247:== Summary == {{Information TV series screenshot |Series= |Episode= (name) |EpNumber= (prod num) |Time= |Description= |Source=] |Copyright_date= |Screenshot_date={{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTDAY2}}, {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}} |Author= }} == Licensing == {{Non-free television screenshot}} === Fair use for {{PAGENAME}} === This image, {{PAGENAME}}, is being linked here; though the picture is subject to copyright I (~~~~) feel it is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because: # it is a low resolution still of a television program; # it does not limit the copyright owner's rights to sell the television program in any way; # copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the television program; # the photo is only being used for informational purposes. # Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the subject of this article
310:
policy page and decree it to be so. This does address
Wikitruth's little tiff about the "God King" Wales. It also makes his depotism much more blatant. I dislike people citing his emails as actual policy. His "we shoulds" (paraphrase) or whatever are ambiguous at best. Policy and critera for deletion or other such decrees need to be concrete, so arguments can be much easily solved. As it stands now, Jimbo's words are like the Bible -- open to interpretation. Either that, or we need a policy that says "Jimbo is always right".
319:"funness" factor that surrounds the Internet. It is the same whimsy that Google has tapped into with its cartoony renditions of Google's logo on special days and it's do no evil policy and it's corporate office filled with exercise balls, friday hockey, free food, Page and Brin's emphasis on fun, etc. And look how successful Google is. That is what I think WP needs. That Internet whimsy is what sets us apart from those Ivory Tower publications like Britannica.
127:
64:
99:
33:
318:
Personally, I think people should calm down about deleting some of the more controversial ones. Frankly, some of them are funny (I liked the "Bush's Edits to the
Constitution needed to be reverted" one). While I don't think WP should be just about being funny, I think it needs to retain a tad of the
309:
What
Knowledge policy said Jimbo was policy maker for Knowledge? I say that anything he proposes or suggests or thinks through his emails should be disregarded or made into a proposed policy for the community to comment on. However, since he is part of the Foundation, he can always create his own
171:
I don't really write a ton of articles. I mainly go around and do RC patrol (not often since I'm slower than most of the other RCers out there, with my dialup and all). I also do redirecting disambig links. Most of the time, though, I hit Random
Article until I find something that needs fixing or
325:
As for the disputed userboxes that don't show up down there, I'll delete them and rearrange when the situation dies down and everything is calm once again. Then I can be assured that the ones I like will be able to stay, if they are allowed to stay.
159:". Scroll down to the part where he quotes "revert removal of recall mention, its pretty notable, also removing POV language like "successful", LOTS of fact tags., this still reads like an ad." Why.... that's
477:
472:
38:
106:
322:
I support the move of userboxes to User space since they directly relate to users. Maybe we should create a new space for them, called the "User
Template space?"
251:
482:
43:
338:" long enough, you eventually realize the prevalence of the word "notable" or some other variant of it in articles. (According to Google, there are
453:: df268f17f3330c17048a991c72a174efaa1b987f9b266a86400724ed496d44d95836f1b9c3a5727d5bf9f70bb9badfb0abff223ac1597d2ab1510cb3c249b361 is a
358:" What does "notable lack of hygiene" mean? If he has bad hygiene, just say it. In the WP world, "notable" has become a
70:
449:
191:
351:
350:
as an AFD criteria, editors like to justify their subjects notability in subtly overt ways. Just take a look at
269:==Warnings== {{subst:s/wnote}} ==={{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}=== # {{subst:uw-test1}} ~~~~
404:
156:
292:
175:
279:
383:
19:
457:
257:
207:
238:
224:
197:
339:
263:
126:
63:
466:
202:
231:
218:
77:
347:
359:
134:
98:
454:
416:
32:
149:
Yo. (That's my normal greeting to most people, but I'm no rapper.)
335:
152:
I really need to improve this thing, but, real work calls.
346:
that contain "notable".) It seems that with the advent of
194:
One of the best things I have ever seen to hit
Knowledge.
362:. It does have some uses, but often, it is meaningless.
478:
WikiProject
Wikipedians against censorship participants
160:
473:
Wikipedians who fix disambiguation pages with links
210:one of the most violated suggestions of the MoS
343:
252:Template_talk:Information_TV_series_screenshot
295:Hope ya find it funny in years to come Xu 老师!
8:
356:He also has a notable lack of hygiene.
7:
375:
121:
93:
58:
27:
460:to this user's real-life identity.
483:Wikipedians interested in politics
242:{{convert|2599|m|0|abbr=on|lk=on}}
14:
125:
97:
62:
31:
107:Wikipedians against censorship
1:
354:, where the editor wrote, "
192:Knowledge:Proposed deletion
132:This user is interested in
499:
405:keep track of who hates me
352:Wally (Dilbert character)
104:This user is a member of
382:This user page has been
260:one of my favorite jobs!
450:Committed identity
230:Fair use image example
280:User:Copysan/Pink Taco
181:Pages worth mentioning
273:Articles in Progress
155:Apparently, I am a "
44:disambiguation pages
20:Knowledge:Userboxes
282:
237:Convert template:
394:
393:
334:If you click on "
278:
147:
146:
142:
141:
114:
113:
86:
85:
51:
50:
42:repairs links to
490:
376:
344:en.wikipedia.org
300:WP-related Rants
243:
239:Template:Convert
221:<ref> tags
129:
122:
101:
94:
66:
59:
35:
28:
16:
15:
498:
497:
493:
492:
491:
489:
488:
487:
463:
462:
461:
439:Homework Online
413:
399:
398:
397:
395:
373:
368:
332:
316:
307:
302:
293:Mrs. Xu's Page.
289:
275:
270:
248:
241:
188:
183:
169:
161:my edit summary
143:
115:
87:
74:
52:
12:
11:
5:
496:
494:
486:
485:
480:
475:
465:
464:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:TranslateLatin
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
419:
412:
409:
392:
391:
380:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
336:Random article
331:
328:
315:
312:
306:
303:
301:
298:
297:
296:
288:
285:
284:
283:
274:
271:
268:
267:
266:
264:Knowledge:WARN
261:
246:
245:
244:
235:
234:
233:
228:
222:
213:
212:
211:
200:
195:
187:
184:
182:
179:
172:categorizing.
168:
165:
145:
144:
140:
139:
130:
120:
117:
116:
112:
111:
102:
92:
89:
88:
84:
83:
67:
57:
54:
53:
49:
48:
36:
26:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
495:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
470:
468:
459:
456:
452:
451:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
422:
421:Study Guides
420:
418:
415:
414:
410:
408:
406:
401:
389:
385:
381:
378:
377:
370:
365:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
330:On Notability
329:
327:
323:
320:
313:
311:
304:
299:
294:
291:
290:
286:
281:
277:
276:
272:
265:
262:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
240:
236:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
216:
214:
209:
206:
205:
204:
201:
199:
196:
193:
190:
189:
185:
180:
178:
177:
173:
166:
164:
162:
158:
153:
150:
137:
136:
131:
128:
124:
123:
119:
118:
109:
108:
103:
100:
96:
95:
91:
90:
81:
80:
79:
72:
68:
65:
61:
60:
56:
55:
46:
45:
40:
37:
34:
30:
29:
25:
24:
21:
18:
17:
448:
402:
396:
387:
355:
333:
324:
321:
317:
314:On Userboxes
308:
249:
174:
170:
154:
151:
148:
133:
105:
78:The Signpost
76:
75:
41:
427:MonkeyNotes
467:Categories
458:commitment
436:SparkNotes
407:. Fun eh?
403:I like to
384:vandalized
366:This is me
340:10,100,000
258:WP:Copyvio
215:Citations
208:WP:MOSDATE
176:To-Do List
71:subscribes
69:This user
433:Booknotes
360:buzz word
342:pages in
227:citations
157:Wikignome
39:This user
430:BookRags
424:Slashdoc
417:Pastebin
305:On Jimbo
225:WP:CITET
198:WP:SUBST
135:politics
455:SHA-512
411:Notepad
371:Vandals
390:times.
386:
203:WP:MOS
186:Policy
400:Yay?
379:vn-13
287:Funny
250:from
219:WP:FN
348:WP:N
167:Jobs
469::
388:13
163:!
73:to
138:.
110:.
82:.
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
