176:
stand or fall on their own; though their respective values will be interpreted differently depending on the reader's POV. We can not allow ourselves to present facts in such a way that leads a reader to "our" conclusion. That will only make the intelligent and conscious reader discount the total wikipedia process as biased. They want us to provide them with all sides the best we can so they can decide from there. It has nothing to do with the volume of material. Most times, one sentence is all that it takes to make a good antagonistic POV statement. If we do our job, we just cover all the POV's as thoroughly and succinctly as possible.--
64:
129:
The
Commissioners concluded that Mesmer's universal fluid without imagination was nothing, and imagination without the fluid created the observed effect. They tested Mesmers animal magnetism theory and falsified it. (Antoinette, King Louis, and Lavoisier were all later decapitated by Guillotin's invention. Run Ben, Run!)
197:. Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized religion but still feels as if there is something greater than ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious. Life has a meaning outside of the rational.
128:
This is
Mesmerism. Benjamin Franklin, Guillotin and Lavoisier were commissioned by King Louis XVI to check out his wife, Marie Antoinette's doctor, Franz Mesmer. The patient went into convulsions at the foot of the wrong tree and another patient did not convulse after drinking the mesmerized fluid.
175:
As editors of an encyclopedia, it is not ours to determine the validity of any claim, or for that matter, any science. We should not be concerned whether the results of our conscientious good editing sounds any more or less POV either way. Research speaks for itself, and abstract theories either
67:
a great source for WP. The credentials of the authors are apparent and reputable and it is published in a journal for which its subject is studied by the intended audience. I don't know how to determine the impact of the journal or how to find out if the journal is peer reviewed. I need to find
26:
I am an american chiropractor by trade, father of four, and husband to one. I am very active in my community; past president of the business association, ball coach, community festival director, blah, blah, blah, and have recently retired from my
Scoutmaster position where I learned more about
118:
I'm going with fact. If it is simple enough to be consistent, it may not consider alternatives and therefore be incomplete, but if it is complete enough to consider alternatives, it would lose consistency in being correct each time. Wow, these are
27:
myself than I dare say. Nothing prepares you better for the world than trying to train 20 boys to "play" well together in the woods=). But, no doubt, being a Dad is my favorite job. I thank my wife every day for giving me somebody to play with.
17:
30:
I, too, consider myself a skeptic, but not in the usual sense of the word. I question everything. The boys taught me that... If you don't have the answer to the "why" question, you better not say it.
106:
KV probably knows.), Nature (half of cell - 20? Vitalism page), The
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics .75 (VS page), The Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine .65 (VS page)
115:
It could be
Newtons law of universal gravitiation being overthrown in 1915 by Einsteins Theory of Relativity because it did not explain the curves associated with orbiting planets and satellites?
413:
article is greatly improved, thanks to your diligent and faithful efforts in seeking to create the BIG picture (by not settling for just one picture). You can be proud of work well done! --
122:
John Stuart Mill, emergentism. Other; it depends on your definition of vitalism and if you consider KV part of scientific orthodoxy. I still don't know if it's controversial or not:)
401:
163:
387:
34:
I realized young that I feel most alive when I am learning something new. So show me something I don't know and I'll remember you forever!
424:
150:
Hint, only one of these is famous for a strictly molecular biological, reductionist explanation for complex phenomena.
103:
109:
Sir Isaac Newton was called that by John
Maynard Keynes (this should be in the vitalism page!) silly cult member:)
90:
I mean RAND (Shelkell:), but I'll have to check.(can't prove it, may not even be SM! - skip this one for now:)
78:
Alpert JS. The relativity of alternative medicine. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2385. It ended up in the
146:
Alcmaeon of Croton, Aristotle, Berzelius, Driesch, Empodecles, David Icke, Lamarck, Pasteur, Reichenbach
125:
Because he invoke the "vitalism!" If KV would just quit reverting this, I would have had it last night!
400:
75:
Professor Tom Meade said that. He was obviously a sharp dude;) That was definitely a harder one!
57:
390:
For your extraordinary patience, tolerance, and incessant good nature on the
Chiropractic page
209:
372:
349:
329:
309:
289:
269:
249:
229:
79:
441:
410:
386:
440:
for outstanding editing and consolidation of the old lead and introduction of the
445:
414:
423:
391:
102:
Contemporary
Sexuality (this can't even be rated is it? Nothing on PS page?
39:
16:
95:
Okay. I have to go with acupuncture by the
British Medical Journal (BMJ)
200:
187:
99:
162:
Do you mean other than the fact that they were all vitalists on the
154:
OK. Too easy, all are known as vitalists except for Icke. But what
422:
399:
385:
15:
164:
Top 1000 Scientists: From the
Beginning of Time to 2000 AD
86:
The X is definitley spinal manipulation. The X might be
80:
AMA Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-97)
68:
this out! Myonly concern is that I agree with it:)--
112:OMG, it's Newton again. He was a vitalist nut!
8:
7:
405:This barnstar is hereby awarded to
14:
38:Answers to Dr. Leng's final exam
82:concerning alternative medicine.
448:19:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
158:do the others have in common?
144:P.S. Which is the odd one out?
72:19:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
409:for outstanding editing. The
23:Welcome to Dematt's page.
37:
467:
421:
398:
384:
93:Going to work on this one.
444:article. Congratulations!
180:19:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
104:nothing found on ISI site
60:! That was an easy one:)
58:Ernst Mayr about Vitalism
417:18:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
394:22:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
449:
418:
395:
373:What's you World View?
20:
426:
403:
389:
19:
434:is hereby awarded to
450:
419:
396:
195:Cultural Creative.
166:? (except Icke:)!
21:
454:
453:
431:Editor's Barnstar
367:
366:
363:
362:
356:
355:
336:
335:
316:
315:
296:
295:
276:
275:
256:
255:
236:
235:
216:
215:
205:Cultural Creative
458:
382:
381:
350:
330:
310:
290:
270:
250:
230:
210:
201:
188:
52:
51:
47:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
439:
435:
433:
429:
427:
404:
380:
369:
199:
198:
186:
173:
138:Galileo Galilei
53:
49:
45:
43:
42:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
452:
451:
420:
397:
379:
376:
365:
364:
361:
360:
357:
354:
353:
347:
345:Fundamentalist
341:
340:
337:
334:
333:
327:
321:
320:
317:
314:
313:
307:
301:
300:
297:
294:
293:
287:
285:Existentialist
281:
280:
277:
274:
273:
267:
261:
260:
257:
254:
253:
247:
241:
240:
237:
234:
233:
227:
221:
220:
217:
214:
213:
207:
193:You scored as
191:
185:
182:
172:
171:My take On POV
169:
168:
167:
142:Extra Credit:
140:
139:
133:
130:
126:
123:
120:
116:
113:
110:
107:
96:
83:
76:
73:
61:
56:That would be
41:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
447:
443:
438:
432:
425:
416:
412:
408:
402:
393:
388:
383:
377:
375:
374:
370:
358:
352:
351:
348:
346:
343:
342:
338:
332:
331:
328:
326:
323:
322:
318:
312:
311:
308:
306:
303:
302:
298:
292:
291:
288:
286:
283:
282:
278:
272:
271:
268:
266:
265:Postmodernist
263:
262:
258:
252:
251:
248:
246:
243:
242:
238:
232:
231:
228:
226:
223:
222:
218:
212:
211:
208:
206:
203:
202:
196:
192:
190:
189:
183:
181:
179:
170:
165:
161:
160:
159:
157:
152:
151:
147:
145:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
121:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
101:
97:
94:
91:
87:
84:
81:
77:
74:
71:
66:
62:
59:
55:
54:
48:
40:
35:
32:
28:
24:
18:
442:Chiropractic
436:
430:
411:Chiropractic
406:
371:
368:
344:
324:
304:
284:
264:
244:
224:
204:
194:
177:
174:
155:
153:
149:
148:
143:
141:
135:
92:
89:
85:
69:
33:
29:
25:
22:
305:Romanticist
225:Materialist
136:Gareth Leng
132:Karl Popper
63:I consider
184:World View
100:28.38 2004
378:Barnstars
245:Modernist
325:Idealist
446:Fyslee
437:Dematt
415:Fyslee
407:Dematt
178:Dematt
119:tough!
70:Dematt
44:": -->
392:Gleng
98:Cell
88:Manga
219:100%
156:else
65:this
46:edit
428:The
339:13%
319:25%
299:44%
279:50%
259:56%
239:69%
359:6%
50:]
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
