31:
67:
262:
Part of the reason it's so simple is so that it should be easily understood by any idiot, and is by most of them. It's not always easy to keep to it, particularly when under attack yourself, or when you don't understand the other view and so the
221:
We probably could not come to consensus without this. Or even if we did, we'd never know for sure whether we had, or whether it was just that the guy with the thickest hide was the only one left standing. Not good.
363:
If it doesn't really matter to you, then let's not overreact. The job is not to write a perfect rulebook, it's to write the best possible encyclopedia. Too many rules just waste time both writing them and
242:
Of course some of us have thicker hides than others. That doesn't give us any right to say to the others, grow up, be a man, it's only a very small insult. Knowledge (XXG) should be a safe place for
213:. But not quite. Both are very good ideas, to the point that without at least some common acceptance of the general principle involved, Knowledge (XXG) just ain't gonna work.
93:
203:
We could in theory come to consensus without this one. It would just take longer, and discourage people along the way, and probably be the end of
Knowledge (XXG).
343:
If the rule is generally useful but this is an unusual case, get consensus on that and follow common sense to recognise this as the occasional exception. Simple.
270:
But even a mild personal attack on someone who shrugs it off as harmless lessens
Knowledge (XXG). It sets a precedent that others will follow. Not good.
288:
368:. Either follow the rule or don't, and if you're challenged or reverted, discuss and hope to invoke IAR, go with the consensus either way, and move on.
401:
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
47:
411:
406:
147:
396:
151:
have proved remarkably successful. Not perfect, but definitely towards that top end of the scale that runs all the way from
141:
77:
Knowledge (XXG) works best when everyone makes an effort to follow the rules, including and especially those they don't like
118:
96:
edit this one. But it's generally more helpful (and polite) to discuss the proposed change on its talk page first.
162:
This usefulness would be reason enough to have the rules. But it goes further. The smart money is, the rules are
327:
when they disagree. In the extreme that editors only obeyed the rules they agreed with, the rules would have
129:
in building an encyclopedia. And on closer inspection it's not as strange as it seems, mainly because the
384:
231:
131:
105:
51:
109:
427:
255:
Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done.
305:
267:
rule is wearing thin. And a mild personal attack is not always a hanging offence. Not by any means!
101:
89:
39:
365:
136:
376:
277:
a bad idea to break this particular rule, and a good idea to try your best not to break it.
75:
The rules are a communication device written by you, not a textbook written by someone else
357:
312:! Again, enough said, surely? Knowledge (XXG) is a collaboration, and that works best if
421:
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
17:
116:. But Knowledge (XXG)'s strangest and perhaps most important policy is
259:
There's no wiggle-room at all, and it's like that for a reason.
61:
25:
371:
If it matters to you but you can't get consensus support,
360:. Get consensus, and change it. Maybe not quite so simple.
316:
editors are prepared to make an effort to obey the rules
339:
When you disagree with a rule, there are four options.
257:
225:
Even if not quite so blatant as that, personal attacks
193:
190:
the primary way decisions are made on
Knowledge (XXG)
112:
etc. and lots of other things that might be seen as
331:, and it would be rather pointless having them.
346:If it matters to you that a particular rule is
229:improve a discussion that's aimed at producing
8:
402:User:Andrewa/The senility of Knowledge (XXG)
308:need to be forced to! Because the rules are
304:to obey the rules, and mostly they do. They
48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
397:Knowledge (XXG):Communication not power
412:User:Andrewa/The Knowledge (XXG) Creed
125:We have them because these rules are
7:
249:The rule on no personal attacks is
166:. Those four rules in particular:
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
122:. What! Then why even have them?
407:User:Andrewa/The Prime Directive
65:
29:
375:. Obey the rule anyway for the
318:even if they disagree with them
206:It's almost the same as saying
139:). And these two, supported by
92:to the whole project, any user
135:policy is stranger still (see
1:
414:(read this if nothing else)
444:
108:, documentation on use of
285:This could be restated,
239:of our discussions are.
73:This page in a nutshell:
383:A fifth option is to
195:Enough said, surely!
50:, as it has not been
387:. But please don't.
329:no effect whatsoever
176:No personal attacks.
100:Knowledge (XXG) has
377:good of the project
289:get on with the job
217:No personal attacks
148:No personal attacks
173:Assume good faith.
137:wp:Creed#consensus
265:assume good faith
199:Assume good faith
179:Ignore all rules.
142:Assume good faith
81:
80:
60:
59:
435:
292:(and has been).
281:Ignore all rules
119:Ignore all rules
69:
68:
62:
33:
32:
26:
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
418:
417:
393:
337:
298:
295:
283:
219:
201:
186:
76:
66:
56:
55:
44:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
431:
430:
420:
419:
416:
415:
409:
404:
399:
392:
389:
381:
380:
379:, and move on.
369:
361:
356:), then let's
344:
336:
333:
300:People should
297:
294:
282:
279:
218:
215:
200:
197:
185:
182:
181:
180:
177:
174:
171:
155:right down to
79:
78:
70:
58:
57:
45:
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
429:
426:
425:
423:
413:
410:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
394:
390:
388:
386:
378:
374:
370:
367:
362:
359:
355:
354:
349:
345:
342:
341:
340:
334:
332:
330:
326:
321:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
293:
291:
290:
280:
278:
276:
271:
268:
266:
260:
258:
256:
252:
247:
245:
240:
238:
234:
233:
228:
223:
216:
214:
212:
211:the other guy
210:
204:
198:
196:
194:
191:
188:Consensus is
183:
178:
175:
172:
169:
168:
167:
165:
160:
158:
154:
150:
149:
144:
143:
138:
134:
133:
128:
123:
121:
120:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
97:
95:
91:
87:
74:
71:
64:
63:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
382:
372:
366:reading them
352:
351:
347:
338:
328:
324:
322:
317:
313:
309:
301:
299:
286:
284:
274:
272:
269:
264:
261:
254:
250:
248:
243:
241:
236:
230:
226:
224:
220:
208:
207:
205:
202:
189:
187:
163:
161:
156:
152:
146:
140:
130:
126:
124:
117:
113:
99:
85:
83:
82:
72:
37:
18:User:Andrewa
428:User essays
350:useful (ie
287:let's just
38:This is an
325:especially
246:to edit.
170:Consensus.
106:guidelines
358:change it
306:shouldn't
296:But don't
232:consensus
184:Consensus
164:essential
132:Consensus
110:templates
422:Category
391:See also
323:Perhaps
273:So it's
244:everyone
235:. Which
102:policies
84:In that
335:Instead
251:extreme
209:respect
157:useless
153:perfect
310:useful
275:always
127:useful
90:belong
88:pages
373:tough
353:wrong
227:never
114:rules
40:essay
16:<
385:rant
302:want
145:and
348:not
314:all
237:all
94:may
86:all
424::
320:.
253:.
192:.
159:.
104:,
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.