224:
activists" and "Transgender rights activists" in addition to the "Bisexual rights activists" category, or we should have the single umbrella "LGBT" category. Given that it would be a minefield to separate these out I propose that the umbrella "LGBT" term should be the only one in use. Should there be no negative comments to this proposal I propose to make this change within seven days. --Vamp:Willow 15:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
132:
As a side note, Google reports 98 categories when I searched for "site:en.wikipedia.org intitle:Category (intitle:Gay OR intitle:Lesbian OR intitle:Bisexual OR intitle:Transgender OR intitle:Transexual OR intitle:Transsexual OR intitle:Queer OR intitle:homosexual) -intitle:talk -intitle:wikipedians".
223:
I am somewhat unhappy that we appear to be further marginalising a marginal community - which appears that it should be included in the "LGBT" of this category - by having a sub-category for "bisexual"-only activists. Either we should have all three separate "Lesbian rights activists", "Gay rights
157:
because NO-ONE had bothered to cat it appropriately. I'm just not really sure of how to go about it, I've been recategorising ti as I go along, but I don't know about the big picture. I've always imagined queer writer are those who either identify as queer or write about queer theory. Would you
81:
Does anyone have any idea where to start organizing the morass of LGBT categories? One way that I don't think would work is to start with
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender - there are too many cats, articles, etc that span all four. So what are some other taxonomies that might work? --
128:
But maybe you're right and the current overall structure is sufficient - I haven't studied it enough to form an opinion. Mostly I'm just looking for input from different people to see what their thoughts are as to what needs to be
180:
114:, for example - in my opinion, it's not very organized. And there are lots of articles that are in multiple categories where simplification would help. For instance, what's the difference between
55:
35:
21:
194:
144:
93:
166:
154:
58:
included
Bisexual people. Survived, but lots of arguing, the categories I am proposing may get nominated for deletion.
46:
125:
And there have been several calls for re-organization, including one from you on the WP:LGBT talk page :)
119:
213:
115:
190:
140:
89:
174:
17:
185:
135:
84:
170:
159:
111:
104:
56:
Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_February_8#Category:LGBT_people
110:
Well, it's quite a jumble. Take a look at the category list on the
153:
I'm for reorganisation, after I discovered that no-one knew about
181:
List of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered sportspeople
103:
What is wrong with the way we already have, to begin with?
66:
bisexual rights activist was opposed and likely removed.
36:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Categories
165:There does not appear to be such an article as
162:(Have a nice day!) 16:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
107:(Have a nice day!) 18:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8:
62:Rights activists discussion 2006 and 2007
51:Categories for discussion, February 2007
7:
72:Jan 2007 discussion on Category:LGBT
167:List of transgendered sports people
155:List of transgendered sports people
28:
1:
177:00:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
200:01:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
150:16:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
99:18:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
41:August 2008 revamp proposed
240:
219:Bisexual rights activitsts
120:Category:Queer writers
116:Category:Gay writers
31:Previous Discussions
158:rather merge them?
214:Category_talk:LGBT
231:
199:
198:
149:
148:
98:
97:
239:
238:
234:
233:
232:
230:
229:
228:
221:
188:
184:
138:
134:
87:
83:
79:
74:
64:
53:
43:
33:
26:
25:
24:
22:LGBT Categories
18:User:Scarykitty
12:
11:
5:
237:
235:
220:
217:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
130:
126:
123:
78:
75:
73:
70:
63:
60:
52:
49:
42:
39:
32:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
236:
227:
225:
218:
216:
215:
196:
192:
187:
182:
179:
178:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:
161:
156:
152:
151:
146:
142:
137:
131:
127:
124:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
106:
102:
101:
100:
95:
91:
86:
76:
71:
69:
67:
61:
59:
57:
50:
48:
47:
40:
38:
37:
30:
23:
19:
222:
211:
80:
65:
54:
44:
34:
112:Portal page
77:Organizing
212:Source:
195:contribs
145:contribs
94:contribs
20: |
186:SatyrTN
136:SatyrTN
85:SatyrTN
171:Jmabel
160:Dev920
105:Dev920
129:done.
45:2007
16:<
191:talk
175:Talk
169:. -
141:talk
118:and
90:talk
183:--
133:--
226:]
193:|
173:|
143:|
92:|
68:]
197:)
189:(
147:)
139:(
122:?
96:)
88:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.