31:
67:
146:" does not help Knowledge (XXG). Instead, it's an "in your face" to experts and academics for whom credentials matter. It hurts Knowledge (XXG) by creating an anti-intellectual atmosphere which discourages their participation and encourages mistrust among academics and the everyday user in general.
81:
It is widely acknowledged that experts, including academics and other professionals, are important. Aside from content, they provide credibility. Their contributions may be non-essential to the project's viability, but the encyclopedia is clearly aided, not hindered, by their participation. Following
149:
In sum, Knowledge (XXG) is already well protected from the undue influence of professionals by established policies. A process of verification will not preempt those policies; in fact, it may strengthen them. That said, verification is not necessary to the project, and this is essay is not intended
117:
To provide a method for the verification of credentials is not to circumvent cornerstone
Knowledge (XXG) policies like ATT and NPOV. The opposite is true. While not everyone is well-equipped to assess the reliability of a source, for example, an expert with years of experience probably is. Verified
150:
to advocate such a process. But an environment receptive to the input of experts may in fact be necessary to
Knowledge (XXG)'s long term success. An environment hostile to their participation is at best unnecessary, and at worst harmful, to the project.
113:
makes it clear that all significant viewpoints must be included, not just the most personally agreeable. These policies already prevent anyone from using
Knowledge (XXG) as a vehicle to express their own opinions, no matter their credentials.
121:
As long as existing policies are enforced and guidelines are followed, there is no room for abuse -- only improvement. Credentials (verified or not) do not give anyone an upper hand. They are harmless.
94:
that the process might ultimately "destroy the concept of anonymity, equality and community that is fundamental to the
Knowledge (XXG) ethos." A policy has been proposed to "
143:
87:
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
47:
159:
174:
169:
109:
makes it clear that content must be attributable to a published source and must not be original thought. Additionally,
164:
51:
189:
39:
83:
75:
An environment hostile to experts is at best unnecessary, and at worst harmful, to the project.
110:
17:
139:
135:
131:
106:
95:
91:
130:
Is it really necessary, then, to go out of our way to attack credentials? Calling them "
183:
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
118:
credentials would allow experts to enforce the policy better, not get around it.
61:
25:
86:, however, a number of essays have been written opposing
126:Specifically anti-credential policy is harmful
8:
48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
98:" instead. This reaction is excessive.
7:
90:of verifying expert's credentials,
160:Knowledge (XXG):Credentials matter
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
175:Knowledge (XXG):Expert retention
170:Knowledge (XXG):Expert rebellion
65:
29:
1:
165:Knowledge (XXG):Credentials
206:
88:Jimbo's proposed process
73:This page in a nutshell:
96:ignore all credentials
102:Existing policy works
50:, as it has not been
138:", something to be "
92:one even suggesting
144:nobody cares about
142:", and something "
84:Essjay controversy
79:
78:
60:
59:
197:
69:
68:
62:
33:
32:
26:
18:User:Bcasterline
205:
204:
200:
199:
198:
196:
195:
194:
180:
179:
156:
128:
104:
66:
56:
55:
44:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
203:
201:
193:
192:
182:
181:
178:
177:
172:
167:
162:
155:
152:
127:
124:
103:
100:
77:
76:
70:
58:
57:
45:
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
202:
191:
188:
187:
185:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
157:
153:
151:
147:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
123:
119:
115:
112:
108:
101:
99:
97:
93:
89:
85:
74:
71:
64:
63:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
148:
129:
120:
116:
105:
80:
72:
37:
190:User essays
38:This is an
136:irrelevant
184:Category
154:See also
140:ignored
132:useless
111:WP:NPOV
107:WP:ATT
40:essay
16:<
134:", "
82:the
186::
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.