1715:«Edit summaries are especially important when reverting another editor's good faith work. Repeated reversions are contrary to Knowledge policy under Edit warring, except for specific policy-based material (such as WP:BLP exceptions) and for reversions of vandalism. Except in cases affected by content policies or guidelines, most disputes over content may be resolved through minor changes rather than taking an all-or-nothing position. Edit summaries are useful, but do not try to discuss disputes across multiple edit summaries; that is generally viewed as edit warring and may incur sanctions.»
598:). If you work with articles in the latter type, you will find more opposition and conflictual situations, whereas with unpopular articles you can 99% of the time work on your own without any discussion raised. That's because popular/polemic articles are more scrutinized by more editors, and more closely, one could say they are "sensitive" articles/topics. For a newcomer, it's advisable to start with unpopular articles first. Never focus all your contributions on only popular/polemic articles, you should mix both types when contributing, else you will be in for a lot of troubles! Check also
1089:
1055:
312:), which can autofill all fields to cite a journal/book/website from just the PMID, DOI, ISSN or url, see the two videos below. Personal tip: always use the PubMed's PMID to cite a scientific work, this will both ensure that the work is referenced in PubMed (which is a positive indication on quality, if it's not on PubMed it's generally a bad sign that this source is not usable on Knowledge, although there are exceptions). There is also a
1632:, "repeatedly pushing a viewpoint with which the consensus of the community clearly does not agree, effectively preventing a policy-based resolution" and "Removing a large addition for a minor error" and gaslighting technics, baseless contradiction, bad-faith negociating (luring into a false compromise and removing it when the other editor has compromised), "Reverting with "discuss first" without discussing, or BR
2018:, the philosophical root, of doubting everything and rejecting any knowledge (ie, any statement as being true), is unarguably extreme and incorrect! And this definition is nothing new, it mostly pertains to Plato's epistemology of knowledge (believing an entirely true statement) vs belief (believing a statement we don't fully know if it is fully true). This mixed with critical thinking and bayesian thinking. The
1612:"Using policies and guidelines to build (or push) a patently false case that some editor is editing in bad faith, with the "evidence" for this itself being an obviously unreasonable bad-faith interpretation of that person's action. This is more often categorized as a breach of the guideline to assume good faith, and in particular, repeated unjustified "warnings" may also be viewed as a breach of civility."
2015:: considering we can know nothing is extreme! And it's considered a moderate form of skepticism. Can't they at least know the sun is rising every day, and moon takes its place every night? Doubting everything is as bad as total credulity. "Bayesian" skepticism is the real moderate and most useful form of skepticism IMO. Although modern skeptics prefer to define themselves as simply being rational
926:
2647:
2570:
1735:: "It is unacceptable for an editor to routinely accuse others of misbehavior without reasonable cause. An editor must not accuse another of misbehavior without evidence, especially when the accusations are repeated or severe. If accusations must be made, they should be raised, with evidence, on the user-talk page of the editor they concern or in the appropriate forums."
2982:]. Preliminary plan: 1) update SCIRS inspired by latest MEDRS (initially SCIRS was based on MEDRS, but on an older version), 2) ensure primary studies are usable, but like everywhere in wikipedia, secondary scientific sources > primary sources (primary sources should not challenge secondary sources, but can give a more recent different point of view with appropriate
1004:
723:
627:
506:
17:
970:
740:
659:
495:
176:
74:
66:
2181:"They may quote policies in misleading ways, by citing them out of context, with extreme interpretations and without relevant disclaimers and exceptions." and "repeatedly reverting edits without discussion or explanation (peremptory deletions). Baiting and goading opponents until they become angry and uncivil is another POV-railroading tactic."
1618:"It does not mean one must be a native English speaker. There is no expectation that editors have high English skills. Minor spelling and grammar mistakes can be fixed by others. If poor English prevents an editor from writing comprehensible text directly in articles, they can instead post a change request on the article talk page."
1738:"Knowledge users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute." Arbcom ruling
2154:("Editors who revert a change proposed by an edit should generally avoid terse explanations (such as "against consensus") which provide little guidance to the proposing editor (or, if you do use such terse explanations, it is helpful to also include a link to the discussion where the consensus was formed)").
1061:Ça faisait longtemps que j'y songeais mais voila, je te décerne ce laurier tout spécial pour te remercier de tout le boulot que tu as fait pour que le 1er avril de cette année sur Wikipédia soit spécial et remarquable. Encore un grand bravo pour ta réactivité et tes bonnes idées. À bientôt peut-être !
320:
387:
is less important than having a sourced pertinent content as the formatting can be fixed without any knowledge of the topic (and sometimes even automated) and thus takes much less time, I will personally be happy to fix the formatting for you as long as you provide reliably sourced content, but other
2608:
Berrington de
Gonzalez, A; Hartge, P; Cerhan, JR; Flint, AJ; Hannan, L; MacInnis, RJ; Moore, SC; Tobias, GS; Anton-Culver, H; Freeman, LB; Beeson, WL; Clipp, SL; English, DR; Folsom, AR; Freedman, DM; Giles, G; Hakansson, N; Henderson, KD; Hoffman-Bolton, J; Hoppin, JA; Koenig, KL; Lee, IM; Linet,
1636:
without the D", "Arguing more discussion is needed, without discussing more", "arguing against discussion by alleging time wasting", "Avoiding substantive discussion because of who is involved", lack of consensus does not imply a consensus favoring the status quo: "Claiming consensus supports the
1594:
Consensus: "Deleting the pertinent cited additions of others. You delete the cited additions of others with the complaint that they did not discuss their edits first" and "Ignoring or refusing to answer good faith questions from other editors. Failure to cooperate with such simple requests may be
1154:
744:
Start copying from the top section to the bottom, with lede last if all sections are approved (as the lede must only contain info that is already in the entry's content). You should copy sections by sections as soon as your draft is good enough, so that you continue further modifications with the
1727:"Tactics can include frustrating the editor, hostility that discourages them from participating, or creating a false narrative that misrepresents actual events or edits in order to discredit the editor. Tactics can include continuously and exclusively referring to users in a negative manner."
34:
I am mostly contributing to science and musical articles, although my interests are broad and change over time. I am currently more invested in
Wikiversity, as it provides a great complementary platform with a different philosophy, allowing the introduction of scientific concepts via practical
1491:"Knowledge has changed from 'the encyclopedia that anyone can edit' to 'the encyclopedia that anyone who understands the norms, socializes him or herself, dodges the impersonal wall of semi-automated rejection and still wants to voluntarily contribute his or her time and energy can edit.'"
636:
932:
931:
928:
927:
933:
207:, an interactive tutorial that will guide you through each step. When you will feel more confident in your understanding of Knowledge's interface and how collaborative editing works, you can follow the indications below that are specific to medical articles on English Knowledge.
396:
Disputes are a normal part of the process of any collaborative project, and
Knowledge is unfortunately no exception. Despite the time you may take upon yourselves to make great contributions to Knowledge, sometimes your contributions may get totally annihilated (ie, reverted).
727:
Another way to publish is to copy section by section, one day at a time, and maintaining references consistency (by placing refs definitions in top to bottom order and outside of the lede), in order for other reviewers to have the time to review your changes in small
930:
262:
1721:"Little or no interest in working collaboratively. Extreme lack of interest in working constructively and in a cooperative manner with the community where the views of other users may differ; extreme lack of interest in heeding others' legitimate concerns..."
1577:"some tendentious editors engage in disruptive deletions as well. An example is repeated deletion of reliable sources posted by other editors" and "Does not engage in consensus building" and "repeatedly disregards other editors' explanations for their edits."
757:(stop after each copy to see if there was a revert, and discuss, don't revert back until it's fixed using other editors feedback). Be careful, if your userspace draft is left without editions for some time (or if it does not have the banner tags above such as
538:. Make sure you read and understand these two very important points. To summarize: you can write only what is written in reliable secondary sources. You can select (the pertinent info), you can reduce/synthesize (to make it more concise and short), but you
277:
Summary: a good reliable source is: 1. a secondary source like a review, or a tertiary source like an encyclopedia, 2. there are quality differences between reviews: guidelines are the highest (international > national > professional society), then
1196:
327:
328:
643:
607:
Tip for good sources: check that your reference has a PubMed PMID and use that to make a reference using the cite journal tool (this will signal to other editors that this reference is listed on PubMed). If not, check if the publisher is not in
337:
663:, you work iteratively but a bit randomly (so that some of your edits might not comply with Knowledge's formatting or sourcing rules), and are easily frustrated by reverts, then you can copy an article's source into your own userspace draft:
550:
for images (as we have to deal with images copyright, so it's allowed to make original images as long as it contains published infos, but not necessarily all in the same ref and not necessarily in the same way). Original research is however
269:
346:
345:
172:. That is not to say that deletionism is useless, of course it's necessary, like it's necessary for the brain to trim minor memories out to leave room for more significant ones, it's just not where I (and my brain) are good at doing
483:
Tip: if you come from a
Knowledge of another language, you should not assume that the rules are the same! For instance, warnings can be issued on your talk page by any user, not just admins, and even though they may be unjustified.
1449:
325:
324:
321:
2609:
MS; Park, Y; Pocobelli, G; Schatzkin, A; Sesso, HD; Weiderpass, E; Willcox, BJ; Wolk, A; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A; Willett, WC; Thun, MJ (2 December 2010). "Body-mass index and mortality among 1.46 million white adults".
326:
2513:, it makes as little sense as a potential "Knowledge is not Flickr" essay, Knowledge is not video-centric, but complementation with graphics IS useful, at least for conciseness and low literacy access. See also
1102:
50:
fashion. I edit
Knowledge as I would do a state-of-the-art literature review, so Knowledge is a by-product of my own research but it allows me to follow a strict methodology, and that's very nice! I try to be a
641:
640:
637:
642:
282:
are considered of very high quality, then systematic reviews and meta-analyses are high quality, then narrative reviews, and then mini-reviews, 3. it needs to be published by a reliable publisher, ie, not in
78:) to reduce bias. I will always be open to discussion to resolve these kinds of issues, so please feel free to reach to me (if I do not do it first). If nothing else works, please see what to do next in
323:
1571:
1476:
comments on arbitration, where lots of editors clearly don't mind an uncivil workplace... Have civility expectations lowered over time on WP? Or just everywhere in society, as the increase of
929:
639:
542:
combine (to create a new meaning, even a slight bias)! Make sure what you write is findable, without interpretation nor reasoning, in the source. There are however a few limited exceptions:
267:
266:
263:
268:
3002:
2344:
than they are to their own political agenda. Battlegrounds don't produce quality. And a certain blindness can set in if I'm only working with people I agree with. But if we disagree, but
1435:
This section mainly describes concepts and links that are or have been of interest to me. In other words: this is a mess, although you may find some stuff to be of interest for yourself.
1921:
All contents do not necessarily need to have an attached citation, only that the reliable source exists. But if challenged (eg, by a revert), it cannot be reinstated without a citation.
340:
343:
339:
338:
350:
More examples of the citation tool, particularly the "journal" template which you will most often use for medical articles, and can be autopopulated using the PMID (PubMed ID) or DOI
344:
2591:
Relative risk of death over 10 years for white men (blue) and women (purple), who have never smoked, in the United States by BMI. The 22.5 to 24.9 BMI range is set as the reference.
1377:
2953:
1712:"Editors who revert a change proposed by an edit should generally avoid terse explanations (such as "against consensus") which provide little guidance to the proposing editor".
1109:
for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki
Project Med Foundation is a
863:
when there are big behavioral problems that are inadmissible, any other dispute should be solved by other means and foremost by discussion, as any adult should be able to do!
242:, which follows specific more stringent rules different from the rest of Knowledge, the most useful and quick tips IMO are to 1. watch the intro video below (3min), 2. read
2976:
2365:
711:). This will allow you to work at your own pace, and when you are done, follow the instructions on the preceding link to ask for a review, or post a link to your draft on
265:
170:
2189:"long-term users might create a new account to better understand the editing experience from a new user's perspective. These accounts are not considered sockpuppets."
780:
2947:
342:
1606:"Filibustering the consensus-building process by reverting another editor for minor errors, or sticking to a viewpoint that the community has clearly rejected."
322:
156:
1583:"Their comments may avoid breaches of civility by refraining from personal attacks but still interfering with civil and collaborative editing and discussion"
2092:
Try to understand each participants point of view. Asking for a list of reliable sources with succinct quotes to describe their points is often a good start.
638:
3496:
1. Disagreement about validity of sources. 2. Disagreement about whether to include launch names in payload column of table. 14:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
2873:
2980:
1662:
144:
3636:
2422:
552:
143:
It seems my main abilities are in finding reliable scientific sources, and adding/revising content, as shown in xTools authorship of most articles I edit
1637:
status quo when it doesn't", "Drive-by long-distance reverts", "Unreasonable sourcing demands", etc. And also indirectly under the term "filibuster" at
444:. As a last resort, you can open an RfC. If the other editor's behavior is the problem (eg, insults, threats), you can seek help from administrators at
2986:) + scientific sources > mediatic sources, 3) rewrite until everything is concise and as small as possible and precise to avoid misunderstandings +
3624:
2540:
1286:
910:
tag on the line that is disputed (leave the line to their version), so that they will have to discuss to resolve the matter :-) Great idea from
616:
and has a high enough impact factor (as a rule of thumb, anything lower than 2 is not worth considering for
Knowledge). In case of doubts, check the
3612:
3417:
3368:
3319:
3270:
3221:
3172:
3123:
3074:
1570:«Revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique.», from
2112:
1872:
1780:
Consensus is achievable through editing without discussion (apart from edit summaries), and is considered the "ideal" collaborative editing form:
1282:
938:
664:
264:
2137:
572:
A competence that is not necessary for content editing but absolutely required for efficient collaborative communication is to learn how to use
2915:
1392:
621:
341:
168:
2998:
2796:
62:
If you disagree with my edits, it means either I am wrong, or you are wrong, or we're both wrong, or we're both correct and we don't know it
3517:
3513:
2868:
2682:
1679:
91:
1595:
interpreted as evidence of a bad faith effort to exasperate or waste the time of other editors." and "banning others from your talk page"
1278:
154:
3686:: cecd154d8fab67c73ae5eec2d8f7a9c5767820fbaeb41b666fa6f469c009e5787db8a406a2661956e3b9f4b3ced96f3ca5a3ac641995e7bb445458d0b2474dd1 is a
3570:
2221:
1989:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1388:
162:
3670:
3665:
2942:
1373:
796:
148:
166:
3507:
3014:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine&curid=21093109&diff=930051672&oldid=930004247
1999:
1652:
959:
955:
942:
648:
300:
288:
2185:
150:
160:
2991:
2778:
1453:
3516:. Disagreement about definitions, the consensus in philosophy of mind, and the sources used (see also the previous discussion:
2672:
2503:
2402:
2397:
2384:
2309:
332:
How to use the internal citation tool with autopopulation (click on lower-right gear to increase quality if text is unreadable)
2977:
Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_273#Using_of_primary_genetics_sources_at_Uyghur_(and_many_other_Eurasian_pages)
1739:
3493:
992:
Tip for science (but not necessarily medical) lovers: a similar but less constraining set of guidelines for good sourcing to
46:
My editing methodology is as follows: searching for high quality sources, read them, and then use them to write entries in a
476:, and wait at least 1 week without any reply before moving on to another avenue, as otherwise this could be considered
2054:
1922:
273:
An intro to medical articles editing on
Knowledge (click on the lower-right gear to increase quality if text is unreadable)
3499:
2417:
2355:
2257:
1510:
1939:
1408:, before there was almost no info on the net (at least not centralized!) for such a critical parameter for fMRI studies!
894:
158:
3682:
2763:
2738:
2412:
2211:
1545:
979:
963:
954:, there are very useful optional tools there (such as ProveIt, eases citations management, or the awesomely versatile
810:). Knowing and understanding these pages will ensure your arguments will be constructive. Also ensure you comply with
518:
Often, newcomers (and even experienced editors), and particularly those from academic backgrounds, have issues with
2920:
2787:
2407:
2275:
2133:
975:
230:
for non-medical scientific content). In any case, secondary sources are always to be preferred to primary sources.
146:
247:
3406:
3393:
3308:
3295:
3259:
3246:
3197:
3161:
3148:
3099:
2895:
2823:
2767:
1908:
1244:
987:
Tip for advanced users: you can configure your
Watchlist to save you a lot of time! (See the video on the right).
708:
686:
668:
2500:
3464:
2713:
2328:
2036:
2008:
1913:
1894:
1814:
1502:
1485:
1115:
884:
814:
by clarifying your affiliation on your userpage if you intend to work on articles pertaining to your expertise.
761:
679:
164:
2908:
Rename all instances of
Hodgkin's (syndrome|disease|lymphoma) into Hodgkin (syndrome|disease|lymphoma), using
1381:
3282:
2805:
2057:: edit warring and consensus cannot violate other rules and community-wide consensus (although there is also
1357:
152:
3588:
3380:
2839:
2265:
2173:
2069:
1853:
1716:
1665:
1481:
292:
1656:
859: :-D If agreement can't be reached, no problem, just ask on a WikiProject or make an RFC. Use the ANI
2289:
2150:
status quo page prior to changes when no consensus, but stability is not an argument to avoid changes per
1866:
1764:
1673:
1629:
1578:
832:
734:
429:
421:
186:
here, I am not fond of personality traits categories... But if you really want one, I think I might be a
3376:
3278:
3135:
2865:
2178:
2147:
1903:
1756:
1728:
1556:
1327:
1322:
1174:
1064:
591:
313:
115:
103:
2338:
590:
There are 2 sides of Knowledge: there are obscure articles that almost noone care about, and there are
379:
your contributions. If you are an academic working on the topic you are editing on Knowledge, see also
3478:
3402:
3389:
3357:
3344:
3304:
3291:
3255:
3242:
3193:
3184:
3157:
3144:
3095:
2968:
2535:
2510:
2323:
2200:
2099:
1775:
1745:
1732:
1469:
1312:
1302:
1220:
836:
768:
413:
187:
3327:
3010:
make an essay on why BOLD is essential: because noone will teach you, you'll have to learn by doing.
2657:
2580:
1153:
1088:
1000:. It's only an essay but several science editors are already following it, and I think that's great
788:
581:
If you modify the lede (introductory text at the head of any article), make sure to read and follow
3448:
3429:
3331:
3210:
2774:
2294:
2247:
2190:
2158:
2095:
2074:
2040:
2032:
1981:
1781:
1703:
1685:
1651:
applies to biomedical information, not to all infos in biomedical articles (clarified in MEDRS and
1638:
1625:
1533:
1332:
951:
784:
700:
609:
535:
477:
449:
409:
305:
284:
40:
3461:
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put
3229:
1935:
1559:(can't just say "unnecessary" as a reason for revert), the latter confirming my interpretation of
1360:
731:
3525:
3503:
2964:
2932:
2926:
2909:
2792:
2733:
2678:
2044:
1848:
1770:
1760:
1541:
1537:
1514:
1461:
1444:
1347:
1242:
1038:
1025:
918:
856:
840:
716:
712:
704:
703:
that could cause disruption by edit warring, as long as it's not for POV reason (a POV-fork, see
564:
531:
453:
368:
309:
126:
95:
87:
52:
36:
2523:
2028:
means essentially that you can do anything as long as you're not disrupting WP or its community.
1836:
795:
Tip for discussions: often, most discussions (and oppositions to edits) will be on the basis of
468:
and work on other articles, away from the editors with whom you had issues. See also the sound
222:
applies. For the rest, such as historical accounts or biomolecular content, the less stringent
3690:
3658:
3233:
2626:
2403:
Knowledge:User_scripts/Requests#User_script_to_help_guide_students_working_on_medical_articles
2393:
2319:
2242:
1995:
1889:
1861:
1857:
1840:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1752:- also acknowledge that criticism should be clear enough even for non-native English speakers.
1749:
1722:
1584:
1552:
869:
820:
693:
599:
417:
183:
111:
107:
79:
1567:, at worst incompetent editors should be eased, not just labelled incompetent and driven out.
3600:
3131:
2983:
2972:
2960:
2878:
2618:
2528:
2473:
2378:
2351:
2304:
2283:
2231:
2216:
2206:
2142:
2064:
2048:
1972:
1954:
1899:
1844:
1803:
1642:
1619:
1613:
1607:
1564:
1465:
1424:
1169:
844:
776:
754:
556:
457:
384:
380:
360:
243:
56:
1946:
A-hierarchical open collaboration? How conflicts and bureaucratic rules make Knowledge grow
3474:
3353:
3340:
3180:
3112:
3086:
2987:
2891:
2746:
2728:
2694:
2237:
2227:
2127:
1977:
1884:
1819:
1648:
1601:
1520:
1212:
997:
993:
904:
877:
852:
804:
523:
465:
251:
227:
219:
2389:
xTools enabled in Gadgets to get links to wikiblame to find who added/removed a content:
1135:
1106:
3444:
3425:
3206:
2715:
2707:
2314:
2299:
2087:
2083:
1950:
1878:
1809:
1785:
1498:
1492:
1473:
1457:
1126:
1013:
828:
800:
613:
543:
488:
254:
to identify reliable sources (20min). All of these links will help in identifying what
1672:"How to discourage stonewalling": "Advocate for the reverting of unexplained reverts"
1054:
287:
and generally with a PubMed id (PMID). If you use such reliable sources, your content
3654:
3647:
3548:
3521:
3025:
2954:
Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources_(science)#Why_isn't_this_official_policy?
2782:
2759:
2718:
2463:
2253:
2195:
2151:
2122:
2105:
2079:
2058:
2025:
1926:
1793:
1789:
1709:
1588:
1560:
1506:
1017:
914:
873:
824:
811:
750:
746:
595:
560:
527:
461:
445:
441:
437:
433:
405:
364:
239:
204:
99:
83:
47:
1596:
1450:
Knowledge:Why_is_Wikipedia_losing_contributors_-_Thinking_about_remedies#Deletionism
1035:
29:
3486:
2937:
2167:
978:
to add an indicator of edit warring, and a full list of gadgets may be found here:
937:
Configure your Watchlist with the new AI-powered colored filters, and combine with
772:
672:
547:
519:
316:
to do additional clean up, or to check that you formatted the citations correctly.
223:
2653:
2576:
2047:(local consensus can not override community-wide consensus but exceptionally) and
1624:
Stonewalling to status quo ante bellum is clearly rejected in Knowledge policies:
279:
70:. I never edit entries pertaining to my job or my interests (apart from curiosity
2813:
1918:
The goal is not to be right or wrong, it's to learn and build knowledge together.
1110:
2484:
2451:
2437:
1342:
1195:
2390:
129:, always remember the goal is to make better articles, no matter the hardships.
3108:
3082:
2507:
2019:
2012:
1945:
1572:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Episodes_and_characters_2#Editorial_process
1024:
I wish you an enjoyable collaborative editing experience on Knowledge full of
719:), before moving your draft to the mainspace where all public articles reside
3518:
Talk:Artificial general intelligence § Revert of edits on consciousness
2809:
573:
372:
3502:. Disagreement about inclusion of foreign language text quotes in sources.
2818:
2630:
1210:
This is for your valuable efforts on contributing to Knowledge. Thank you.
2979:
and origin of why it could not be promoted to guidelines, last message in
2622:
1412:
3687:
2022:
entry does not even describe how the modern skeptics describe themselves.
1307:
1241:
at the top right :-D For the very interesting rationale behind, see
582:
464:
is often disadvised, the best if the situation is stalled is to drop the
2842:
header when external sources duplicate Knowledge, see also how to detect
1070:-- about April's Fools event of April 1st 2018 event of French Knowledge
1337:
647:
Supercharge your Knowledge experience by enabling gadgets, such as the
28:
by adding, and seldom reverting (hence low edit count, but still >6K
2652:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
2575:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
2118:
2016:
775:! See also other possible use of content forking/moving in userspace:
388:
editors might think otherwise and revert you for formatting mistakes.
16:
15:
2490:
to add a precision to locate the page or figure/table from a source:
2721:
2668:
1033:
1032:
PS: of course, Knowledge is far from perfect and has systemic biases
3007:
Extend volunteer marek's gt essay to civility and personal attacks?
1931:
428:
to seek more editors opinions. You can do so by first asking for a
1658:
1645:
with a description closer to stonewalling than real filibustering.
1477:
1317:
1297:
499:
Contributing to medical articles will become easier over time and
335:
318:
260:
1239:
1113:
whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining
851:
and not on other editors, and to find higher quality sources per
487:
Always remember, and particularly in dire times, that we are all
203:
If you are totally new to Knowledge, the best thing is to follow
1669:
revert to status quo ante bellum while discussions are fostered?
699:). Content forking is allowed, including for major revisions to
617:
3500:
Talk:Cirsium × przybylzkii § Non-English text in citations
1868:
1653:
Knowledge:Status_quo_stonewalling#Unreasonable_sourcing_demands
1246:
226:
applies instead (and if you want to follow good practices, use
2641:
2564:
2520:
2184:
Scoping review of Knowledge in academic and health literature
1967:
Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Avoiding_constant_disputes
1532:
Easily fixable errors are not grounds for revertion/rejection
966:
to more easily reply (and never ill-indent your replies again
827:
and try to be concise, save your and others' time by avoiding
2801:
2559:
Relative risk of mortality by BMI in White US Men & Women
2532:
2163:
1405:
745:
normal collaborative process. When doing that, always follow
3589:
Wiki Education assignment: Biology I from cells to organisms
1959:
Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Writing_for_the_opponent
250:
for a general outline of how to contribute (10min), 3. then
2781:(also does ref order). See also all references gadgets at:
210:
The rest of this practical tutorial below pertains only to
2848:
Detect copyvio potential issues: Earwig's copyvio detector
2366:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Colin
1238:
Please also see the wonderful heart-shaped WikiLove plugin
689:
of the main article or its talk page (don't forget to add
2925:
create articles for ATC/DDD (medicines consumption), see
2916:
Talk:Non-alcoholic_fatty_liver_disease#Weight_loss_image
2519:
WikiData and template tables/maps countries projection:
1536:
and WP encourages inclusionism rather than reductionism
1511:
Knowledge:Closing_discussions#Challenging_other_closures
3640:
3561:
3538:
3533:
3013:
2957:
2849:
2843:
2827:
2771:
2549:
2514:
2360:
1660:
1271:
1267:
1263:
911:
808:
729:
469:
452:
at you and get you banned, so make sure to always have
25:
3514:
Talk:Artificial general intelligence § AGI vs ASI
3003:
Knowledge:Biographies_of_living_persons_dos_and_don'ts
2469:
to make a link to a pubmed article directly without a
2346:
treat each other with dignity, good humor, and respect
962:
that will allow to activate even more scripts such as
807:(which could be summarized as "mainstream, not fringe"
2948:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Archive_128#ICD11
2943:
Talk:Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia#New_content_to_add
1431:
Going further (about WP architecture and intricacies)
1372:
Major overhaul and "universalization" of the article
1180:(I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.)
701:
avoid modifying an article with sub-standard material
950:
Tip for advanced users: check your Preferences >
432:
or directly ask on the closest WikiProject (such as
194:
A practical introduction to medical articles edition
880:users: if they don't want to discuss, simply add a
847: ;-) Often, the best thing to do is simply to
3494:Talk:List of Starship launches § Recent Edits
3469:on your page. Click on that link for more options.
1991:Belief and truth : a skeptic reading of Plato
733:, as to avoid placing other editors in front of a
1963:Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Pseudoscience
1105:across any language of Knowledge. Thank you from
2055:Knowledge:What_is_consensus?#Not_a_walled_garden
781:Knowledge:When_in_doubt,_hide_it_in_the_woodwork
2310:Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view#Bias_in_sources
1041:, in the end things tend to get better :-)
777:Knowledge:Drafts#Moving_articles_to_draft_space
715:or the TeaHouse to discuss the changes before (
3625:Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone
2933:WT:MED#Dementia_risk_perception_is_in_the_news
2788:Help:Archiving_a_talk_page#Automated_archiving
1748:and avoid indirect criticism and scare quotes
1482:Game theoretic modeling of Knowledge conflicts
833:Knowledge:Noticeboards#Suggestions_for_success
585:, which provides invaluable and clear advices.
440:or another more pertinent noticeboard such as
436:), and if this doesn't work out, you can seek
2973:WP:ESSAYS#Creation_and_modification_of_essays
298:To make your life easier, you can (ab)use of
8:
3628:on Talk:Sex and gender differences in autism
3601:Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology
2896:Sentence clause structure#Compound sentences
2762:and its activation directly from interface:
2712:Double standard of warning templates usage:
2157:List of essays on consensus and discussion:
2051:for essays impact on consensus and policies.
618:archives of the Reliable Sources Noticeboard
234:Collaborative editing & reliable sources
3616:on Talk:Digital media use and mental health
2997:Make a Dos and Don'ts for MEDRS and SCIRS:
2874:Category:Creative_Commons-licensed_journals
2037:Knowledge:Sham_consensus#Level_of_consensus
996:but for science in general is available at
546:for simple calculations with consensus and
474:only exactly one of these avenues at a time
3582:Last updated by Reports bot 6 seconds ago
3030:
2766:, and for non-citation auto fixes there's
2423:User:Technical_13/Scripts/OneClickArchiver
2340:who are also absolutely committed more to
2286:(american and european infos can co-exist)
1563:(competence is required) also reminded in
448:, but be warned that this last option can
424:you, don't fight back: the solution is to
359:Finally, but it's more daunting, read the
924:
634:
3613:Wiki Education assignment: Social Media
3555:
3539:
2600:
2348:, we can do something very good indeed.
2334:a strong article is best produced by a
1873:Knowledge:WikiProject_Medicine/Research
1664:and somewhat related about competence:
1049:
665:Knowledge:So_you_made_a_userspace_draft
2541:Knowledge:Don't draw misleading graphs
2446:
2159:WP:ESSAYLIST#Discussions_and_consensus
2033:Knowledge:Consensus#Level_of_consensus
1771:Knowledge:Civility#Avoiding_incivility
1587:. And Dealing with disruptive editors
622:Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard
410:Knowledge:Consensus#Through_discussion
139:Rule 3: always follow Rules 1 & 2!
2797:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser/User_manual
2354:-- this is confirmed by studies, see
2205:editors need not be consulted before
2172:controversial is usually best avoided
2031:Hierarchy of consensus and policies:
1012:For biographies about academics, see
492:
416:is not required, and at worst follow
240:medical articles editing on Knowledge
71:
7:
2683:Knowledge:Coloring_cartographic_maps
2531:(can use Vega! But only v2 supported
2138:Special:Log/thanks?page=User:Signimu
2049:WP:ESSAYS#Wikipedia_namespace_essays
1988:Vogt, Katja Maria (September 2012).
1695:About edit summaries and discussion:
1680:Knowledge:Revert_only_when_necessary
1378:Appendix with extended source codes!
1162:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
1001:
967:
737:
720:
656:
624:
503:
491:to build the sum of human knowledge
420:. If you think other editors may be
173:
92:Knowledge:Revert_only_when_necessary
63:
24:I contribute to Knowledge since 2006
3693:to this user's real-life identity.
3481:) at 17:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2611:The New England journal of medicine
2534:...). Better use simple Wikichart:
2222:Knowledge:Reference_desk/Humanities
1927:Knowledge Projects are not censored
1782:Knowledge:Consensus#Through_editing
1540:. Interestingly, another alias for
1133:along with the rest of the team at
675:(don't forget to add in the header
671:". This is allowed, either in your
289:should most of the time be accepted
3653:To get notifications, register at
2999:Knowledge:Biography_dos_and_don'ts
1641:. And in fact totally accepted in
1168:for your random acts of kindness!
958:). It's also possible to enable a
620:and if still in doubt you can ask
438:the dispute resolution noticeboard
14:
3671:Knowledge policies and guidelines
1119:, there are no associated costs.
1037:, try to be patient and stick to
594:articles (such as those found on
3528:) 21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
3510:) 20:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2992:Knowledge:Policy_writing_is_hard
2779:User:Cumbril/Reference_Organizer
2645:
2568:
1744:How to avoid abuse of talk pages
1688:reasons why edit warring are bad
1639:WP:CONSENSUS#Pitfalls_and_errors
1454:Academic_studies_about_Wikipedia
1194:
1152:
1087:
1053:
1002:
968:
738:
721:
657:
625:
504:
493:
174:
132:Rule 2: always avoid discussing
72:
64:
3641:Add this feed to your Watchlist
2890:Commas and compound sentences:
2673:Knowledge:Extended image syntax
2504:Knowledge:WikiProject_Videowiki
2398:User:SD0001/hide-reverted-edits
2385:Knowledge:User_scripts/Requests
2342:Knowledge's ideal of neutrality
1462:Workplace_bullying#Volunteering
555:to evaluate the pertinence and
553:allowed and sometimes necessary
3666:Maths, science, and technology
3631:00:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
3619:00:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
3607:06:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
3595:06:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
3026:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
2743:watchlist with parametrization
945:gadgets to save a lot of time!
559:of sources and sentences with
1:
2418:User:Signimu/common.js/backup
2356:Ideological bias on Knowledge
2258:Knowledge:Edit summary legend
2252:To understand abbreviations:
1374:Reed–Solomon codes for coders
1139:17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
655:Content forking: If, like me
472:. Also post help requests in
280:Cochrane's systematic reviews
2975:) and address discussion at
2179:WP:POVRAILROAD#Policy misuse
1731:. There is an ArbCom ruling
1682:"Reverts drive editors away"
1382:Main Page News on 2017-07-02
1356:List of created articles: en
1232:16:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
1182:10:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
1171: - Mark D Worthen PsyD
1101:In 2018 you were one of the
919:the failure to discuss essay
442:reliable sources noticeboard
258:is pertinent for Knowledge.
214:, in other words to content
2938:Talk:Dieting#Content_to_add
2804:(Authorship in XTools) and
2764:Knowledge:Citation_expander
2739:User:Lupin/Anti-vandal_tool
2509:. I strongly disagree with
2413:User:Enterprisey/reply-link
2212:Knowledge:Kindness Campaign
2108:'s very inspirational intro
1994:. Oxford University Press.
1702:Avoid vague edit summaries
1686:Knowledge:Reverting#Reasons
1380:). It was announced on the
1136:Wiki Project Med Foundation
1107:Wiki Project Med Foundation
980:Knowledge:User_scripts/List
964:User:Enterprisey/reply-link
797:WP:Verifiability, not truth
400:In any case, try to remain
94:. I do my best to stick to
3707:
3592:on Talk:Multiple sclerosis
2921:User:Evad37/EditWarChecker
2819:yabbr to remove ref dupes?
2408:User:Evad37/EditWarChecker
2134:Special:Log/thanks/Signimu
1125:Thanks again :-) --
976:User:Evad37/EditWarChecker
787:. See also this discussion
513:Tips and pitfalls to avoid
216:pertaining to human health
121:My own rules of behavior:
3042:
3039:
3036:
3033:
2824:User:Frietjes/findargdups
2768:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser
1971:policy writing/drafting:
1909:Help:Notifications/Thanks
1509:for non-admins. See also
1200:
1193:
1158:
1151:
1086:
767:, it can get deleted per
82:. I comply foremost with
35:tutorials. I am often at
2667:Timelines: EasyTimeline
2506:, alternative to Osmosis
2336:politically diverse team
2009:Philosophical skepticism
1103:top ~250 medical editors
199:Totally new to Knowledge
3683:Committed identity
3320:Battle of_al-Qadisiyyah
3222:Benevolent dictatorship
2931:Alzheimer insulin? see
2773:. To merge references:
2553:Simple charts examples:
1763:and the opposite view:
1480:may suggest?. See also
1348:fr:Humiliation scolaire
1294:Notable contributions:
301:internal citation tools
205:The Knowledge Adventure
53:true (bayesian) skeptic
3572:View Other Discussions
3487:Third opinion disputes
2675:(also includes videos)
2447:highlighted text with
2368:and MEDPRICE on WT:MED
2166:and related discussion
946:
921:sound advices :-)
651:
351:
333:
274:
20:
2956:(follow these advices
2623:10.1056/NEJMoa1000367
2443:to show a markup code
2383:Ask for new scripts:
1986:Knowledge vs belief:
1328:Management of obesity
1323:Very-low-calorie diet
1204:The Original Barnstar
936:
900:(if they restore) or
783:and content dumping:
646:
592:popular/controversial
349:
331:
306:additional tools here
272:
98:, but highly dislike
19:
3648:Request for Comments
2864:FDA unapproved drugs
2826:(example of result:
2536:Template:Graph:Chart
2201:Knowledge:Editnotice
2132:Thanks log from me:
1546:WP:IMPROVEDONTREMOVE
1501:consensus, but on a
1470:Workplace_incivility
1464:- better understand
1313:Intermittent fasting
1303:Video game addiction
890:(if they delete) or
855:and don't forget to
837:Knowledge:ANI_advice
480:and get you banned.
188:Knowledge:WikiDragon
3604:on Talk:Cass Review
3563:Ask the WikiProject
3551:related discussions
3040:Last volunteer edit
2775:User:Uglemat/RefMan
2758:Auto citation fix:
2706:Warning templates:
2271:with "result=" and
1411:All contributions:
1376:(and check out the
1333:Calorie restriction
1095:The 2018 Cure Award
895:failed verification
785:Knowledge:Workpages
456:behavior and avoid
434:Medical WikiProject
310:more tutorials here
238:For editors new to
3677:Committed identity
3657:or check manually
2910:User:Joeytje50/JWB
2793:User:Joeytje50/JWB
2770:. See this comment
2679:Template:Graph:Map
1515:Minority influence
947:
667:. This is called "
652:
532:Overgeneralization
392:Dispute resolution
352:
334:
275:
21:
3544:
3470:
3458:
3457:
2952:Attempt refining
2783:WP:USL#References
2664:
2663:
2587:
2586:
2548:Pathways graphs:
2276:Discussion bottom
1914:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
1815:WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC
1503:WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS
1497:Do not rely on a
1236:
1235:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1144:
1143:
1123:
1122:
1075:
1074:
1042:
956:Navigation popups
943:navigation popups
934:
687:temporary subpage
649:Navigation popups
644:
460:. Requesting the
383:. In my opinion,
347:
329:
270:
182:(Sorry, no fancy
125:Rule 1: stick to
3698:
3632:
3620:
3608:
3596:
3575:
3573:
3566:
3564:
3556:Have a question?
3543:
3541:
3532:
3482:
3473:Last updated by
3468:
3460:
3386:1 days, 14 hours
3363:1 days, 14 hours
3350:1 days, 14 hours
3314:1 days, 10 hours
3301:1 days, 10 hours
3203:1 days, 10 hours
3190:3 days, 18 hours
3141:5 days, 15 hours
3105:1 days, 13 hours
3092:12 days, 9 hours
3031:
2861:Cochrane reviews
2840:WP:BACKWARDSCOPY
2649:
2648:
2642:
2635:
2634:
2605:
2572:
2571:
2565:
2489:
2483:
2478:
2472:
2468:
2462:
2456:
2450:
2442:
2436:
2361:How Woke Are We?
2352:User:Jimbo_Wales
2280:
2274:
2270:
2264:
2070:WP:EXTRAORDINARY
2005:
1854:WP:REASONABILITY
1717:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
1505:as confirmed in
1252:My contributions
1229:
1226:
1223:
1218:
1215:
1198:
1191:
1190:
1179:
1177:
1172:
1156:
1149:
1148:
1131:
1091:
1084:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1071:
1067:
1057:
1050:
1031:
1007:
1006:
1005:
973:
972:
971:
960:script installer
935:
909:
903:
899:
893:
889:
883:
849:focus on content
766:
760:
743:
742:
741:
726:
725:
724:
698:
692:
684:
678:
662:
661:
660:
645:
630:
629:
628:
602:and avoid these!
509:
508:
507:
498:
497:
496:
412:, remember that
402:calm and patient
348:
330:
271:
179:
178:
177:
77:
76:
75:
69:
68:
67:
57:pseudoskepticism
3706:
3705:
3701:
3700:
3699:
3697:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3679:
3651:
3644:
3643:
3630:
3629:
3618:
3617:
3606:
3605:
3594:
3593:
3584:
3583:
3578:
3577:
3571:
3569:
3562:
3560:
3553:
3537:
3490:
3472:
3471:
3465:DRN case status
3462:
3454:1 days, 8 hours
3435:1 days, 8 hours
3403:Robert McClenon
3390:Robert McClenon
3337:2 days, 1 hours
3305:Robert McClenon
3292:Robert McClenon
3288:2 days, 3 hours
3265:1 days, 9 hours
3256:Robert McClenon
3252:1 days, 9 hours
3243:Robert McClenon
3239:3 days, 3 hours
3194:Robert McClenon
3158:Robert McClenon
3145:Robert McClenon
3096:Robert McClenon
3075:Nivkh alphabets
3029:
3022:
2927:WT:MED#MEDPRICE
2905:
2887:
2885:English grammar
2858:
2836:
2755:
2747:Knowledge:STiki
2729:User:ClueBot_NG
2703:
2691:
2646:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2607:
2606:
2602:
2593:
2592:
2589:
2588:
2569:
2561:
2497:
2487:
2481:
2476:
2470:
2466:
2460:
2454:
2448:
2440:
2434:
2431:
2375:
2290:WP:ICANTHEARYOU
2278:
2272:
2268:
2262:
2002:
1987:
1796:= edit warring.
1765:WP:ALLARGUMENTS
1674:WP:Stonewalling
1630:WP:Stonewalling
1579:WP:DISRUPTSIGNS
1484:. And this case
1441:
1433:
1421:
1406:SPM slice order
1402:
1369:
1259:
1254:
1227:
1224:
1221:
1216:
1213:
1188:
1175:
1170:
1146:
1127:
1077:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1048:
1003:
969:
925:
907:
901:
897:
891:
887:
885:disputed-inline
881:
764:
762:userspace draft
758:
739:
735:WP:FAITACCOMPLI
722:
696:
690:
682:
680:userspace draft
676:
669:content forking
658:
635:
626:
515:
505:
494:
430:WP:THIRDOPINION
422:WP:STONEWALLING
394:
375:to know how to
357:
336:
319:
261:
236:
212:medical content
201:
196:
175:
73:
65:
12:
11:
5:
3704:
3702:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3668:
3650:
3645:
3637:View full list
3635:
3634:
3633:
3621:
3609:
3597:
3581:
3580:
3579:
3558:
3557:
3554:
3552:
3546:
3530:
3529:
3511:
3497:
3489:
3484:
3456:
3455:
3452:
3442:
3439:
3436:
3433:
3423:
3420:
3414:
3413:
3410:
3400:
3397:
3387:
3384:
3374:
3371:
3369:Queen of Sheba
3365:
3364:
3361:
3351:
3348:
3338:
3335:
3325:
3322:
3316:
3315:
3312:
3302:
3299:
3289:
3286:
3276:
3273:
3271:Super Bowl_III
3267:
3266:
3263:
3253:
3250:
3240:
3237:
3227:
3224:
3218:
3217:
3214:
3204:
3201:
3191:
3188:
3178:
3175:
3169:
3168:
3165:
3155:
3152:
3142:
3139:
3129:
3126:
3120:
3119:
3116:
3106:
3103:
3093:
3090:
3080:
3077:
3071:
3070:
3067:
3064:
3061:
3058:
3055:
3052:
3049:
3045:
3044:
3041:
3038:
3035:
3028:
3023:
3021:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3011:
3008:
3005:
2995:
2950:
2945:
2940:
2935:
2929:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2904:
2901:
2900:
2899:
2886:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2876:
2871:
2862:
2857:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2846:
2835:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2821:
2816:
2799:
2790:
2785:
2754:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2744:
2741:
2736:
2731:
2726:
2723:
2710:
2702:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2690:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2676:
2670:
2662:
2661:
2650:
2637:
2636:
2617:(23): 2211–9.
2599:
2598:
2594:
2590:
2585:
2584:
2573:
2563:
2562:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2551:
2546:
2543:
2538:
2525:
2517:
2496:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2479:
2458:
2444:
2430:
2429:Useful markups
2427:
2426:
2425:
2420:
2415:
2410:
2405:
2400:
2395:
2387:
2381:
2374:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2363:
2358:
2331:
2326:
2317:
2312:
2307:
2302:
2297:
2292:
2287:
2281:
2266:Discussion top
2260:
2250:
2245:
2240:
2235:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2203:
2198:
2193:
2187:
2182:
2176:
2170:
2161:
2155:
2148:WP:NOCONSENSUS
2145:
2140:
2130:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2109:
2102:
2093:
2090:
2077:
2072:
2067:
2062:
2052:
2029:
2023:
2006:
2000:
1984:
1975:
1969:
1948:
1943:
1940:video tutorial
1929:
1924:
1919:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1904:WP:DisruptTalk
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1875:
1870:
1864:
1851:
1838:
1831:
1826:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1757:WP:KEEPCONCISE
1753:
1742:
1736:
1729:WP:POVRAILROAD
1725:
1719:
1713:
1707:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1683:
1677:
1670:
1667:
1646:
1622:
1616:
1610:
1604:
1599:
1592:
1581:
1575:
1568:
1557:WP:OWNBEHAVIOR
1549:
1527:
1526:
1525:About reverts:
1523:
1518:
1489:
1488:
1447:
1440:
1437:
1432:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1420:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1409:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1385:
1368:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1291:
1290:
1275:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1234:
1233:
1207:
1206:
1201:
1199:
1184:
1183:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1157:
1142:
1141:
1121:
1120:
1098:
1097:
1092:
1073:
1072:
1058:
1047:
1044:
1022:
1021:
1009:
1008:
989:
988:
984:
983:
923:
922:
865:
864:
831:and following
816:
815:
792:
791:
633:
632:
604:
603:
587:
586:
578:
577:
569:
568:
514:
511:
478:forum shopping
393:
390:
356:
353:
291:, but however
235:
232:
200:
197:
195:
192:
141:
140:
137:
130:
116:WP:POVRAILROAD
104:WP:TENDENTIOUS
39:and I support
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3703:
3692:
3689:
3685:
3684:
3676:
3672:
3669:
3667:
3664:
3663:
3662:
3660:
3656:
3649:
3646:
3642:
3639: –
3638:
3627:
3626:
3622:
3615:
3614:
3610:
3603:
3602:
3598:
3591:
3590:
3586:
3585:
3576:
3574:
3567:
3565:
3550:
3547:
3545:
3542:
3535:
3527:
3523:
3519:
3515:
3512:
3509:
3505:
3501:
3498:
3495:
3492:
3491:
3488:
3485:
3483:
3480:
3476:
3466:
3453:
3450:
3446:
3443:
3440:
3437:
3434:
3431:
3427:
3424:
3421:
3419:
3416:
3415:
3411:
3408:
3404:
3401:
3398:
3395:
3391:
3388:
3385:
3382:
3378:
3377:Afrodiplomacy
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3366:
3362:
3359:
3355:
3352:
3349:
3346:
3342:
3339:
3336:
3333:
3329:
3326:
3323:
3321:
3318:
3317:
3313:
3310:
3306:
3303:
3300:
3297:
3293:
3290:
3287:
3284:
3280:
3279:73.28.218.215
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3268:
3264:
3261:
3257:
3254:
3251:
3248:
3244:
3241:
3238:
3235:
3231:
3228:
3225:
3223:
3220:
3219:
3215:
3212:
3208:
3205:
3202:
3199:
3195:
3192:
3189:
3186:
3182:
3179:
3176:
3174:
3171:
3170:
3166:
3163:
3159:
3156:
3153:
3150:
3146:
3143:
3140:
3137:
3133:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3121:
3117:
3114:
3110:
3107:
3104:
3101:
3097:
3094:
3091:
3088:
3084:
3081:
3078:
3076:
3073:
3072:
3068:
3065:
3062:
3059:
3056:
3053:
3050:
3047:
3046:
3043:Last modified
3032:
3027:
3024:
3019:
3015:
3012:
3009:
3006:
3004:
3000:
2996:
2993:
2989:
2985:
2981:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2969:WP:POLSILENCE
2966:
2962:
2958:
2955:
2951:
2949:
2946:
2944:
2941:
2939:
2936:
2934:
2930:
2928:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2911:
2907:
2906:
2902:
2897:
2893:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2877:
2875:
2872:
2869:
2866:
2863:
2860:
2859:
2855:
2850:
2847:
2844:
2841:
2838:
2837:
2833:
2828:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2815:
2811:
2807:
2803:
2800:
2798:
2794:
2791:
2789:
2786:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2756:
2752:
2748:
2745:
2742:
2740:
2737:
2735:
2732:
2730:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2720:
2717:
2714:
2711:
2709:
2705:
2704:
2700:
2696:
2693:
2692:
2688:
2684:
2680:
2677:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2666:
2665:
2659:
2658:MediaWiki.org
2655:
2651:
2644:
2643:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2604:
2601:
2597:
2582:
2581:MediaWiki.org
2578:
2574:
2567:
2566:
2560:
2552:
2550:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2533:
2530:
2526:
2524:
2521:
2518:
2515:
2512:
2511:WP:NOTYOUTUBE
2508:
2505:
2501:
2499:
2498:
2494:
2486:
2480:
2475:
2465:
2459:
2457:
2453:
2445:
2439:
2433:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2416:
2414:
2411:
2409:
2406:
2404:
2401:
2399:
2396:
2394:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2382:
2380:
2377:
2376:
2372:
2367:
2364:
2362:
2359:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2337:
2332:
2330:
2329:Citation hunt
2327:
2325:
2324:WP:CANVASSING
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2306:
2303:
2301:
2298:
2296:
2293:
2291:
2288:
2285:
2282:
2277:
2267:
2261:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2249:
2246:
2244:
2241:
2239:
2236:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2204:
2202:
2199:
2197:
2194:
2192:
2188:
2186:
2183:
2180:
2177:
2174:
2171:
2168:
2165:
2162:
2160:
2156:
2153:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2113:
2111:Edits types:
2110:
2107:
2106:User:Headbomb
2103:
2101:
2100:WP:NOABSTRACT
2097:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2078:
2076:
2073:
2071:
2068:
2066:
2063:
2060:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2027:
2024:
2021:
2017:
2014:
2010:
2007:
2003:
2001:9780199916818
1997:
1993:
1992:
1985:
1983:
1979:
1976:
1974:
1970:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1949:
1947:
1944:
1941:
1937:
1936:how to use it
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1877:"Yes. We are
1876:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1867:
1865:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1811:
1808:
1806:reciprocation
1805:
1802:
1801:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1777:
1776:WP:ASPERSIONS
1774:
1772:
1769:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1755:Conciseness:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1746:WP:AVOIDABUSE
1743:
1740:
1737:
1734:
1733:WP:ASPERSIONS
1730:
1726:
1724:
1720:
1718:
1714:
1711:
1708:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1693:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1678:
1675:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1659:
1657:
1655:). See also:
1654:
1650:
1647:
1644:
1640:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1621:
1617:
1615:
1611:
1609:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1597:
1593:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1580:
1576:
1573:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1486:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1436:
1430:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1399:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1251:
1249:
1247:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1231:
1230:
1219:
1209:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1189:
1178:
1173:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1160:
1155:
1150:
1147:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1132:
1130:
1118:
1117:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1090:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1069:
1068:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1034:
1029:
1027:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1010:
999:
995:
991:
990:
986:
985:
981:
977:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
944:
940:
920:
916:
913:! Also check
912:
906:
896:
886:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
817:
813:
809:
806:
802:
798:
794:
793:
789:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:WP:STALEDRAFT
763:
756:
752:
748:
736:
732:
730:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
695:
688:
681:
674:
670:
666:
654:
653:
650:
623:
619:
615:
611:
606:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
588:
584:
580:
579:
575:
571:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
512:
510:
502:
490:
485:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
414:WP:PERFECTION
411:
407:
403:
398:
391:
389:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
354:
317:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
296:
294:
290:
286:
281:
259:
257:
253:
249:
248:this document
245:
241:
233:
231:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
208:
206:
198:
193:
191:
189:
185:
180:
171:
169:
167:
165:
163:
161:
159:
157:
155:
153:
151:
149:
147:
145:
138:
135:
134:when fatigued
131:
128:
124:
123:
122:
119:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
60:
58:
54:
49:
44:
42:
38:
32:
30:
27:
26:
18:
3681:
3652:
3623:
3611:
3599:
3587:
3568:
3559:
3531:
3467:}}
3463:{{
3459:
2867:(for animals
2614:
2610:
2603:
2595:
2558:
2527:Wikicharts:
2488:}}
2482:{{
2477:}}
2471:{{
2467:}}
2461:{{
2455:}}
2449:{{
2441:}}
2435:{{
2373:User scripts
2345:
2341:
2335:
2333:
2295:WP:ADMINSHOP
2279:}}
2273:{{
2269:}}
2263:{{
2248:WP:UNDERCITE
2191:WP:SOCKLEGIT
2117:October 2019
2096:WP:MEDANIMAL
2075:WP:VOLUNTEER
2041:WP:CONEXCEPT
1990:
1982:WP:NOTPOINTy
1704:WP:SUMMARYNO
1633:
1626:WP:STONEWALL
1534:WP:NOTBUREAU
1490:
1434:
1237:
1211:
1203:
1187:
1161:
1145:
1134:
1128:
1124:
1114:
1094:
1076:
1063:
1030:
1023:
908:}}
902:{{
898:}}
892:{{
888:}}
882:{{
860:
848:
773:WP:UP#COPIES
765:}}
759:{{
697:}}
691:{{
683:}}
677:{{
610:WP:CRAPWATCH
539:
536:WP:INTEGRITY
500:
486:
482:
473:
470:advices here
450:WP:BOOMERANG
425:
401:
399:
395:
376:
358:
314:Citation bot
299:
297:
285:WP:CRAPWATCH
276:
255:
237:
215:
211:
209:
202:
181:
142:
133:
120:
61:
45:
41:WP:RETENTION
33:
23:
22:
3418:Dog fashion
3132:Olga Sydney
3124:Lydham Hall
3079:In Progress
2965:WP:PROPOSAL
2892:grammar.com
2734:WP:WARNVAND
2654:Phabricator
2577:Phabricator
2136:and to me:
2045:WP:CONLEVEL
1849:WP:TRIFECTA
1761:WP:BLUDGEON
1542:WP:PRESERVE
1538:WP:PRESERVE
1468:. See also
1445:WP:EMOTICON
1387:Full list:
1367:Wikiversity
1343:Weight loss
1039:WP:Wikilove
1028:! :-D
1026:WP:Wikilove
857:WP:PRESERVE
841:WP:NOPUNISH
717:WP:CAUTIOUS
565:WP:SYNTHNOT
563:, see also
454:WP:WIKILOVE
369:WP:REFPUNCT
127:WP:WikiLove
96:WP:Wikilove
88:WP:PRESERVE
3691:commitment
3661:. For me:
3659:WP:RFC/All
3475:FireflyBot
3354:Kovcszaln6
3341:Kovcszaln6
3181:Nasserb786
3020:3O and DRN
2814:opensource
2753:Automation
2596:References
2522:and tuto:
2320:WP:APPNOTE
2243:WP:MEDCITE
2164:Detox tool
2020:Skepticism
2013:Skepticism
1932:ORES paper
1895:SuggestBot
1890:WP:CENTRAL
1862:WP:NOSHAME
1858:WP:KOOLAID
1841:WP:INBRIEF
1834:WP:ZEALOUS
1829:WP:REMOVAL
1824:WP:CLEARLY
1750:WP:INDCRIT
1723:WP:NOTHERE
1585:WP:RUNAWAY
1553:WP:BRD-NOT
1277:Knowledge
1262:Knowledge
1111:user group
939:inlineDiff
870:WP:DISPUTE
821:WP:DISPUTE
685:) or as a
600:WP:NOTHERE
574:Help:Diffs
561:competence
501:experience
418:WP:DISPUTE
355:Formatting
293:not always
112:WP:BRD-NOT
108:WP:ESDONTS
80:WP:DISPUTE
55:and avoid
3445:RteeeeKed
3426:RteeeeKed
3328:M7md AAAA
3207:Abo Yemen
2984:WP:WEIGHT
2961:WP:PGBOLD
2879:WP:INTREF
2806:WikiBlame
2701:Vandalism
2529:WP:GRAPHS
2379:WP:USLIST
2305:WP:YESPOV
2284:WP:GLOBAL
2232:WP:WEASEL
2217:WP:CANDOR
2207:WP:EPTALK
2143:WP:NOBIAS
2065:WP:GRUDGE
1973:WP:PGBOLD
1955:WP:ASSERT
1900:WP:TALKNO
1845:WP:SIMPLE
1804:WP:NEWBIE
1643:WP:GAMING
1620:WP:CIRNOT
1614:WP:GAMING
1608:WP:GAMING
1565:WP:CIRNOT
1551:See also
1466:WP:NEWBIE
1439:Unordered
1425:WP:NOBIAS
1400:Wikibooks
1257:Knowledge
1129:Doc James
845:WP:KETTLE
823:: follow
755:WP:EPTALK
673:userspace
557:WP:WEIGHT
458:WP:KETTLE
404:, follow
385:WP:MEDMOS
381:WP:EXPERT
373:MOS:WORDS
361:WP:MEDMOS
244:WP:MEDHOW
3688:SHA3-512
3522:Alenoach
3412:14 hours
3399:14 hours
3216:13 hours
3167:13 hours
3154:13 hours
3118:18 hours
2988:WP:CREEP
2695:WP:BEANS
2631:21121834
2545:Inkscape
2495:Graphics
2238:WP:VENUE
2228:WP:LABEL
2128:WP:FIRST
1978:WP:POINT
1885:WP:ABIAS
1820:WP:TRUCE
1649:WP:MEDRS
1602:WP:NINJA
1521:WP:SCIRS
1308:Fad diet
998:WP:SCIRS
994:WP:MEDRS
878:WP:NINJA
868:Tip for
853:WP:MEDRS
819:Tip for
805:WP:UNDUE
694:Workpage
583:MOS:LEDE
524:WP:SYNTH
466:WP:STICK
252:WP:MEDRS
228:WP:SCIRS
220:WP:MEDRS
218:, where
3230:Banedon
3037:Created
2912:or AWB?
2856:Sources
2834:Copyvio
2802:WikiWho
2716:WP:DTTR
2708:WP:WARN
2656:and on
2579:and on
2474:reftalk
2315:WP:ONUS
2300:WP:AOBF
2088:WP:AAGF
2084:WP:COOL
1951:WP:INDY
1938:with a
1810:WP:BASH
1786:WP:BRDR
1499:WP:SHAM
1474:WP:FRAM
1458:WP:ACST
1413:Signimu
1389:Signimu
1338:Dieting
1014:WP:PROF
952:Gadgets
829:WP:MWOT
801:WP:NPOV
614:WP:RS/P
544:WP:CALC
489:WP:HERE
256:content
3655:WP:FRS
3549:WP:MED
3534:update
3373:Closed
3324:Closed
3275:Closed
3226:Closed
3128:Closed
3051:Status
2812:) are
2810:github
2760:WP:UCB
2719:WP:TTR
2629:
2254:WP:WTF
2226:Avoid
2196:WP:BMB
2152:WP:CCC
2123:WP:OUT
2104:Check
2080:WP:FOC
2059:WP:IAR
2026:WP:IAR
1998:
1879:biased
1794:WP:BRR
1792:. But
1790:WP:BRB
1710:WP:CCC
1589:WP:DDE
1561:WP:CIR
1507:WP:NHC
1472:. And
1419:Essays
1176:(talk)
1066:VateGV
1046:Awards
1018:WP:COI
915:WP:1AM
905:medref
874:WP:BRR
825:WP:AGF
812:WP:COI
751:WP:1RR
747:WP:0RR
713:WT:MED
596:WP:CEN
528:WP:AND
462:WP:ANI
446:WP:ANI
426:always
406:WP:BRD
377:format
365:WP:MOS
100:WP:BRR
84:WP:BRD
48:WP:BRD
37:WT:MED
3540:Purge
3109:Modun
3083:Modun
3048:Title
2234:words
1478:Blame
1318:Blame
1298:NAFLD
872:with
548:WP:OI
540:can't
520:WP:OR
224:WP:RS
184:boxes
3526:talk
3508:talk
3504:Ivan
3479:talk
3438:None
3173:Wudu
3069:Time
3066:User
3063:Time
3060:User
3057:Time
3054:User
3034:Case
2971:and
2967:and
2963:and
2959:and
2903:ToDo
2894:and
2795:and
2777:and
2681:and
2627:PMID
2502:and
2464:PMID
2392:and
2322:and
2256:and
2230:and
2098:and
2086:and
2082:and
2061:...)
2043:and
2039:and
2035:and
2011:and
1996:ISBN
1980:and
1934:and
1902:and
1822:and
1788:and
1784:and
1628:and
1555:and
1513:and
1460:and
1456:and
1452:and
1359:, fr
1116:here
1016:and
941:and
917:and
876:and
861:only
843:and
839:and
835:and
803:and
771:and
753:and
728:bits
709:here
707:and
705:here
612:nor
534:and
408:and
371:and
308:and
114:and
90:and
3520:).
3441:n/a
3422:New
3177:New
2689:Fun
2619:doi
2615:363
2350:--
1544:is
1393:ip1
1391:(+
1287:ip2
1283:ip1
1281:(+
1272:ip2
1268:ip1
1266:(+
974:),
749:or
246:or
31:).
3536:,
3001:,
2990:+
2725:TW
2625:.
2613:.
2485:rp
2452:tq
2438:tl
1965:,
1961:,
1957:,
1953:,
1881:."
1860:,
1856:,
1847:,
1843:,
1759:,
1285:+
1279:fr
1270:+
1264:en
1248:.
1225:OP
1222:SL
1217:TH
1214:PA
799:,
779:,
530:,
526:,
522:,
367:,
363:,
295:.
190:)
118:.
110:,
106:,
102:,
86:,
59:.
43:.
3524:(
3506:(
3477:(
3451:)
3449:t
3447:(
3432:)
3430:t
3428:(
3409:)
3407:t
3405:(
3396:)
3394:t
3392:(
3383:)
3381:t
3379:(
3360:)
3358:t
3356:(
3347:)
3345:t
3343:(
3334:)
3332:t
3330:(
3311:)
3309:t
3307:(
3298:)
3296:t
3294:(
3285:)
3283:t
3281:(
3262:)
3260:t
3258:(
3249:)
3247:t
3245:(
3236:)
3234:t
3232:(
3213:)
3211:t
3209:(
3200:)
3198:t
3196:(
3187:)
3185:t
3183:(
3164:)
3162:t
3160:(
3151:)
3149:t
3147:(
3138:)
3136:t
3134:(
3115:)
3113:t
3111:(
3102:)
3100:t
3098:(
3089:)
3087:t
3085:(
2994:.
2898:.
2870:)
2851:.
2845:.
2829:)
2808:(
2660:.
2633:.
2621::
2583:.
2516:.
2175:.
2169:.
2114:.
2004:.
1942:.
1767:.
1741:.
1706:.
1676:.
1634:D
1598:.
1591:.
1574:.
1548:.
1517:.
1487:.
1395:)
1384:.
1362:.
1289:)
1274:)
1228:U
1020:.
982:.
790:.
631:.
576:.
567:.
304:(
136:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
