223:
under
Correctional Custody to guide and assist institutions and jurisdictions in "the development of local policy and practice". The report outlines five key principles on which the Task Force reached a consensus, and 11 recommendations concerning the use of restraints on pregnant women. The five principles discuss the importance of written policies and procedures on the use of restraints during custody and transport, who should be writing these policies, the unique healthcare needs and circumstance of pregnant women and girls, the related health risks posed by restraints, and the limitation on the use of restraints to "absolute necessity". The 11 recommendations outline specific cases in which the use of restraints should be prohibited, avoided and/or limited, as well as what facility standard operating procedures should include regarding the use of restraints on pregnant women. ACOG standards specifically state that the use of restraints on pregnant incarcerated women and adolescents compromises health care and is inhumane. Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming and Alabama have no policies. Many other states have policies about providing healthcare for pregnant inmates, but do not mention anything about restraining or shackling them.
87:. Shackling is defined as "using any physical restraint or mechanical device to control the movement of a prisoner's body or limbs, including handcuffs, leg shackles, and belly chains". For females, shackles or handcuffs are placed around the ankles, wrists, or around the stomach. The shackling of pregnant women occurs while they are transported within a facility, transported to a hospital, and/or during and after childbirth. Restraints are also used on detained pregnant women in
110:
22:
177:
gravity is shifted by the pregnant uterus. For example, restraints placed on a woman's wrists also prevent her from breaking a fall and protecting herself and her abdomen. In regards to sickness and treatment, the use of shackles complicates the assessment of physical and other medical conditions before and during the process of childbirth. This includes diagnostic tests to determine the source of abdominal pains and nausea,
144:
security in general. Moreover, these justifications are identical to those used to support the use of restraints on male and female inmates in general population across various state and federal facilities. Correctional department officials also cite their responsibility or burden to balance the health and safety of the inmate with that of the public in further support of the use of restraints on pregnant women.
367:
to enact comprehensive laws, including training of correctional officers, 3) to review existing state anti- shackling laws and policies to ensure that they are comprehensive and fully implemented, and 4) to conduct an empirical study to determine the scope of shackling in U.S. prisons and to understand why the practice of shackling pregnant women persists.
122:
on women in general, and pregnant women in particular, is controversial. Also, since there is a disproportionately higher rate of women of color incarcerated across the United States, African-American and
Hispanic women are disproportionately affected by policies designed to control male inmates with a higher risk of violence.
219:
on pregnant prisoners. A number of states allow for the unrestricted use of restraints on pregnant women. Of the states that have passed restrictions of some sort, 18 still include broad exceptions. More broadly speaking, 48 states lack legislation that lays out specific protections for incarcerated pregnant women.
331:
prohibits the use of restraints on pregnant women, unless the woman "is an immediate and credible flight risk that cannot reasonably be prevented by other means" or "poses an immediate and serious threat of harm to herself or others that cannot reasonably be prevented by other means" or "a healthcare
231:
In April 2014, Massachusetts passed an act allowing for the use of restraints in "extraordinary circumstances". Such "extraordinary circumstances" include anytime a corrections officer deems it necessary that restraints be used to prevent a pregnant inmate from escaping or from causing self-injury or
366:
1) enact a federal law banning the practice of shackling prisoners during pregnancy, covering, at a minimum, the third trimester, transport to medical facilities, labor, delivery and postpartum recovery, 2) take appropriate measures to ensure that those 32 states that do not have anti-shackling laws
361:
recommended to the United States in 2006 to "prohibit the shackling of detained women during childbirth" to come into compliance with the aforementioned international treaties. Many state and federal level policies enacted to eliminate or reduce the use of shackles on pregnant women have served as a
218:
States in the US have moved toward eliminating or greatly reducing the use of restraints on pregnant women in their facilities. California, Illinois, and New York have passed statewide legislation to eliminate the practice and a total of 24 states have adopted policies limiting the use of restraints
121:
Due to the disproportionately higher incarceration rates of violent male offenders to female offenders, prison systems (for example, policies about when physical restraints should be used) have predominantly been designed to control potentially violent male inmates. Consequently, the use of shackles
318:
In 2008 the
Federal Bureau of Prisons mandated that in all federal correctional facilities, "inmates in labor, delivery, or post-delivery recuperations shall not be placed in restraints unless there are reasonable grounds to believe the inmate presents an immediate serious threat of hurting herself
147:
Opponents of the practice offer several counterarguments to the justifications presented above. They argue foremost the use of restraints on pregnant women raises important human rights concerns and increases the health risks to the woman and her child. Many in the international community are quick
117:
There continues to be a disproportionately higher percentage of males than females incarcerated across the United States. In 2009, less than 10% of incarcerated people were women. Women are more likely than men to be in custody for drug offenses, less likely to be in custody for violent crimes, and
94:
Pregnant women and babies under correctional custody have unique healthcare needs. These needs are often not addressed by most custody policies, which may put these women and babies at risk. In custody, there is a typical lack of routine prenatal care and adequate nutrition. There is also a risk of
222:
In 2014, the Bureau of
Justice Assistance (BJA) under the U.S. Department of Justice released a report entitled "Best Practices in the Use of Restraints with Pregnant Women and Girls under Correctional Custody". It was created by the National Task Force on the Use of Restraints with Pregnant Women
380:
On the legal front, the use of restraints on pregnant women has been repeatedly challenged for violating the Eighth
Amendment of the United States Constitution, which prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment". In a recent landmark decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
301:
Idaho law states that a correctional institution cannot use restraints on a prisoner known to be pregnant during labor and delivery, except in an extraordinary circumstance where a corrections official makes an individualized determination that restraints are necessary to prevent a prisoner from
143:
There are three primary justifications used to support the use of restraint on pregnant women. First, restraints prevent inmates from bringing harm to themselves and others; second, restraints prevent the escape or attempt to escape of pregnant women; and third, restraints are meant to maintain
130:
According to the Bureau of
Justice Assistance (BJA), among the adult population, "Four percent of state and three percent of federal inmates said they were pregnant at the time of admission." Upon intake the BJA also found that "five percent of women in jails reported being pregnant". Pregnancy
332:
professional responsible for the health and safety of the prisoner determines that the use of restraints is appropriate for the medical safety of the prisoner." For those situations in which restraints are allowed, the legislation mandates the use of the least restrictive restraints necessary.
275:
West
Virginia law states that pregnant inmates will not be restrained after reaching the second trimester of pregnancy until the end of the pregnancy, unless she poses a threat of escape or safety of herself, the public, staff, or the fetus. Then the inmate may be restrained, but she will also
176:
and others surrounding the use of shackles on pregnant women. These concerns involve various increased health risks to the woman and her child, which arise at different points of shackling. While pregnant during incarceration, shackles can increase the risk of falling where a woman's center of
323:
into law, requiring all federal facilities to document and report "the use of physical restraints on pregnant female prisoners during pregnancy, labor, delivery, and post-delivery and justify the use of restraints with documented security concerns". This shift in federal policy, limiting and
266:
Florida prohibits use of restraints on pregnant prisoners at all times during labor, delivery, and postpartum recovery unless a corrections official makes an individualized determination that the prisoner presents an extraordinary circumstance requiring restraints.
340:
The use of shackles on pregnant women by correctional facilities in the United States has been widely criticized by the international community. The following have been cited as international policies which this practice violates: Articles 7 and 10 of the
371:
British law states that pregnant women will no longer wear restraints within hospitals unless they are considered to be high security risks. They will be allowed to have antenatal visits at the prison where there will be at least one accompanying woman.
292:
Hawaii law states that no restraints may be used on any committed female from the third trimester of her pregnancy through postpartum recovery or during any portion of her pregnancy if her physician so orders, except in extraordinary circumstances.
152:(ACLU) filed a joint report stating, "Women who are pregnant, in labor, or in postpartum recovery are especially low flight and safety risks." In support of this point of view, Geraldine Doetzer in "Hard Labor" states that pregnant women who are in
249:
In
January 2006, California passed legislation stating that a pregnant "inmate shall not be shackled by the wrists, ankles, or both during labor, including during transport to a hospital, during delivery, and while in recovery after giving birth."
196:
Following childbirth, restraints can interfere with the mother's ability to safely handle their infant, and interfere in creating a close bond. The restriction in mobility from restraints can place the woman at increased risk for contracting the
385:. The Court held that the Arkansas law "'clearly established' that shackling a woman prisoner during labor and delivery violated the Eighth Amendment, imposing cruel and unusual punishment." In their Judicial Opinion the Court cited
391:, in which the Supreme Court held "deliberate indifference" to provide medical care to incarcerated populations violated the Eighth Amendment based on the government's obligation to abide by "an evolving standard of human decency".
240:
In
Pennsylvania, pregnant prisoners can be shackled and handcuffed during the delivery of the child. In fact, the state reported that over 100 pregnant women were shackled during a year-long period between July 2012 to June 2013.
885:
1073:
184:
Restraints can also interfere with normal labor and delivery of the child. It can be important for women to be able to walk around during labor to alleviate pain and be able to be moved quickly in case a
818:
American Civil
Liberties Union. (2014). State Standards for Pregnancy-Related Health Care and Abortion for Women in Prison. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from American Civil Liberties Union:
1019:
512:
350:
342:
165:
674:
469:
767:
588:
319:
or others, or there are reasonable grounds to believe the inmate presents an immediate and credible risk of escape." In April 2008, President George W. Bush signed the
32:
193:
often necessitate an emergency C-section. For these reasons, the American Public Health Association, warns "omen must never be shackled during labor and delivery".
1018:
THE SHACKLING OF INCARCERATED PREGNANT WOMEN: A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION COMMITTED REGULARLY IN THE UNITED STATES. (2013, August). Retrieved November 23, 2014, from
276:
consult with an appropriate health care professional to assure that the manner of restraint will not pose an unreasonable risk of harm to the inmate or the fetus.
258:
Maryland's policy states they limit the use of restraints, but it does not say anything about the use of shackles or restraints on pregnant, incarcerated women.
148:
to point out pregnant women are lower security threats to themselves and others than men. In particular, the International Human Rights Clinic, CLAIM, and the
586:
Justice, B. o. (2014). Best Practices in the Use of restraints with Pregnant women and girls Under correctional cUstody. Retrieved November 23, 2014, from
104:
971:
Legislature, I. (2011). TITLE 20 STATE PRISON AND COUNTY JAILS CHAPTER 9 RESTRAINT OF PREGNANT PRISONERS. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from Idaho Statutes.
619:
44:
1020:
https://ihrclinic.uchicago.edu/sites/ihrclinic.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/Report%20-%20Shackling%20of%20Pregnant%20Prisoners%20in%20the%20US.pdf
284:
Rhode Island's policy states that pregnant inmates cannot be restrained in their second or third trimester unless deemed medically appropriate.
1031:
358:
944:
734:
Parker, Kelly (2005). "Pregnant Women Inmates: Evaluating Their Rights and Identifying Opportunities for Improvements in Their Treatment".
420:
181:—which occur in 12–22% of pregnancies—and of vaginal bleeding. All of these pose severe threats to the health of the mother and the fetus.
324:
reporting the use of restraints on pregnant women parallels the policy changes being made at the state and local levels mentioned above.
819:
1078:
852:
169:
84:
66:
681:
916:
Joyner. (2012, April 7). SB 524: Restraint of Incarcerated Pregnant Women. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from The Florida Senate:
774:
595:
715:
Doetzer, Geraldine (2008). "Hard Labor: The Legal Implications of Shackling Female Inmates During Pregnancy and Childbirth".
149:
929:
310:
In Washington, the use of restraints on pregnant women or youth in custody is allowed only in extraordinary circumstances.
928:
31-20-30a. Mechanical restraints during pregnancy. (2014). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from West Virginia Lesgislature:
173:
960:
1083:
48:
940:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections Policy and Procedure. (2012, February 27). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from
346:
513:"The Shackling of Incarcerated Pregnant Women: A Human Rights Violation Committed Regularly in the United States"
95:
experiencing physical and emotional abuse, mental health issues, and untreated sexually transmitted infections.
320:
562:
1048:
Griggs, Claire Louise (2011). "Birthing Barbarism: The Unconstitutionality of Shackling Pregnant Prisoners".
959:
Hawaii Capitol Government. (n.d.). 353-122 Limitation on use of restraints. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from
1032:
http://rageuniversity.org/PRISONESCAPE/EVASION%20OUTSIDE%20PRISON/Shackling%20prisoners%20in%20hospital.pdf
362:
response to these recommendations and statements issued by the United Nations. They proposed that the U.S.:
198:
132:
792:
523:
354:
189:
becomes necessary. Problems such as complications from hemorrhages, a decrease in fetal heart tones, or
178:
88:
820:
https://www.aclu.org/maps/state-standards-pregnancy-related-health-care-and-abortion-women-prison-map
994:
1030:
DILLNER, L. (1996, January 13). Shackling prisoners in hospital. Retrieved November 23, 2014, from
768:"Best Practices in the Use of Restraints with Pregnant Women and Girls under Correctional Custody"
153:
941:
80:
435:
893:
860:
650:
613:
387:
186:
642:
109:
948:
805:
536:
981:
930:
http://www.legis.state.wv.us/wvcode/ChapterEntire.cfm?chap=31&art=20§ion=30A
980:
RCW 72.09.651 . (2010). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from Washington State Legislature:
328:
832:"An Act relative to prevent shackling and promote safe pregnancies for female inmates"
1067:
961:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0353/HRS_0353-0122.htm
563:"Bound by Injustice: Challenging the Use of Shackles on Incarcerated Pregnant Women"
470:"Health Care for Pregnant and Postpartum Incarcerated Women and Adolescent Females"
190:
831:
917:
633:
Clarke, Jennifer G. (March 2011). "Perinatal Care for Incarcerated Patients".
202:
897:
864:
886:"Maryland delegates consider a ban on using restraints on pregnant inmates"
654:
668:
666:
664:
646:
468:
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (November 2011).
421:"Giving Birth in Shackles: A Constitutional and Human Rights Violation"
156:"are physically much less able to mount an attack or escape attempt."
511:
International Human Rights Clinic, CLAIM & ACLU (August 2013).
108:
995:"Text - H.R.5682 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): FIRST STEP Act"
942:
http://www.doc.ri.gov/documents/administration/policy/9.17.pdf
15:
675:"Shackling of Pregnant Inmates: A Violation of Human Rights"
680:. International Human Rights Funders Group. Archived from
1074:
Imprisonment and detention of women in the United States
40:
982:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=72.09.651
351:
Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners
343:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
164:
A number of health concerns have been raised by the
166:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
635:The Journal of the American Medical Association
506:
1043:
1041:
1039:
918:http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2012/0524
710:
708:
706:
704:
702:
504:
502:
500:
498:
496:
494:
492:
490:
488:
486:
428:Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
29:The examples and perspective in this article
8:
232:injuring medical or correctional personnel.
105:Incarceration of women in the United States
1050:Journal of Gender, Social Policy & Law
83:on pregnant women is a common practice in
717:William and Mary Journal of Women and Law
556:
554:
552:
550:
548:
546:
67:Learn how and when to remove this message
414:
412:
410:
408:
406:
404:
400:
383:Nelson v. Correctional Medical Services
118:less likely to be violent recidivists.
801:
790:
761:
759:
757:
755:
753:
751:
749:
618:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
611:
532:
521:
463:
461:
459:
457:
455:
353:. In response to reports presented by
85:prisons and jails in the United States
766:Bureau of Justice Assistance (2014).
359:United Nations Human Rights Committee
7:
570:Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender
381:supported this claim in the case,
170:American Public Health Association
14:
884:Schwartzman, Paul (2023-05-18).
20:
853:"Opinion | In Labor, in Chains"
477:Women's Health Care Physicians
349:(CAT), and the United Nations
302:escaping or injuring herself.
150:American Civil Liberties Union
131:statistics are not tracked in
1:
993:Collins, Doug (23 May 2018).
851:Quinn, Audrey (2014-07-26).
434:(2): 223–255. Archived from
174:American Medical Association
133:juvenile justice facilities
43:, discuss the issue on the
1100:
347:Convention Against Torture
345:(ICCPR) Article 16 of the
102:
1079:Legal issues in pregnancy
736:Journal of Law and Health
201:and getting a postpartum
160:Health risks and concerns
79:The use of shackles or
800:Cite journal requires
673:Dharmaraj, Krishanti.
561:Sussman, Dana (2009).
531:Cite journal requires
369:
199:thromboembolic disease
114:
647:10.1001/jama.2011.125
419:Sichel, D.L. (2008).
364:
355:Amnesty International
179:hypertensive diseases
113:Standard leg shackles
112:
89:immigration detention
49:create a new article
41:improve this article
31:may not represent a
209:Policy perspectives
139:Opposing viewpoints
1084:Physical restraint
947:2015-09-23 at the
857:The New York Times
376:Legal perspectives
115:
388:Estelle v. Gamble
321:Second Chance Act
187:Caesarean section
77:
76:
69:
51:, as appropriate.
1091:
1058:
1057:
1045:
1034:
1028:
1022:
1016:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1005:
999:www.congress.gov
990:
984:
978:
972:
969:
963:
957:
951:
938:
932:
926:
920:
914:
908:
907:
905:
904:
881:
875:
874:
872:
871:
848:
842:
841:
839:
838:
828:
822:
816:
810:
809:
803:
798:
796:
788:
786:
785:
779:
773:. Archived from
772:
763:
744:
743:
731:
725:
724:
712:
697:
696:
694:
692:
686:
679:
670:
659:
658:
630:
624:
623:
617:
609:
607:
606:
600:
594:. Archived from
593:
584:
578:
577:
567:
558:
541:
540:
534:
529:
527:
519:
517:
508:
481:
480:
474:
465:
450:
449:
447:
446:
440:
425:
416:
126:Pregnant inmates
72:
65:
61:
58:
52:
24:
23:
16:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1047:
1046:
1037:
1029:
1025:
1017:
1013:
1003:
1001:
992:
991:
987:
979:
975:
970:
966:
958:
954:
949:Wayback Machine
939:
935:
927:
923:
915:
911:
902:
900:
890:Washington Post
883:
882:
878:
869:
867:
850:
849:
845:
836:
834:
830:
829:
825:
817:
813:
799:
789:
783:
781:
777:
770:
765:
764:
747:
733:
732:
728:
714:
713:
700:
690:
688:
687:on 4 March 2016
684:
677:
672:
671:
662:
632:
631:
627:
610:
604:
602:
598:
591:
589:"Archived copy"
587:
585:
581:
565:
560:
559:
544:
530:
520:
515:
510:
509:
484:
472:
467:
466:
453:
444:
442:
438:
423:
418:
417:
402:
397:
378:
338:
316:
308:
299:
290:
282:
273:
264:
256:
247:
238:
229:
216:
214:State and local
211:
162:
141:
128:
107:
101:
73:
62:
56:
53:
38:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
1097:
1095:
1087:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1035:
1023:
1011:
985:
973:
964:
952:
933:
921:
909:
876:
843:
823:
811:
802:|journal=
745:
726:
698:
660:
625:
579:
542:
533:|journal=
482:
451:
399:
398:
396:
393:
377:
374:
337:
334:
329:FIRST STEP Act
315:
312:
307:
304:
298:
295:
289:
286:
281:
278:
272:
269:
263:
260:
255:
252:
246:
243:
237:
234:
228:
225:
215:
212:
210:
207:
161:
158:
140:
137:
127:
124:
103:Main article:
100:
97:
75:
74:
35:of the subject
33:worldwide view
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1096:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1056:(1): 247–271.
1055:
1051:
1044:
1042:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1015:
1012:
1000:
996:
989:
986:
983:
977:
974:
968:
965:
962:
956:
953:
950:
946:
943:
937:
934:
931:
925:
922:
919:
913:
910:
899:
895:
891:
887:
880:
877:
866:
862:
858:
854:
847:
844:
833:
827:
824:
821:
815:
812:
807:
794:
780:on 2014-09-25
776:
769:
762:
760:
758:
756:
754:
752:
750:
746:
741:
737:
730:
727:
722:
718:
711:
709:
707:
705:
703:
699:
683:
676:
669:
667:
665:
661:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
629:
626:
621:
615:
601:on 2014-09-25
597:
590:
583:
580:
575:
571:
564:
557:
555:
553:
551:
549:
547:
543:
538:
525:
514:
507:
505:
503:
501:
499:
497:
495:
493:
491:
489:
487:
483:
478:
471:
464:
462:
460:
458:
456:
452:
441:on 2014-07-24
437:
433:
429:
422:
415:
413:
411:
409:
407:
405:
401:
394:
392:
390:
389:
384:
375:
373:
368:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
336:International
335:
333:
330:
325:
322:
313:
311:
305:
303:
296:
294:
287:
285:
279:
277:
271:West Virginia
270:
268:
261:
259:
253:
251:
244:
242:
235:
233:
227:Massachusetts
226:
224:
220:
213:
208:
206:
204:
200:
194:
192:
188:
182:
180:
175:
171:
167:
159:
157:
155:
151:
145:
138:
136:
134:
125:
123:
119:
111:
106:
98:
96:
92:
90:
86:
82:
71:
68:
60:
50:
46:
42:
36:
34:
27:
18:
17:
1053:
1049:
1026:
1014:
1002:. Retrieved
998:
988:
976:
967:
955:
936:
924:
912:
901:. Retrieved
889:
879:
868:. Retrieved
856:
846:
835:. Retrieved
826:
814:
793:cite journal
782:. Retrieved
775:the original
739:
735:
729:
720:
716:
691:28 September
689:. Retrieved
682:the original
641:(9): 923–9.
638:
634:
628:
603:. Retrieved
596:the original
582:
573:
569:
524:cite journal
476:
443:. Retrieved
436:the original
431:
427:
386:
382:
379:
370:
365:
339:
326:
317:
309:
300:
291:
283:
280:Rhode Island
274:
265:
257:
248:
239:
236:Pennsylvania
230:
221:
217:
195:
191:preeclampsia
183:
168:(ACOG), the
163:
154:active labor
146:
142:
129:
120:
116:
93:
91:facilities.
78:
63:
54:
30:
1004:21 December
1068:Categories
903:2023-08-08
870:2023-03-02
837:2023-08-08
784:2014-11-24
605:2014-11-24
445:2014-10-20
395:References
306:Washington
245:California
203:hemorrhage
99:Background
81:restraints
57:April 2018
898:0190-8286
865:0362-4331
45:talk page
945:Archived
655:21304069
614:cite web
254:Maryland
39:You may
314:Federal
262:Florida
896:
863:
742:(259).
653:
576:(477).
479:(511).
357:, the
288:Hawaii
172:, the
778:(PDF)
771:(PDF)
685:(PDF)
678:(PDF)
599:(PDF)
592:(PDF)
566:(PDF)
516:(PDF)
473:(PDF)
439:(PDF)
424:(PDF)
297:Idaho
47:, or
1006:2018
894:ISSN
861:ISSN
806:help
723:(2).
693:2014
651:PMID
620:link
537:help
327:The
643:doi
639:305
1070::
1054:20
1052:.
1038:^
997:.
892:.
888:.
859:.
855:.
797::
795:}}
791:{{
748:^
740:19
738:.
721:14
719:.
701:^
663:^
649:.
637:.
616:}}
612:{{
574:15
572:.
568:.
545:^
528::
526:}}
522:{{
485:^
475:.
454:^
432:16
430:.
426:.
403:^
205:.
135:.
1008:.
906:.
873:.
840:.
808:)
804:(
787:.
695:.
657:.
645::
622:)
608:.
539:)
535:(
518:.
448:.
70:)
64:(
59:)
55:(
37:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
