20:
JeMa, if you don't stop removing material which is relevent to the discussion at hand, I'm going to have to follow what you do throughout this encyclopedia, because I think you're a disaster waiting to happen. What you did to the Dating the Bible article is partly useful but mostly travesty.
44:
article. I doubt your clarity at this point and I'm spitting mad at what I regard as your outright stupidity. Accusing someone of being "pro
Gnostic" is a cheap excuse to continue to delete material others regard as essential (I'll point out, it isn't
24:
Do you know what the Nag
Hammadi collection is? For what reason did you remove references to it? Do you know that the oldest known versions of the Gospel of Thomas are found in the Nag Hammadi collection? Do you know what the Gospel of Thomas is?
16:
I am new user to
Knowledge. I do not usually have much time to contribute, but I will try to pitch in from time to time.
50:
41:
54:
37:
29:
28:
To be plain, I wish you knew something about the topics you manage to butcher.
49:
me). I'll also say that claiming the stuff you removed was in
53:when it was not is exceptionally disingenious.
8:
7:
14:
1:
71:
32:22:45, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
57:21:07, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
51:documentary hypothesis
40:to intercede in the
62:
42:Dating the Bible
70:
69:
65:
64:
63:
61:
60:
59:
34:
18:
12:
11:
5:
68:
66:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
67:
58:
56:
52:
48:
43:
39:
33:
31:
26:
22:
17:
46:
38:User:Ed Poor
35:
27:
23:
19:
15:
36:I'm asking
55:Dwmyers
30:Dwmyers
47:just
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.