31:
220:
ballot is one that gives an equal number of supports and opposes to the viable candidates, and I aim to at least approximate that, despite that we have many good candidates this year. This puts me in the position where I will have to oppose some very qualified and respected
Wikipedians just because I
185:
Making ArbCom effective without them being mad with power. In 2005, an ArbCom case wasn't over until somebody got banned. In 2008, it wasn't over until... well, basically ever. I'm looking for candidates who will be able to find the happy medium, being prepared to hand down decisions that are both
212:" where one of the layers is made of bullshit. Knowledge (XXG) has a responsibility to give its readers the most accurate possible understanding of the world. To this end, I've asked all candidates on this list a question about science and NPOV.
177:
The table below shows only candidates who are admins already. It's exceedingly unlikely that a candidate who hasn't passed RfA yet would win in the ArbCom election. When it comes to non-admins, I will oppose some and abstain on the rest.
43:
173:
This is my voter guide, in progress. I've now examined every candidate's background, statement, and questions at least once, but for some candidates I have to wait until they answer more questions before making a decision.
193:
have to face big cases where scientific consensus conflicts with widespread beliefs. I feel that recent ArbComs have been rather wussy about promoting scientific knowledge on
Knowledge (XXG). In particular, the
49:
123:
87:
206:
case of 2006. ArbCom tends to feel that the "NPOV" thing to do is to carve out niches for both science and silliness, or to declare the core of the conflict to be an irrelevant "content decision".
202:
209:
196:
216:
Now, just appearing responsible and fair and saying positive things about science doesn't necessarily get a candidate my endorsement. The most effective
76:
107:
363:
Even though it risks becoming too detached from the actual decision, this page makes my inner statistics geek happy. It would be happier if
367:
were to step in and call the result of the ArbCom election, but given the improbability of that, I'll settle for this meta-guide.
53:
151:
69:
372:
119:
159:
358:
103:
62:
147:
143:
127:
163:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
99:
139:
135:
111:
37:
115:
235:
131:
217:
30:
364:
224:
17:
377:
Unfortunate. Sows division among
Wikipedians for no purpose, not even humor.
221:
don't support them enough. Try not to take it too personally, candidates.
333:
189:
Keeping in mind
Knowledge (XXG)'s educational purpose. The ArbCom
208:
I do not want this false equivalence to remain. I do not want a "
25:
346:
245:
200:case of 2007 was a significant step back from the
340:Bonus section: Rspeer's voter guide guide guide
70:
8:
54:final results were announced on December 20
77:
63:
336:for the convenient table and templates.)
181:The following are the big issues for me:
344:or: Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Meta
339:
7:
38:2008 Arbitration Committee Elections
24:
29:
106: (meta) •
243:06:01, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
210:three-layer cake with frosting
1:
394:
89:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
52:is now closed, and the
186:swift and appropriate.
252:Preliminary thoughts
96:Individuals' guides:
94: •
162: •
158: •
154: •
150: •
146: •
142: •
138: •
134: •
130: •
126: •
122: •
118: •
114: •
110: •
102: •
47: •
41: •
324:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
321:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
318:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
315:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
312:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
309:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
306:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
303:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
300:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
297:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
294:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
291:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
288:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
285:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
282:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
279:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
276:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
273:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
270:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
267:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
264:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
261:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
258:User:AGK/ACE2008/U
91:Candidate Profiles
381:
380:
330:
329:
255:My intended vote
170:
169:
166:
57:
385:
347:
246:
241:
238:
231:
228:
98:
79:
72:
65:
48:
33:
26:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
342:
239:
236:
229:
226:
218:approval voting
207:
172:
85:
84:
83:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
379:
378:
375:
369:
368:
361:
355:
354:
351:
341:
338:
328:
327:
253:
250:
214:
213:
187:
168:
167:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
58:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
376:
374:
371:
370:
366:
362:
360:
357:
356:
352:
349:
348:
345:
337:
335:
326:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
298:
295:
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
254:
251:
248:
247:
244:
242:
233:
232:
222:
219:
211:
205:
204:
203:Pseudoscience
199:
198:
192:
188:
184:
183:
182:
179:
175:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
90:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
55:
51:
46:
45:
44:General Guide
40:
39:
35:
32:
28:
27:
19:
359:Caspian blue
343:
331:
256:
249:Editor name
225:
223:
215:
201:
195:
190:
180:
176:
171:
160:SandyGeorgia
155:
104:Caspian blue
95:
88:
86:
42:
36:
373:Ameliorate!
365:Nate Silver
332:(Thanks to
18:User:Rspeer
197:Paranormal
152:Rschen7754
148:PhilKnight
128:GlassCobra
353:Comments
164:Shot info
144:MZMcBride
108:CT Cooper
334:User:AGK
120:Franamax
140:MBisanz
136:Majorly
112:east718
350:Author
156:Rspeer
116:Elonka
50:Voting
237:ɹəəds
230:speer
124:Giggy
16:<
191:will
132:Lar
100:AGK
240:ɹ
234:/
227:r
78:e
71:t
64:v
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
