264:
39:
280:
The former would extend information and consultation rights backwards into commercial decision-making, while the latter might be seen as pointlessly late – how can you consult meaningfully about reducing the number of redundancies where the decision which makes them inevitable has already been
247:
by going further than EU law required. These appeals were dismissed on the basis that just because legislation does not contain a clear exemption does not mean that the courts should read any such exemption into the legislation. On the second ground it was held that because the
275:
The case will now return to the Court of Appeal where it will be decided whether the duty to consult arises when there is a proposal to make a business decision that will lead to redundancies or when that decision has been made. On this point it has been argued that:
114:
applies to employment in a public administrative establishment. The secretary of state did not exceed his powers when making the
Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 by going further than
202:. In 2006 the base was closed down and Mrs Nolan was dismissed for redundancy on the day before it closed. Mrs Nolan brought a case based on the failure of the United States to consult with an employee representative when proposing to dismiss her.
384:
579:
432:
715:
710:
705:
700:
695:
690:
685:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
622:
301:
249:
240:
179:
171:
111:
548:
422:
877:
231:
whether the duty to consult with an employee representative arose on a 'proposal' or a 'decision' to close the base. The
European Court declined jurisdiction over the issue.
857:
401:
377:
556:
327:
562:
479:
370:
489:
255:
Lord
Carnwath dissented on this point and noted the importance of limiting the ministerial power to legislate outside of the normal parliamentary process.
887:
720:
243:
should not apply to public administrative establishments and secondly that the
Secretary of State had exceeded the powers conferred by section 2 of the
215:
Both the
Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal found in favour of Mrs Nolan and granted an order for remuneration for a one-month period.
454:
862:
741:
464:
595:
568:
228:
607:
418:
589:
484:
449:
393:
175:
49:
872:
867:
736:
263:
244:
758:
296:
252:
had established a unified domestic regime the
Secretary of State had not exceeded his powers when making the 1995 regulations.
818:
38:
746:
522:
474:
469:
763:
751:
601:
768:
494:
882:
809:
780:
428:
291:
459:
797:
352:
85:
823:
773:
357:
306:
224:
199:
154:
17:
528:
195:
814:
362:
851:
239:
The United States appealed to the
Supreme Court on two key grounds. Firstly that the
167:
785:
516:
150:
802:
790:
268:
191:
829:
328:"USA v Nolan: Supreme Court Confirms That s.188 Applies to US Base in UK"
116:
262:
366:
60:
The United States of
America (Appellant) v Nolan (Respondent)
623:
List of judges of the
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
302:
2015 Judgments of the
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
250:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
241:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
180:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
112:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
729:
633:
617:
578:
547:
538:
507:
442:
411:
400:
144:
136:
132:
Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Reed
128:
123:
104:
96:
91:
81:
73:
65:
55:
45:
31:
278:
378:
8:
544:
408:
385:
371:
363:
37:
28:
858:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases
182:to public administrative establishments.
227:procedure the Court of Appeal asked the
318:
878:United Kingdom–United States relations
840:Justices shown in order of appointment
229:Court of Justice of the European Union
7:
557:The Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
164:The United States of America v Nolan
32:The United States of America v Nolan
394:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
176:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
50:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
178:concerning the application of the
25:
888:History of the United States Army
759:Judiciaries of the United Kingdom
742:House of Lords judicial functions
563:The Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury
326:Noblet, Caroline (October 2015).
480:Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare
297:Redundancy in United Kingdom law
18:United States of America v Nolan
863:2015 in United Kingdom case law
819:Secretary of State for Justice
1:
596:The Baroness Hale of Richmond
569:The Baroness Hale of Richmond
245:European Communities Act 1972
747:List of House of Lords cases
271:base where Mrs Nolan worked.
764:Courts of England and Wales
490:Lord Richards of Camberwell
904:
769:Courts of Northern Ireland
590:The Lord Hope of Craighead
419:The Lord Reed of Allermuir
873:Termination of employment
868:United Kingdom labour law
838:
810:Law officers of the Crown
781:Law of the United Kingdom
455:Lord Briggs of Westbourne
292:United Kingdom labour law
149:
109:
36:
192:watercraft repair centre
798:Law of Northern Ireland
485:Lady Rose of Colmworth
465:Lord Hamblen of Kersey
353:Supreme Court judgment
283:
272:
190:Mrs Nolan worked at a
358:Video of the judgment
330:. Squire Patton Boggs
266:
69:15 & 16 July 2015
211:Employment Tribunals
824:Middlesex Guildhall
774:Courts of Scotland
307:European Union law
273:
267:A building at the
225:preliminary ruling
200:United States Army
155:European Union law
845:
844:
629:
628:
503:
502:
160:
159:
16:(Redirected from
895:
883:Hythe, Hampshire
545:
450:Lord Lloyd-Jones
433:Deputy President
409:
387:
380:
373:
364:
340:
339:
337:
335:
323:
198:operated by the
196:Hythe, Hampshire
82:Neutral citation
41:
29:
21:
903:
902:
898:
897:
896:
894:
893:
892:
848:
847:
846:
841:
834:
815:Lord Chancellor
725:
625:
613:
581:
574:
540:
534:
509:
499:
438:
403:
396:
391:
349:
344:
343:
333:
331:
325:
324:
320:
315:
288:
261:
237:
221:
219:Court of Appeal
213:
208:
188:
77:21 October 2015
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
901:
899:
891:
890:
885:
880:
875:
870:
865:
860:
850:
849:
843:
842:
839:
836:
835:
833:
832:
827:
821:
812:
807:
806:
805:
800:
795:
794:
793:
778:
777:
776:
771:
766:
756:
755:
754:
749:
739:
733:
731:
727:
726:
724:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
643:
637:
635:
631:
630:
627:
626:
621:
619:
615:
614:
612:
611:
605:
602:The Lord Mance
599:
593:
586:
584:
576:
575:
573:
572:
566:
560:
553:
551:
542:
536:
535:
533:
532:
526:
520:
513:
511:
505:
504:
501:
500:
498:
497:
492:
487:
482:
477:
472:
467:
462:
457:
452:
446:
444:
440:
439:
437:
436:
426:
415:
413:
406:
398:
397:
392:
390:
389:
382:
375:
367:
361:
360:
355:
348:
347:External links
345:
342:
341:
317:
316:
314:
311:
310:
309:
304:
299:
294:
287:
284:
260:
257:
236:
233:
220:
217:
212:
209:
207:
204:
187:
184:
158:
157:
147:
146:
142:
141:
138:
134:
133:
130:
126:
125:
121:
120:
107:
106:
102:
101:
98:
94:
93:
89:
88:
83:
79:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
63:
62:
57:
56:Full case name
53:
52:
47:
43:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
900:
889:
886:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
864:
861:
859:
856:
855:
853:
837:
831:
828:
825:
822:
820:
816:
813:
811:
808:
804:
801:
799:
796:
792:
789:
788:
787:
784:
783:
782:
779:
775:
772:
770:
767:
765:
762:
761:
760:
757:
753:
750:
748:
745:
744:
743:
740:
738:
735:
734:
732:
728:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
638:
636:
632:
624:
620:
616:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
587:
585:
583:
577:
570:
567:
564:
561:
558:
555:
554:
552:
550:
546:
543:
537:
530:
527:
524:
521:
518:
515:
514:
512:
506:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
447:
445:
441:
434:
430:
427:
424:
420:
417:
416:
414:
410:
407:
405:
399:
395:
388:
383:
381:
376:
374:
369:
368:
365:
359:
356:
354:
351:
350:
346:
329:
322:
319:
312:
308:
305:
303:
300:
298:
295:
293:
290:
289:
285:
282:
277:
270:
265:
258:
256:
253:
251:
246:
242:
235:Supreme Court
234:
232:
230:
226:
218:
216:
210:
205:
203:
201:
197:
193:
185:
183:
181:
177:
173:
172:2015 judgment
169:
166:
165:
156:
152:
148:
143:
140:Lord Carnwath
139:
135:
131:
127:
124:Case opinions
122:
118:
113:
108:
103:
99:
97:Prior history
95:
90:
87:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
61:
58:
54:
51:
48:
44:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
737:Constitution
531:(since 2020)
523:Mark Ormerod
475:Lord Burrows
470:Lord Leggatt
332:. Retrieved
321:
279:
274:
259:Significance
254:
238:
222:
214:
189:
163:
162:
161:
92:Case history
59:
26:
786:English law
610:(2018–2020)
604:(2017–2018)
598:(2013–2017)
592:(2009–2013)
571:(2017–2020)
565:(2012–2017)
559:(2009–2012)
525:(2015–2020)
519:(2009–2015)
495:Lady Simler
334:23 December
145:Area of law
100:EWCA Civ 71
852:Categories
826:(location)
517:Jenny Rowe
460:Lord Sales
429:Lord Hodge
412:Leadership
313:References
223:Under the
151:Labour law
803:Scots law
791:Welsh law
752:Law Lords
634:Judgments
608:Lord Reed
582:President
549:President
529:Vicky Fox
510:Executive
423:President
269:RAF Hythe
119:requires.
830:UKSCblog
541:justices
404:justices
286:See also
206:Judgment
129:Majority
730:Related
402:Current
174:of the
168:UKSC 63
137:Dissent
105:Holding
86:UKSC 63
74:Decided
618:Judges
580:Deputy
539:Former
443:Judges
281:taken?
170:was a
117:EU law
66:Argued
508:Chief
186:Facts
46:Court
817:and
721:List
716:2024
711:2023
706:2022
701:2021
696:2020
691:2019
686:2018
681:2017
676:2016
671:2015
666:2014
661:2013
656:2012
651:2011
646:2010
641:2009
336:2015
110:The
194:in
854::
153:;
435:)
431:(
425:)
421:(
386:e
379:t
372:v
338:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
