21:
59:
and the frequent and continuing mislinkings, and by policy and guidelines, which state that an ambiguous base name cannot be used unless the article is on the primary topic. An RfC found that New York State is not the primary topic of
112:
85:, or not. In view of the incredibly messy history of this issue, it would be unwise to attempt a three-way poll at this time. This RM if approved represents at least a great improvement.
92:
RM. Let the dust settle. It has taken twelve years to create this mess. Another year before proposing the perfect solution is a good investment of time.
56:
55:. This is an improvement on a long-standing but ridiculous situation. It is supported both by the practical considerations of
81:
This RM leaves open the possibility that a future RM may move the New York City article to the base name
31:
27:
97:
69:
106:
93:
65:
88:
But I would suggest another voluntary one-year moratorium on the
15:
113:
New York City and New York State move discussion pages
8:
43:New York (disambiguation) -> New York
30:, where sanity finally prevailed, and
7:
14:
40:New York -> New York (state)
19:
57:principle of least astonishment
34:. Kept for historical reasons.
1:
90:New York City -> New York
129:
32:User:Andrewa/NYRM2018
38:
37:
120:
23:
22:
16:
128:
127:
123:
122:
121:
119:
118:
117:
103:
102:
79:
49:
20:
12:
11:
5:
126:
124:
116:
115:
105:
104:
78:
75:
74:
73:
48:
45:
36:
35:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
125:
114:
111:
110:
108:
101:
99:
95:
91:
86:
84:
76:
71:
67:
63:
58:
54:
51:
50:
46:
44:
41:
33:
29:
26:Obsoleted by
25:
18:
17:
89:
87:
82:
80:
61:
52:
42:
39:
77:Discussion
107:Category
83:New York
62:New York
28:NYRM2017
94:Andrewa
66:Andrewa
53:Support
98:talk
70:talk
47:Poll
109::
100:)
64:.
96:(
72:)
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.