28:
334:
148:
the first place was because he believed that he did not have the financial resources to hire an expert witness to investigate his defense. In regard to his explanation, the court appointed him a private attorney to represent him. With the court's approval, Solon was able to request an expert witness, with an investigation budget of $ 20,000 supplied by the court.
147:
Nathaniel Solon was charged on
January 18, 2007, by the indictment with possessing child pornography. On October 2, 2007, he pleaded guilty. When he came back for another hearing on January 8, 2008, however, Solon stated that he was an innocent man, and the only reason that he had pleaded guilty in
404:
394:
199:
38:
205:
409:
375:
135:. The case became known in the media for irregularities in the process, and suspicions (affirmed by the defendant) that the material was introduced by
414:
399:
419:
439:
139:
on the computer. There were other people accused of similar crimes, who were later acquitted, but Solon was never exonerated.
424:
368:
307:
208:
229:
251:
245:
361:
266:
429:
341:
89:
27:
280:
233:
298:
85:
132:
345:
434:
93:
289:
128:
388:
127:, 596 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2010), was a case in which Nathaniel Solon, a resident of
316:
182:
70:
333:
186:
223:
157:
136:
67:
269:, a website collecting similar cases, inspired on this case.
405:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit cases
395:
American people convicted of child pornography offenses
349:
201:
Casper man convicted of child porn makes final appeal
39:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
276:, 596 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2010) is available from:
112:
104:
99:
81:
76:
62:
54:
44:
34:
20:
369:
247:Trojan horse found responsible for child porn
8:
49:United States of America v. Nathaniel Solon
376:
362:
26:
17:
218:
216:
225:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna33778733
169:
344:or its constituent jurisdictions is a
7:
330:
328:
410:United States due process case law
348:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
131:, was convicted for possession of
14:
332:
274:United States v. Nathaniel Solon
415:United States Internet case law
400:United States computer case law
420:2010 in United States case law
252:Copy at FramedForChildPorn.com
230:Copy on FramedForChildPorn.com
1:
342:case law in the United States
440:United States case law stubs
456:
327:
340:This article relating to
25:
108:Tacha, joined by Seymour
178:United States v. Solon
124:United States v. Solon
90:Stephanie Kulp Seymour
21:United States v. Solon
425:Child pornography law
267:Framed for Child Porn
183:596 F.3d 1206
222:ROBERTSON, Jordan.
86:Deanell Reece Tacha
357:
356:
133:child pornography
120:
119:
58:February 17, 2010
447:
378:
371:
364:
336:
329:
321:
315:
312:
306:
303:
297:
294:
288:
285:
279:
254:
244:KOTADIA, Munir.
242:
236:
220:
211:
196:
190:
180:
174:
94:Carlos F. Lucero
77:Court membership
30:
18:
455:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
445:
444:
430:Casper, Wyoming
385:
384:
383:
382:
325:
319:
313:
310:
304:
301:
295:
292:
286:
283:
277:
263:
258:
257:
243:
239:
234:copy on FoxNews
221:
214:
197:
193:
176:
175:
171:
166:
154:
145:
129:Casper, Wyoming
12:
11:
5:
453:
451:
443:
442:
437:
432:
427:
422:
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
387:
386:
381:
380:
373:
366:
358:
355:
354:
337:
323:
322:
299:Google Scholar
270:
262:
261:External links
259:
256:
255:
250:(04/08/2003).
237:
228:(11/08/2009).
212:
204:(25/10/2011).
191:
168:
167:
165:
162:
161:
160:
153:
150:
144:
141:
118:
117:
114:
113:Concur/dissent
110:
109:
106:
102:
101:
97:
96:
83:
82:Judges sitting
79:
78:
74:
73:
64:
60:
59:
56:
52:
51:
46:
45:Full case name
42:
41:
36:
32:
31:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
452:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
392:
390:
379:
374:
372:
367:
365:
360:
359:
353:
351:
347:
343:
338:
335:
331:
326:
318:
309:
300:
291:
282:
281:CourtListener
275:
271:
268:
265:
264:
260:
253:
249:
248:
241:
238:
235:
231:
227:
226:
219:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
202:
198:MORTON, Tom.
195:
192:
188:
184:
179:
173:
170:
163:
159:
156:
155:
151:
149:
142:
140:
138:
134:
130:
126:
125:
115:
111:
107:
103:
100:Case opinions
98:
95:
91:
87:
84:
80:
75:
72:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
50:
47:
43:
40:
37:
33:
29:
24:
19:
16:
350:expanding it
339:
324:
273:
246:
240:
224:
200:
194:
177:
172:
146:
123:
122:
121:
48:
15:
189: 2010).
389:Categories
164:References
143:Background
187:10th Cir.
272:Text of
152:See also
105:Majority
63:Citation
435:Malware
290:Findlaw
158:Frameup
137:malware
55:Decided
320:
317:Leagle
314:
311:
308:Justia
305:
302:
296:
293:
287:
284:
278:
209:Copy 2
206:Copy 1
185: (
181:,
116:Lucero
35:Court
346:stub
71:1206
68:F.3d
66:596
391::
232:,
215:^
92:,
88:,
377:e
370:t
363:v
352:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
