28:
308:
The Ninth
Circuit's decision against the government and in favor of Syufy emphasized that there were no barriers to entry in the Las Vegas cinema business. In fact, competition arose almost immediately after Syufy achieved his monopoly. Within a week after becoming the sole first-run exhibitor in Las
276:
found in favor of Syufy, holding that "Syufy's actions did not injure competition because there are no barriers to entry—others could and did enter the market—and that Syufy therefore did not have the power to control prices or exclude the competition."
273:
611:
326:
Roberts
Company then began opening new multiplexes of its own, increasing its screen count to 28 in Las Vegas by December 1986, compared to 23 for Syufy. In 1987, Roberts sold its theaters to
512:"A Compendium of Clever and Amusing Law Review Writings: An Idiosyncratic Bibliography of Miscellany with In Kind Annotations Intended as a Humorous Diversion for the Gentle Reader"
197:
38:
259:
The
Justice Department brought a case against Syufy for antitrust violations, arguing that "you may not get monopoly power by buying out your competitors."
606:
601:
289:
which became notable both for its commentary on business competition in a free enterprise system and for
Kozinski's incorporation of over 200
213:
175:
162:
27:
583:
437:
511:
171:
158:
201:
298:
294:
233:
323:
to
Roberts instead. Orion also stopped licensing its other movies to Syufy not only in Las Vegas, but anywhere.
370:
302:
97:
319:. Rather than release Syufy from his guarantee, Orion sued Syufy for breach of contract and chose to license
327:
125:
574:
350:
78:
315:
293:
titles into his opinion, including statements such as "Roberts/UA's newly opened theatres evolved from
245:
400:
565:
117:
244:
to exit the Las Vegas market, selling all of their theaters to Syufy. In 1984, Syufy bought out
248:' eleven-screen Redrock Theatre; upon completion of that purchase, Syufy then owned all of the
229:
217:
193:
463:
Weinstein, Henry (May 10, 1990). "Owner of Las Vegas Movie Houses Wins
Landmark Lawsuit".
450:
426:
285:
The Court of
Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in a decision written by Judge
310:
241:
595:
526:
286:
253:
249:
237:
225:
121:
481:
179:
542:
his is truly an amazing feat; most federal judges do not even go to the movies.
166:
469:
The judge, a movie buff, referred to about 200 films in his 25-page opinion.
374:
101:
309:
Vegas, Syufy attempted to renounce the guarantee he had previously offered
204:
case decided by the United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
354:
221:
94:
252:
theaters in Las Vegas, leaving
Roberts Company (which exhibited mostly
274:
United States
District Court for the Northern District of California
584:
University of Texas School of Law (with movie titles highlighted)
290:
75:
49:
United States of America v. Syufy Enterprises; Raymond J. Syufy
330:, then the largest exhibition circuit in the United States.
236:
in Las Vegas in 1981. The success of that Syufy theater led
140:
Kozinski, joined by Wiggins (in full); Quackenbush (in part)
612:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases
427:"How the Market Self-Polices Against Predatory Pricing"
39:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
425:Boudreaux, Donald J.; Andrew N. Kleit (June 1996).
152:
144:
136:
131:
113:
108:
89:
84:
70:
62:
54:
44:
34:
20:
561:, 903 F.2d 659 (9th Cir. 1990) is available from:
232:. Raymond Syufy opened a newly built six-screen
8:
256:films) as his sole competition in the city.
26:
17:
339:
7:
493:Brigham Young University Law Review
214:United States Department of Justice
189:United States v. Syufy Enterprises
21:United States v. Syufy Enterprises
14:
607:United States antitrust case law
438:Competitive Enterprise Institute
224:or attempted to monopolize the
602:1990 in United States case law
559:United States v. Syufy Enters.
367:United States v. Syufy Enters.
347:United States v. Syufy Enters.
1:
399:Roemer, John (April 2008).
628:
525:: 105, 114. Archived from
313:Corporation for the movie
510:Baker, Thomas E. (2002).
371:712 F. Supp. 1386
226:motion picture exhibition
157:
25:
434:Antitrust Reform Project
328:United Artists Theaters
126:Justin Lowe Quackenbush
440:. pp. 5, 18 n.11
401:"Just Being Kozinski"
172:Clayton Antitrust Act
159:Sherman Antitrust Act
532:on September 2, 2006
351:903 F.2d 659
389:, 903 F.2d at 661.
295:absolute beginners
118:Charles E. Wiggins
465:Los Angeles Times
405:California Lawyer
246:Cragin Industries
230:Las Vegas, Nevada
218:Syufy Enterprises
185:
184:
619:
588:
582:
579:
573:
570:
564:
545:
544:
539:
537:
531:
519:Drake Law Review
516:
507:
501:
500:
490:
478:
472:
471:
460:
454:
449:
447:
445:
431:
422:
416:
415:
413:
411:
396:
390:
384:
378:
364:
358:
344:
281:Court of Appeals
109:Court membership
30:
18:
627:
626:
622:
621:
620:
618:
617:
616:
592:
591:
586:
580:
577:
571:
568:
562:
554:
549:
548:
535:
533:
529:
514:
509:
508:
504:
488:
480:
479:
475:
462:
461:
457:
443:
441:
429:
424:
423:
419:
409:
407:
398:
397:
393:
385:
381:
365:
361:
345:
341:
336:
321:The Cotton Club
316:The Cotton Club
283:
270:
265:
210:
170:
58:August 14, 1989
12:
11:
5:
625:
623:
615:
614:
609:
604:
594:
593:
590:
589:
566:Google Scholar
553:
552:External links
550:
547:
546:
502:
486:Rosetta Stone"
473:
455:
417:
391:
379:
359:
338:
337:
335:
332:
311:Orion Pictures
282:
279:
269:
268:District Court
266:
264:
261:
242:Plitt Theatres
209:
206:
200:1990), was an
183:
182:
176:15 U.S.C.
163:15 U.S.C.
155:
154:
150:
149:
146:
142:
141:
138:
134:
133:
129:
128:
115:
114:Judges sitting
111:
110:
106:
105:
91:
87:
86:
82:
81:
72:
68:
67:
64:
60:
59:
56:
52:
51:
46:
45:Full case name
42:
41:
36:
32:
31:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
624:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
599:
597:
585:
576:
567:
560:
556:
555:
551:
543:
528:
524:
520:
513:
506:
503:
498:
494:
487:
485:
477:
474:
470:
467:. p. 1.
466:
459:
456:
452:
439:
435:
428:
421:
418:
406:
402:
395:
392:
388:
387:Syufy Enters.
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
343:
340:
333:
331:
329:
324:
322:
318:
317:
312:
306:
304:
300:
299:staying alive
296:
292:
288:
287:Alex Kozinski
280:
278:
275:
267:
262:
260:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:Mann Theatres
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:alleged that
215:
207:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
181:
177:
173:
168:
164:
160:
156:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:Case opinions
130:
127:
123:
122:Alex Kozinski
119:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
96:
92:
90:Prior history
88:
83:
80:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
50:
47:
43:
40:
37:
33:
29:
24:
19:
16:
558:
541:
534:. Retrieved
527:the original
522:
518:
505:
496:
492:
483:
476:
468:
464:
458:
442:. Retrieved
433:
420:
408:. Retrieved
404:
394:
386:
382:
366:
362:
346:
342:
325:
320:
314:
307:
303:big business
284:
271:
258:
228:business in
211:
188:
187:
186:
153:Laws applied
85:Case history
48:
15:
377: 1989).
357: 1990).
353:, 662 (
222:monopolized
148:Quackenbush
145:Concurrence
66:May 9, 1990
596:Categories
254:second run
536:April 13,
444:April 13,
410:April 13,
375:N.D. Cal.
301:, into a
297:, barely
250:first-run
234:multiplex
202:antitrust
180:§ 18
102:N.D. Cal.
557:Text of
355:9th Cir.
263:Judgment
198:9th Cir.
167:§ 2
137:Majority
95:F. Supp.
71:Citation
63:Decided
587:
581:
578:
575:Justia
572:
569:
563:
499:: 457.
451:Part 2
373: (
192:, 903
178:
165:
55:Argued
530:(PDF)
515:(PDF)
489:(PDF)
484:Syufy
482:"The
430:(PDF)
334:Notes
291:movie
208:Facts
196:659 (
104:1989)
35:Court
538:2008
497:1992
446:2008
412:2008
272:The
240:and
220:had
212:The
194:F.2d
98:1386
93:712
76:F.2d
74:903
305:."
79:659
598::
540:.
523:51
521:.
517:.
495:.
491:.
436:.
432:.
403:.
369:,
349:,
174:,
161:,
124:,
120:,
453:.
448:.
414:.
169:;
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
