217:
the world with varying interests, values, and attitudes. After first joining
Knowledge (XXG), newcomers are presented with Knowledge (XXG) Essentials and Editing Basics tutorials. These tutorials are informative, but do not do a good enough job in preparing the new user for harsh criticism they may face. I’m sure that Knowledge (XXG) does this to not turn off new members from the site, but they should also be letting them know how strictly they regard their policies and the difficulties many newcomers may encounter. This way, newcomers who do not take the cite seriously, are not a good fit, or who simply do not care enough to become a contributing member will be diverted from the community. As best explained by Kraut and Resnick, “ensuring that new recruits match the style and values of an online community will lead them to stay longer and be more satisfied with their membership, and it will lead to more benefits for the group as a whole and for existing members."
37:
welcoming initially, Knowledge (XXG) is a large and somewhat overwhelming community that can be hard for newcomers to properly assimilate into. Although new
Knowledge (XXG) users are presented with a variety of tutorials when initially joining, they are soon cut off and left to fend for themselves. Not to overlook the numerous articles and tips for use that are present on Knowledge (XXG), but these are often hard to find and even more difficult for a newcomer to navigate correctly. Throughout my experience contributing to Knowledge (XXG) I was continuously reminded of this and often felt discouraged. However, as time went on, I eventually became more knowledgeable of the community and ultimately found my experience to be a positive one. While reflecting on my personal experiences, I will argue that Knowledge (XXG) needs to better their approach to newcomers so that new members can be more easily be accepted into the community.
199:
have obviously taken more effort, but I would have learned more from my mistakes and would have become a better
Knowledge (XXG) member because of it. According to the findings of Haiyi Zhu et al. (2013) in their field experiment on Knowledge (XXG), "Positive feedback and social messages increase people's general motivation to work these effects are stronger for newcomers" while, "negative feedback reduced motivation." This experiment tested the effects of different feedback types on members' contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and further proved how important it is for newcomers to receive positive feedback from existing members. Although we can be frustrating to deal with, everyone starts off as a newcomer and should be viewed as an growing asset to the community instead of an annoyance.
238:.” Speaking from my personal experience, after my first attempt at contributing to an article resulted in reversion, I too wanted to run away from the community. I was frustrated that all my hard work was deleted in one swoop and discouraged from taking another try contributing to the community. Knowledge (XXG) could benefit by taking a more lenient approach to moderating newcomer contributions, and better explain to newcomers the errors behind their mistakes. This way, they will be more apt to contribute in the future without fear of retaliation. As further explained by Kraut and Resnick (2011) in Design Claim 18, “When newcomers have friendly interactions with existing community members soon after joining a community, they are more likely to stay longer and contribute more."
247:
socialization period for newcomers, “the central challenge for the community is to keep the newcomer around." It is beneficial for the community as a whole to initiate interactions with newcomers as it acts to encourage their affective commitment to the community. Kraut and
Resnick argue, “The person who feels attached to the community as a whole will want to be part of the community and to further its purpose." In order for newcomers to feel attached to the Knowledge (XXG) community, they need to have positive social interactions with existing members.
267: what the other side has to say, then we can reach the state of "WikiLove". Additionally, Knowledge (XXG) could help promote the spread of Wikilove by having some kind of promotion in place where each time WikiLove was shared to a user a donation of a certain dollar amount would be made to Knowledge (XXG). I'm not sure of all the logistics behind this, or if it is even feasible for Knowledge (XXG) to do, but it would extrinsically motivate users to spread WikiLove while also raising donations for the community.
161:, James Grimmelmann does a great job putting the size of Knowledge (XXG) into perspective, "The English-language Knowledge (XXG) alone has over four and a half million articles. Twenty-three million registered users and countless anonymous ones have made more than seven hundred million edits." These pure stats, combined with the large amount of Wikipedians who have a hostile and annoyed approach to new members, do not create the best environment for a newcomer trying to enter the community.
259:
discovered by new members to
Knowledge (XXG). Without Professor Reagle pointing it out to me, I probably would not have found it on my own and would not have understood how to use it. I would suggest Knowledge (XXG) make it a more pronounced feature during their new member tutorials and initiation to help encourage positive synergy. As Knowledge (XXG) says itself, "If we keep this common goal, this love of knowledge, in mind, if we concentrate on achieving a
170:
can promote good norms in online communities. First, they should be, "fostering a sense of shared identity that reinforces participants' sense of belonging and their commitment to the good of the community." Second, and most importantly in my opinion, they should be sensitive to, "the initiation of new participants, who must be taught the community's expectations at the same time as they are made to feel welcome."
225:
Retention is one of the biggest problems I believe
Knowledge (XXG) faces when dealing with new members. Research conducted on online communities shows that, “these groups experience a substantial amount of turnover and that turnover is especially high with new members." I found that Knowledge (XXG)
207:
Kraut and
Resnick (2011) introduce five basic problems online communities must solve when dealing with newcomers: recruitment, selection, retention, socialization, and protection. Speaking from my personal experience on Knowledge (XXG), I will be focusing on the three present problems of selection,
169:
Moderators are essential to the success of all online communities. Without them, there would be no policing or governance present. Moderators have a tough role to fill when balancing participation in a community while simultaneously preventing abuse. James
Grimmelmann explains a few ways moderators
84:
and flagged because the content was said to be written as an advertisement. My contributions contained many links to outside sources and numerous to Rover.com's website, something that at the time I thought was a good thing to have in an article. I learned the hard way that having so many links was
275:
While my experience as a newcomer joining
Knowledge (XXG) was frustrating and required a great deal of perseverance, overall I would consider myself successfully initiated into the online community. Although their approach to newcomers and moderation is not what I would consider welcoming, I found
216:
To begin, I think that selection in itself is a difficult task for online communities to undergo with new members. There is a fine line between being too selective and letting anyone and everyone join a community. This is especially true with
Knowledge (XXG), where people are joining from all over
173:
In hindsight, I understand and agree that my contributions made to Rover.com were overly promotional. However, I do not think the moderator that reverted my contributions approached the situation in the best way. With a quick look at my user page they would have found I was a newcomer to Knowledge
198:
by a more experienced user.” Being frank, the user who reverted my contributions could have learned a bit from this article. Maybe they could have taken the time to reach out to me with feedback, or even edited the article accordingly instead of just reverting everything I contributed. This would
258:
is one great way Knowledge (XXG) allows users to express gratitude to one another and interact in a positive way. It successfully encourages benevolent conversation among members of the community. Although I benefited from WikiLove as a newcomer, I do not think it is not something that is easily
36:
My experience as a newcomer contributing to Knowledge (XXG) was a lot different from what I initially anticipated, but was ultimately a positive (although at times, frustrating) learning experience. The main takeaway I had was arguably one the majority of Knowledge (XXG) newcomers face: although
246:
Socialization is another dilemma Knowledge (XXG) encounters with newcomers. It is an important interaction faced by newcomers trying to actively join an online community, where “the group needs to socialize the newcomers, teaching them how to behave in ways appropriate to the group." During the
156:
Although I faced some challenges, my overall experience with Knowledge (XXG) was positive and I learned a great deal from it. As previously mentioned, my main takeaway is that Knowledge (XXG) is a vast, overwhelming community quite difficult for newcomers to easily assimilate into. In
61:. Once I started editing and began to realise the full scope of Knowledge (XXG), I found myself wishing for an additional step-by-step instruction manual for dummies. Following the suggestion of Professor Reagle, I began making my contributions and edits in my user sandbox page as a
69:, “Sandboxes both speed up the learning process for newcomers and reduce the harm to the community that newcomers might otherwise cause.” Using my sandbox allowed me to slowly and carefully hone my Knowledge (XXG) skills before laying them out in the public mainspace.
88:
At this point I was frustrated and conflicted - should I attempt to continue with Rover.com or start fresh with another topic? I did not want to risk having everything reverted again, so I made the decision to change my topic and start from the beginning.
276:
that most Wikipedians are just dedicated members of the community who truly care about its preservation. After all, there is a reason that "Other than the internet itself, Knowledge (XXG) is the preeminent example of successful online collaboration."
147:
from the Knowledge (XXG) community. I was elated to find that none of these were negative, and most were just simple copyedits and changes to my reference formatting. Hopefully as time passes this state of benevolence towards my article continues.
111:
to our fellow users. It successfully helped to strengthen the bonds between myself and other users. I really enjoyed this activity, and it was a welcome distraction from all of the negativity I had been facing from the Knowledge (XXG) community.
174:(XXG). As a newcomer who had just joined the community, they could have helped me learn what I did wrong before rushing to revert all of my contributions. I readily admit that a lot of my contributions were overly promotional, but certainly not
106:
my article in my user sandbox page. I made all of my edits and contributions in this space and used it as a draft so I could finalize everything before making it public. During this stage, one activity that Professor Reagle had us do was spread
226:
is no exception. As previously mentioned, Seven Ages of Wikipedians depicts the stages of growth a Wikipedian progresses through. When Wikipedians reach the age of a “WikiTeen” the article cautions that, “...it is important to
142:
over to the mainspace and was actually pleasantly surprised. As of my writing this, my article is still up and has not been deleted! I took this as a huge success. After my article was active for a day or so, I began getting
97:
After learning from the harsh reality I met with my first article attempt, I decided I may be more successful choosing a topic not already represented on Knowledge (XXG). After some debate, I decided to make an article for
49:, my initial knowledge of the site was limited to what I found when briefly searching for something on Google. I already anticipated a learning curve when I joined the site, but I found the initial
131:
to be really helpful. They noticed things I did not, such as a missing logo and product image, that helped improve the overall quality of my article. Professor Reagle also made some helpful
369:
Zhu, Haiti; Zhang, Amy; He, Jiping; Kraut, Robert E.; Kittur, Aniket (2013). "Effects of Peer Feedback on Contribution: A Field Experiment in Knowledge (XXG)".
57:
tutorials to be a helpful start. When I began the Knowledge (XXG) assignment I chose to elaborate and improve on an already existing article page,
76:
my contributions to the public Rover.com article mainspace. A couple of days later I discovered all of my edits and changes to the article were
179:
260:
128:
178:
that I wrote. At this stage of my experience, I would have been classified according to the Knowledge (XXG) article,
85:
frowned upon, as it made the article read more like a disguised advertisement and less like an article page.
80:. This was very discouraging to say the least. The contributions I had made to the article were marked as
50:
183:
235:
54:
231:
195:
65:. As scholars Paul Resnick and Robert E. Kraut (2011) explain in Design Claim 24 of their book,
191:
81:
227:
187:
124:
99:
17:
120:
371:
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13
127:. They both made copyedits and changed some repetitive wording, but I found their
102:, a popular company that manufactures and sells silicone bracelets. As before, I
72:
After a few weeks of what I thought were careful improvements to the article, I
58:
135:
and edits, ultimately suggesting I move my article over to the mainspace.
255:
108:
46:
309:
Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-based social design
67:
Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design
138:
Despite having hesitations and fears of deletion, I had my article
263: even when it is difficult, and if we try to actually
329:
Grimmelmann, James (2015). "The Virtues of Moderation".
384:
351:
186:
about editing, but still lack an in-depth knowledge of
144:
139:
132:
116:
103:
77:
73:
62:
311:. MIT Press. pp. 79, 180–181, 197, 205, 208, 219.
182:, as a “WikiChild.” They describe WikiChildren as, “
45:Starting as the definition of a Knowledge (XXG)
194:. Wikipedians at this stage often benefit from
8:
352:"Knowledge (XXG):Seven Ages of Wikipedians"
331:The Yale Journal of Law & Technology
307:Resnick, Paul; Kraut, Robert E. (2011).
284:
27:Knowledge (XXG) Assignment Reflection
7:
346:
344:
324:
322:
320:
318:
302:
300:
298:
296:
294:
292:
290:
288:
192:remember this when dealing with them
24:
41:Round One: The Trials of a Newbie
208:retention, and socialization.
1:
234:too harshly may retaliate by
119:, my article was edited by
409:
385:"Knowledge (XXG):WikiLove"
51:Knowledge (XXG) Essentials
180:Seven Ages of Wikipedians
159:The Virtues of Moderation
93:Round Two: New Beginnings
203:Dealing with Newcomers
165:The Role of Moderators
115:After getting it to a
261:neutral point of view
190:. It is important to
230:; WikiTeens who are
184:highly enthusiastic
82:overly promotional
228:treat them fairly
400:
393:
392:
381:
375:
374:
366:
360:
359:
348:
339:
338:
326:
313:
312:
304:
408:
407:
403:
402:
401:
399:
398:
397:
396:
389:Knowledge (XXG)
383:
382:
378:
368:
367:
363:
356:Knowledge (XXG)
350:
349:
342:
328:
327:
316:
306:
305:
286:
282:
273:
253:
244:
223:
214:
205:
167:
154:
95:
43:
34:
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:User:Sabbatessa
12:
11:
5:
406:
404:
395:
394:
376:
361:
340:
314:
283:
281:
278:
272:
269:
252:
249:
243:
240:
222:
219:
213:
210:
204:
201:
166:
163:
153:
150:
94:
91:
55:Editing Basics
42:
39:
33:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
405:
391:. 2017-03-02.
390:
386:
380:
377:
372:
365:
362:
358:. 2015-01-13.
357:
353:
347:
345:
341:
336:
332:
325:
323:
321:
319:
315:
310:
303:
301:
299:
297:
295:
293:
291:
289:
285:
279:
277:
270:
268:
266:
262:
257:
250:
248:
242:Socialization
241:
239:
237:
233:
229:
220:
218:
211:
209:
202:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
171:
164:
162:
160:
151:
149:
146:
141:
136:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
110:
105:
101:
92:
90:
86:
83:
79:
75:
70:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
40:
38:
31:
26:
19:
388:
379:
370:
364:
355:
334:
330:
308:
274:
264:
254:
245:
236:running away
224:
215:
206:
175:
172:
168:
158:
155:
137:
114:
96:
87:
71:
66:
44:
35:
32:Introduction
125:Marina Mano
117:final place
280:References
271:Conclusion
265:understand
176:everything
152:Discussion
121:Sara Perry
337:: 43–109.
221:Retention
212:Selection
145:revisions
133:revisions
59:Rover.com
256:WikiLove
251:WikiLove
232:punished
196:adoption
109:WikiLove
78:reverted
129:reviews
188:policy
74:posted
47:newbie
140:moved
104:began
100:Lokai
63:draft
16:<
123:and
53:and
387:.
354:.
343:^
335:17
333:.
317:^
287:^
373:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.