324:. I wouldn't be able to support you as an admin just yet, but that's a problem that time would easily solve. Your content contribs are a little weak, at least from an RfA standpoint, so I highly recommend a GA or two if you're serious about running. Like Reaper said though, what areas are you planning on helping out in as an admin? Whatever you choose, I suggest you begin work there quickly, and become a familiar face there long before you try to get the sysop bit. I also agree that your spread over multiple namespaces in nice - I've never done much in the file namespace, for example. All around, you've done an excellent job since you came here, and I advise you to simply keep doing what you're doing. There's nothing quite like experience.
197:. You contributed very well in the October and December wikification backlog elimination drives. I also like your stub creations. However, many will oppose you over the lack of DYKs or any other form of recognized content, such as GAs. I would consider trying to get an article to GA level, not to "get adminship", but to improve the encyclopedia with better content.
281:. I would use the tools primarily with Speedy Deletes and general maintenance of Knowledge (XXG):... pages. I have read several admin guides and other essays(I'm finally going to have some bedtime reading tonight!). I don't plan on running until at least May which should be ample time to get up to what the current requirements seem to be.
147:
called me a sock. At fist I was shocked and appalled but after I looked into the situation I actually found it quite hilarious. If ever confronted with a nasty editor in the future I will simply look into the situation and try to reply appropriately based upon my knowledge. In the case of an edit war
182:
You have a good spread of edits overall, with the exception of the start when you contributed too much to your own userspace :) . You work with other editors, which is necessary as a sysop. (I can see this from the amount you contribute to the talk, wikipedia, and even wikipedia talk namespaces.) I
228:
I see a great editor who regularly contributes to articles. I also see a potential sysop, but where do you plan on using the sysop tools? If you plan on working AIV or UAA, you will need more experience in that area. Page protection (at RFPP) is usually done in response to antivandalism or content
203:
I see decent knowledge of policy in your XFD contributions. However, many of them appear to be to XFDs where the outcome is already decided, and you are just reiterating what has already been said. That aside, I found enough others to demonstrate policy knowledge. Be sure you have read
125:
discussions, and speedy deletion tagging. I particularly like my contributions to
Wikiproject Wikify's drives(64 articles in the October drive, 83 articles in the December drive). I favor these contributions mainly due to the vast quantity of articles. I also like contributing to
229:
disputes, and I see no evidence of dispute resolution. (It isn't necessary to have that.) If you plan on working at XFD, you will want to get involved in for XFDs. Be sure to read the relevant minor policies before !voting, however. You will definitely want to read
138:
Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
315:
In my interaction with you I have found you to be extremely competent, and my rough review of your contributions has confirmed this. You've almost always been civil, made useful edits after your
Myspace-y start (which we've all had -
249:. I would also encourage you to read various user essays, as you can learn a lot from them—or at least I have! Good luck editing, and perhaps we will see a little mop icon on your userpage in several months!
222:
Many people will probably oppose you over your edit count, which is around 6000 right now. Granted, they are mostly manual (around 5000 are), but editcountitis is rampant at RfA.
273:
Thank You for the feedback! I've never been the first to report a user, but I have added to suspected socks and vandalism cases. I think I will try to improve the article
70:). I've edited for almost a year(January 24). I have had reviewer and rollbacker privileges for many months but just recently applied for and received permission to use
121:
and the two backlog elimination drives the project has had. Also I have been doing general cleanup using AWB, vandal fighting at Recent
Changes and New Pages,
277:, and maybe come across some DYK's in my future article contributions. I'll try to be a little more active on XFD and AFD, when not working at
148:
I would, since I watch every page I've edited, probably notice what was happening before it became an issue and warn/notify/report accordingly.
190:
67:
57:
294:
95:
51:
113:
What are your primary contributions to
Knowledge (XXG)? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
17:
256:
194:
127:
288:
85:
45:
238:
332:
252:
230:
300:
144:
336:
305:
260:
246:
234:
176:
Have you ever reported a vandal to AIV? Have you ever reported an inappropriate username to UAA?
102:
143:
I've never been in much of a dispute. The only thing that ever was somewhat stressful was when
321:
278:
122:
118:
71:
282:
75:
40:
242:
205:
325:
274:
213:
209:
23:
66:
6000th edit a few days ago and this seemed like a good time for another review(
74:. I have been considering possibly running for adimin. sometime this year.
130:, namely writing articles about California and Arizona airports.
317:
117:My main contributions, recently, have been at
320:really made me laugh), and done good work at
8:
191:Desert Christian Schools (California)
183:see dedication to improving articles.
7:
189:Nice work on expanding and sourcing
31:
1:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review
337:22:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
306:23:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
261:18:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
103:03:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
166:Alright! I've finished now!
352:
195:Rosamond Skypark Airport
187:Article contributions :
119:Wikiproject Wikify
24:User:Sumsum2010/ER
62:I have passed my
22:(Redirected from
343:
329:
303:
297:
291:
285:
220:Other comments :
100:
90:
80:
61:
27:
351:
350:
346:
345:
344:
342:
341:
340:
327:
301:
295:
289:
283:
174:Antivandalism :
96:
86:
76:
68:My first review
43:
38:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
349:
347:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
275:Sheldon Cooper
266:
265:
264:
263:
253:Reaper Eternal
223:
217:
198:
184:
177:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
155:
153:
152:
151:
150:
136:
134:
133:
132:
37:
35:Sumsum2010 (2)
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
348:
339:
338:
335:
334:
331:
330:
323:
319:
307:
304:
298:
292:
286:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
262:
258:
254:
251:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
149:
146:
145:Mr. Orange 89
141:
140:
137:
135:
131:
129:
124:
120:
115:
114:
112:
111:
110:
109:
105:
104:
101:
99:
94:
91:
89:
84:
81:
79:
73:
69:
65:
59:
56:
53:
50:
47:
42:
36:
33:
25:
19:
333:
326:
314:
225:
219:
200:
186:
180:Namespaces :
179:
173:
156:
154:
142:
116:
107:
106:
97:
92:
87:
82:
77:
63:
54:
48:
39:
34:
128:WP:Airports
302:Review me!
284:Sumsum2010
239:WP:PROTECT
78:Sumsum2010
41:Sumsum2010
328:Nolelover
318:this edit
231:WP:DELETE
226:Overall :
108:Questions
247:WP:ADMIN
235:WP:BLOCK
201:Policy :
157:Reviews
52:contribs
322:WP:WWF
279:WP:WWF
245:, and
212:, and
64:5000th
243:WP:UN
206:WP:RS
58:count
16:<
257:talk
214:WP:V
210:WP:N
193:and
46:talk
123:AFD
72:AWB
259:)
241:,
237:,
233:,
208:,
299:·
296:C
293:·
290:T
287:·
255:(
216:.
98:C
93:·
88:T
83:·
60:)
55:·
49:·
44:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.