27:
leave a message on the user's talk page asking nicely for the comment to be removed. If enough different people do this, it will help users who have been using the ref desk inappropriately which comments are innapropriate and put community pressure on them to change their behavior. For this to work, I need everyone's help, so I'd like to invite you to join me!
147:
It seems to me that the users who misuse the reference desk tend to greatly enjoy arguing, and have an infinite capacity for it, and they do not argue from the viewpoint of what is good for
Knowledge or for the purpose of the reference desk. Discussion has already been tried by a number of users,
26:
Here's what I personally will be doing, for the time being, to try to deal with misuse of the reference desk by certain users. If I feel a comment undermines the reference desk, I will not remove it, but simply copy it to the talk page and explain why it's a bad idea; in some cases, I might also
163:
a matter of opinion. Excessive discussion, inappropriate joking, rudeness to new users, and advocacy of opinion are all violations of
Knowledge policy—especially when they get in the way of the reference desk page serving its function. If those who abuse the reference desk don't get the
122:
It seems to me that the following comment was not appropriate to the reference desk. FictionalUser has inserted her own personal opinion rather than answering a very clear question, and has given medical advice as well. I'd like to ask
FictionalUser to remove her comment, please, since they
148:
and gotten nowhere. Thus in many cases there will be little point in responding directly when they dispute your comments. Let their arguments hang in the air, be patient, and wait for similar complaints to accumulate.
172:
This being a wiki, you should of course feel free to add any ideas you have that would help with this strategy; however, if you oppose my efforts, it would probably make more sense for you to comment on the talk page.
151:
If you see another user has already commented on something you feel is inappropriate, you could certainly add a note of agreement. Again, you might want to avoid being drawn into a long discussion.
164:
message from this strategy, then at least we'll have clear examples of problematic behavior, and our efforts to address the problem, for use in requesting a more binding solution.
76:
95:. Giving "not-medical-advice" is inappropriate and will mislead question askers, in ways that may prove very unfortunate for them; that's bad.
102:
is a place to assist in finding factual answers to questions. Things that get in the way of this function are not appropriate.
81:
116:
88:
92:
111:
I might leave this comment on the ref desk talk page, and a slightly modified version on the user's talk page:
38:
Anything whose presence you think makes the reference desk significantly worse. For me, this might include:
45:
Inside jokes, or purposeless crude comments, that might make new users feel excluded from the reference desk
71:
48:
Opinions stated as fact, of which get in the way of others trying to provide factual answers
99:
54:
Answers that are clearly unhelpful, in cases when the poster ought to have known better
42:
Discussion that gets in the way of factual answers by obscuring it and taking up space
124:
82:
Knowledge:What
Knowledge is not#Knowledge is not a publisher of original thought
17:
84:, item 5, which states that Knowledge is not to be used for discussion forums.
137:
Doctors are evil; they will only make things worse. -- FictionalUser
131:
How do I find a doctor near San Mateo, California? -- Questioner
67:
of the reference desk. Here are some reasons you might cite:
117:
Knowledge:Reference desk/Miscelleneous#How to find a doctor
63:
Comment in terms of
Knowledge policy and in terms of the
87:
Knowledge cannot give medical or legal advice. See
154:
123:undermine the purpose of the reference desk. --
8:
155:If there's no response to community pressure
159:The right to misuse the reference desk is
77:Knowledge:Please do not bite the newcomers
30:Here's a quick guide to what to do...
7:
24:
1:
127:01:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
51:Advocacy of personal opinions
89:Knowledge:Medical disclaimer
115:Inappropriate comment from
187:
168:Please help with this page
93:Knowledge:Legal disclaimer
143:Avoid useless arguments
72:Knowledge:Be civil
34:What to comment on
107:Fictional example
178:
186:
185:
181:
180:
179:
177:
176:
175:
170:
157:
145:
120:
109:
61:
36:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
184:
182:
169:
166:
156:
153:
144:
141:
140:
139:
119:
113:
108:
105:
104:
103:
100:reference desk
96:
85:
79:
74:
60:
57:
56:
55:
52:
49:
46:
43:
35:
32:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
183:
174:
167:
165:
162:
152:
149:
142:
138:
135:
134:
133:
132:
128:
126:
118:
114:
112:
106:
101:
97:
94:
90:
86:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
69:
68:
66:
58:
53:
50:
47:
44:
41:
40:
39:
33:
31:
28:
19:
171:
160:
158:
150:
146:
136:
130:
129:
121:
110:
64:
62:
37:
29:
25:
59:What to say
18:User:SCZenz
65:purpose
125:SCZenz
16:<
98:The
91:and
161:not
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.