83:, however the two easiest ways will be to show where their work has been the subject of notable adaptations and/or that their books have received a lot of coverage in independent and reliable sources. The latter of the two is usually the easiest, as books (or other written material) are more likely to receive reviews than they are to be made into a notable adaptation. The difficulty level with adaptations is that you'd have to show where the adaptation is notable enough to where it'd pretty much warrant its own article - and not every adaptation gets the type of coverage needed to pass GNG.
143:
media outlets. Despite this, these authors still need to have received RS coverage that would establish notability. It's admittedly not entirely fair that we have to judge the notability of self-published and indie authors against the same criteria we'd use to establish notability for mainstream authors, but at present there are no guidelines that would be able to take any of this into consideration and it's unlikely that there ever will be. This doesn't mean that these types of authors
196:
not seen as usable on
Knowledge (XXG). Vanity awards are also something to be careful of, as there are many companies out there that take advantage of authors in order to make a quick buck. However in general most book awards aren't usable unless you can show where the award/honor is notable enough to where it would likely warrant its own article.
31:
688:
121:
ended up being his big break and received 10 reviews. In this situation his first two books might not necessarily merit individual entries, however the reviews for his prior work could help justify an article for the author. The same can be said for an author whose overall work have received reviews,
66:
Hi! If you're here, it's likely because you're curious as to what an author needs to do to gain notability on
Knowledge (XXG)! Establishing notability for an author on Knowledge (XXG) is incredibly difficult, as you need to show that the author or their works have received coverage in independent and
195:
Something else to take into consideration is that there are a lot of book review and award services out there that aren't usable. If the author has to pay to receive the review, it's not usable. If the outlet is one that openly advertises that it only issues 4-5 star reviews, you can guess that it's
179:
and will be at least 2-3 paragraphs long. General articles about the book are also usable as long as they go into a little depth and aren't just 1-2 lines stating that the work will release or announcing a cover. If these type of articles go into depth then of course they're usable, but most aren't.
142:
does not count towards notability on
Knowledge (XXG). The reason it's so hard is because in most cases these authors will not have received coverage in the type of places that Knowledge (XXG) will consider to be reliable - and it's very difficult for these authors to gain the attention of the larger
1091:
108:
If the author has released two or more books that have received reviews in independent and reliable sources, then that would establish notability for the author. Something interesting about this process is that while it's generally expected that each individual book would have its own article, this
191:
can be used as a reliable source but you need to show how that source is considered to be a reliable and trusted authority. The problem is that few SPS receive the type of attention needed to assert this, as you'd have to show where the SPS has been routinely cited as a reliable source by reliable
100:, as opposed to the author, so it makes more sense to have an article about the work in question, especially as articles for authors who have released only one book tend to be extremely short because the coverage doesn't contain much (if any) coverage about the author themselves.
1058:
743:
368:
843:
493:
259:
698:
96:, it makes more sense to have an article about the book and not the author, as in that situation there would only be enough notability for one article: book or author. Incoming readers are more likely going to be coming in to read about the
913:
868:
953:
443:
91:
Something to be careful about when trying to establish notability is whether or not the author is only known for one book. If the author has only put out one book of note and the coverage for them is solely about the
488:
908:
813:
1018:
1008:
453:
303:
1106:
543:
483:
918:
768:
553:
358:
848:
214:
573:
126:
is a good example of this, as most of her books haven't received enough coverage to warrant individual articles for the most part. (Although this can, of course change over time.)
748:
738:
673:
598:
134:
It's difficult to assert notability for self-published and indie authors because it's still possible for them to solidly fail notability guidelines even if the author has put out a
938:
478:
983:
423:
308:
668:
883:
167:
are usable, however they're not the greatest sources to use to assert notability for an article because of their short length. The best reviews will be in places like the
403:
998:
958:
893:
928:
633:
568:
1013:
853:
798:
683:
433:
1101:
943:
663:
628:
353:
588:
205:
68:
778:
898:
763:
155:
The trick here is that the coverage for the books has to be in places that
Knowledge (XXG) would consider to be reliable. Trade reviews from outlets like
722:
678:
393:
978:
963:
933:
948:
323:
1048:
863:
858:
613:
1028:
648:
538:
508:
503:
993:
638:
563:
246:
1063:
643:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
518:
513:
51:
428:
703:
298:
219:
1142:
1038:
832:
753:
498:
398:
923:
878:
693:
528:
313:
1023:
888:
733:
603:
558:
418:
342:
288:
1096:
773:
653:
618:
463:
413:
180:
Ones that only list a press release or appear to be almost entirely based off a press release will very likely be considered a
147:
be notable, but it does make it so unlikely that it's more common for these authors to fail notability guidelines than pass.
80:
758:
658:
593:
468:
448:
388:
1053:
988:
968:
583:
578:
458:
383:
378:
373:
608:
293:
181:
973:
783:
548:
272:
1003:
788:
438:
903:
793:
523:
408:
239:
803:
808:
623:
473:
318:
689:
User:Vanished user 909146283013/Follow the WP:EPISODE guideline and make AfD easier for articles that don't
139:
43:
255:
55:
1147:
1122:
363:
232:
17:
1043:
169:
39:
175:
1059:
User:MichaelQSchmidt/The general notability guide versus subject-specific notability guidelines
187:
Book blogs and social media sites like
Goodreads cannot be used as sources. Sometimes, rarely,
533:
744:
User:ASCIIn2Bme/Verifiability and plagiarism are the hammer and anvil of astute wikilawyers
209:
188:
1033:
163:
79:
There are several ways to establish notability for an author (you can read about this at
71:, but I'll try to go over some specific points about notability for authors and books.
1092:
Assume the assumption of the assumption of the assumption of the assumption of bad faith
369:
User:Aspening/Just because something is unflattering doesn't mean it should be deleted
1136:
283:
844:
User:HowardBGolden/Abuse of the
General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions
494:
User:HowardBGolden/Abuse of the
General Notability Guideline in Deletion Discussions
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
123:
699:
User:ViperSnake151/Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (Human
Readable Version)
1125:
category page has many more, listed below the subcategories section on the pages.
192:
sources (academic sources, newspapers, etc). That's incredibly tough to assert.
138:
of work and has a decent fan following, as the amount of work and the author's
914:
Knowledge (XXG):Don't assume lasting significance for instances of self-harm
869:
User:Chrislk02/anarticleaboutaschoolthatcantfindagermanteacherisnotnotable
954:
User:Mike Cline/Imagining a new way to look at the question of
Notability
444:
User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman/Deleting redirects to facilitate searching
157:
909:
Knowledge (XXG):Don't assume lasting significance for crime articles
215:
The differences between academic papers and Knowledge (XXG) articles
122:
but not enough to really justify individual articles for each book.
109:
is not always the case. For example, John Smith wrote three books.
814:
User:Vincentvikram/Always keep context in mind when arguing claims
224:
1019:
User:Geo Swan/Evaluating notability for lesser prizes and awards
1080:
830:
720:
454:
User:Geo Swan/opinions/editing Fahd al Jutayli while before Afd
340:
304:
User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters/Academic and artistic biographies
270:
228:
25:
554:
User:NawlinWiki/List of things that will get speedily deleted
359:
User:AleatoryPonderings/Systemic bias in deletion discussions
544:
User:Mike Cline/The Inclusionist's Guide To Deletion Debates
67:
reliable sources. You can read a bit I wrote about sourcing
1009:
User:PorkchopGMX/Popularity doesn’t always equal notability
919:
User:MalwareSmarts/Don't confuse non-notability with a hoax
849:
User:Philtweir/Academic communities articles and notability
489:
User:Hijiri88/Don't call yourself or others "inclusionists"
769:
User:SMcCandlish/Discretionary sanctions 2013–2018 review
574:
User:Puzzledvegetable/DINC alone is not a reason to keep
984:
User:Davidwr/No topic deserves to be in Knowledge (XXG)
739:
User:Alexia Death/Community Court for community issues
674:
User:Tothwolf/rescued essays/AfD: formula for conflict
599:
User:Robofish/Thoughts on inclusionism and deletionism
939:
User:League Octopus/Club notability tables (and test)
484:
User:Hijiri88/Don't call other editors "deletionists"
479:
User:Hiding/Points to note regarding deletion debates
220:
Notability for YouTube and social media personalities
424:
User:Davidwr/Choosing SPEEDY, PROD, or AFD deletion
309:
User:This is Paul/Articles concerning criminal acts
884:User:Czarkoff/essays/Businesses are rarely notable
1107:Nomination of Knowledge (XXG) for speedy deletion
959:User:Davidwr/Inherent Notability as a slang term
894:User:ReaderofthePack/Common notability arguments
749:User:ASCIIn2Bme/What "no consensus" really means
929:User:Anon126/Explaining notability to newcomers
779:User:Orlady/Getting your way at Knowledge (XXG)
634:User:SoWhy/Ten Commandments for Speedy Deletion
569:User:SMcCandlish/Notability and Deletion policy
1014:User:RoySmith/essays/Presumption of Notability
854:User:Robert McClenon/Acceptance of Biographies
799:User:The Bushranger/Lob a grenade and run away
684:User:Ultraexactzz/Time-delayed Speedy Deletion
434:User:Eire2020/WP:On the subject of deletionism
404:User:The Bushranger/Don't move articles at AfD
944:User:ArsenalFan700/Indian Football Notability
664:User:Tisane/Allow viewing of deleted articles
629:User:SoWhy/Before tagging for speedy deletion
354:User:Mangojuice/Administrators are not slaves
240:
8:
589:User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7
899:User:Lagrange613/Coverage is not notability
764:User:Beeblebrox/The perfect policy proposal
1077:
999:User:Herostratus/"Notable people" sections
827:
717:
679:User:Ultraexactzz/Sorting Deletion Debates
394:User:Bibliomaniac15/A guide to closing CFD
337:
267:
247:
233:
225:
979:User:Brainy J/No Exceptions to Notability
964:User:Robert McClenon/Internet celebrities
934:User:AliveFreeHappy/Notability (firearms)
949:User:Phil Sandifer/History of notability
324:User:Steve Smith/Semi-protection of BLPs
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
1049:User:ReaderofthePack/YouTube notability
864:User:Masem/Alternate Take on Notability
859:User:Alex Noble/AFC is about notability
669:User:Tisane/Don't delete users' résumés
614:User:Simon Dodd/Some AFD considerations
1029:User:Esquivalience/Essay on notability
874:User:ReaderofthePack/Author notability
649:User:Syrenka V/Protection not deletion
539:User:Mike Cline/Archimedes was deleted
509:User:K50 Dude/Essay on Speedy Deletion
504:User:Jh12/School articles and deletion
994:User:Glades12/Notability is temporary
639:User:Spartaz/Rescuing Deleted Content
564:User:Northamerica1000/Eager to delete
7:
1064:User:voorts/The spectrum of coverage
644:User:Stifle/Delete unless cleaned up
704:User:Yunshui/Deletion for beginners
299:User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism
1039:User:Fleets/sandboxWPRL notability
754:User:GTBacchus/A recurring problem
499:User:Isomorphic/Essays/Deletionism
429:User:Davidwr/Deleting GA+ articles
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
924:User:Basket of Puppies/Editorials
879:User:Gryllida/BiographyNotability
723:User essays on dispute resolution
694:User:Vermont/essay/AfD Filibuster
529:User:Martijn Hoekstra/what is AfD
519:User:Lenticel/Deletion isn't Evil
514:User:KGirlTrucker81/What G1 isn't
314:User:Mattinbgn/BLP considerations
1024:User:RoySmith/Three best sources
889:User:Northamerica1000/Churnalism
734:User:AGK/Arbitration and content
604:User:RoySmith/Three best sources
559:User:NeoFreak/Essays/Deletionism
419:User:Northamerica1000/Churnalism
289:User:Doc glasgow/The BLP problem
130:Self-published and indie authors
29:
774:User:Guy Macon/One against many
654:User:Terrariola/Delete the junk
619:User:Seraphimblade/Deletion FAQ
464:User:Ginkgo100/Speedy deletions
414:User:Champion/Deletion is cheap
399:User:Buddy431/AFD isn't cleanup
104:Authors with more than one book
759:User:Jnc/Astronomer vs Amateur
659:User:The Cunctator/Deletionism
594:User:Ritchie333/The Dumpy test
469:User:Graymornings/Have a heart
449:User:Fl/Reports/RevisionDelete
389:User:Balloonman/CSD G10 survey
1:
1054:User:Seraphimblade/sandbox2/3
989:User:Esquivalience/Notability
969:User:Joe Decker/IsThisNotable
584:User:RileyBugz/G11 and drafts
579:User:Randy Kryn/Rule of thumb
459:User:Ginkgo100/AFD philosophy
384:User:Balloonman/CSD G1 survey
379:User:Balloonman/CSD A7 survey
374:User:Balloonman/CSD A1 survey
208:, especially ones applied at
804:Knowledge (XXG):Unblockables
609:User:Sebwite/Mock Afd Series
294:User:JoshuaZ/Thoughts on BLP
974:User:Trackinfo/sandbox/NHSL
784:User:Robert McClenon/Crisis
549:User:Mr.Z-man/on fixing CSD
206:Common notability arguments
1164:
1004:User:Uncle G/On notability
789:User:RGloucester/Sanctions
439:User:Elaragirl/Deletionism
117:received two reviews, and
113:, received only 1 review,
87:Authors with only one book
1143:User essays on notability
1119:
1087:
1076:
904:User:Bahamut0013/deletion
839:
833:User essays on notability
826:
794:User:Skomorokh/First rule
729:
716:
524:User:Livitup/Deletion FAQ
409:User:Spartaz/Closing AFDs
349:
336:
279:
266:
1102:Letters from the editors
809:User:AGK/AE improvements
624:User:Shereth/Deletionism
474:User:Hellboy2hell/Delete
343:User essays on deletion
319:User:SirFozzie/BLP-Lock
75:Establishing notability
189:self-published sources
54:, as it has not been
364:User:Angela/Deletion
18:User:ReaderofthePack
1044:User:Moray An Par/b
273:User essays on BLP
1130:
1129:
1115:
1114:
1072:
1071:
822:
821:
712:
711:
332:
331:
64:
63:
1155:
1078:
828:
718:
534:User:MBisanz/AfD
338:
268:
261:
249:
242:
235:
226:
33:
32:
26:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1126:
1111:
1083:
1082:Humorous essays
1068:
1034:User:Fleets/RLN
835:
818:
725:
708:
345:
328:
275:
262:
253:
202:
170:Washington Post
164:Library Journal
153:
132:
106:
89:
77:
60:
59:
48:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1161:
1159:
1151:
1150:
1145:
1135:
1134:
1128:
1127:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1097:Avoid headings
1094:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
891:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
840:
837:
836:
831:
824:
823:
820:
819:
817:
816:
811:
806:
801:
796:
791:
786:
781:
776:
771:
766:
761:
756:
751:
746:
741:
736:
730:
727:
726:
721:
714:
713:
710:
709:
707:
706:
701:
696:
691:
686:
681:
676:
671:
666:
661:
656:
651:
646:
641:
636:
631:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
591:
586:
581:
576:
571:
566:
561:
556:
551:
546:
541:
536:
531:
526:
521:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
441:
436:
431:
426:
421:
416:
411:
406:
401:
396:
391:
386:
381:
376:
371:
366:
361:
356:
350:
347:
346:
341:
334:
333:
330:
329:
327:
326:
321:
316:
311:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
280:
277:
276:
271:
264:
263:
254:
252:
251:
244:
237:
229:
223:
222:
217:
212:
201:
198:
182:primary source
176:New York Times
152:
149:
131:
128:
105:
102:
88:
85:
76:
73:
62:
61:
49:
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1160:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1124:
1118:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1079:
1075:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
841:
838:
834:
829:
825:
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
795:
792:
790:
787:
785:
782:
780:
777:
775:
772:
770:
767:
765:
762:
760:
757:
755:
752:
750:
747:
745:
742:
740:
737:
735:
732:
731:
728:
724:
719:
715:
705:
702:
700:
697:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
655:
652:
650:
647:
645:
642:
640:
637:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
590:
587:
585:
582:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
427:
425:
422:
420:
417:
415:
412:
410:
407:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
351:
348:
344:
339:
335:
325:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
284:User:DGG/bios
282:
281:
278:
274:
269:
265:
257:
250:
245:
243:
238:
236:
231:
230:
227:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
207:
204:
203:
199:
197:
193:
190:
185:
183:
178:
177:
172:
171:
166:
165:
160:
159:
150:
148:
146:
141:
137:
129:
127:
125:
120:
116:
112:
103:
101:
99:
95:
86:
84:
82:
74:
72:
70:
57:
53:
47:
45:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
873:
194:
186:
174:
168:
162:
156:
154:
144:
135:
133:
124:Marta Acosta
118:
114:
110:
107:
97:
93:
90:
78:
65:
37:
1148:User essays
1123:User essays
256:User essays
38:This is an
1137:Categories
1121:Note: The
140:popularity
44:notability
200:See also
161:and the
158:Booklist
151:Sourcing
81:WP:NBOOK
173:or the
258:
119:Book C
115:Book A
111:Book A
145:can't
40:essay
16:<
98:book
94:book
69:here
260:(?)
210:AfD
136:lot
42:on
1139::
184:.
248:e
241:t
234:v
46:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.