User:K1Bond007/Archive13

498:

bit done, I've run my course of tolerating people who treat me like an amateur or worse, an idiot, regarding certain matters (obviously this does not apply to you in any way, nor does it apply to 99% of the editors I deal with. But it only takes 1% to spoil everything. I've been made aware of a competing Wiki called Citizendium and I've been invited to start afresh and I might do that. But right now I'm simply too tied up with real world issues to devote so much time to a project that doesn't pay me and these days tends to leave me more frustrated than satisified. Obviously if you need support on an issue, please feel free to e-mail me and I'll help out, plus I might lurk here and there (either signed in or not) so I'm not necessarily disappearing completely. Cheers!

613:, has been told that he would be a good candidate for adminship. I tend to agree. I was wondering whether you, an admin, would be interested in perhaps sponsoring this person for RfA. If you would care to review his record, please do so and make your decision then. In any event, I think you know better than I do what is required of an admin, and would be a much better person to nominate him if he were to choose to do so. It is possible that he may decline, of course. I know firsthand that delusional homicidal megalomaniacs tend to be easily distracted, and am not honestly sure if the above party would be interested in seeking adminship. Anyway, I would welcome your review of the situation. Thanks. 443:. I also agree with the above statement about the movie, OHMSS, stating that SPECTRE still existed. Bond said that it operated world wide, which meant that he couldn't have been wrong about SPECTRE still existing. If it had collapsed, he would have known it. Since Bloefeld constantly revived SPECTRE until he died, it can be assumed that SPECTRE's existance continued until Bloefeld met his maker. Also, the Special Edition DVD box to OHMSS specifically stated that SPECTRE was the villianious organination in the movie. 1267: 1017: 59: 582:. Also, what about the other standard characters? They're even voiced by the current actors. You once mentioned that Jaws turned good. How do you know that he stayed good? Something may have pushed him back into being a villian's hit-man. He only turned good because of his new girlfriend. Take away her, and he would probably turn evil again. 119:

Even though the footage may have been confirmed as coming from the PS3 and 360, it seems to me that reporting that it's coming out definitively for those two and not saying anything at all about a Wii version after the official "Next-Gen Systems" is a tad irresponsible. Especially if there's gonna be

349:

It's about time a Wikiproject came together regarding Bond. I'm not 100% in favor of everything planned (as my comments on the project's talk page indicate) but it's a step in the right direction. Incidentally that old chestnut about Never Say Never being called an unofficial film has erupted again

299:

a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wiki's library of James Bond information. If you're interested, go to the project page and add your name under 'Interested Wikipedians' . Don't be afraid to mention the project to other people you know will want to help. I look forward to starting the project

497:

I've been away from Wiki for the last few weeks and I've decided I'm probably going to stay away except perhaps for some "special request" editing that I have been asked to do by a few people. Aside from the fact that I realized life without Wiki is not only possible but I can actually get quite a

565:

Once again, just stating my beliefs and why. I'm new at working with other wikipedians, but isn't clearing things like this up a good thing for the articles' sake. For example, with SPECTRE, we have to be consistent about when we say it ended. I think we should say that it ended with Blofeld's

363:

I agree that Sean Connery is the best James Bond actor. Recently, you deleted one of my edits (The Man With the Golden Gun Novel). I added the section about how it was different from the movie. You said that it should go on the movie page. I agree, but recently, I tried something similiar on

2803:

article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very

178:

Hey there fellow Bond fan!! I hope you approve but I like articles to have plenty of images to support it so if I can combine some free natural images to identify settings, or vehicles in the films with far use screenshots I reckon we get a better picture for people who don't know the films.

910:

of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the

2652:

have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience.

593:

Gotcha. I just thought that it would be canonical since EON had to approve of it to use the characters thus making the game legitimate canon. Sorry about the frequent messages, I'm just used to arguing points until I am completely proven wrong.

247:

2644:

1325:

631:

407:

201:

2840: 2312:

539:. This is not true. Just so you know, I consider it canon if it does not contradict the movies. NSNA does contradict the EON movies because of characters and organizations that are dead. For example, I consider 510:

You said that none of the video games are cannon. I believe that this statement is not true. The only time a video game is non-canonical is if the game contradicts what happens in the films. Since games like

2591: 2411: 2268: 1543: 1227: 2713: 2672: 2554: 2513: 2374: 2333: 2231: 2190: 1506: 1465: 1360: 1190: 1149: 1073: 847: 806: 796: 712: 664: 975:

you indicated your desire to be notified if and when I was nominated for bureaucratship again. As per your comment, I'm letting you know that I'm up for bureaucratship for the third and final time at

435:

I think that SPECTRE existed from the time Bloefeld founded it until he died. Even though it may not have been as large in its final appearances, it still existed, even in minor forms. In the novel

2640: 2632: 116:

Dear K1Bond007, Shouldn't you at least mention the possibility of a Wii release for this game? To my knowledge, it hasn't even officially been announced for the PS3 and 360- just "Next-Gen Systems".

1922:

as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on

953:

as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on

197: 2308: 153:

Sorry, I couldn't find an author for the article, and I wanted to check with someone who might know something I don't before actually editing the page. Didn't mean to jump up your butt! -Matt

2489:

are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at

403: 243: 1321: 906: 627: 2169: 2143: 2117: 1299:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1049:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 780:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 543:

canonical because it doesn't contradict the films (you mentioned Jaws, he could have turned evil again; as I recall in the movies, he was mostly a hit-man for hire). In contrast,

1444: 1418: 1392: 1295:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1045:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

912: 776:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2465:

participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the

523:(which even had all of the actors from the main movie rolls: Brosnan as Bond, Dench as M, and Cleese as Q) do not contradict the films save the bonuses, they are canonical. 2485: 2805: 2843:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 562:

About SPECTRE, I think it still existed in OHMSS because if you look at the back of the special edition DVD box, it specifically mentioned SPECTRE as the villians.

976: 431:. I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on that one. SPECTRE existed until Blofeld died. Below is the explanation I placed on the SPECTRE discussion page. 364:

several other Bond movie pages, but I was then told to put it on the novels page so I was not sure whether this section should go on the novel or movie page.

1288:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1038:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

769:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1284:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1034:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 765:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 477:, it just existed in a smaller form. Further evidence that it still existed is that the producers were going to make SPECTRE and Blofeld the villains in 2756:

due to failing standards and low participants. If you still wish this collaboration to run, then work hard in making this collaboration of GA status.

1296: 1046: 777: 123:

I may have missed something somewhere, but I can't find any official word that it will be coming out for any systems other then the PS2, PSP and DS.

2490: 2466: 2172:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2146:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2120:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1447:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1421:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1395:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2165: 2139: 2113: 1440: 1414: 1388: 296: 159: 129: 2075: 2067: 2019: 2011: 1963: 1955: 1885: 1877: 1829: 1821: 1773: 1765: 1717: 1709: 1661: 1653: 1304: 1054: 785: 271: 2649: 485:, and maybe a little while after that, though not as big as before and I think that all James Bond related articles should reflect this. 931:. Even if it is just a few details it all helps -any contribution you can make will be more than appreciated!! I've been expecting you!! 684: 1201: 997:

Thanks in part to your support, I am Knowledge's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words.

473:

SPECTRE." Granted SPECTRE may not have been as big as it was in previous movies, it still existed just as it did in the novel for

2724: 979:, and your opinion would be welcome. It has been a while, so if you're no longer interested, I apologize and understand. Cheers, 320: 547:

is not canonical because it obviously contradicts the movies. There are also, different canons. A novel canon, a movie canon "

350:(I think by the same guy who had issue with it last time). I've decided to push the issue by making resolving it an Open Task. 2832: 2825: 2242: 2091: 2035: 1979: 1901: 1845: 1789: 1733: 1677: 481:, but legal action from Kevin McClory was the only thing that stopped them. In conclusion, SPECTRE existed at least until 2085: 2029: 1973: 1895: 1839: 1783: 1727: 1671: 858: 1527: 1170: 180: 171: 141: 274:.. You and Thunderbrand were the two people that inspired me to commit myself to Knowledge. I thought you should know. 2728: 2693: 2475: 2461: 1276:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1026:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 757:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1336:

Are you sure about the film poster?? It looks like the original 1963 poster to me. The other doesn't look original.

2565: 1289: 1039: 770: 227: 2836: 2395: 2246: 2211: 1350: 954: 950: 566:

death due to the fact that he constantly reformed his organinzation (though not always as extensive as before).

2780: 2616: 2436: 2290: 2135: 1833: 1807: 1565: 1337: 1249: 1129: 932: 889: 862: 827: 735: 610: 336: 323: 184: 97: 94: 91: 224: 2809: 2176: 2150: 2124: 2098: 2042: 1986: 1930: 1908: 1852: 1796: 1740: 1684: 1451: 1425: 1399: 1272: 972: 614: 465:

Ultimate Edition DVD and the director of the movie specifically said, "aside from the beginning sequence of

88: 85: 82: 79: 76: 73: 70: 67: 64: 1092:

passed to GA status early. While you are free to work on this article because it still is out Collaboration

2839:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 2023: 1997: 928: 2161: 2079: 2053: 1967: 1941: 1665: 1639: 1436: 1410: 1384: 1022: 535:

Thank you for responding to my comments. But, you said that by saying that games were canonical, so was

2569: 2534: 2173: 2147: 2121: 2095: 2060: 2039: 2004: 1983: 1948: 1927: 1905: 1870: 1849: 1814: 1793: 1777: 1758: 1751: 1737: 1702: 1681: 1646: 1448: 1422: 1396: 753: 389: 377: 1923: 1919: 2734: 2109: 2074:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

2018:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

1962:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

1889: 1884:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

1863: 1828:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

1772:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

1721: 1716:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

1695: 1660:

according to Knowledge policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the

256: 208: 2804:

grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at

2771: 2717: 2607: 2558: 2427: 2378: 2283: 2235: 1558: 1510: 1308: 1242: 1194: 1122: 1058: 882: 851: 789: 716: 281: 58: 2071: 2015: 1959: 1881: 1825: 1769: 1713: 1657: 1004: 986: 439:, Bond refers to Bloefeld's organization as SPECTRE, even though it is not as large as it was in 163: 133: 1211: 1205: 1088: 469:, Blofeld and SPECTRE appeared in six of the first seven Bond films." Note, he said "Blofeld 1625:

who is an admin on the site and self proclaimed 'Head of Bondpedia Advertising on Knowledge'

1281: 1266: 1031: 1016: 916: 762: 559:

to present). Just so you know, I am only trying to present my position. I am not arguing.

307: 167: 137: 2451: 1622: 595: 583: 567: 524: 486: 447: 365: 251: 203: 1366:

The film is increasingly viewed as an epic, comic, satire of the whole James Bond genre.

574:

What about Everything or Nothing. That game was designed to somewhat act as a sequel to

1359:

I was wondering if you would vote for this film as the next James Bond Collaboration at

2385: 1517: 1285: 1035: 766: 276: 25: 17: 2343:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (September 8, 2007]] - September 22, 2007)

2848: 2656: 2498: 2317: 1372: 1329: 1102: 999: 981: 868: 635: 499: 411: 351: 1621:

Please come along and contribute by editing or joining for more information contact

45:

If you'd like to leave me a new comment, a criticism, a question or whatever please

2800: 2707: 2548: 2368: 2225: 1500: 1277: 1184: 1027: 841: 758: 704: 2523:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (September 22, 2007 - October 6, 2007)

578:. The main villian in the game was the apprentice of Max Zorin, the villiam from 2682:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (October 20, 2007 - November 3, 2007)

2200:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (August 25, 2007 - September 8, 2007)

302: 1475:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (August 11, 2007 - August 25, 2007)

1159:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (July 28, 2007 - August 11, 2007]])

221: 2750: 1595: 2575: 2389: 2354: 2252: 1521: 1486: 676:

THE COLLABORATION OF THE FORTNIGHT (6 September 2011 - 20 September 2011) is

1083:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (July 14, 2007 - July 28, 2007)

816:

The new collaboration for this fortnight is (June 30, 2007 - July 14, 2007)

156:

PS-my favorite Bond is Dalton, hands-down, though I love them all :)

2844: 1609: 959: 2841:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of locations in the Star Fox series

2590:

If you would like not to recieve these messages please add your name to

2410:

If you would like not to recieve these messages please add your name to

2267:

If you would like not to recieve these messages please add your name to

1542:

If you would like not to recieve these messages please add your name to

1226:

If you would like not to recieve these messages please add your name to

2473:

to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several

871:

failed for GA status, mainly due to little contribution to the article.

2705: