31:
300:
wrote that "administrative implementation of a particular statutory provision qualifies for
Chevron deference when it appears that Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force of law, and that the agency interpretation claiming deference was promulgated in the
273:
doctrine applied to interpretations adopted in legislative rules and certain formal adjudications, but lower courts differed on whether it also applied to interpretative rules, policy statements, informal adjudications, advisory letters, and amicus briefs. In 2001, the
Supreme Court finally began to
874:
749:
1009:
882:
831:
281:, the issue was whether the court should defer to the Customs Services' interpretation of the Customs Act, as manifested by the many classification decisions its regional offices made annually. The court granted
311:
However, the Court remanded the case for the Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit to determine whether Customs' classification decision was entitled to deference according to its "power to persuade" under
1041:
890:
342:
324:
was the sole dissenter in the case. Scalia believed that
Chevron deference should be applied to all agency decisions that are "authoritative" and so took issue with the Court's reaffirmation of
701:
685:
445:
393:
365:
72:
993:
969:
733:
522:
1046:
669:
977:
1001:
823:
304:
Recognizing that thousands of tariff decisions are issued each year by the 46 regional offices of the U.S. Customs
Service, and that each decision has no
1036:
799:
725:
584:
914:
370:
1051:
985:
693:
946:
216:
515:
350:
231:
35:
531:
866:
791:
590:
508:
555:
255:
906:
765:
578:
355:
850:
614:
242:
deference applies when
Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force of law.
858:
628:
596:
314:
483:
258:
that classified its day planners as "diaries, notebooks and address books, bound," which were subject to a
658:
560:
456:
132:
717:
449:
397:
64:
938:
757:
741:
160:
807:
709:
400:
235:
124:
116:
621:
465:
251:
98:
930:
898:
634:
570:
156:
144:
815:
651:
474:
321:
168:
136:
1030:
545:
500:
297:
148:
67:
185:
Souter, joined by
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
329:
550:
282:
83:
305:
79:
492:
238:
should be applied. In an 8–1 majority decision, the Court determined that
308:
value, the Court determined that the
Chevron Doctrine should not apply.
97:
A tariff classification is not entitled to judicial deference under the
259:
504:
30:
362:
deference to regulations promulgated by the
Customs Service.
702:
Bi-Metallic
Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
1042:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
366:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 533
961:
842:
783:
776:
677:
668:
643:
606:
569:
538:
197:
189:
181:
176:
105:
91:
59:
49:
42:
23:
230:, 533 U.S. 218 (2001), is a case decided by the
516:
8:
343:Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council
800:Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
780:
726:Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
674:
523:
509:
501:
20:
371:List of United States Supreme Court cases
986:Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
382:
1047:United States administrative case law
18:2001 United States Supreme Court case
7:
947:Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
217:Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
351:United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1037:United States Supreme Court cases
452:218 (2001) is available from:
234:that addressed the issue of when
532:United States administrative law
29:
1052:2001 in United States case law
867:Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB
792:Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner
591:Government in the Sunshine Act
274:shed some light on the issue.
1:
301:exercise of that authority."
256:United States Customs Service
907:Christensen v. Harris County
766:Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
579:Administrative Procedure Act
356:Court of International Trade
923:United States v. Mead Corp.
859:Skidmore v. Swift & Co.
851:NLRB v. Hearst Publications
615:Code of Federal Regulations
442:United States v. Mead Corp.
390:United States v. Mead Corp.
285:to determine the limits of
254:challenged a ruling of the
232:United States Supreme Court
227:United States v. Mead Corp.
54:United States v. Mead Corp.
24:United States v. Mead Corp.
1068:
629:Emergency Federal Register
597:Regulatory Flexibility Act
585:Freedom of Information Act
493:Oyez (oral argument audio)
328:, which Scalia called an "
354:(1999), holding that the
214:
207:
202:
110:
96:
28:
269:, it was clear that the
670:Supreme Court decisions
427:, 533 U.S. at 239, 250.
318:, 323 U.S. 134 (1944).
43:Argued November 8, 2000
750:Vermont Yankee v. NRDC
734:United States v. FECRC
659:Foreign Affairs Manual
561:Nondelegation doctrine
358:was required to apply
718:Richardson v. Perales
415:, 533 U.S. at 234–39.
78:121 S. Ct. 2164; 150
45:Decided June 18, 2001
939:West Virginia v. EPA
758:Califano v. Yamasaki
644:Policies and manuals
742:Mathews v. Eldridge
571:Federal legislation
484:Library of Congress
161:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
133:Sandra Day O'Connor
875:MVMA v. State Farm
832:Corner Post v. FRB
694:Londoner v. Denver
686:CMSPR v. Minnesota
121:Associate Justices
1024:
1023:
1020:
1019:
957:
956:
808:Heckler v. Chaney
710:Goldberg v. Kelly
315:Skidmore v. Swift
236:Chevron deference
223:
222:
117:William Rehnquist
1059:
781:
675:
622:Federal Register
525:
518:
511:
502:
497:
491:
488:
482:
479:
473:
470:
464:
461:
455:
428:
422:
416:
410:
404:
387:
252:Mead Corporation
106:Court membership
99:Chevron doctrine
33:
32:
21:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1016:
1010:NCTA v. Brand X
953:
931:Kisor v. Wilkie
899:Auer v. Robbins
891:Chevron v. NRDC
838:
777:Judicial Review
772:
664:
639:
635:Regulations.gov
602:
565:
534:
529:
495:
489:
486:
480:
477:
471:
468:
462:
459:
453:
437:
432:
431:
423:
419:
411:
407:
388:
384:
379:
338:
295:
248:
210:
159:
157:Clarence Thomas
147:
145:Anthony Kennedy
135:
125:John P. Stevens
87:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1065:
1063:
1055:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1029:
1028:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1015:
1014:
1006:
1002:Whitman v. ATA
998:
990:
982:
974:
965:
963:
959:
958:
955:
954:
952:
951:
943:
935:
927:
919:
911:
903:
895:
887:
879:
871:
863:
855:
846:
844:
840:
839:
837:
836:
828:
824:Norton v. SUWA
820:
816:Webster v. Doe
812:
804:
796:
787:
785:
778:
774:
773:
771:
770:
762:
754:
746:
738:
730:
722:
714:
706:
698:
690:
681:
679:
672:
666:
665:
663:
662:
655:
652:Justice Manual
647:
645:
641:
640:
638:
637:
632:
625:
618:
610:
608:
604:
603:
601:
600:
594:
588:
582:
575:
573:
567:
566:
564:
563:
558:
553:
548:
542:
540:
536:
535:
530:
528:
527:
520:
513:
505:
499:
498:
436:
435:External links
433:
430:
429:
417:
405:
381:
380:
378:
375:
374:
373:
368:
363:
347:
337:
334:
322:Justice Scalia
298:Justice Souter
294:
291:
247:
244:
221:
220:
212:
211:
208:
205:
204:
200:
199:
195:
194:
191:
187:
186:
183:
179:
178:
174:
173:
172:
171:
169:Stephen Breyer
137:Antonin Scalia
122:
119:
114:
108:
107:
103:
102:
94:
93:
89:
88:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1064:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1032:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1003:
999:
996:
995:
994:Gade v. NSWMA
991:
988:
987:
983:
980:
979:
978:CFTC v. Schor
975:
972:
971:
970:INS v. Chadha
967:
966:
964:
962:Agency Action
960:
949:
948:
944:
941:
940:
936:
933:
932:
928:
925:
924:
920:
917:
916:
912:
909:
908:
904:
901:
900:
896:
893:
892:
888:
885:
884:
880:
877:
876:
872:
869:
868:
864:
861:
860:
856:
853:
852:
848:
847:
845:
841:
834:
833:
829:
826:
825:
821:
818:
817:
813:
810:
809:
805:
802:
801:
797:
794:
793:
789:
788:
786:
784:Reviewability
782:
779:
775:
768:
767:
763:
760:
759:
755:
752:
751:
747:
744:
743:
739:
736:
735:
731:
728:
727:
723:
720:
719:
715:
712:
711:
707:
704:
703:
699:
696:
695:
691:
688:
687:
683:
682:
680:
676:
673:
671:
667:
661:
660:
656:
654:
653:
649:
648:
646:
642:
636:
633:
631:
630:
626:
624:
623:
619:
617:
616:
612:
611:
609:
605:
598:
595:
592:
589:
586:
583:
580:
577:
576:
574:
572:
568:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
543:
541:
537:
533:
526:
521:
519:
514:
512:
507:
506:
503:
494:
485:
476:
467:
458:
457:CourtListener
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
434:
426:
421:
418:
414:
409:
406:
402:
399:
395:
391:
386:
383:
376:
372:
369:
367:
364:
361:
357:
353:
352:
348:
345:
344:
340:
339:
335:
333:
331:
327:
323:
319:
317:
316:
309:
307:
302:
299:
292:
290:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
263:
261:
257:
253:
245:
243:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
219:
218:
213:
209:Superseded by
206:
201:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:Case opinions
175:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
123:
120:
118:
115:
113:Chief Justice
112:
111:
109:
104:
100:
95:
90:
85:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1008:
1000:
992:
984:
976:
968:
945:
937:
929:
922:
921:
913:
905:
897:
889:
883:BGLC v. NRDC
881:
873:
865:
857:
849:
830:
822:
814:
806:
798:
790:
764:
756:
748:
740:
732:
724:
716:
708:
700:
692:
684:
657:
650:
627:
620:
613:
546:Adjudication
441:
424:
420:
412:
408:
403: (2001).
389:
385:
359:
349:
341:
325:
320:
313:
310:
306:precedential
303:
296:
286:
278:
276:
270:
266:
264:
249:
239:
226:
225:
224:
215:
198:Laws applied
164:
152:
149:David Souter
140:
128:
71:
53:
15:
915:FDA v. BWTC
678:Due Process
607:Regulations
401:218, 226-27
330:anachronism
289:deference.
203:Customs Act
1031:Categories
551:Rulemaking
425:Mead Corp.
413:Mead Corp.
377:References
283:certiorari
246:Background
84:U.S. LEXIS
82:292; 2001
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
843:Standard
539:Concepts
440:Text of
336:See also
326:Skidmore
293:Decision
182:Majority
466:Findlaw
360:Chevron
287:Chevron
271:Chevron
265:Before
240:Chevron
190:Dissent
92:Holding
1013:(2005)
1005:(2001)
997:(1992)
989:(1988)
981:(1986)
973:(1983)
950:(2024)
942:(2022)
934:(2019)
926:(2001)
918:(2000)
910:(2000)
902:(1997)
894:(1984)
886:(1983)
878:(1983)
870:(1951)
862:(1944)
854:(1944)
835:(2024)
827:(2004)
819:(1988)
811:(1985)
803:(1971)
795:(1967)
769:(1982)
761:(1979)
753:(1978)
745:(1976)
737:(1973)
729:(1972)
721:(1971)
713:(1970)
705:(1915)
697:(1908)
689:(1890)
599:(1980)
593:(1976)
587:(1966)
581:(1946)
556:Notice
496:
490:
487:
481:
478:
475:Justia
472:
469:
463:
460:
454:
392:,
346:(1984)
260:tariff
193:Scalia
167:
165:·
163:
155:
153:·
151:
143:
141:·
139:
131:
129:·
127:
448:
396:
450:U.S.
398:U.S.
279:Mead
267:Mead
250:The
86:4492
73:more
65:U.S.
63:533
446:533
394:533
332:."
277:In
68:218
1033::
444:,
262:.
524:e
517:t
510:v
101:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.