42:
105:
176:
If you are commenting at RFA and find that a given candidate's ability to use the tools correctly (i.e. within policy, guideline and consensus) is likely to provide a greater benefit to the project than the consequences of their abuse or misuse of the tools, then a
126:
is a process to determine if the community believes that a given editor is capable of dealing with the tools that come with adminship, and the implication of the outcome of application of those tools.
210:
162:
Given that mistakes may happen, a secondary consideration should be whether (accidental or otherwise) misuse of the tools outweighs positive and proper use of the tools.
27:
This essay is about evaluating an editor's contributions in requests for adminship. For the essay on unblocking editors with net positive contributions, see
205:
154:
It is possible, although unlikely, that any given new administrator will use their tools for things found either undesirable or simply against policy (e.g.
57:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
58:
123:
190:
117:
tools to a user is going to produce more help than harm to
Knowledge (XXG) then the user should be supported in that request.
129:
Whilst there are a number of extra functions granted to admins, blocking, deleting and protecting are the most "visible".
28:
62:
151:
It is possible, although much less certain, that any given new administrator will make severe mistakes.
72:
138:
142:
50:
134:
114:
155:
17:
199:
65:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
148:
It is probable, although not certain, that a new administrator will make mistakes.
165:
Of course "more help than harm" in terms of administrative actions is explicitly
133:
It is probable, and desirable, that a new administrator will start using the
181:
applies and the candidate should be supported in their request.
99:
36:
87:
80:
145:tools in an area they have expressed interest in.
169:numerical; 51 good deletions v. 49 bad ones is
8:
211:Matters related to requests for adminship
59:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
206:Knowledge (XXG) essays about adminship
124:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
7:
191:Knowledge (XXG):Disruptive sanctions
156:pushing a particular point of view
63:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
103:
40:
34:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
1:
29:Knowledge (XXG):Unblockables
227:
70:
26:
111:This page in a nutshell:
173:"more help than harm".
18:User:Pedro/Net Positive
61:, as it has not been
121:
120:
98:
97:
16:(Redirected from
218:
107:
106:
100:
90:
83:
44:
43:
37:
21:
226:
225:
221:
220:
219:
217:
216:
215:
196:
195:
187:
104:
94:
93:
86:
79:
75:
67:
66:
41:
35:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
224:
222:
214:
213:
208:
198:
197:
194:
193:
186:
183:
160:
159:
152:
149:
146:
119:
118:
108:
96:
95:
92:
91:
84:
81:WP:NETPOSITIVE
76:
71:
68:
56:
55:
47:
45:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
223:
212:
209:
207:
204:
203:
201:
192:
189:
188:
184:
182:
180:
174:
172:
168:
163:
157:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
136:
132:
131:
130:
127:
125:
116:
112:
109:
102:
101:
89:
85:
82:
78:
77:
74:
69:
64:
60:
54:
52:
46:
39:
38:
30:
19:
179:net positive
178:
175:
170:
166:
164:
161:
128:
122:
113:If granting
110:
48:
49:This is an
200:Categories
88:WP:NETPOS
73:Shortcuts
185:See also
139:Protect
143:Delete
135:Block
115:admin
51:essay
141:and
171:not
167:not
202::
158:).
137:,
53:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.