124:
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I do see some sections that could be expanded upon. The first sentence in the plot where Dirk McDonald is introduced. I think the author could add more information on Dirks background. The rest of the plot looks
298:
requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? The article is rated a C which is considered a low standard. So, I believe it meets the standard, however for the purpose of this assignment it meets the purpose of
305:
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? The article flows well, has neutrality and is balance but there is room for
335:
How can the content added be improved? I would like to see a few more pictures (the imaginary settings) expand more on the plot and add some reviews as a link. Otherwise the article's picture is eye catching and the new improvements look
327:
Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The content that was added made a big improvement from the older version. As mentioned more content should be added, pictures and
331:
What are the strengths of the content added? The author made the article a lot more interesting by going deep into the history of the lawsuit, issues with publishing, and the history of the books first public
156:
In the plot it looks like the author gave his opinion on Dirk not being happy because he had a secret. That could appear to the reader as being a little bias. I'm not sure that it is completely bias though
238:
Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content is clearly written and touches on many different dimensions such as; challenges the book had with publishing
244:
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content is organized well and the sections are in the right areas on the page.
271:
Do all images adhere to
Knowledge's copyright regulations? I'm not sure because when I clicked on the picture it states that it is believed to belong to the publisher or the cover artist.
302:
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? I believe the author did a thorough job finding sources.
265:
Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The article has a nice picture of the books cover. It is colorful and pops out at the viewer
72:
If a reader should find this page, I believe the lead is concise enough for them to understand that Baby Be-Bop is another book developed in the series of adventures.
241:
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not find any grammatical spelling errors and paragraphs seem to flow.
80:
The table of contents could be expanded upon however it is enough for the reader to scroll through and get to the important sections.
309:
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? The writer did a good job linking words to other articles.
31:
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
118:
Is the content added relevant to the topic? The articles content is relevant to the authors description of the story.
213:
Most of the sources are retrieved recently 2020 an up to date. There are only two dates that are from 2009.
69:
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
295:
169:
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
289:
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
274:
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? The image is appealing and colorful
202:
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
17:
268:
Are images well-captioned? The images are well-captioned and bolded appropriately
153:
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
172:
When reading this article I am presented with more facts rather than opinions
205:
The sources reflect what the author is presenting about the books story line
194:
Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
77:
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
64:
The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by the author.
61:
Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
148:
The article seems neutral and unbiased about the character and his life.
85:
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
161:
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
121:
Is the content added up-to-date? The content does seem up to date
218:
Check a few links. Do they work? All the links work well
45:
User:Amdoubleu/Baby Be-Bop/Kerrymonique Peer Review
164:The view points are not over or underrepresented.
93:Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
8:
88:The lead includes the necessary information.
40:Whose work are you reviewing? (Amdoubleu)
7:
261:If your peer added images or media
294:Does the article meet Knowledge's
24:
223:Sources and references evaluation
43:Link to draft you're reviewing:
145:Is the content added neutral?
1:
197:The sources are all reliable
279:Images and media evaluation
179:Tone and balance evaluation
356:
210:Are the sources current?
249:Organization evaluation
312:New Article Evaluation
184:Sources and References
284:For New Articles Only
317:Overall impressions
96:The lead is concise
341:Overall evaluation
322:Guiding questions:
259:Guiding questions:
233:Guiding questions:
189:Guiding questions:
140:Guiding questions:
130:Content evaluation
113:Guiding questions:
56:Guiding questions:
347:
254:Images and Media
135:Tone and Balance
355:
354:
350:
349:
348:
346:
345:
344:
343:
319:
286:
281:
256:
251:
230:
225:
186:
181:
137:
132:
110:
105:
103:Lead evaluation
53:
37:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
353:
351:
342:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
318:
315:
314:
313:
310:
307:
303:
300:
285:
282:
280:
277:
276:
275:
272:
269:
266:
255:
252:
250:
247:
246:
245:
242:
239:
229:
226:
224:
221:
220:
219:
216:
215:
214:
208:
207:
206:
200:
199:
198:
185:
182:
180:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
167:
166:
165:
159:
158:
157:
151:
150:
149:
136:
133:
131:
128:
127:
126:
122:
119:
109:
106:
104:
101:
100:
99:
98:
97:
91:
90:
89:
83:
82:
81:
75:
74:
73:
67:
66:
65:
52:
49:
48:
47:
41:
36:
33:
28:
25:
23:
18:User:Amdoubleu
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
352:
340:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
323:
316:
311:
308:
304:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
290:
283:
278:
273:
270:
267:
264:
263:
262:
260:
253:
248:
243:
240:
237:
236:
235:
234:
227:
222:
217:
212:
211:
209:
204:
203:
201:
196:
195:
193:
192:
191:
190:
183:
178:
171:
170:
168:
163:
162:
160:
155:
154:
152:
147:
146:
144:
143:
142:
141:
134:
129:
123:
120:
117:
116:
115:
114:
107:
102:
95:
94:
92:
87:
86:
84:
79:
78:
76:
71:
70:
68:
63:
62:
60:
59:
58:
57:
50:
46:
42:
39:
38:
34:
32:
26:
19:
321:
320:
306:improvement.
288:
287:
258:
257:
232:
231:
228:Organization
188:
187:
139:
138:
112:
111:
55:
54:
44:
35:General info
30:
299:evaluation.
27:Peer review
296:Notability
328:headings.
332:display.
108:Content
336:great!
125:good!
16:<
51:Lead
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.