239:; I improve articles all the time, as, I assume, do you; that's what it means to be a Wikipedian. If no one else gets around to these points, I will, eventually; I am not fast. This is a sort of question to DreamRimmer, who is standing for Administrator, partly on the strength of that article. It's debatable whether one RFA is more or less important than one article, but there are certainly fewer of them! And Admins definitely have more power over articles than articles have over Administrators.
325:- if you look there, I am defending the image from the candidate's article in question from deletion. Looks like it may have worked, actually, the person who nominated it for deletion seems to be withdrawing their request. Again, the candidate seems like a good guy (gal?), and the article is a good article (lowercase), even if I am interested in their reaction to this somewhat irregular question, and worry about it being a
243:
56:
in her autobiography? Are you sure this isn't a misphrasing, such as a mistranslation from the German of some different meaning of "biological"? I've got to say, a modern mainstream politician lying in order to claim to be a blood relative of a Nazi general seems an unusual claim, it would be easier
247:
Anyway, their reaction to this list of suggestions is, in my humble opinion, a rather important part of what it means to be a
Knowledge Administrator. I imagine you can guess what I would consider a favorable reaction, and an unfavorable reaction. It's not a trick question, it's hopefully a rather
157:
Less flippantly, this needs more details, this is supposed to be a GA, you can't just throw it off like that. Yes, lots of people get married, and even marrying colleagues isn't that rare, in general we have some ideas why people get married, we can let that go. But not everyone gets married to
87:
She served as the chairwoman of the German
Association of Women Lawyers (Deutscher Juristinnenbund ) from 1977 to 1981 and joined the Social Democratic Party (SPD) in 1988. Starting in 1972, she served as a family judge at the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court in Hamburg. In 1984, following some
339:
in the pipeline that I'm working on, and one other person already asked for my help, which I haven't yet given much of, so I hope you'll give a raincheck on that. When those tasks are done, I hope to come find you and make that offer. Thank you for your kind words.
279:
as that the nominee must answer question #19 to your standard or you'll vote to oppose their request. If I'm wrong, there's a true possibility you'll vote to support even if they give a bad answer or no answer at all. Am I right?
109:
This is the article about her, she should be the main actor in most of it. How about "...campaign, she developed a legislative proposal ... ; however ..." (see I'm not against all howevers on principle, just where they
97:
In 1988, as part of Emma magazine's PorNO campaign, a legislative proposal aiming to establish a German law against pornography, developed in collaboration with
Peschel-Gutzeit, was published; however, it did not get
208:", you could have simply deleted that word. That's just one example; everything here is an example of you taking the long road for no reason I can guess. Why not just make these changes?
45:
In her autobiography, she referred to her adoptive father, former Nazi
General Hans Gutzeit, as her biological father. However, he formally adopted her only after she reached adulthood.
179:
Autobiography written with Brüdgam, Nele-Marie (2013). Selbstverständlich gleichberechtigt: eine autobiographische
Zeitgeschichte (in German) (2nd ed.). Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
310:
though I admit the question was all one edit, so it may not have come out clearly. Isn't that the whole point of RFA questions? That the candidate's answer to any of them
37:- ? Hamburg is the impoverished merchant family? How about "Her mother came from the Brüggmann family, merchants from Hamburg, who lost their fortune during WWI" (
332:
I appreciate your coming here. Sometime around now I would ask whether you would like to collaborate on an article, but I'm just a bit overloaded right now, I've got
77:
This is also awkwardly placed, since she had the half-sister since birth, but this is put after her being adopted at adulthood. I'd move it either before or after
74:"was four years older from her mother's first marriage" sounds awkward. How about "a half-sister, four years older, from her mother's first marriage"?
329:(uppercase), respectively. I'm gathering you're here to defend the candidate and/or article - apologies for the misunderstanding if you are not.
322:
296:
224:
154:
marriages to terminally ill colleagues? Desperately needs a pair of commas: "Her first marriage, to a terminally ill colleague, ended..."
41:
that's what you're trying to say - the fact I don't understand whether "impoverished" and "suffered" are related is a problem in itself!)
135:- Weird place to make a paragraph break, right after another "She advocated" sentence. Is there a difference between the two advocacies?
158:
terminally ill colleagues! That's actually kind of rare! Did she know he was terminally ill? How long were they married? Please expand.
35:
Her mother's family also hailed from
Hamburg, the impoverished merchant family Brüggmann, which suffered during World War I.
139:
In 2019, she founded the family and inheritance law firm ... In 2019, she was honored with the Marie
Juchacz Women's Prize
323:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Flickr_-_boellstiftung_-_Lore_Marie_Peschel-Gutzeit_(1).jpg
27:
318:
173:
Also a few details or at least reviews of the book would not go amiss; in fact in a GA I'd think they be required.
333:
181:
Hoffmann and Campe is not part of the title, it's the publishing house; don't translate it as part of the title!
288:
216:
336:
113:
Why does
Voscherau III Senate have a redlink and link but Diepgen III Senate in the very next sentence not?
326:
117:
Peschel-Gutzeit left office and retired from politics. She implemented corresponding legislative proposals
283:
211:
274:
I imagine you can guess what I would consider a favorable reaction, and an unfavorable reaction.
319:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Flickr_-_boellstiftung_-_Lore_Marie_Peschel-Gutzeit_(1).jpg
235:
Because, as the title of this page says, this page is not an attempt to improve that article,
206:
why the
However? I mean, he's not her biological father no matter when he adopted her, right?
49:
why the
However? I mean, he's not her biological father no matter when he adopted her, right?
345:
253:
199:
90:- Why 1977 then 1988 then 1972 then 1984? Why not put these events in chronological order?
88:
internal conflicts, she became the first woman appointed as the chair of a family senate.
341:
249:
192:
67:
She had a half-sister who was four years older from her mother's first marriage.
17:
264:...you could refuse to answer it. This would, in itself, be a valuable answer.
79:
Peschel-Gutzeit's biological father didn't play a significant role in her life
164:
Titled 'Naturally Equal,' Peschel-Gutzeit published her autobiography in 2012
129:
Neue Juristische Wochenschrift. = needs italics, it's the name of a magazine
166:- No, just no. "Peschel-Gutzeit published her autobiography, titled
57:
to believe a modern mainstream politician lying in order to claim
103:
133:
She advocated for joint parental custody and children's rights.
145:
Her first marriage to a terminally ill colleague ended in 1958
93:
Same for the next few bits - 1990, then 1988, then 1991 ?
317:
Another link that may have gotten lost in my post there is
141:
Wasn't the second event before the first? The sources are.
307:
102:
Avoided the verb at the end putting should be, or like
121:
How could she implement anything if she left office?
8:
308:"may well support regardless of your answer"
259:I'm interpreting this part of question 19
61:to be a blood relative of a Nazi general.
272:
269:and this sentence from your reply here
262:
178:
163:
144:
138:
132:
116:
96:
86:
78:
66:
44:
34:
7:
314:affect the vote of whoever reads it?
240:
124:What does "corresponding" mean here?
24:
241:
71:had? Doesn't any more? Clarify
1:
256:) 23:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
367:
348:) 13:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
28:Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit
303:04:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
231:23:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
202:'s request for adminship.
306:I'm pretty sure I wrote
248:straight forward one. --
327:Knowledge:Good article
170:, in 2012." Please.
204:Instead of typing "
321:and the resulting
203:
108:
106:to sound we risk.
358:
299:
294:
291:
286:
246:
245:
244:
227:
222:
219:
214:
200:User:DreamRimmer
198:I found this in
197:
196:
100:
366:
365:
361:
360:
359:
357:
356:
355:
297:
292:
289:
284:
242:
225:
220:
217:
212:
190:
188:
168:Naturally Equal
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
364:
362:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
330:
315:
277:
270:
267:
260:
187:
184:
183:
182:
176:
175:
174:
161:
160:
159:
155:
142:
136:
130:
127:
126:
125:
122:
114:
111:
94:
91:
84:
83:
82:
75:
72:
64:
63:
62:
50:
42:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
363:
347:
343:
338:
335:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
309:
305:
304:
302:
301:
300:
295:
287:
278:
276:
275:
271:
268:
266:
265:
261:
258:
257:
255:
251:
238:
234:
233:
232:
230:
229:
228:
223:
215:
207:
201:
194:
185:
180:
177:
172:
171:
169:
165:
162:
156:
153:
150:Did she have
149:
148:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
123:
120:
119:
118:
115:
112:
107:
105:
99:
95:
92:
89:
85:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
68:
65:
60:
55:
51:
48:
47:
46:
43:
40:
36:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
311:
282:
281:
273:
263:
236:
210:
209:
205:
189:
167:
151:
101:
98:implemented.
58:
53:
38:
18:User:GRuban
52:Also, she
186:Q & A
147:- what?
237:as such
342:GRuban
337:drafts
298:Silver
250:GRuban
226:Silver
193:GRuban
152:other
110:fit!)
16:<
346:talk
285:City
254:talk
213:City
104:Yoda
54:lied
334:two
312:may
59:not
340:--
293:f
221:f
39:if
344:(
290:o
252:(
218:o
195::
191:@
81:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}