31:
54:
90:
154:
be active in XfD. That includes AfD and either CfD, TfD, or IfD. My definition of "active" is that you have participated in at least one AfD discussion every couple of weeks on average, OR if you do a burst of AfD participation of at least 50 or so right before your RfA where your vote equaled the
128:
I value XfD and CSD, AN/I, and the user's ability to deal with conflict and to maintain an attractive user page for interaction with people. I don't care about GA/FA/DYK since I'm not nominating the admin to produce articles but to keep idiots away from me so that I can produce articles. I don't
234:
Being able to understand the often drama-laden shitstorms at AN/I will be an important criteria I look at for being an admin. People like Erik the Red, who often participate and provide feedback, are my exemplar for what I'd like to see in non-admin participation in AN/I.
203:
An editor's ability to correctly identify pages that should be speedily deleted means he or she won't make mistakes when , as an admin, they actually delete them. If you have good judgment in tagging, then your judgment will PROBABLY be good in deleting.
244:
You should have had some activity in AN/I. Some activity can quite literally be only one discussion, as long as you're involved in it for some time, or it can more often be just a few comments here and there. 10 points. No activity, no
124:
I cannot simply disallow or allow my !vote based on strict criteria, so I score people. The scoring process is based on my interpretation of what an admin should be, modified by my assessment of their ability *act* like an admin.
132:
The primary criterion, above and beyond all of this of course, is the editor's ability to operate logically, dispassionately, appropriately, and discreetly. This isn't given a point value. It's more of a multiplier.
213:
You should not have a history of bad prods or CSD's. 20 points. A bad history -- more than a couple of CSD's or Prods brought up as bad faith and verified as such -- loses all points.
141:
Participation in the various deletion debates is critical, since admins are the ones most likely to close these debates, and to evaluate the votes therin.
185:-5 points if you are, for all intents and purposes, indisguishable from Kappa or Improv in terms of how determined you are to include or delete everything.
257:
Admins are expected to be the exemplar of discipline and perspective, and I tend to treat people who stir drama as unsuitable for adminship.
395:
69:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
70:
291:
A minor point. I strongly doubt I'll ever oppose someone over their userpage. But it might tip me over to supporting.
30:
74:
264:
You can't have more than a single RfC. Everyone gets one pass. 10 points. Any second RFC loses all 10.
17:
62:
295:
Must have an awesome user page. 5 points. No points if your page looks like a pile of user boxes.
100:
267:
You can't have more than two blocks for any reason. 5 points. Unjust blocks don't count.
389:
77:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
180:+5 points if you have participated in deletewars such as the deletion of Esperanza.
103:
tools must demonstrate competence in the areas critical to being an administrator
278:+5 if you have more than 3500 edits with no blocks, RfC, or other DM against you.
261:
You can't have any RfAr's filed against you. 10 points. Any arbcom loses all 10.
115:
I have very simple admin criteria that I evaluate in a very complex manner.
129:
particularly care about vandal fighting, since any editor can do that.
224:+5 points if you regularly source articles instead of CSDing them.
25:
84:
48:
29:
162:, not idiot crap like IAR or ILIKEIT or IHATEIT. 15 points.
38:
190:+10 points if you've done more than one non-admin close.
8:
306:+5 if you have mutiple good userpage awards.
165:You must not be an extreme inclusionist
71:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
352:130 points: Strongest possible support.
155:actual outcome fairly often. 20 points.
107:of how outstanding an editor they are.
7:
28:
373:Below 0: Strongest possible oppose.
75:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
355:101 - 129 points: Strong support.
88:
52:
169:extreme deletionist. 5 points.
1:
361:60 - 80 points: Weak Support.
339:Total Bonus Points: 30 points
334:Total Basic Reqs: 100 points
158:You must be voting based on
396:User criteria for adminship
378:Best possible score is 130.
412:
47:
358:80 - 100 points: Support.
99:An editor requesting the
370:Below 20: Strong Oppose.
364:50 - 60 points: Neutral.
96:This page in a nutshell:
40:
367:20 - 50 points: Oppose.
35:
73:, as it has not been
33:
18:User:Logical Premise
329:User Page: 5 points
317:Behavior: 25 points
116:
36:
384:
383:
114:
112:
111:
83:
82:
403:
92:
91:
85:
56:
55:
49:
42:
26:
411:
410:
406:
405:
404:
402:
401:
400:
386:
385:
349:
343:
320:AN/I: 10 points
314:
289:
283:
255:
249:
232:
201:
195:
139:
122:
117:
89:
79:
78:
67:
53:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
409:
407:
399:
398:
388:
387:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
348:
345:
341:
340:
336:
335:
331:
330:
327:
326:XfD: 40 points
324:
323:CSD: 20 points
321:
318:
313:
310:
309:
308:
297:
296:
288:
285:
281:
280:
269:
268:
265:
262:
254:
251:
247:
246:
231:
228:
227:
226:
215:
214:
200:
197:
193:
192:
187:
182:
171:
170:
163:
156:
138:
135:
121:
118:
113:
110:
109:
93:
81:
80:
68:
59:
57:
45:
44:
37:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
408:
397:
394:
393:
391:
377:
376:
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
350:
346:
344:
338:
337:
333:
332:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
315:
311:
307:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:Bonus points:
294:
293:
292:
286:
284:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:Bonus Points:
266:
263:
260:
259:
258:
252:
250:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
229:
225:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:Bonus Points:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
198:
196:
191:
188:
186:
183:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:Bonus Points:
168:
164:
161:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
146:
142:
136:
134:
130:
126:
119:
108:
106:
102:
97:
94:
87:
86:
76:
72:
66:
64:
58:
51:
50:
46:
43:
32:
27:
19:
342:
305:
299:
298:
290:
282:
277:
271:
270:
256:
248:
238:
237:
233:
223:
217:
216:
207:
206:
202:
194:
189:
184:
179:
173:
172:
166:
159:
151:
144:
143:
140:
131:
127:
123:
104:
98:
95:
60:
39:
239:Basic Reqs:
208:Basic Reqs:
145:Basic Reqs:
61:This is an
105:regardless
287:User Page
120:Rationale
41:Work Desk
390:Category
347:Outcomes
253:Behavior
245:points.
312:Totals
160:policy
34:Stuffz
101:admin
63:essay
16:<
230:AN/I
152:must
150:You
199:CSD
137:XfD
392::
167:OR
65:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
