31:
82:
62:
The onus of proof is surely on those who wish to continue making this an exception to policy and guidelines, rather than on those who wish to follow them
66:
41:
37:
76:
17:
65:
Reader experience is also improved for those wanting NYS, see
25:
67:
Talk:New York/Proposed move#Another reason to think about
56:
83:
New York City and New York State move discussion pages
8:
57:Dealing with the suggested Condorcet paradox
51:These may or may not come up in discussion
40:, where sanity finally prevailed, and
7:
69:for the justification for this claim
24:
29:
44:. Kept for historical reasons.
1:
59:(best expression yet of many)
99:
42:User:Andrewa/NYRM2018
48:
47:
90:
33:
32:
26:
98:
97:
93:
92:
91:
89:
88:
87:
73:
72:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
96:
94:
86:
85:
75:
74:
71:
70:
63:
60:
46:
45:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
95:
84:
81:
80:
78:
68:
64:
61:
58:
55:
54:
53:
52:
43:
39:
36:Obsoleted by
35:
28:
27:
19:
50:
49:
18:User:Andrewa
77:Category
38:NYRM2017
16:<
79::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.