31:
657:
142:
Good question. I haven't decided, and I don't think
Knowledge (XXG) has, either. Ten years ago the understanding of notability on Knowledge (XXG) was different than it is now. Like many of Knowledge (XXG)'s core notions it has stabilized as the project has matured, but I suspect in another ten years
1060:
93:
Why does it do this? For one thing, the GNG is exactly what it says it is: a general guideline. No general guideline can be dispositive in every situation, and the GNG acknowledges that. More importantly, though, the GNG acknowledges the limits of coverage in assessing notability. Coverage does not
161:
Referencing the GNG in notability discussions makes sense, of course. But when that happens it needs to be a part of a complete statement that engages with the core concepts and advances the level of discourse, rather than a substitute for it. When you write about notability, write notably.
1027:
158:. They evidence only the slightest bit more work, and no more actual thought, than "Keep; notable" and "Delete; not notable". They're also a much bigger appeal (and thus deference) to authority than most Wikipedians probably realize or would be comfortable with if they did.
102:
notability. Aware of its own limitations and the limitations of coverage, the GNG claims insight, not authority. It doesn't tell you what to think about notability; it suggests how you should think about notability. It's where you should start, not where you should end.
712:
111:
Coverage does not always imply notability. At least monthly the news media in the United States fixate on some "human interest" story at the expense of notable topics. It receives significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of it, but that makes it
337:
69:. Coverage is notedness. This has some bearing on assessing notability, but it is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition. We need to elevate our discussions around notability so that we are engaging the core points rather than deferring to authority.
812:
462:
228:
667:
143:
it will be different again. It will probably be more inlcusionist in some respects and more deletionist in others. Perhaps we'll have an entirely new way of thinking about it that makes the inclusionism–deletionism dichotomy feel antiquated.
882:
837:
922:
412:
457:
86:'s first clause and its three key words: "significant", "reliable", and "independent". But there's a second clause, and it has but one key word: "presumed". The GNG is often (mis)used in deletion discussions as a
877:
782:
987:
977:
422:
272:
1075:
512:
452:
887:
737:
522:
327:
178:
Sort of. The media and the subjects of these stories both want our attention and our dollars, and their joint interests lead them to collaborate in creating these ephemera. But that's another rant.
817:
542:
717:
707:
642:
567:
146:
In the meantime, we need to hold ourselves to a higher standard when assessing notability. It requires more than checking three boxes and writing 200 bytes. No more "Keep; passes
907:
447:
131:
essentially adopt the GNG as a sufficient condition for notability in their areas and then suggest other ways to prove a subject is notable in the absence of GNG-level coverage.
952:
392:
277:
637:
852:
372:
967:
927:
862:
78:
If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.
897:
602:
537:
982:
822:
767:
652:
402:
1070:
912:
632:
597:
322:
557:
747:
732:
691:
647:
362:
947:
932:
902:
917:
292:
1017:
832:
827:
582:
997:
842:
617:
507:
477:
472:
962:
607:
532:
215:
1032:
612:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
487:
482:
51:
397:
672:
267:
1111:
1007:
801:
722:
467:
367:
892:
847:
662:
497:
282:
992:
857:
702:
572:
527:
387:
311:
257:
1065:
742:
622:
587:
432:
382:
155:
727:
627:
562:
437:
417:
357:
1022:
957:
937:
552:
547:
427:
352:
347:
342:
577:
262:
942:
752:
517:
241:
972:
757:
407:
90:
condition for notability, when in one little word the GNG itself announces that it is not to be used in that way.
872:
762:
492:
377:
208:
87:
772:
777:
592:
442:
287:
658:
User:Vanished user 909146283013/Follow the WP:EPISODE guideline and make AfD easier for articles that don't
43:
224:
55:
1116:
1091:
332:
201:
1012:
127:
At the same time, lack of coverage does not always imply lack of notability. Other guidelines like
121:
39:
1028:
User:MichaelQSchmidt/The general notability guide versus subject-specific notability guidelines
502:
17:
713:
User:ASCIIn2Bme/Verifiability and plagiarism are the hammer and anvil of astute wikilawyers
151:
147:
128:
83:
1002:
1061:
Assume the assumption of the assumption of the assumption of the assumption of bad faith
338:
User:Aspening/Just because something is unflattering doesn't mean it should be deleted
1105:
252:
813:
User:HowardBGolden/Abuse of the
General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions
463:
User:HowardBGolden/Abuse of the
General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
668:
User:ViperSnake151/Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (Human
Readable Version)
134:
Thus, while coverage and notability often go together, neither implies the other.
1094:
category page has many more, listed below the subcategories section on the pages.
883:
Knowledge (XXG):Don't assume lasting significance for instances of self-harm
838:
User:Chrislk02/anarticleaboutaschoolthatcantfindagermanteacherisnotnotable
923:
User:Mike Cline/Imagining a new way to look at the question of
Notability
413:
User:Emmette
Hernandez Coleman/Deleting redirects to facilitate searching
187:
I admit that I have done this. It was wrong. I am trying to do better.
73:
The most widely cited and most widely misunderstood piece of
Wikitext
878:
Knowledge (XXG):Don't assume lasting significance for crime articles
783:
User:Vincentvikram/Always keep context in mind when arguing claims
193:
988:
User:Geo Swan/Evaluating notability for lesser prizes and awards
1049:
799:
689:
423:
User:Geo Swan/opinions/editing Fahd al
Jutayli while before Afd
309:
273:
User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters/Academic and artistic biographies
239:
197:
25:
523:
User:NawlinWiki/List of things that will get speedily deleted
328:
User:AleatoryPonderings/Systemic bias in deletion discussions
513:
User:Mike Cline/The
Inclusionist's Guide To Deletion Debates
120:. This is why we have, for example, subject guidelines like
978:
User:PorkchopGMX/Popularity doesn’t always equal notability
888:
User:MalwareSmarts/Don't confuse non-notability with a hoax
818:
User:Philtweir/Academic communities articles and notability
458:
User:Hijiri88/Don't call yourself or others "inclusionists"
738:
User:SMcCandlish/Discretionary sanctions 2013–2018 review
543:
User:Puzzledvegetable/DINC alone is not a reason to keep
953:
User:Davidwr/No topic deserves to be in Knowledge (XXG)
708:
User:Alexia Death/Community Court for community issues
643:
User:Tothwolf/rescued essays/AfD: formula for conflict
568:
User:Robofish/Thoughts on inclusionism and deletionism
908:
User:League Octopus/Club notability tables (and test)
453:
User:Hijiri88/Don't call other editors "deletionists"
448:
User:Hiding/Points to note regarding deletion debates
393:
User:Davidwr/Choosing SPEEDY, PROD, or AFD deletion
278:
User:This is Paul/Articles concerning criminal acts
853:User:Czarkoff/essays/Businesses are rarely notable
1076:Nomination of Knowledge (XXG) for speedy deletion
928:User:Davidwr/Inherent Notability as a slang term
863:User:ReaderofthePack/Common notability arguments
718:User:ASCIIn2Bme/What "no consensus" really means
898:User:Anon126/Explaining notability to newcomers
748:User:Orlady/Getting your way at Knowledge (XXG)
603:User:SoWhy/Ten Commandments for Speedy Deletion
538:User:SMcCandlish/Notability and Deletion policy
138:If notability is not coverage, then what is it?
76:
983:User:RoySmith/essays/Presumption of Notability
823:User:Robert McClenon/Acceptance of Biographies
768:User:The Bushranger/Lob a grenade and run away
653:User:Ultraexactzz/Time-delayed Speedy Deletion
403:User:Eire2020/WP:On the subject of deletionism
373:User:The Bushranger/Don't move articles at AfD
913:User:ArsenalFan700/Indian Football Notability
633:User:Tisane/Allow viewing of deleted articles
598:User:SoWhy/Before tagging for speedy deletion
323:User:Mangojuice/Administrators are not slaves
209:
8:
558:User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7
868:User:Lagrange613/Coverage is not notability
733:User:Beeblebrox/The perfect policy proposal
1046:
968:User:Herostratus/"Notable people" sections
796:
686:
648:User:Ultraexactzz/Sorting Deletion Debates
363:User:Bibliomaniac15/A guide to closing CFD
306:
236:
216:
202:
194:
948:User:Brainy J/No Exceptions to Notability
933:User:Robert McClenon/Internet celebrities
903:User:AliveFreeHappy/Notability (firearms)
918:User:Phil Sandifer/History of notability
293:User:Steve Smith/Semi-protection of BLPs
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
1018:User:ReaderofthePack/YouTube notability
833:User:Masem/Alternate Take on Notability
828:User:Alex Noble/AFC is about notability
638:User:Tisane/Don't delete users' résumés
583:User:Simon Dodd/Some AFD considerations
171:
107:Coverage and notability are not subsets
998:User:Esquivalience/Essay on notability
843:User:ReaderofthePack/Author notability
618:User:Syrenka V/Protection not deletion
508:User:Mike Cline/Archimedes was deleted
478:User:K50 Dude/Essay on Speedy Deletion
473:User:Jh12/School articles and deletion
963:User:Glades12/Notability is temporary
608:User:Spartaz/Rescuing Deleted Content
533:User:Northamerica1000/Eager to delete
124:that are much stricter than the GNG.
82:Most of the time the focus is on the
7:
1033:User:voorts/The spectrum of coverage
613:User:Stifle/Delete unless cleaned up
673:User:Yunshui/Deletion for beginners
268:User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism
1008:User:Fleets/sandboxWPRL notability
723:User:GTBacchus/A recurring problem
468:User:Isomorphic/Essays/Deletionism
398:User:Davidwr/Deleting GA+ articles
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
893:User:Basket of Puppies/Editorials
848:User:Gryllida/BiographyNotability
692:User essays on dispute resolution
663:User:Vermont/essay/AfD Filibuster
498:User:Martijn Hoekstra/what is AfD
488:User:Lenticel/Deletion isn't Evil
483:User:KGirlTrucker81/What G1 isn't
283:User:Mattinbgn/BLP considerations
993:User:RoySmith/Three best sources
858:User:Northamerica1000/Churnalism
703:User:AGK/Arbitration and content
573:User:RoySmith/Three best sources
528:User:NeoFreak/Essays/Deletionism
388:User:Northamerica1000/Churnalism
258:User:Doc glasgow/The BLP problem
29:
743:User:Guy Macon/One against many
623:User:Terrariola/Delete the junk
588:User:Seraphimblade/Deletion FAQ
433:User:Ginkgo100/Speedy deletions
383:User:Champion/Deletion is cheap
368:User:Buddy431/AFD isn't cleanup
728:User:Jnc/Astronomer vs Amateur
628:User:The Cunctator/Deletionism
563:User:Ritchie333/The Dumpy test
438:User:Graymornings/Have a heart
418:User:Fl/Reports/RevisionDelete
358:User:Balloonman/CSD G10 survey
1:
1023:User:Seraphimblade/sandbox2/3
958:User:Esquivalience/Notability
938:User:Joe Decker/IsThisNotable
553:User:RileyBugz/G11 and drafts
548:User:Randy Kryn/Rule of thumb
428:User:Ginkgo100/AFD philosophy
353:User:Balloonman/CSD G1 survey
348:User:Balloonman/CSD A7 survey
343:User:Balloonman/CSD A1 survey
154:". These should be listed in
773:Knowledge (XXG):Unblockables
578:User:Sebwite/Mock Afd Series
263:User:JoshuaZ/Thoughts on BLP
84:general notability guideline
943:User:Trackinfo/sandbox/NHSL
753:User:Robert McClenon/Crisis
518:User:Mr.Z-man/on fixing CSD
1133:
973:User:Uncle G/On notability
758:User:RGloucester/Sanctions
408:User:Elaragirl/Deletionism
67:Coverage is not notability
1112:User essays on notability
1088:
1056:
1045:
873:User:Bahamut0013/deletion
808:
802:User essays on notability
795:
763:User:Skomorokh/First rule
698:
685:
493:User:Livitup/Deletion FAQ
378:User:Spartaz/Closing AFDs
318:
305:
248:
235:
1071:Letters from the editors
778:User:AGK/AE improvements
593:User:Shereth/Deletionism
443:User:Hellboy2hell/Delete
312:User essays on deletion
288:User:SirFozzie/BLP-Lock
88:necessary or sufficient
80:
156:WP:Arguments to avoid
54:, as it has not been
333:User:Angela/Deletion
150:" or "Delete; fails
1013:User:Moray An Par/b
242:User essays on BLP
1099:
1098:
1084:
1083:
1041:
1040:
791:
790:
681:
680:
301:
300:
64:
63:
1124:
1047:
797:
687:
503:User:MBisanz/AfD
307:
237:
230:
218:
211:
204:
195:
188:
185:
179:
176:
33:
32:
26:
18:User:Lagrange613
1132:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1080:
1052:
1051:Humorous essays
1037:
1003:User:Fleets/RLN
804:
787:
694:
677:
314:
297:
244:
231:
222:
192:
191:
186:
182:
177:
173:
168:
140:
109:
98:notability. It
75:
60:
59:
48:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1130:
1128:
1120:
1119:
1114:
1104:
1103:
1097:
1096:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1079:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1066:Avoid headings
1063:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1050:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
950:
945:
940:
935:
930:
925:
920:
915:
910:
905:
900:
895:
890:
885:
880:
875:
870:
865:
860:
855:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
809:
806:
805:
800:
793:
792:
789:
788:
786:
785:
780:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
750:
745:
740:
735:
730:
725:
720:
715:
710:
705:
699:
696:
695:
690:
683:
682:
679:
678:
676:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
635:
630:
625:
620:
615:
610:
605:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
560:
555:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
525:
520:
515:
510:
505:
500:
495:
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
465:
460:
455:
450:
445:
440:
435:
430:
425:
420:
415:
410:
405:
400:
395:
390:
385:
380:
375:
370:
365:
360:
355:
350:
345:
340:
335:
330:
325:
319:
316:
315:
310:
303:
302:
299:
298:
296:
295:
290:
285:
280:
275:
270:
265:
260:
255:
249:
246:
245:
240:
233:
232:
223:
221:
220:
213:
206:
198:
190:
189:
180:
170:
169:
167:
164:
139:
136:
108:
105:
74:
71:
62:
61:
49:
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1129:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1107:
1093:
1087:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1048:
1044:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
924:
921:
919:
916:
914:
911:
909:
906:
904:
901:
899:
896:
894:
891:
889:
886:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
864:
861:
859:
856:
854:
851:
849:
846:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
810:
807:
803:
798:
794:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
749:
746:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
729:
726:
724:
721:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
706:
704:
701:
700:
697:
693:
688:
684:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
621:
619:
616:
614:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
559:
556:
554:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
464:
461:
459:
456:
454:
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
359:
356:
354:
351:
349:
346:
344:
341:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
324:
321:
320:
317:
313:
308:
304:
294:
291:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:
276:
274:
271:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
253:User:DGG/bios
251:
250:
247:
243:
238:
234:
226:
219:
214:
212:
207:
205:
200:
199:
196:
184:
181:
175:
172:
165:
163:
159:
157:
153:
149:
144:
137:
135:
132:
130:
125:
123:
119:
115:
106:
104:
101:
97:
91:
89:
85:
79:
72:
70:
68:
57:
53:
47:
45:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
867:
183:
174:
160:
145:
141:
133:
126:
117:
116:rather than
113:
110:
99:
95:
92:
81:
77:
66:
65:
37:
1117:User essays
1092:User essays
225:User essays
38:This is an
1106:Categories
1090:Note: The
44:notability
122:WP:EVENTS
100:confirms
118:notable
227:
129:WP:BIO
96:confer
166:Notes
114:noted
40:essay
16:<
229:(?)
152:GNG
148:GNG
42:on
1108::
217:e
210:t
203:v
46:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.