17:
blindness allows them to give you commands, no matter how stupid and inappropriate they are. There is no problem for them to appear inadequate. The parents who are tired of their children never look inadequate. They look like parents who care over (stupid) children. Parents are not obliged to listen what the children are mumbling to them. So, being ignorant raises you overtop the ignored nuisance!
70:
a resemblance; though differing in matter, they approximate in form and in the order of their parts. When we examine them from this point of view, we shall see them widen and tend to embrace everything. This is what gives value to certain facts that come to complete a whole, and show that it is the faithful image of other known wholes. (c) Henri
Poincaré
54:
necessary to defeat the common sense. This is imposed by our elites, who make money doing disgusting things and teach society not notice that (member Iraq, attacked two times, under blatantly false pretexts). And nobody cares! Anyway, whenever I attempt to discuss the content, I am either ignored or stopped with "personal attack".
69:
The most interesting facts are those which can be used several times, those which have a chance of recurring ... What we must aim at is not so much to ascertain resemblances and differences, as to discover similarities hidden under apparent discrepancies ... on looking closer we can generally detect
61:
reminds us about Graham
Pyramid, which says that responding to tone is unacceptable. Defeating substance by respect is unacceptable in Knowledge. Yet, this is how its contributors operate. The only way to discuss content seriously, addressing the matter, and how it looks, is considered a "personal
16:
I see that people are blind to madness. Despite calling themselves "homo sapiens" (intelligent), they are pure bots. They follow the be "nice policy" blindly giving you ritual sweet words to look highly moral but never look at what you say them. They may just react as bots, whose "Being nice" and
97:
Javalenok, may I weigh in on your views. Math requires us to proof connectivity. Seeing it is not enough. I have felt your frustration, if the person reverting is not logged in then undo it! They are too cowardly to use there account, if its a user and it is unjust make sure you have proven with
31:
Criminals always demand tolerance and respect. Without people closing their eyes when they see stupid bullshit, evil could not proliferate. The demand to stay civil, i.e. buy any garbage they sell you and regard it as something meaningful,no matter how blatant it is, is what I see everywhere and
53:
Polite people are sure that if you qualify the content as 'crap' or 'author is idiot' somewhere, you make a personal attack. They know that there cannot be any crap and there is nothing to discuss. Even if there is a crap, you must (be tolerant) and close your eyes. Ignorance and tolerance are
111:
control
Knowledge. I summarized the Global Dimming article, noticing that it says that soot from airplane engines that causes extra clouds. I did that in Contrails article. And know what? My edit was removed with resolution "no reliable sources". Another guy found it silly that I cannot link
39:
instead of addressing myself to political liberty, as Mill did, I wrote about liberty in social occasions - the problem of having to fake and lie in order to be polite, and does this perpetual game of faking in social situations lead to the "destruction of the moral fiber of
48:
You see, when I hear about physics, I just think about physics, and I don't know who I'm talking to, so I say dopey things like "no, no, you're wrong," or "you're crazy." But it turned out that's exactly what he
82:
rule, as if it does not exist and demand you "do not revert, talk" when they have decided everything for you, they revert and not talk and, moreover, proceed re-revering (as usually, without talk) after
104:
Surprisingly, I find the
Scholarpedia more comprehensive and easy to understand than the Knowledge articles. Do students pretend to be more advanced and sophisticated than the world top scientists?
57:
The same applies here, in
Knowledge. Knowledge declares great rules but they seem to be defiantly disregarded by wikipedia owner cliques. They even dare to remove my edits as intolerant, despite
112:
wikipedia articles and came up with another reason to remove: there is no evidence that airplane soot produces clouds besides ariplane soot-induced ones. Also see how DVdm criminal says that
32:
particularly in
Knowledge. The world is as bad as it is not because you are not tolerant, it is because you avoid discussing issues for the sake of tolerance. Here is how
33:
84:
79:
87:
and punish you with warnings if you respond them the same way. It seems that some creatures know very well how to own
Knowledge. --
34:
Feynman, who was always perceived negatively and even certified mentally defected because he always openly told the truth, puts it
65:
In
Knowledge I mostly try to establish retlationship between things and thus use interwiki links to tie things together.
98:
credible citation evidence your point and take it to arbitration there are nasty users out there that hate progress
74:
Yet, it seems that people hate to see that things are related. They even call the increased connectedness
92:
58:
99:
25:
21:
108:
113:
75:
26:I have low level of tolerance for stupid bullshit
8:
78:. It is how reverters blatantly violate the
114:using wikilink is improper in wikipedia
59:wikipedia unacceptable behaviour rules
28:" (George Carlin). That is about me.
7:
80:Knowledge:Revert only when necessary
14:
95:) 13:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
76:"reduced cohesion of the text"
1:
130:
22:People are fukcing dumb
72:
51:
42:
67:
46:
37:
121:
129:
128:
124:
123:
122:
120:
119:
118:
96:
12:
11:
5:
127:
125:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
126:
117:
115:
110:
105:
102:
101:
94:
90:
86:
85:one re-revert
81:
77:
71:
66:
63:
60:
55:
50:
45:
41:
36:
35:
29:
27:
23:
18:
106:
103:
88:
73:
68:
64:
56:
52:
47:
43:
38:
30:
19:
15:
107:See which
109:criminals
89:Javalenok
62:attack".
40:society.
100:Mkevlar
49:needed.
24:" and "
93:talk
44:and
116:.
91:(
20:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.