31:
163:
You're *supposed* to choose the one at the top of the list as it's been waiting the longest, but you don't have to. Most experienced reviewers will shoot through random categories reviewing the oldest articles, using the backlog notice at the top. No need for you to steal their fun! Instead, look
147:
Cross-comparing against a 'good' article makes it really obvious if there are any problems with the article you are reviewing. This is especially true for omissions; all the stuff that isn't in the article but should be. It is easy to be fooled by concentrating on problems of style and not see that
335:
It's tedious and pointless (in most cases) to check refs inline, just check them all when you've read through the rest of the article. HOWEVER, if you see a potentially contentious statement in the article, ensure it's sourced to something that actually backs it
113:. Chances are you've been here before...otherwise, you're probably better off writing a few articles yourself, just to get the hang of...things. At GAN, read the header...there's some useful information there about what GA is, what takes place on the page, etc.
211:
Click on the link to the template, just below where you got your on hold tag for the article. Copy paste all the code from the template's description page, and insert this at the bottom of your article's talk page. Now, start filling stuff in!
314:
Paragraphs that are highly sourced or wikilinked are often quoting statistics etc., and changes of there being prose issues or other things to pick up on there are less likely than in paragraphs with less links, one ref at the end, and longer
374:
Finish off the review, with all the notes you've made about the article. Preview and save the talk page, then go back to GAN and add the on hold template below the article. On the article's talk page, invite the author to review a GAN!
160:, and try and find a subject area that takes your fancy. Music, history, places, science, whatever floats your boat. Having chosen that topic and clicked its entry on the toc, you'll see a list of nominees in that subject area.
175:
There are plenty of ways to actually set out your review, and it really, truly, does not matter at all which way you do it. Let's assume you're putting the article on hold. On GAN, go towards the top of the page, and find
310:
If you're feeling lazy or are trying to burn a few reviews in a short amount of time (please please please don't do this if you're new to GA), you can often see obvious prose issues at a glance, so skim through.
416:
Causes for this could be a newly released album or movie, a presidential campaign, or a bomb having gone off...basically, stuff that's likely to change in the near future with new information coming to
132:
No, not your real homework - which you should have completed before fooling around on
Knowledge (XXG) - but the necessary bit of homework needed to efficiently and quickly review an article. Check the
164:
through the list and find the article that sounds the most interesting to you. If you see something that you know a bit about, that'll also make your reviewing experience that little bit easier.
140:
lists and try to find a similar article to your review article. Keep the article open in a separate tab or window so that you can cross-compare. For some types of articles, don't forget to check
62:
This isn't supposed to be a definitive guide on how to review GANs, and if you treat it as such I'll be forced to change it to something totally unworkable. So don't. It's advice; that's all.
249:
Not having images isn't going to stop the article meeting GA status. If there are images, are they fair use, and do they have proper rationales? Do the images have appropriate captions?
519:
378:
Now sit back and enjoy getting your GANs reviewed faster, thanks to the work you've done in shortening the backlog. Don't sit back for too long though...review another one!
407:
I find myself starting my GA review by adding the on hold templates, and only changing these to passes/fails in very extreme circumstances. So it's a good place to start.
300:
Keep an eye out on external links; in most cases, there is an abundance of links that could be used as inline references, and that shouldn't be in the EL section anyway
172:
Open the article's talk page in edit mode, and the article itself. Leave the GAN page open in another tab, just for reference and for some template stuff later on.
294:
271:
If the article is (semi-)protected, this could be due to an edit war. If so, it automatically fails that critierion, and thus fails its GA nom.
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
47:
365:
and check disambiguation links. Fix them if you can, but if there are lots or if you aren't sure, make a note of them in your review.
262:) as you see them, and then the nominator can indent their responses, or whatever. Quick and easy...and a bit too simple for some!
297:
and see if the article meets the stuff listed there. Point editors towards it - even experienced editors will find it useful.
137:
91:
70:
480:
parser...which takes a long time anyway, but you can let it run while reviewing. Not sure if it's worth it...up to you.
287:
tags at the start of the review is OK, but be sure to point them out; you shouldn't pass the GA until they are sorted.
231:
Does it cover all aspects of the topic? Is it missing anything you'd expect to want to know when reading the article?
133:
85:
64:
307:
is often drilled in GA reviews - make sure you do too! Check length, clarity, broadness of coverage, etc.
51:
443:
458:
Don't bother reading quotes in such cases as the prose issues there need to be replicated in the quote.
329:
290:
References need to go after some form of punctuation (,."-), not before it, and with no spaces between.
514:
194:
184:
39:
427:
119:
426:
I suppose if you're starting it's probably better to use a template which reminds you of the
304:
353:
345:
362:
177:
157:
110:
237:
Does the article call Johnny a legend and Jimmy a wanker with no sources or justification?
332:
and ask the people there for opinions on your review, or on the article, or on anything.
508:
281:
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
489:
Or follow the pass/fail instructions if that's what you've done to the article.
17:
477:
476:
Another way to check if you're lazy or the article is long is to use the
274:
Cleanup templates result in a quick fail, unless they shouldn't be there.
190:. Add this to the top of the article's talk page, replacing the current
141:
219:
This is where you add commentary relating to prose, etc. Criterion 1.
498:
This may be more appropriate when you pass the article, but whatever.
395:
180:. Read the instructions there, and copypaste the on hold variant of
350:
should be used, and if the references are generally quite short,
258:
This is how I do things. Basically, you just list things (using
25:
339:
Insist on reliable sources, or the FAC regulars will eat us.
225:
Are the references reliable? Are they formatted properly?
122:
if you haven't done so already. In fact, read it anyway!
467:
This sorts them into columns....but rarely works in IE
144:
or another on-line reference source to cross-compare.
295:Knowledge (XXG):Guide for nominating good articles
83:The "noob" in the page title is me, not you.
8:
520:User essays on editing and building content
48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
398:article if you slept through chemistry.
387:
266:Reviewing tips, and things to look for
7:
358:can be used if you have 15 or more.
293:If you haven't already, check out
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
394:In other words, don't review the
342:If there are more than 10 refs,
29:
243:Edit wars, or regular changes.
1:
449:in the 20-refs notes section
148:whole sections are missing.
109:Well, to get started, go to
536:
207:Using the on hold template
79:06:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
100:02:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
203:Now for the fun part...
370:When the review is done
50:, as it has not been
356:|3}}
348:|2}}
178:the on hold section
152:Choosing an article
86:dihydrogen monoxide
65:dihydrogen monoxide
320:If you need help,
138:Featured articles
99:
78:
60:
59:
527:
499:
496:
490:
487:
481:
474:
468:
465:
459:
456:
450:
448:
442:
437:
431:
424:
418:
414:
408:
405:
399:
392:
357:
349:
286:
280:
222:Factual accuracy
199:
193:
189:
183:
128:Do your homework
89:
68:
33:
32:
26:
535:
534:
530:
529:
528:
526:
525:
524:
505:
504:
503:
502:
497:
493:
488:
484:
475:
471:
466:
462:
457:
453:
446:
440:
438:
434:
425:
421:
415:
411:
406:
402:
393:
389:
384:
372:
351:
343:
327:
326:
325:
284:
278:
268:
256:
209:
197:
191:
187:
181:
170:
154:
130:
124:
123:
107:
105:Getting started
95:
74:
56:
55:
44:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
533:
531:
523:
522:
517:
507:
506:
501:
500:
491:
482:
469:
460:
451:
432:
419:
409:
400:
386:
385:
383:
380:
371:
368:
367:
366:
359:
340:
337:
333:
323:
322:
321:
318:
317:
316:
308:
301:
298:
291:
288:
275:
272:
267:
264:
261:
255:
252:
251:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
208:
205:
169:
166:
153:
150:
129:
126:
117:
116:
106:
103:
102:
101:
93:
72:
58:
57:
45:
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
532:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:
510:
495:
492:
486:
483:
479:
473:
470:
464:
461:
455:
452:
445:
436:
433:
429:
423:
420:
413:
410:
404:
401:
397:
391:
388:
381:
379:
376:
369:
364:
360:
355:
347:
341:
338:
334:
331:
319:
313:
312:
309:
306:
302:
299:
296:
292:
289:
283:
277:Having a few
276:
273:
270:
269:
265:
263:
259:
254:Template-free
253:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
214:
213:
206:
204:
201:
196:
186:
179:
173:
167:
165:
161:
159:
151:
149:
145:
143:
139:
135:
134:Good articles
127:
125:
121:
114:
112:
104:
97:
88:
87:
82:
81:
80:
76:
67:
66:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
494:
485:
472:
463:
454:
447:}}
444:unreferenced
441:{{
435:
422:
412:
403:
390:
377:
373:
352:{{
344:{{
285:}}
279:{{
257:
216:Well written
210:
202:
198:}}
192:{{
188:}}
182:{{
174:
171:
162:
155:
146:
131:
115:
108:
84:
63:
61:
37:
515:User essays
38:This is an
509:Categories
315:sentences.
195:GA nominee
185:GA nominee
156:Go to the
18:User:Giggy
478:Veropedia
328:. Go to
240:Stability
228:Broadness
168:Reviewing
118:Read the
428:criteria
361:Install
136:and the
120:criteria
439:eg. an
354:reflist
346:reflist
142:Encarta
417:light.
396:Alkane
363:popups
330:WT:GAN
246:Images
111:WP:GAN
382:Notes
40:essay
16:<
305:lead
303:The
282:fact
234:NPOV
430:...
336:up.
324:ASK
158:toc
511::
200:.
260:*
98:)
96:O
94:2
92:H
90:(
77:)
75:0
73:2
71:H
69:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.