60:
Please do not engage in threaded discussion on this page or the other RfC pages. If you wish to make general points or to express disagreement with another editor's views or with an argument for or against the proposal, please use the talk page. The RfC will be actively curated so threaded comments
106:
this proposal please add your signature below. Please do not engage in threaded discussion here - if you wish to do so, please use the talk page. This section should not be used to discuss where you would like to see GAs appearing on the Main Page. When you have finished, please continue to
69:
Good
Articles (GAs) do not currently appear on the Main Page of Knowledge. It is proposed that they should appear somewhere on the Main Page, either in their own slot or combined with an existing slot. It is not proposed that GAs should replace an existing slot.
34:
This RfC proceeds in 3 stages. In this first page, please indicate whether you support or oppose the proposal. If you support it, please continue to the next page. You will then be asked to indicate where you believe GAs should appear on the Main Page.
123:
this proposal please add your signature below. Please do not engage in threaded discussion here - if you wish to do so, please use the talk page.
26:
This
Request for Comments aims to identify whether Good Articles should be displayed on the Main Page of Knowledge and if so, where.
94:
this proposal to this section. It is recommended that editors read this section and the arguments against before voting.
82:
this proposal to this section. It is recommended that editors read this section and the arguments against before voting.
49:
To indicate your support or opposition to the proposal, please add a simple signed "Support" or "Oppose" under
108:
17:
111:
to indicate where you believe GAs should be presented on the Main Page.
46:
at the top. Please feel free to add your own arguments to this section.
8:
98:I support GAs appearing on the Main Page
115:I oppose GAs appearing on the Main Page
7:
24:
61:will be moved to the talk page.
1:
137:
90:Please add your argument
78:Please add your argument
109:User:Prioryman/GA RFC 2
51:I support this proposal
55:I oppose this proposal
38:Each page sets out
86:Arguments Against
44:Arguments Against
128:
136:
135:
131:
130:
129:
127:
126:
125:
117:
100:
88:
76:
67:
32:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
134:
132:
116:
113:
99:
96:
87:
84:
75:
72:
66:
63:
31:
28:
23:
18:User:Prioryman
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
133:
124:
122:
114:
112:
110:
105:
97:
95:
93:
85:
83:
81:
74:Arguments For
73:
71:
64:
62:
58:
56:
52:
47:
45:
41:
40:Arguments For
36:
29:
27:
19:
120:
118:
103:
101:
91:
89:
79:
77:
68:
65:The proposal
59:
54:
50:
48:
43:
39:
37:
33:
30:Instructions
25:
119:If you
104:SUPPORT
102:If you
92:AGAINST
121:OPPOSE
16:<
42:and
80:FOR
53:or
57:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.