120:
realize is that the trilogy would not have been possible without his earlier work 'Maternal Care and Mental Health' which went on to be a best seller. Even if they have heard of this book they assume it contains basically the same ideas as his later works. These individuals for the sake of this discussion belong to the 'Bowlby School' of
Psychology. They have no reason to question their teachers or the work of Bowlby. In fact their opinion is reinforced by the governments of the day which adopted Bowlby's earlier ideas as social policy. This is a know fact which you will need to check for yourself if you are not aware of the controversy.
91:
at ACT and don't have a copy of this form. I forwarded his request to the executive director the first time I received it. Since he brought up the subject, though, I've become quite curious about his center and whether it's incorporated for-profit or not. This point is relevant to disclosure of financial interests, as we've discussed here ad infinitum.
145:
There are many people who belong to the 'Bowlby School' of
Psychology who would like to see him crowned 'father of the attachment theory'. But as my latest video clip on YouTube called 'John Bowlby and Maternal Deprivation' shows he was proud of the theory of 'maternal deprivation' and never claimed
90:
Actually Becker-Weidman is licensed as a clinical social worker, with a designation that makes him third-party payable. (I'm not sure how this jibes with his description of himself as a scientist on his user page.) And I know who he is, and have told him several times that I do no administrative work
94:
If I recall correctly from administering a different non-profit (i.e. not ACT), the 990 needs to be filed yearly only if an income of more than $ 25,000 a year is occurring. So there may not even be a recent form in anyone's hands. But Becker-Weidman may have the IRS on his mind since a colleague of
137:
Because in your other posting you also query how Bowlby "diffused" the theory of 'maternal deprivation' into the 'attachment theory'. If you knew about the controversy you would know this is the accepted explanation of how Bowlby 'reformed' to become an accepted part of the academic community. This
152:
Fanities relies upon your criticisms of me to make his edits. If you check my sources and see what I am saying is true I should be grateful if you would distance yourself from
Fanities. With the help of Doug I want to restore the damage you and Fanities have done to these pages. If you intend to
141:
I have had a look at your books and it is clear
Fanities knows even less than you about this controversy. However his 'speakers' are working and he has seen and heard my video clips. Therefore he has used every trick in the book to try and stop my voice being heard in Knowledge (XXG), so I have
126:
The problem lies in the fact that the significance of 'Deprivation of
Maternal Care' is that it shows that the research community was not happy with Bowlby's initial theories so much so that he had to change his ideas. You do not understand this fact because you have altered the definition of
119:
Let me make it clear that you are not alone. A great number of people come to the subject of 'attachment' through the work of Bowlby. Not surprisingly a great number of institutions use his 'Attachment and Loss' trilogy to teach about the subject. But what a great number of these people do not
127:'monotropy' to a 'small number of people' on the Knowledge (XXG) page on 'Maternal Deprivation'. But part of the original controversy was precisely about this issue. What you have tried to do is 'iron out' an aspect of Bowlby's work that everybody else found controversial in the first place.
58:
I notice that in your description you make no mention of your being a leader of
Advocates for Children in Therapy and I was wondering why not since it is such a major component of your professional career (promotes your books and articles and positions and views and such)?
79:
just outside buffalo NY. The scary thing is that
Wiedman is a licensed psychologist. creepy to think that people are going to him and paying him money. of course much comes from the taxpayers. here is an anonymous person demanding info. can you spell nutjob?
33:
Although you may not believe others no longer think in terms of MD part of the problem you have found in keeping track of the changes to these pages is that many people still do - please take my word for it.
133:
You have vandalized the page because you are not aware of the controversy in the first place. You do not know about it because you belong to the 'Bowlby School' of
Psychology. How can I be sure of this?
149:
I knew nothing about you before coming to
Knowledge (XXG). But it is because there are many people like you that I put up the page called 'Maternal Deprivation' on Knowledge (XXG).
62:
Oh, also, on another subject, I'd asked you for a copy of your group's IRS form 990 and have not yet received a copy. Many organizations actually post theirs on their website.
30:
If you take a look at the pages I have created on 'maternal deprivation' and 'Professor Sir
Michael Rutter' I have identified major differences with the Attachment theory.
113:
I should like to take this opportunity to outline how I think things have gone wrong, with a copy to Doug, an independent editor, who I have enlisted to help.
110:
Thank you for your comment regarding 'Deprivation of Maternal Care. A Reassessment of its effects' which I believe goes a long way to explaining my complaint.
76:
IP Address Location IP Address 69.204.15.239 City AKRON State or Region NEW YORK Country UNITED STATES ISP ROAD RUNNER HOLDCO LLC.
116:
It is clear from your comment regarding the above work that you are not really aware of the controversy surrounding Bowlby's writings.
50:
PS I have also just completed a page on the Michael Rutter Centre for Children and Adolescents, not without its hicups!
37:
What is more is that they believe they are the same thing ie mothers are naturally better parents than fathers.
163:
159:
44:
156:(Please see Fanities latest comment on and edit to the section on Maternal Deprivation in John Bowlby).
63:
27:
You have a very good feel for the subject and the changes you have made are a vast improvement.
153:
continue editing these pages I will be forced to take my complaint against yourself further.
84:
70:
83:
maybe if he would say who he is you would reply to him directly.
95:
his recently had quite a bit of trouble along this line.
130:Why have you vandalized the page in this way?
146:to be the 'father of the attachment theory'.
8:
43:KingsleyMiller 21:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
138:is how Rutter describes the process.
7:
14:
166:) 16:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)kip
1:
99:17:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
87:19:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
73:22:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
47:21:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
40:Thank you for your interest
180:
123:So what is the problem?
142:enlisted Doug's help.
103:Maternal Deprivation
54:ACT and IRS form 990
69:What description?
171:
20:MORE ATTACHMENT!
179:
178:
174:
173:
172:
170:
169:
168:
105:
68:
56:
24:Dear Fainties,
22:
12:
11:
5:
177:
175:
160:KingsleyMiller
104:
101:
55:
52:
45:KingsleyMiller
21:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
176:
167:
165:
161:
157:
154:
150:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
128:
124:
121:
117:
114:
111:
108:
102:
100:
98:
92:
88:
86:
81:
77:
74:
72:
66:
65:
64:69.204.15.239
60:
53:
51:
48:
46:
41:
38:
35:
31:
28:
25:
19:
17:
158:
155:
151:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
125:
122:
118:
115:
112:
109:
106:
96:
93:
89:
82:
78:
75:
67:
61:
57:
49:
42:
39:
36:
32:
29:
26:
23:
15:
107:Dear Jean,
97:Jean Mercer
85:FatherTree
71:Fainites
16:COPY
164:talk
162:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.