User talk:Homy - Knowledge

341:'Another' excuse, I meant: "Using the term 'quantum level' is just another way for us limited humans to express reality then the term 'relativity' does." Which "MD", "master", "doctor", or "professor" in which field would convince everyone homeopathy is true science? Those titles are not relevant, the quality of healing abilties of the physician are. There rarely exist a master degree for homeopathy. Why ? Because governments tend to trust and are oriented at traditional dominating science over pioneering science, financial and judicial support is used for traditional medicine and academics.-- 448:

diluting substance name m1 and the medium m2 et cetera and divide the mass equally, according to the fist law of thermodynamics we get: E1 = E2. This is applicable when you should potentiate with steps of 1/2. You can figure it out from here, when you might calculate the speed (v) of a particle against the average speed of particles of the mass in rest when you use the Enskog equation. Don't forget factors like friction or so. Good luck. The outcome of those numbers don't prove much, only my point:

64:

homeopathy. The subject(s) added speak for itself, they are however a problem for the 'homeopathy is quack' group. Some people are not able to express themselves with arguments but only with fanatic behavior. The fact that subjects as 'clinical homeopathy' and 'complex homeopathy' or relativity and homeopathy don't exist proves my point. Which argument or subject needs defending you think ? Additions I made and were deleted see below. For more information about my vision, see my

141:

easy way to avoid this unneccesary friction is to discuss things on the talk page before making controversial edits. Keep your cool and you may well find that compromises are easier to establish than you might expect. Trench wars usually end up being very frustrating. I'm sure Peter can give you more advice in this area too. He will probably be a valuable collaborator for you too. For starters see some of the links in the welcome message below.

489:

system to be true in an empirical or physical sense. This leads to confusion on the part of those who assume that where mathematical concepts are named after or ostensibly correspond with aspects of reality (physics, economics, etc), they have a rigorous relationship with it. Such is simply not the case, and empirical testing of mathematical predictions is not a mathematical undertaking (see Mathematics as science above).

382:

esteem to think that only the known scientists know what everything is about, they are just specialists on their micro area or have a wide view of macro, but limits they have. The question is: Do you have the determination to make your point. The theory suggested could be true. There are experiments with dilution and water crystals. With some extra research this comment might deserve a place in Wiki.

1175: 459:. Introverted sensing is just as great. Each patient one gives a homeopathic remedy for example could experience sensations and symptoms which 'proves' the remedy does what is meant to. Asking for certain evidences proofs an orientation on classic science. Everyone is invited to participate in my homeopathic provings for empirically testings. Report to me and I am able to expand the 1136: 81:

Diluting a homeopathic remedy is not a random act, but creating a relativistic frame where the ratio between the medium, the tool which is used and the target dilution becomes infinitely great. This could be called quantum potentation or relativistic potentation. Then the numbers mentioned above are even peanuts. See also Classical homeopathy

322:.<<<< Some people need a page of equatations? 'Distance' IS rewritten the moment someone makes a homeopathic remedy based on quantum or relativistic potentation. Even molecules redifine their distance every second due to relativistic effects. People who think the other doesn't understand a subject could be 'subjective' to 1194: 246:

defend you. Getting into arguments is just NOT productive. You will be surprised to find (I hope) that even people with whom you disagree will come to your defense, if you stay calm. It will also garner you much respect and open up avenues of discussion that will allow you to make your mark on articles.

1072:

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Knowledge under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If

469:

Well, namedropping high school concepts like "Galilean transformation" (because adding vectors is SO complex) and saying "Good luck doing it yourself, don't forget to account for friction," isn't actually a mathematical proof (nor did your statements resemble anything coherent anyway), and you didn't

245:

It will always be harder for you to edit here since you are editing from the perspective of the minority view point. This is something that you should realise sooner not later. To be honest, given the nature of your edits to date, you are going to have people shout at you. My advice is to let others

231:

I really doubt that would occur, at least i have not seen that happen, even when people strongly disagree. Typically that sort of behaviour would get people blocked. As i said as long as you enter discussions being able to justify your changes and remain polite you will always have the backing of the

100:

Hi again, yes I agree with all the changes you made BUT as you said the science freaks detest homeopathy and those people who have interfered already are all in that category and one has only made contributions to the homeopathy in his whole year on wiki !! anyway, see how it develops and watch the

692:

IMO this is all rather silly. What is the point of copying the whole article here? why not proceed in the usual manner and insert additions piece by piece which people can then respond to positively or negatively and then thrash it out via discussion. Why does the whole article need overhaul? how is

488:

Mathematical concepts and theorems need not correspond to anything in the physical world. Insofar as a correspondence does exist, while mathematicians and physicists may select axioms and postulates that seem reasonable and intuitive, it is not necessary for the basic assumptions within an axiomatic

385:

The issue here is not: What is relativity ? OR what is quantum physics. OR How can I prove these subjects? It is a mere application. As half of the invented technical objects have integrated quantum physics you can not expect every inventor to reinvent quantum physics. They just apply the basics and

381:

I higly regard the comments above as intelligent remarks, it should have a reason that these are placed here, a critical view on any subject is welcome. I think there is a scientist in everybody. It is a matter of focus whether someone decides to use those qualities, it might be a matter of low self

284:

Thanks again David. I'm not so talk'ative I rather write. I appreciate the positive response. I think however that the subject 'homeopathy' needs fine responds mere on the base of argument. When people like to express their emotions badly I think you are completely right. I'm a very peaceful person,

110:

Thanks for your encouragement. I only don't think those people are 'science freaks', real science is multicomponent. It doesn't exist only of measuring existing technical human components, but also developing holding theories of what does exist in human body and psyche, like homeopathy is a personal

564:

Well for example you CLAIM that the article is incomplete' how? so instead of droning on endlessly about Einstein, who is marginal at best for most homeopaths, why not compose some specific paragraphs that might improve the article? your previous stuff about clinical and complex homeopathy is good

377:

I would like to react on subjects. The word subject relates to subjective. Every science does have subjective and objective information, both could be right, both could be wrong. An object for example is a car, a computer. Subjects for example are psychology, homeopathy, physics. Subjects therefore

351:

So you have no formal training in chemistry or physics at all. That's unsurprising. I can make up crazy science too - did you know that homeopathic remedies are actually inverted populations of water molecules? Potentization of the remedy results in the outer shell electrons of the water's hydrogen

140:

I already did the redirect from your user page to your talk page. You may also want to read up on formatting pages as well as consensus building. You will find that many editors object to your changes. (i too may disagree with your edits and revert you until they have been discussed). However, an

88:

is a natural result of classical homeopathy. It is called clinical because it is very much directed to organs and pathological tissue while classical is more focused on the whole person. It is mostly used by physicians who have a clinic orientation or experience. The experienced classical homeopath

619:

I'm not sure why you write this, it seems pretty obvious to me. Which bits do you think are ambiguous? It is very unusual to tag whether a particular sentence is neutral for or agaisnt a topic (i have never seen this done before), therefore i would suggest that those sentences which are ambiguous

373:

As said on top of this page, I do not comment on personal information. Conclusions about my person are therefore based on suggestion. Knowledge is about contents. If I like I could publish information about myself, however I decide not to do this. The world is mostly centered around looks. As said

299:

Generaly the use of the word quantum without at least say a page of equations to back it up suggests you lack a complete understanding of the subject.Using the words relativistic and quantum interchangeably isn't posible without some fairly fundimental rewriting of the systems probably starting by

114:

OK I sent you an email thru ur website so please check that...please find ways to put back what has been removed...you would be well advised to insert citations for any 'claims' you make as this will help others to follow the validity of your reasoning. It is basically a good article and the above

95:

is a natural result of clinical homeopathy. Because there were many remedies to choose from to treat certain organs or pathological tissue, is was easier to put some or many remedies together in the hope the right remedy fits. Generally homeopathic and herbal remedies and all kind of potencies are

447:

You might use Euclidean mathemathics, use the Galilean transformation or Lorenz calculations, they all point to the same point, but it is just a logic conclusion. As you might probably know, the RELATIVISTIC formula E = m rel c²√(1-v²/c²) is applicable to each QUANTUM particle. If you call the to

268:

You can also customise your signature to direct users straight to your talk page using the following wiki-markup ] as a signature. You can do this by using the preferences option at the top of each wikipedia page. Here you can customise your signature to anything you like. Currently have the

63:

Thanks for your message. From your message I don't understand completely whether you agree with some changes I made. I don't know whether it makes a different if I defend myself in this regard, there is always a difference of opinions. I think those opponents might be opposing the whole sector

80:

There is one principle which should be mentioned here, namely the consequences of special relativity. The combination of homeopathy and relativity seems counter-intuitive but as the earth is traveling through Space-time, mass itself contains dilutions or dilations of time, space and momentum.

989:

In theory a link could be made from a small box on the right to the bottom of the page using an anchor (although it is unusual in Knowledge), but each page would probably have to be designed individually. I don't think the reverse would work - a link from the bottom of the page to the top.

470:

actually provide any observable evidence for your theory, and you certainly didn't indicate how your theory could be disproven, I guess I'll just say I wish you luck getting that obviously rigorous treatment published in a peer-reviewed physics journal at some point in the near future.

89:

will use 'clinical' in the case of severe pathology or disease. The main clinical homeopath is Dr. Douglas Borland, though he writes also about treating the constitution too. Therefore there is no clear separation between clinical and classical homeopathy, it is a matter of focus.

512:

Chris Hunter and I, have been investigating more complicated topologies, in which there are other possible singularities in the foliation of spacetime.....However, one can extend this classification scheme, to Euclidean metrics of any dimension. Stephen Hawking

508:

I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, that is on continues structures...Then nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also of the rest of modern physics" Albert Einstein

1054:

Glad to see you have taken this approach. It will be much more effective and you will see results. Inevitably you will have to compromise here and there but it will be constructive. As Tim mentioned it has to be collaborative otherwise it will not work.

778:

I've changed the name of the homoeopathy template to {{Homoeopathy}} - it still seems to work on the articles, but the name should really be altered on each of the pages it is on (I also moved the wikiquote template on homoeopathy to the top of the

96:

mixed together. When herbal remedies are mixed, I don't want to give an opinion about that, but mixing homeopathic potencies is counter effective; each remedy has its own direction of energy and by repeating the remedy this will bring misbalance.

53:

Hi, maybe you can justify and defend some of your recent changes to the homeopathy article, many of which have been good additions? they will continue to get deleted by those opposed to such edits unless you defend them on the talk page. thanks

330:

intersting set of words but very few of them make sense. For example "The quantum level is just anther way for us limited humans to express reality then relativity does" shows a complete failer to understand either subject. What is your degree

633:

I agree with David that you must be specific about what deficiencies there are in the article in your view and not just speak in vague general terms...what is missing and lets have a list and start working through it.

317:

in the end with E=mc2 The quantum level is just anther way for us limited humans to express reality then relativity does. By the way, distance is relative as the universe is subject to cosmological shift a form of

1256:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 415:

Can you derive this 'ratio' mathematically? I mean, you say it goes to infinity, right? That indicates the use of a formal proof. So demonstrate it using the formal mathematics of quantum physics and relativity.

378:

can not be seen, nor is evidence clear for everybody. Most objects can be seen, but still information about these enter the level of subjectivity. However the right information will prove itself in practice.

810: 129:

I have asked another user to contact you so you can appear blue instead of red...this will help you appear less of a newbie and more of an "old pro" as it were! he will contact you soon I guess. cheers

1030:

to Knowledge articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior.

648:

Homeopathy is one type of alternative medicine, being particularly popular in Europe and India. In the USA, homeopathy is subject to regulation. In Europe regulations are tightened as well as a new

450:

Diluting a homeopathic remedy is not a random act, but creating a relativistic frame where the ratio between the medium, the tool which is used and the target dilution becomes infinitely great.

406:

Diluting a homeopathic remedy is not a random act, but creating a relativistic frame where the ratio between the medium, the tool which is used and the target dilution becomes infinitely great.

269:

default signature. If you tick the 'raw signature' box and paste in the ] code into the signature box you will get a signature with a hyper link to your talk page. i hope this gets you going.

444:: "we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view" or copyrights. I seemed to have missed something as I have the supposal that Wiki is all about self-published material. 708:

Please highlight any changes to the below article in a new colour or italics, to identify somehow the changes as who is going to read through the whole thing? its crazy. thanks

115:

material you added was a useful addition...pity that vandals and petty folks keep wrecking it...one has to simply find ways to compromise or to add back the good stuff. best

953:(Oke, it is a good idea (categorie, medicines). Is it also possible to make a short link on the top right to the Topics in Homoeopathy. --Homy 11:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)) 1218: 111:

experience with millions of people. They like to talk about denial of reality, this behavior is what they mean with it. In psychology it is called 'projection'. Homy.

493:

Good luck means you need to be a computer programmer to apply those formulas in a mathematical program. Good luck, means that for each dilution you may use different

352:

orbitals moving to a metastable higher energy level, which allows the water to form a substructure. Hey! That was fun! Who needs evidence when you've got lingo?

1299: 255:

Personally I think the signature is very important since it will facilitate your interactions with other users in wikipedia. i think you will find that if you

540:

I have to say I find this 'discussion' largely irrelevant to homeopathy and very mysterious. Why not try to improve the actual article? what say you? thanks

519:

Thus, the task is, not so much to see what no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees. Erwin Schrödinger

1304: 398:. The remedies which are a result prove itself in practice. This is my opinion and I hope you respect me for it. I realize this evokes further comments. 848:

Good point about the US/World view - I've been floundering around a bit with that westernised viewpoint. Your comment led me to look at the WHO website

754:

and feel free to alter it to suit. It can be put in a template and then added to the bottom of all related articles. If you need a hand just shout. --

204: 363:

You are making some claims based on some very complex area of physics. It does not seem unreasonable to ask what your training in these areas is.

613:"The neutral reader can not see which argument is neutral, which reflecting homeopathic opinion and which argument oppose homeopathic opinions" 164:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

390:" AND "relativistic potentation" and developed it further, I did not change the relativity theory or quantum physcics, I just applied exsting 822: 1281: 1191:, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Don't delay---the first 25 members will receive this beautfiul toaster 228:

Thanks David. I have however doubts about signing my name. Doesn't this give a track so others can delete everything you wrote ? Homy

1147:. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. 421:

What predictions do your model of homeopathy make that can be tested empirically? i.e. how could we disprove it, if it were false?

1188: 1183: 821:. Please respect this or suggest an alternative way of classifying the template. I am in the process of designing a template for 1277: 1221:. In the eventuality of their deletion and you want to see them again leaver a message on my talk and I can recreate them. -- 874: 207:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

740:

I'm going to do an infobox for homoeopathy to go at the bottom of the page, please leave the alt. med. template, thanks. --

896: 188: 829:, and eventually to link all CAM therapies. You could add herbalism to the homoeopathy template if it is appropriate. -- 173: 161: 1268:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

913:

Remedies could be included by adding a short section e.g. == Homoeopathic use of sulfur == on the existing page (e.g.

1273: 1144: 456: 441: 319: 826: 408:

Science is more than just providing a hypothetical statement and waiting for the Nobel Prize to roll in. For example:

236:). Too many reversion on one article can get you blocked very quickly, as well as turning other editors against you. 33: 460: 1015: 1008: 1157: 193: 871: 730: 323: 232:

community. You should try and use the talk pages as much as possible rather than entering into edit wars (See

391: 709: 694: 635: 566: 541: 131: 116: 102: 55: 497:

calculations, which still prove nothing. Homeopathic dilutions are reality whether people like it or not.--

1032: 168: 29: 404:

Well, it's almost a moot point, because Knowledge doesn't allow self-published material, but... You say:

200: 1084: 520: 387: 1226: 965: 891:

After looking at your addition to the Homoeopathy template I was thinking of making a subcategory of

1269: 1027: 937: 933: 918: 892: 208: 565:

but it needs citations and examples...do you follow? so let's do it! instead of just rambling...

428:

If you can't reasonably answer the above questions, your hypothesis has little scientific merit.

1059: 1041: 868: 849: 751: 670: 624: 395: 273: 219: 183: 145: 215:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

1245: 1236: 285:

only people sometimes feel attacted when I address a subject with a sharp view. Like this, --

1265: 1249: 1264:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1187:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of Homeopathy. Please visit the 1222: 679:

That's what I mean. The original is outdated. It is about nuance. Compare the original.--

374:

Knowledge is not about this, it is about what is behind the 'looks', real information.

1261: 1253: 1293: 1257: 1204: 1087: 1074: 1056: 667: 649: 621: 604:

A step in the right direction would be for you to outline what you think is missing.

310: 309:"Relivity" can hardly be a subject at all. A whole page of equations don't prove the 270: 256: 233: 216: 178: 142: 1073:

the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

1107: 991: 969: 941: 922: 904: 878: 853: 830: 797: 780: 765: 755: 741: 516:

I learned to distrust all physical concepts as the basis for a theory. Paul Dirac

554:. I can't do it alone as I handle my subjects better than my network abilities.-- 1174: 483: 471: 429: 353: 1135: 1114: 666:

So what are your suggested changes, if any? Whats wrong with these sentences?

595: 455:"Observable evidence" is not just that what you can see. This belongs just to 418:

Alternatively, what observable evidence do you have to support this assertion?

314: 259:

using four tidles (~~~~) it makes it much easier to keep track of discussions.

900: 839: 769: 721: 680: 657: 575: 555: 524: 498: 364: 342: 332: 301: 286: 1083:

Since you have made no moves to recify the mistake, you have been reported

814: 17: 42: 598:

is incomplete, not reflecting all versions or opinions of homeopathy."

914: 1193: 852:- it may be better to rethink the whole process from scratch... -- 65: 1252:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

484:

Mathematics#Relationship between mathematics and physical reality

1285: 1230: 1207: 1160: 1110: 1090: 1077: 1062: 1044: 994: 972: 944: 925: 907: 881: 856: 842: 833: 800: 783: 772: 758: 744: 724: 712: 697: 683: 673: 660: 638: 627: 578: 569: 558: 544: 527: 501: 474: 432: 367: 356: 345: 335: 304: 289: 276: 222: 148: 134: 119: 105: 58: 386:

concentrate on the theory they need. As I (personal !) named "

867:

The pictures are also on the commons, and can be used on en:

1134: 551: 620:

are rewritten. Do you have any you wish to start with?

1153: 1143:

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the

1104: 1019: 818: 653: 693:

it outdated? please let's be serious. and specific.

917:) to describe the remedy, with a reference to the 1244:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1219:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Homy Homeopathy 825:, of which herbal medicine is one, to add to the 796:template name on all pages to {{Homoeopathy}}. -- 729:Discussion about homeopathy can be continued at 652:(Pharmeuropa) is implemented and watched by the 101:"no more than 3 reverts rule" I wish you well. 813:classifications, as linked to in the template 1120:made on September 20 2006 to Homeopathy": --> 8: 1169: 1130: 199:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 964:Do you mean a link on the top right of 932:Also there is already a subcategory of 899:, what do you think? And which type of 817:, and as mentioned in the edit history 1026:that attempts to recognize and repair 838:Thanks for the clarification. -- 1217:Various subpages of yours are on MfD 968:? and if so, a link to which page? -- 823:Category:Biologically based therapies 440:Thanks for this critical remark. See 7: 1300:Wikipedians interested in psychology 921:, and add them to the category. ] -- 1040:about the bot and this warning. // 550:Thanks Peter. You are welcome. See 211:, ask me on my talk page, or place 1305:Wikipedians interested in medicine 1213:Your subpages on homeopathy on MfD 903:is Chamomilla remedy made from? -- 25: 1270:review the candidates' statements 1192: 1173: 1097:User notice: temporary 3RR block 442:Knowledge:Five pillars Knowledge 875:Image:Samuel_Hahnemann_1841.jpg 827:Category:CAM_navigational_boxes 452:This logic can not be denied ! 1276:. For the Election committee, 1246:Arbitration Committee election 1237:ArbCom elections are now open! 1161:20:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1091:12:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1078:12:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 1286:16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 897:Category:Homeopathic remedies 169:The five pillars of Knowledge 1231:21:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 1181:You are invited to join the 1016:Fermi point (disambiguation) 1009:Fermi point (disambiguation) 764:I gave a reaction on your -- 313:either. Einstein simplified 189:How to write a great article 1272:and submit your choices on 1063:15:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 1045:13:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 995:14:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 973:11:24, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 945:08:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 926:08:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 908:08:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 320:Relativistic Doppler effect 1321: 1278:MediaWiki message delivery 1038:frequently asked questions 882:10:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 872:Image:Samuel_Hahnemann.png 857:00:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 843:10:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 834:09:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 809:This template is based on 801:09:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 784:17:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 773:19:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 759:17:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 745:17:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 736:Alt. Med. Systems Template 725:10:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 713:10:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 698:09:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 684:09:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 674:08:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 661:08:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 639:07:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 628:07:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 579:08:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 570:07:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 559:07:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 545:07:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 528:16:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 502:07:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 475:19:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 461:Homeopathic Materia Medica 433:15:56, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 368:00:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 357:23:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 346:23:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 336:22:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 305:20:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 290:22:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 277:22:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 223:20:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 149:20:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 135:20:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 120:20:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 106:18:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 59:17:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1208:20:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 731:User talk:Homy/homeopathy 30:New outline on homeopathy 594:"The current version of 396:Homeopathy IS relativity 394:. Yet my conclusion is: 324:Psychological projection 78:Homeopathy is relativity 644:Starting from the top? 72:Some possible additions 1184:Homeopathy WikiProject 1139: 792:I've now replaced the 521:Applied universal laws 506:Some citations I like: 1250:Arbitration Committee 1138: 1050:one section at a time 1022:) was reverted by an 295:quantum and relivitiy 1158:William M. Connolley 1152:The duration of the 1103:Regarding reversions 1014:Your recent edit to 966:Template:Homoeopathy 887:Homoeopathy template 300:redfineing distance. 34:classical homeopathy 1254:arbitration process 938:Category:Homeopaths 934:Category:Homeopathy 919:Materia Medica Pura 893:Category:Homeopathy 869:Image:Hahnemann.jpg 457:extroverted sensing 388:quantum potentation 209:Knowledge:Questions 86:Clinical homeopathy 1266:arbitration policy 1140: 794:User:Apers0n/Temp1 752:User:Apers0n/Temp1 588:Above you write: 174:How to edit a page 93:Complex homeopathy 66:website homeopathy 1202: 1201: 1151: 1150: 1145:three-revert rule 607:You also write: 160:Hello, Homy, and 16:(Redirected from 1312: 1196: 1177: 1170: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1123: 214: 21: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1290: 1289: 1274:the voting page 1240: 1215: 1168: 1163: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1099: 1070: 1052: 1012: 889: 865: 738: 586: 538: 297: 257:sign your posts 212: 194:Manual of Style 127: 74: 51: 46: 38: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1318: 1316: 1308: 1307: 1302: 1292: 1291: 1243: 1239: 1234: 1214: 1211: 1200: 1199: 1178: 1167: 1164: 1149: 1148: 1141: 1117: 1101: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1069: 1066: 1051: 1048: 1011: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 957: 956: 955: 954: 948: 947: 929: 928: 888: 885: 864: 861: 860: 859: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 787: 786: 762: 761: 737: 734: 718: 717: 716: 715: 703: 702: 701: 700: 687: 686: 664: 663: 642: 641: 617: 616: 615: 614: 602: 601: 600: 599: 585: 582: 562: 561: 537: 534: 532: 507: 490: 480: 479: 478: 477: 438: 437: 436: 435: 423: 422: 419: 416: 412: 411: 410: 409: 371: 370: 360: 359: 339: 338: 296: 293: 282: 281: 280: 279: 263: 262: 261: 260: 250: 249: 248: 247: 240: 239: 238: 237: 205:sign your name 197: 196: 191: 186: 181: 176: 171: 154: 152: 151: 126: 123: 98: 83: 75: 73: 70: 50: 47: 45: 39: 37: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1317: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1295: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1212: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1198: 1195: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1146: 1142: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1124: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1067: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1049: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1042:AntiVandalBot 1039: 1035: 1034: 1029: 1025: 1024:automated bot 1021: 1017: 1010: 1007:Your edit to 1006: 996: 993: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 974: 971: 967: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 952: 951: 950: 949: 946: 943: 939: 935: 931: 930: 927: 924: 920: 916: 912: 911: 910: 909: 906: 902: 898: 894: 886: 884: 883: 880: 876: 873: 870: 862: 858: 855: 851: 847: 846: 845: 844: 841: 836: 835: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 802: 799: 795: 791: 790: 789: 788: 785: 782: 777: 776: 775: 774: 771: 767: 760: 757: 753: 749: 748: 747: 746: 743: 735: 733: 732: 727: 726: 723: 714: 711: 710:Peter morrell 707: 706: 705: 704: 699: 696: 695:Peter morrell 691: 690: 689: 688: 685: 682: 678: 677: 676: 675: 672: 669: 662: 659: 655: 651: 650:Pharmacopoeia 647: 646: 645: 640: 637: 636:Peter morrell 632: 631: 630: 629: 626: 623: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 605: 597: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 583: 581: 580: 577: 572: 571: 568: 567:Peter morrell 560: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 546: 543: 542:Peter morrell 535: 533: 530: 529: 526: 522: 517: 514: 510: 504: 503: 500: 496: 491: 487: 485: 476: 473: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 462: 458: 453: 451: 445: 443: 434: 431: 427: 426: 425: 424: 420: 417: 414: 413: 407: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 397: 393: 389: 383: 379: 375: 369: 366: 362: 361: 358: 355: 350: 349: 348: 347: 344: 337: 334: 329: 328: 327: 325: 321: 316: 312: 311:string theory 307: 306: 303: 294: 292: 291: 288: 278: 275: 272: 267: 266: 265: 264: 258: 254: 253: 252: 251: 244: 243: 242: 241: 235: 230: 229: 227: 226: 225: 224: 221: 218: 210: 206: 202: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 172: 170: 167: 166: 165: 163: 158: 157: 150: 147: 144: 139: 138: 137: 136: 133: 132:Peter morrell 124: 122: 121: 118: 117:Peter morrell 112: 108: 107: 104: 103:Peter morrell 97: 94: 90: 87: 82: 79: 71: 69: 67: 61: 60: 57: 56:Peter morrell 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 31: 27: 19: 1241: 1216: 1203: 1189:project page 1182: 1180: 1156:is 8 hours. 1108:September 20 1071: 1053: 1037: 1031: 1023: 1013: 890: 866: 837: 808: 793: 763: 739: 728: 719: 665: 643: 618: 606: 603: 587: 573: 563: 539: 531: 518: 515: 511: 505: 494: 492: 481: 454: 449: 446: 439: 405: 384: 380: 376: 372: 340: 308: 298: 283: 198: 159: 155: 153: 128: 113: 109: 99: 92: 91: 85: 84: 77: 76: 62: 52: 28: 1115:Homeopathy 1068:3rr warning 41:My view on 1294:Categories 1262:topic bans 1223:Salix alba 1166:invitation 1033:Click here 596:Homeopathy 536:Irrelevant 495:infinitive 392:principles 315:relativity 213:{{helpme}} 201:Wikipedian 179:Help pages 49:Homeopathy 43:homeopathy 1258:site bans 1028:vandalism 901:Chamomile 863:Hahnemann 552:Consensus 203:! Please 125:Go blue!! 18:User:Homy 1205:Abridged 1106:made on 1088:Jefffire 1075:Jefffire 1057:David D. 779:links)-- 668:David D. 622:David D. 271:David D. 217:David D. 184:Tutorial 156:Welcome! 143:David D. 992:apers0n 970:apers0n 942:apers0n 923:apers0n 905:apers0n 879:apers0n 854:apers0n 831:apers0n 798:apers0n 781:apers0n 766:apers0n 756:apers0n 742:apers0n 584:A start 326:. Homy 162:welcome 1248:. The 1060:(Talk) 915:Sulfur 671:(Talk) 625:(Talk) 472:T.J.C. 430:T.J.C. 354:T.J.C. 274:(Talk) 234:WP:3RR 220:(Talk) 146:(Talk) 68:Homy. 1154:block 811:NCCAM 750:See: 720:Oke-- 482:From 1282:talk 1227:talk 1197:!!! 1122:edit 1111:2006 1036:for 1020:diff 850:here 840:Homy 819:here 815:here 770:Homy 722:Homy 681:Homy 658:Homy 654:EDQM 576:Homy 556:Homy 525:Homy 499:Homy 365:Geni 343:Homy 333:Geni 302:Geni 287:Homy 32:and 1242:Hi, 1113:to 895:as 656:.-- 331:in? 1296:: 1284:) 1260:, 1229:) 1086:. 990:-- 940:-- 936:- 877:-- 768:-- 574:-- 523:-- 486:: 463:. 1280:( 1225:( 1126:] 1018:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index