Knowledge (XXG)

United States v. American Tobacco Co.

Source 📝

684: 42: 271: 330:
stated that the combination of the tobacco companies "in and of itself, as well as each and all of the elements composing it whether corporate or individual, whether considered collectively or separately in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize, and a monopolization within the first and
528: 749: 370:
to determine whether the four companies were further engaged together in monopolistic practices. That committee found that 3 of the 4 companies were guilty of the charges presented to the court.
318:
filed suit against the company, sixty-five companies and twenty-nine individuals were named in the suit. The Supreme Court ordered the company to dissolve in 1911 on the same day that it
119:
The combination in this case is one in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize the business of tobacco in interstate commerce within the prohibitions of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
363: 619: 379: 235: 85: 385: 774: 744: 754: 764: 759: 725: 367: 315: 691: 243: 46: 769: 598: 451: 319: 479: 344: 246:, which held that the combination in this case is one in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize the business of 718: 154: 630: 340: 311: 255: 683: 339:
In order to promote market competition, four firms were created from the American Tobacco Company's assets:
657: 17: 623: 498: 307: 251: 239: 221: 134: 77: 711: 174: 166: 142: 639: 186: 178: 572: 564: 439:
The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product that Defined America
411:
The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product that Defined America
323: 648: 594: 475: 447: 695: 443: 437: 556: 511: 109:
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York
359: 162: 150: 270: 738: 588: 576: 348: 584: 80: 352: 203:
White, joined by McKenna, Holmes, Day, Lurton, Hughes, Van Devanter, Lamar
568: 247: 590:
The Entrepreneurs: Explorations Within the American Business Tradition
547:
Porter, Patrick G. (1969). "Origins of the American Tobacco Company".
92: 666: 560: 474:. New York: Holmes & Meier: Holmes and Meier. pp. 52–53. 529:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
41: 265: 555:(1). The President and Fellows of Harvard College: 59–76. 587:(1974). "James Buchanan Duke: Opportunism Is the Spur". 699: 405: 403: 282: 364:
United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division
250:
in interstate commerce within the prohibitions of the
380:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 221
750:
United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court
314:was indicted in violation of it. In 1908 when the 215: 207: 199: 194: 123: 113: 105: 100: 72: 62: 53: 34: 525:Temporary National Economic Committee Monograph 386:Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States 719: 465: 463: 8: 726: 712: 31: 231:United States v. American Tobacco Company 67:United States v. American Tobacco Company 18:United States v. American Tobacco Company 520:U.S. v. American Tobacco Company, et al. 426:, p. 153. George H. Doran Company, 1927. 331:second sections of the Anti-Trust Act." 399: 507: 496: 242:106 (1911), was a decision by the 616:United States v. American Tobacco Co. 368:Temporary National Economic Committee 355:. The monopoly became an oligopoly. 328:United States v. American Tobacco Co. 310:was created in 1890, and in 1907 the 35:United States v. American Tobacco Co. 29:1911 United States Supreme Court case 7: 680: 678: 593:. New York: Weybright & Talley. 698:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 692:Supreme Court of the United States 47:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 775:United States Supreme Court stubs 745:United States Supreme Court cases 626:106 (1910) is available from: 442:. New York: Basic Books. p.  258:was split into four competitors. 755:United States antitrust case law 682: 269: 40: 765:United States tobacco case law 760:1911 in United States case law 366:began hosting hearings in the 1: 470:Silber, Norman Isaac (1983). 424:James B. Duke: Master Builder 690:This article related to the 326:to dissolve. The ruling in 244:United States Supreme Court 56:Reargued January 9–12, 1911 791: 677: 493:: 229–232. September 1941. 413:, p. 39. Basic Books, 2007 254:of 1890. As a result, the 220: 128: 118: 39: 770:American Tobacco Company 436:Brandt, Alan M. (2007). 341:American Tobacco Company 312:American Tobacco Company 256:American Tobacco Company 54:Argued January 3–6, 1910 549:Business History Review 422:Jenkins, John Wilber: 316:Department of Justice 308:Sherman Antitrust Act 252:Sherman Antitrust Act 222:Sherman Antitrust Act 531: July 24, 1940). 155:Oliver W. Holmes Jr. 58:Decided May 29, 1911 658:Library of Congress 349:Liggett & Myers 179:Willis Van Devanter 324:Standard Oil Trust 281:. You can help by 139:Associate Justices 91:31 S. Ct. 632; 55 707: 706: 506:Missing or empty 409:Brandt, Alan M.: 299: 298: 227: 226: 175:Charles E. Hughes 16:(Redirected from 782: 728: 721: 714: 686: 679: 671: 665: 662: 656: 653: 647: 644: 638: 635: 629: 604: 580: 534: 522: 515: 509: 504: 502: 494: 491:Consumer Reports 485: 472:Test and protest 467: 458: 457: 433: 427: 420: 414: 407: 294: 291: 273: 266: 167:Horace H. Lurton 124:Court membership 44: 43: 32: 21: 790: 789: 785: 784: 783: 781: 780: 779: 735: 734: 733: 732: 675: 669: 663: 660: 654: 651: 645: 642: 636: 633: 627: 611: 601: 583: 561:10.2307/3111987 546: 543: 541:Further reading 538: 537: 518: 505: 495: 489: 482: 469: 468: 461: 454: 435: 434: 430: 421: 417: 408: 401: 396: 376: 337: 304: 295: 289: 286: 279:needs expansion 264: 187:Joseph R. Lamar 177: 165: 153: 135:Edward D. White 96: 57: 55: 49: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 788: 786: 778: 777: 772: 767: 762: 757: 752: 747: 737: 736: 731: 730: 723: 716: 708: 705: 704: 687: 673: 672: 640:Google Scholar 610: 609:External links 607: 606: 605: 599: 581: 542: 539: 536: 535: 533: 532: 516: 480: 459: 452: 428: 415: 398: 397: 395: 392: 391: 390: 382: 375: 372: 360:Thurman Arnold 345:R. J. Reynolds 336: 333: 303: 300: 297: 296: 276: 274: 263: 260: 225: 224: 218: 217: 213: 212: 209: 208:Concur/dissent 205: 204: 201: 197: 196: 192: 191: 190: 189: 163:William R. Day 151:Joseph McKenna 143:John M. Harlan 140: 137: 132: 126: 125: 121: 120: 116: 115: 111: 110: 107: 103: 102: 98: 97: 90: 74: 70: 69: 64: 63:Full case name 60: 59: 51: 50: 45: 37: 36: 28: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 787: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 756: 753: 751: 748: 746: 743: 742: 740: 729: 724: 722: 717: 715: 710: 709: 703: 701: 697: 693: 688: 685: 681: 676: 668: 659: 650: 641: 632: 631:CourtListener 625: 621: 617: 613: 612: 608: 602: 600:0-679-40064-8 596: 592: 591: 586: 585:Sobel, Robert 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 545: 544: 540: 530: 526: 521: 517: 513: 500: 492: 488: 487: 483: 477: 473: 466: 464: 460: 455: 453:9780465070473 449: 445: 441: 440: 432: 429: 425: 419: 416: 412: 406: 404: 400: 393: 388: 387: 383: 381: 378: 377: 373: 371: 369: 365: 361: 356: 354: 350: 346: 342: 334: 332: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 301: 293: 284: 280: 277:This section 275: 272: 268: 267: 261: 259: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 232: 223: 219: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195:Case opinions 193: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 141: 138: 136: 133: 131:Chief Justice 130: 129: 127: 122: 117: 112: 108: 104: 99: 94: 88: 87: 82: 79: 75: 71: 68: 65: 61: 52: 48: 38: 33: 27: 19: 700:expanding it 689: 674: 615: 589: 552: 548: 524: 519: 508:|title= 499:cite journal 490: 471: 438: 431: 423: 418: 410: 384: 357: 338: 335:Significance 327: 305: 287: 283:adding to it 278: 230: 229: 228: 216:Laws applied 182: 170: 158: 146: 101:Case history 84: 66: 26: 527:, XXI ( 523:, 739:Categories 667:OpenJurist 486:, citing 481:0841907498 394:References 290:April 2013 577:145351728 353:Lorillard 73:Citations 614:Text of 374:See also 358:In 1938 302:Judgment 200:Majority 569:3111987 362:in the 320:ordered 248:tobacco 114:Holding 670:  664:  661:  655:  652:  649:Justia 646:  643:  637:  634:  628:  597:  575:  567:  478:  450:  389:(1911) 351:, and 211:Harlan 185: 183:· 181:  173: 171:· 169:  161: 159:· 157:  149: 147:· 145:  93:L. Ed. 694:is a 622: 573:S2CID 565:JSTOR 262:Facts 238: 106:Prior 696:stub 624:U.S. 595:ISBN 512:help 476:ISBN 448:ISBN 322:the 306:The 240:U.S. 86:more 78:U.S. 76:221 620:221 557:doi 285:. 236:221 95:663 81:106 741:: 618:, 571:. 563:. 553:43 551:. 503:: 501:}} 497:{{ 462:^ 446:. 444:41 402:^ 347:, 343:, 234:, 727:e 720:t 713:v 702:. 603:. 579:. 559:: 514:) 510:( 484:. 456:. 292:) 288:( 89:) 83:( 20:)

Index

United States v. American Tobacco Company
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
106
more
L. Ed.
Edward D. White
John M. Harlan
Joseph McKenna
Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day
Horace H. Lurton
Charles E. Hughes
Willis Van Devanter
Joseph R. Lamar
Sherman Antitrust Act
221
U.S.
United States Supreme Court
tobacco
Sherman Antitrust Act
American Tobacco Company

adding to it
Sherman Antitrust Act
American Tobacco Company
Department of Justice
ordered
Standard Oil Trust
American Tobacco Company

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.