Knowledge (XXG)

User:Jesushaces/Proof

Source 📝

159:< 1. The problem with this argument, however, is that it suggests that a statement S(n) that "a zero followed by a decimal point followed by n 9s represents a number less than 1", which is true for all integer n is also true when n is an infinite value. The problem here is that such a deduction is not generally valid (compare with a statement such as "n is finite", which by definition is true for any integer n but false if n is infinite). In fact, the behaviour of infinite properties when compared to their finite counterparts means it is actually possible to prove statements such as 453:, the infinite sum and the infinite limit of the partial sums are not the same (despite such a statement being a common definition to give the infinite sum a valid meaning) and so the numbers are equal. However, it is possible with a little effort to show that the two are in fact equal, if a few simple definitions are agreed upon. 120:
less than one". However, as many mathematics and science teachers are keen to point out, that which is "obvious" is not necessarily true, and such a statement is not particularly useful unless backed with some evidence that it can be proven.
451: 374: 215: 186: 91: 296: 249: 157: 114: 463: 379: 33:, not approximately but exactly, as well as some of the most common arguments that claim that 0.999… is less than 1, or that it is not exactly 1. 315: 298:
and the limit of partial sums that equals 1 both require an infinite number of steps, and thus cannot be "truly" calculated.
476:
by D. O. Tall & R. L. E. Schwarzenberger, University of Warwick Published in Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44–49 (1978).
272: 477: 480: 191: 162: 67: 517: 278: 231: 139: 96: 507: 497: 228:
This argument claims that while it is possible to write an infinite decimal expansion such as
27: 534: 502: 512: 17: 529: 464:
Talk:Proof_that_0.999..._equals_1/Archive02#If_I_may_speak_to_the_article_itself...
446:{\displaystyle \lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {9}{10^{i}}}=1} 251:, this is only an approximation to the exact value and therefore cannot equal 1. 544: 61:
Should we include a counter-example for (each of) these claims? or an example?
124:
The argument may be strengthened by a suggestion along the following lines:
539: 369:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots =\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }{\frac {9}{10^{i}}}} 264:
Infinite decimals and limits are the result of an infinite process.
26:
This article presents background and proofs of the fact that the
305:
An infinite sum is not the same as the limit of an infinite sum.
188:, and with greater rigor, in some cases, than it is to prove 275:
school of mathematics, in that both the full expression of
93:
works along the lines of "because it starts with zero,
382: 318: 281: 234: 194: 165: 142: 99: 70: 474:
Conflicts in the Learning of Real Numbers and Limits
445: 368: 290: 243: 209: 180: 151: 108: 85: 64:Possibly the simplest argument offered as to why 57:Arguments that claim that 0.999… is not exactly 1 384: 261:Decimals and Limits are processes, not numbers. 8: 429: 420: 414: 403: 387: 381: 358: 349: 343: 332: 317: 280: 271:This may be considered a relation to the 233: 193: 164: 141: 98: 69: 312:This is an attempt to say that while 221:Infinite decimals are approximations. 7: 535:Ask A Scientist: Repeating Decimals 394: 344: 210:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots \leq 1} 181:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots \geq 1} 86:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots \neq 1} 24: 391: 37:Definitions and justifications 1: 530:Why does 0.9999... = 1 ? 291:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots } 244:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots } 152:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots } 136:and following this pattern, 109:{\displaystyle 0.999\ldots } 561: 258:Limits are approximations. 447: 419: 370: 348: 292: 245: 211: 182: 153: 110: 87: 448: 399: 371: 328: 293: 246: 212: 183: 154: 111: 88: 380: 316: 279: 232: 192: 163: 140: 97: 68: 518:Limit (mathematics) 443: 398: 366: 288: 241: 207: 178: 149: 106: 83: 508:Convergent series 498:Recurring decimal 435: 383: 364: 42:Elementary proofs 28:recurring decimal 552: 503:Geometric series 452: 450: 449: 444: 436: 434: 433: 421: 418: 413: 397: 375: 373: 372: 367: 365: 363: 362: 350: 347: 342: 297: 295: 294: 289: 250: 248: 247: 242: 216: 214: 213: 208: 187: 185: 184: 179: 158: 156: 155: 150: 115: 113: 112: 107: 92: 90: 89: 84: 31:0.9999… equals 1 560: 559: 555: 554: 553: 551: 550: 549: 540:Repeating Nines 526: 513:Infinite series 494: 489: 487:Popular culture 425: 378: 377: 354: 314: 313: 277: 276: 230: 229: 190: 189: 161: 160: 138: 137: 95: 94: 66: 65: 59: 54: 52:Generalizations 49: 47:Advanced proofs 44: 39: 22: 21: 20: 18:User:Jesushaces 12: 11: 5: 558: 556: 548: 547: 545:Is 0.999...=1? 542: 537: 532: 525: 524:External links 522: 521: 520: 515: 510: 505: 500: 493: 490: 488: 485: 484: 483: 467: 466: 457: 456: 455: 454: 442: 439: 432: 428: 424: 417: 412: 409: 406: 402: 396: 393: 390: 386: 361: 357: 353: 346: 341: 338: 335: 331: 327: 324: 321: 307: 306: 302: 301: 300: 299: 287: 284: 266: 265: 262: 259: 255: 254: 253: 252: 240: 237: 223: 222: 206: 203: 200: 197: 177: 174: 171: 168: 148: 145: 105: 102: 82: 79: 76: 73: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48: 45: 43: 40: 38: 35: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 557: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 531: 528: 527: 523: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 504: 501: 499: 496: 495: 491: 486: 482: 479: 475: 472: 471: 470: 465: 462: 461: 460: 440: 437: 430: 426: 422: 415: 410: 407: 404: 400: 388: 359: 355: 351: 339: 336: 333: 329: 325: 322: 319: 311: 310: 309: 308: 304: 303: 285: 282: 274: 270: 269: 268: 267: 263: 260: 257: 256: 238: 235: 227: 226: 225: 224: 220: 219: 218: 204: 201: 198: 195: 175: 172: 169: 166: 146: 143: 134: 133:0.999 < 1 131: 128: 125: 122: 119: 103: 100: 80: 77: 74: 71: 62: 56: 51: 46: 41: 36: 34: 32: 29: 19: 473: 469:References: 468: 458: 273:constructive 135: 132: 130:0.99 < 1 129: 126: 123: 117: 63: 60: 30: 25: 127:0.9 < 1 459:See also: 401:∑ 395:∞ 392:→ 345:∞ 330:∑ 323:… 286:… 239:… 202:≤ 199:… 173:≥ 170:… 147:… 118:obviously 104:… 78:≠ 75:… 492:See also 481:webpage 320:0.999 283:0.999 236:0.999 196:0.999 167:0.999 144:0.999 101:0.999 72:0.999 16:< 376:and 478:pdf 385:lim 116:is 427:10 356:10 217:. 441:1 438:= 431:i 423:9 416:n 411:1 408:= 405:i 389:n 360:i 352:9 340:1 337:= 334:i 326:= 205:1 176:1 81:1

Index

User:Jesushaces
recurring decimal
constructive
Talk:Proof_that_0.999..._equals_1/Archive02#If_I_may_speak_to_the_article_itself...
pdf
webpage
Recurring decimal
Geometric series
Convergent series
Infinite series
Limit (mathematics)
Why does 0.9999... = 1 ?
Ask A Scientist: Repeating Decimals
Repeating Nines
Is 0.999...=1?

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.