133: 4128: 4122: 4120: 4116: 4115: 4112: 4111: 4109: 4108: 4103: 4096: 4089: 4081: 4079: 4075: 4074: 4072: 4071: 4066: 4061: 4056: 4051: 4046: 4041: 4036: 4031: 4026: 4021: 4015: 4013: 4006: 4000: 3999: 3994: 3992: 3991: 3984: 3977: 3969: 3960: 3959: 3957: 3956: 3945: 3942: 3941: 3938: 3937: 3935: 3934: 3929: 3924: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3907: 3902: 3900:WebTV Networks 3897: 3892: 3887: 3882: 3877: 3872: 3867: 3862: 3857: 3852: 3847: 3842: 3837: 3832: 3827: 3825:Secure Islands 3822: 3817: 3812: 3807: 3802: 3797: 3792: 3787: 3782: 3777: 3772: 3770:Pando Networks 3767: 3762: 3757: 3752: 3747: 3742: 3737: 3735:Mojang Studios 3732: 3727: 3722: 3717: 3712: 3707: 3702: 3697: 3692: 3687: 3682: 3675: 3670: 3665: 3660: 3655: 3650: 3645: 3640: 3635: 3630: 3625: 3620: 3615: 3610: 3605: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3585: 3580: 3575: 3570: 3565: 3560: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3543: 3538: 3533: 3527: 3525: 3518: 3512: 3511: 3509: 3508: 3500: 3492: 3485: 3478: 3471: 3464: 3457: 3450: 3442: 3440: 3434: 3433: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3423: 3418: 3408: 3403: 3398: 3393: 3388: 3383: 3377: 3375: 3369: 3368: 3366: 3365: 3358: 3351: 3344: 3337: 3329: 3327: 3323: 3322: 3319: 3318: 3316: 3315: 3310: 3305: 3300: 3294: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3277: 3272: 3262: 3257: 3252: 3247: 3242: 3237: 3232: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3220: 3209: 3207: 3203: 3202: 3200: 3199: 3194: 3189: 3184: 3179: 3174: 3168: 3166: 3159: 3155: 3154: 3151: 3150: 3148: 3147: 3142: 3137: 3132: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3115: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3103: 3098: 3088: 3083: 3078: 3072: 3070: 3069:Web properties 3066: 3065: 3063: 3062: 3055: 3048: 3043: 3038: 3033: 3028: 3023: 3018: 3013: 3008: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2996: 2991: 2986: 2975: 2973: 2967: 2966: 2964: 2963: 2958: 2953: 2948: 2943: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2926:Power Platform 2923: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2911: 2901: 2896: 2891: 2885: 2883: 2877: 2876: 2874: 2873: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2861: 2856: 2851: 2846: 2841: 2836: 2831: 2821: 2816: 2811: 2805: 2803: 2794: 2790: 2789: 2786: 2785: 2783: 2782: 2777: 2771: 2769: 2765: 2764: 2762: 2761: 2756: 2753:Richard Rashid 2750: 2744: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2735: 2734: 2731:Kathleen Hogan 2728: 2723: 2718: 2712: 2706: 2700: 2694: 2689: 2686: 2679: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2670: 2669: 2664: 2659: 2657:Charles Scharf 2654: 2649: 2647:Penny Pritzker 2644: 2642:Sandi Peterson 2639: 2634: 2629: 2624: 2617: 2615: 2611: 2610: 2608: 2607: 2602: 2596: 2594: 2587: 2583: 2582: 2580: 2579: 2574: 2568: 2565: 2564: 2559: 2557: 2556: 2549: 2542: 2534: 2528: 2527: 2505: 2500: 2495: 2483: 2477: 2468: 2463: 2458: 2453: 2448: 2443: 2438: 2427: 2426:External links 2424: 2422: 2421: 2412: 2406: 2393: 2375: 2356: 2350: 2333: 2327: 2308: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2296: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2284: 2281: 2278: 2275: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2260: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2249: 2233: 2232: 2218: 2206: 2173: 2156: 2144:Cato Institute 2126: 2098: 2073: 2044: 2021: 2005: 1975: 1949: 1945:373 F. 3d 1199 1933: 1911: 1886: 1869: 1852:Windows IT Pro 1838: 1820: 1794: 1766: 1749: 1728: 1709: 1684: 1662: 1636: 1605: 1564: 1553:on May 3, 2001 1538: 1515: 1485: 1455: 1440:. p. B1. 1424: 1393: 1363: 1340: 1315: 1285: 1263: 1241: 1214: 1188: 1163: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1077: 1076: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1051: 1048: 1047: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1000: 997: 996: 986: 983: 982: 963: 960: 959: 942: 939: 938: 932: 929: 928: 922: 919: 918: 915: 913: 912: 905: 898: 890: 883: 880: 815: 812: 797:Consent Decree 768: 765: 711: 708: 676:Lotus Software 643: 640: 603:America Online 564:Steven McGeady 522: 519: 435:(DOJ), led by 364: 361: 287: 286: 280: 279: 275: 274: 264: 263: 259: 258: 255:David S. Tatel 228: 227:Judges sitting 224: 223: 219: 218: 202: 201: 197: 196: 153: 149: 148: 112: 108: 107: 103: 102: 93: 89: 88: 85: 81: 80: 77: 73: 72: 67: 66:Full case name 63: 62: 57: 53: 52: 44: 43: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4555: 4544: 4541: 4539: 4536: 4534: 4531: 4529: 4526: 4524: 4521: 4519: 4516: 4515: 4513: 4498: 4490: 4489: 4486: 4480: 4477: 4474: 4472: 4469: 4467: 4464: 4462: 4459: 4458: 4456: 4452: 4446: 4445: 4441: 4439: 4438: 4434: 4432: 4431: 4427: 4425: 4424:Download.ject 4422: 4420: 4417: 4415: 4412: 4411: 4409: 4405: 4399: 4396: 4394: 4391: 4389: 4386: 4384: 4381: 4379: 4376: 4374: 4371: 4369: 4366: 4364: 4361: 4359: 4356: 4354: 4351: 4349: 4346: 4344: 4343:DirectX Media 4341: 4339: 4336: 4334: 4331: 4329: 4326: 4324: 4321: 4319: 4316: 4315: 4313: 4309: 4301: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4293: 4291: 4288: 4286: 4283: 4281: 4278: 4276: 4273: 4272: 4270: 4266: 4260: 4257: 4255: 4252: 4250: 4247: 4245: 4242: 4240: 4237: 4235: 4232: 4230: 4227: 4225: 4222: 4220: 4217: 4215: 4212: 4210: 4207: 4205: 4202: 4200: 4197: 4193: 4190: 4188: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4180: 4178: 4175: 4173: 4170: 4169: 4167: 4163: 4157: 4154: 4152: 4149: 4147: 4144: 4142: 4139: 4137: 4134: 4132: 4129: 4127: 4124: 4123: 4121: 4117: 4107: 4104: 4102: 4101: 4097: 4095: 4094: 4090: 4088: 4087: 4083: 4082: 4080: 4076: 4070: 4067: 4065: 4062: 4060: 4057: 4055: 4052: 4050: 4047: 4045: 4042: 4040: 4037: 4035: 4032: 4030: 4027: 4025: 4022: 4020: 4017: 4016: 4014: 4010: 4007: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3990: 3985: 3983: 3978: 3976: 3971: 3970: 3967: 3955: 3947: 3946: 3943: 3933: 3932:ZeniMax Media 3930: 3928: 3925: 3923: 3920: 3916: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3908: 3906: 3903: 3901: 3898: 3896: 3893: 3891: 3888: 3886: 3883: 3881: 3878: 3876: 3873: 3871: 3868: 3866: 3863: 3861: 3858: 3856: 3853: 3851: 3848: 3846: 3843: 3841: 3838: 3836: 3833: 3831: 3828: 3826: 3823: 3821: 3818: 3816: 3813: 3811: 3808: 3806: 3803: 3801: 3798: 3796: 3793: 3791: 3788: 3786: 3783: 3781: 3778: 3776: 3773: 3771: 3768: 3766: 3763: 3761: 3758: 3756: 3753: 3751: 3748: 3746: 3743: 3741: 3738: 3736: 3733: 3731: 3728: 3726: 3723: 3721: 3718: 3716: 3713: 3711: 3708: 3706: 3703: 3701: 3698: 3696: 3695:Jellyfish.com 3693: 3691: 3688: 3686: 3683: 3681: 3680: 3676: 3674: 3671: 3669: 3666: 3664: 3661: 3659: 3656: 3654: 3651: 3649: 3646: 3644: 3641: 3639: 3636: 3634: 3631: 3629: 3626: 3624: 3621: 3619: 3616: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3606: 3604: 3601: 3599: 3596: 3594: 3591: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3581: 3579: 3576: 3574: 3571: 3569: 3566: 3564: 3561: 3559: 3556: 3552: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3544: 3542: 3539: 3537: 3534: 3532: 3531:6Wunderkinder 3529: 3528: 3526: 3522: 3519: 3517: 3513: 3506: 3505: 3501: 3498: 3497: 3493: 3491: 3490: 3486: 3484: 3483: 3479: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3456: 3455: 3451: 3449: 3448: 3444: 3443: 3441: 3439: 3435: 3427: 3424: 3422: 3419: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3409: 3407: 3404: 3402: 3401:Microsoft Bob 3399: 3397: 3394: 3392: 3389: 3387: 3384: 3382: 3379: 3378: 3376: 3374: 3370: 3363: 3359: 3356: 3352: 3349: 3345: 3342: 3338: 3335: 3331: 3330: 3328: 3324: 3314: 3311: 3309: 3306: 3304: 3301: 3299: 3296: 3295: 3293: 3289: 3281: 3278: 3276: 3275:ZeniMax Media 3273: 3271: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3263: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3253: 3251: 3250:Retail stores 3248: 3246: 3243: 3241: 3238: 3236: 3233: 3231: 3228: 3224: 3221: 3219: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3211: 3210: 3208: 3204: 3198: 3195: 3193: 3190: 3188: 3185: 3183: 3180: 3178: 3175: 3173: 3170: 3169: 3167: 3163: 3160: 3156: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3128: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3116: 3114: 3111: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3089: 3087: 3084: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3074: 3073: 3071: 3067: 3061: 3060: 3056: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3047: 3044: 3042: 3039: 3037: 3034: 3032: 3029: 3027: 3024: 3022: 3019: 3017: 3014: 3012: 3009: 3007: 3004: 3000: 2997: 2995: 2992: 2990: 2987: 2985: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2977: 2976: 2974: 2968: 2962: 2959: 2957: 2954: 2952: 2949: 2947: 2946:Visual Studio 2944: 2942: 2939: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2929: 2927: 2924: 2922: 2919: 2915: 2912: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904:Microsoft 365 2902: 2900: 2897: 2895: 2892: 2890: 2887: 2886: 2884: 2882: 2878: 2872: 2869: 2865: 2862: 2860: 2857: 2855: 2852: 2850: 2847: 2845: 2842: 2840: 2837: 2835: 2832: 2830: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2822: 2820: 2817: 2815: 2812: 2810: 2807: 2806: 2804: 2802: 2798: 2795: 2791: 2781: 2778: 2776: 2773: 2772: 2770: 2766: 2760: 2759:CĂ©sar Cernuda 2757: 2754: 2751: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2743: 2741:Corporate VPs 2739: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2707: 2704: 2701: 2698: 2695: 2693: 2692:Scott Guthrie 2690: 2687: 2684: 2683:Satya Nadella 2681: 2680: 2678: 2674: 2668: 2665: 2663: 2662:Emma Walmsley 2660: 2658: 2655: 2653: 2650: 2648: 2645: 2643: 2640: 2638: 2635: 2633: 2630: 2628: 2625: 2622: 2621:Satya Nadella 2619: 2618: 2616: 2612: 2606: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2595: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2562: 2555: 2550: 2548: 2543: 2541: 2536: 2535: 2532: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2510: 2506: 2504: 2501: 2499: 2496: 2494: 2490: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2478: 2476: 2474: 2469: 2467: 2464: 2462: 2459: 2457: 2454: 2452: 2449: 2447: 2444: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2418: 2413: 2409: 2403: 2399: 2394: 2382: 2378: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2363: 2357: 2353: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2334: 2330: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2297: 2294: 2291: 2288: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2276: 2273: 2270:Andrew Chin, 2269: 2268: 2264: 2258: 2252: 2246: 2242: 2237: 2236: 2228: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2210: 2207: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2184: 2177: 2174: 2168: 2160: 2157: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2130: 2127: 2112: 2108: 2102: 2099: 2091: 2084: 2077: 2074: 2066: 2062: 2055: 2048: 2045: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2006: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1979: 1976: 1963: 1959: 1953: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1937: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1921: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1899: 1893: 1891: 1887: 1881: 1873: 1870: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1842: 1839: 1834: 1830: 1824: 1821: 1808: 1804: 1798: 1795: 1783: 1782: 1777: 1770: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1737: 1735: 1733: 1729: 1724: 1720: 1713: 1710: 1705: 1701: 1699: 1691: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1672: 1666: 1663: 1650: 1646: 1640: 1637: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1609: 1606: 1592: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1568: 1565: 1552: 1548: 1542: 1539: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1519: 1516: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1489: 1486: 1473: 1469: 1468:Business Week 1465: 1459: 1456: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1428: 1425: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1397: 1394: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1344: 1341: 1329: 1328:money.cnn.com 1325: 1319: 1316: 1303: 1300: 1294: 1292: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1267: 1264: 1251: 1245: 1242: 1229: 1225: 1218: 1215: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1195: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1170: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1145: 1143: 1139: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1081: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1049: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1012: 1007: 1006: 998: 993: 992: 984: 979: 976: 972: 968: 967: 961: 956: 953: 949: 945: 940: 935: 930: 925: 920: 911: 906: 904: 899: 897: 892: 891: 888: 881: 879: 877: 873: 868: 865: 861: 857: 853: 850: 845: 840: 838: 834: 829: 825: 824:antitrust law 821: 813: 811: 808: 801: 798: 792: 789: 786: 781: 776: 774: 766: 764: 762: 758: 754: 748: 744: 741: 737: 732: 730: 726: 721: 717: 709: 707: 705: 699: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 641: 639: 637: 633: 632: 627: 626: 620: 619:Steve Ballmer 615: 611: 608: 604: 595: 591: 589: 585: 579: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 556: 555: 550: 546: 542: 540: 536: 532: 528: 520: 518: 516: 512: 508: 506: 501: 496: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 473: 469: 465: 460: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 424: 422: 418: 414: 409: 407: 403: 398: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 374: 372: 371: 362: 360: 358: 354: 350: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 312:of illegally 311: 307: 303: 302:antitrust law 299: 295: 294: 285: 281: 276: 273: 271: 265: 262:Case opinions 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 229: 225: 220: 216: 212: 208: 203: 198: 194: 191: 187: 183: 180: 176: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 131: 127: 123: 120: 116: 113: 111:Prior history 109: 104: 101: 98: 94: 90: 87:June 28, 2001 86: 82: 78: 74: 71: 68: 64: 61: 58: 54: 50: 45: 40: 37: 33: 19: 4479:Inori Aizawa 4475:Scott Isaacs 4461:Tantek Çelik 4443: 4442: 4436: 4429: 4358:MSN Explorer 4229:RSS Platform 4165:Technologies 4098: 4091: 4084: 3740:Ninja Theory 3705:LinkExchange 3677: 3516:Acquisitions 3502: 3495: 3494: 3487: 3480: 3473: 3466: 3459: 3452: 3445: 3057: 3050: 3036:Transact-SQL 2999:Visual Basic 2970:Programming 2809:Azure Kinect 2748:Joe Belfiore 2726:Phil Spencer 2637:Reid Hoffman 2512: 2472: 2433: 2416: 2397: 2387:November 29, 2385:. Retrieved 2361: 2337: 2314: 2240: 2221: 2209: 2197:. Retrieved 2193:the original 2186: 2176: 2159: 2149:February 23, 2147:. Retrieved 2140:Policy Forum 2139: 2129: 2117:. Retrieved 2101: 2076: 2065:the original 2060: 2047: 2039:the original 2034: 2024: 2015:(Archive at 2008: 1996:. Retrieved 1992:the original 1987: 1978: 1966:. Retrieved 1952: 1940: 1936: 1919: 1914: 1897: 1872: 1860:. Retrieved 1856:the original 1851: 1841: 1832: 1823: 1811:. Retrieved 1807:the original 1797: 1785:. Retrieved 1779: 1769: 1762:§ 29(b) 1752: 1740: 1722: 1712: 1703: 1697: 1670: 1665: 1653:. Retrieved 1648: 1639: 1627:. Retrieved 1618: 1608: 1596:. Retrieved 1591:the original 1577: 1574:"Alter Egos" 1567: 1557:November 19, 1555:. Retrieved 1551:the original 1541: 1533:the original 1528: 1518: 1509:November 14, 1507:, retrieved 1503:the original 1498: 1488: 1478:December 12, 1476:. Retrieved 1472:the original 1467: 1458: 1446:. Retrieved 1437: 1427: 1415:. Retrieved 1411:the original 1407:Businessweek 1406: 1396: 1384:. Retrieved 1380:the original 1375: 1366: 1358:the original 1353: 1343: 1331:. Retrieved 1327: 1318: 1306:. Retrieved 1301: 1271: 1266: 1254:. Retrieved 1244: 1234:February 10, 1232:. Retrieved 1227: 1217: 1209:the original 1204: 1174: 1149: 1116: 1106: 1092:Browser wars 1083: 1052: 1027: 1015: 1001: 987: 964: 943: 871: 869: 854: 848: 841: 817: 803: 794: 790: 777: 770: 749: 745: 733: 713: 700: 680:RealNetworks 645: 629: 623: 616: 612: 600: 580: 554:Businessweek 552: 543: 524: 509: 497: 477:browser wars 461: 456: 452: 426: 419:and the new 410: 399: 376: 368: 366: 342: 314:monopolizing 304:case at the 292: 291: 290: 278:Laws applied 267: 185: 167: 155: 136: 114: 106:Case history 69: 36: 4328:ActiveMovie 4199:favicon.ico 4172:Accelerator 3870:Undead Labs 3820:ScreenTonic 3673:Havok Group 3663:GreenButton 3648:Forethought 3633:FASA Studio 3551:acquisition 3165:Conferences 3135:Outlook.com 2709:Kevin Scott 2119:February 7, 2107:Eben Moglen 2035:I, Cringely 1909: 2002). 1700:: Timeline" 1682: 2000). 1333:October 26, 1308:February 6, 1186: 2000). 1161: 2001). 1058:253 F.3d 34 1045: (1984) 980: (1947) 957: (1936) 833:Eben Moglen 763:presiding. 584:Jim Allchin 568:Paul Maritz 558:received." 472:web browser 391:peripherals 320:market for 318:web browser 179:F. Supp. 2d 172:F. Supp. 2d 130:F. Supp. 2d 119:F. Supp. 2d 4512:Categories 4368:NetMeeting 4234:Smart tags 4146:Extensions 3890:VoloMetrix 3800:ProClarity 3795:Press Play 3725:Metaswitch 3563:AltspaceVR 3438:Litigation 3223:Skype unit 3145:Translator 3059:Visual J++ 3041:TypeScript 3031:PowerShell 2721:Harry Shum 2715:Brad Smith 2605:Paul Allen 2600:Bill Gates 1781:SCOTUSblog 1133:References 1113:Windows 98 842:Economist 773:settlement 767:Settlement 572:extinguish 549:deposition 545:Bill Gates 511:Bill Gates 500:innovation 441:settlement 437:Janet Reno 383:Bill Gates 357:settlement 351:, but the 270:Per curiam 128:2000); 97 4249:Web Slice 4209:Index.dat 4204:HTML+TIME 4136:Box model 4106:IEs4Linux 3830:Simplygon 3785:PlaceWare 3608:Connectix 3598:Colloquis 3593:Clipchamp 3568:aQuantive 3524:Completed 3373:Criticism 3362:Scroogled 3341:Champagne 3326:Campaigns 3206:Divisions 3096:Channel 9 3052:Visual J# 2972:languages 2889:Clipchamp 2844:Laptop Go 2342:MIT Press 2319:MIT Press 1998:March 25, 1862:March 25, 1813:April 17, 1758:15 U.S.C. 1655:April 23, 1629:March 25, 1586:0190-8286 1417:March 19, 1354:CNET News 1228:InfoWorld 1159:D.C. Cir. 1085:Antitrust 753:antitrust 535:predatory 413:Multiplan 370:InfoWorld 310:Microsoft 300:American 207:Microsoft 4497:Category 4388:Spyglass 4119:Overview 4100:for UNIX 4004:Versions 3954:Category 3915:AppNexus 3845:SwiftKey 3790:Powerset 3700:LinkedIn 3628:Farecast 3364:" (2012) 3357:" (2008) 3355:I'm a PC 3350:" (2006) 3343:" (2002) 3336:" (1994) 3245:Research 3118:LinkedIn 3026:Power Fx 2994:VBScript 2894:Dynamics 2881:Software 2814:HoloLens 2801:Hardware 2793:Products 2703:Amy Hood 2593:Founders 2519:Archived 2489:Archived 2381:Archived 2265:Articles 2090:Archived 1968:June 18, 1962:Archived 1787:June 15, 1623:Archived 1598:June 24, 1442:Archived 882:See also 672:Netscape 660:monopoly 642:Judgment 334:Netscape 298:landmark 92:Citation 4373:NetShow 4214:JScript 4177:ActiveX 4151:Removal 4131:Add-ons 4126:History 4093:for Mac 3905:Xamarin 3895:VXtreme 3765:Onfolio 3715:Maluuba 3685:Hotmail 3643:Firefly 3541:Acompli 3411:Windows 3406:_NSAKEY 3291:Estates 3182:Inspire 3158:Company 3106:TechNet 3086:Copilot 2961:Xbox OS 2956:Windows 2931:Servers 2824:Surface 2819:LifeCam 2577:Outline 2572:History 2523:YouTube 2199:June 1, 1448:May 27, 1386:May 27, 1256:June 1, 757:tie-ins 588:desktop 529:at the 457:feature 453:product 445:Windows 402:Windows 373:wrote: 363:History 322:Windows 209:, when 200:Holding 170:); 224 84:Decided 4454:People 4407:Events 4300:Chakra 4295:MSHTML 4290:Tasman 4156:Shells 4086:Mobile 3922:Yammer 3885:Vivaty 3815:RiskIQ 3658:GitHub 3618:Danger 3588:Bungie 3573:Azyxxi 3386:Clippy 3265:Gaming 3235:Garage 3218:Mobile 3197:WinHEC 3177:Ignite 3113:GitHub 2984:VB.NET 2909:Office 2854:Studio 2839:Laptop 2586:People 2404:  2373:  2348:  2325:  2247:  1929:D.D.C. 1927: ( 1923:, 1907:D.D.C. 1905: ( 1901:, 1760:  1680:D.D.C. 1678: ( 1674:, 1584:  1281:D.D.C. 1279: ( 1275:, 1184:D.D.C. 1182: ( 1178:, 1157: ( 1153:, 1060:(2001) 505:Mac OS 455:but a 379:MS-DOS 253:, and 233:, CJ; 188:, 373 126:D.D.C. 76:Argued 4224:MSXML 4219:MHTML 4078:Other 3910:Xandr 3855:Teleo 3835:Skype 3421:Vista 3240:Press 3172:Build 3140:Store 3076:Azure 2979:BASIC 2936:Start 2914:Teams 2899:Havok 2755:(SVP) 2733:(CPO) 2717:(CLO) 2711:(CTO) 2705:(CFO) 2699:(COO) 2685:(CEO) 2307:Books 2114:(PDF) 2093:(PDF) 2086:(PDF) 2068:(PDF) 2057:(PDF) 1833:Wired 1704:Wired 1529:Wired 1499:Wired 1038: 973: 950: 876:tying 785:tying 692:tying 684:Linux 664:Apple 560:Intel 485:Opera 464:Intel 421:Chart 406:Xenix 257:, JJ. 211:tying 162: 143: 117:, 87 56:Court 4254:WPAD 4182:HTML 4012:Main 3927:Yupi 3805:Rare 3583:Beam 3391:iLoo 3081:Bing 3021:MVPL 2871:Xbox 2514:CNBC 2402:ISBN 2389:2010 2371:ISBN 2346:ISBN 2323:ISBN 2245:ISBN 2201:2024 2151:2013 2121:2013 2000:2022 1970:2010 1864:2022 1815:2007 1789:2018 1657:2024 1631:2022 1600:2019 1582:ISSN 1559:2018 1511:2009 1480:2014 1450:2010 1419:2013 1388:2010 1335:2023 1310:2015 1258:2023 1236:2015 1071:and 1067:See 1040:U.S. 975:U.S. 952:U.S. 837:APIs 668:Java 628:and 470:and 427:The 417:Word 338:Java 336:and 326:OEMs 316:the 193:1199 190:F.3d 164:U.S. 145:U.S. 97:F.3d 95:253 4187:HTA 3750:npm 3192:PDC 3187:MIX 3130:MSN 2989:VBA 2941:Tay 2864:Neo 2859:Duo 2849:Pro 2829:Hub 1376:CNN 1036:466 978:392 971:332 955:131 948:298 698:. 652:x86 515:IBM 483:or 182:144 160:534 141:530 4514:: 4069:11 4064:10 3426:10 3416:XP 3046:Q# 3016:F# 3006:C# 2834:Go 2511:. 2379:. 2369:. 2365:. 2344:. 2321:. 2317:. 2185:. 2142:. 2138:. 2088:. 2059:. 2033:. 1986:. 1960:. 1943:, 1889:^ 1850:. 1831:. 1778:. 1743:, 1731:^ 1721:. 1702:. 1687:^ 1647:. 1621:. 1617:. 1580:. 1576:. 1527:. 1497:, 1466:. 1436:. 1405:. 1374:. 1352:. 1326:. 1288:^ 1226:. 1203:. 1191:^ 1166:^ 1141:^ 1034:, 969:, 946:, 936:§3 926:§1 731:. 706:. 682:, 678:, 674:, 670:, 666:, 415:, 389:, 340:. 249:, 245:, 241:, 237:, 175:76 158:, 139:, 133:59 122:30 100:34 4059:9 4054:8 4049:7 4044:6 4039:5 4034:4 4029:3 4024:2 4019:1 3988:e 3981:t 3974:v 3360:" 3353:" 3346:" 3339:" 3332:" 2553:e 2546:t 2539:v 2525:. 2410:. 2391:. 2354:. 2331:. 2253:. 2229:. 2203:. 2153:. 2123:. 2019:) 2002:. 1972:. 1866:. 1817:. 1791:. 1696:" 1659:. 1633:. 1602:. 1561:. 1482:. 1452:. 1421:. 1390:. 1337:. 1312:. 1260:. 1238:. 1043:2 909:e 902:t 895:v 217:. 124:( 34:. 20:)

Index

United States Microsoft antitrust case
United States v. Microsoft Corp. (disambiguation)

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
F.3d
34
F. Supp. 2d
30
D.D.C.
F. Supp. 2d
59
530
U.S.
534
U.S.
F. Supp. 2d
76
F. Supp. 2d
144
F.3d
1199
Microsoft
tying
Sherman Antitrust Act
Harry T. Edwards
Stephen F. Williams
Douglas H. Ginsburg
David B. Sentelle
A. Raymond Randolph
Judith W. Rogers

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑