29:
Readers who rated articles could themselves be rated by future confirmation of potential ideas they had rated, etc, and then their personal rating could weigh their assessments of past and future articles, creating a novel feedback cycle that would hopefully bubble good ideas to the top faster.
22:
Personally I would like to see a 'FuturePedia' where new ideas were discussed and rated by readers, potential new science and ideas rather than fully accepted science, maybe like "The
Journal of Medical Hypothesis".
26:
This would allow people to co-operate on new ideas as well as current or past ideas. The rating growth could highlight cool new ideas.
19:
I normally try to do my best with article edits, I often stick to correcting
English, (like an autonomous DNA repair mechanism).
16:
Hi my name is John, and I once won a sixpence from the
English Master for being the first to parse a sentence (1964?).
8:
7:
14:
1:
47:
33:Love and best wishes John
38:
46:
45:
41:
40:
39:
37:
36:
35:
12:
11:
5:
44:
42:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
43:
34:
31:
27:
24:
20:
17:
32:
28:
25:
21:
18:
15:
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.