1342:" The problem is not the advice as worded; it's the distorted caricature of it that pedants may come away with. I fight this all the time at work regarding the principle of "A little Strunk & White is a dangerous thing." Pedants would remember the takeaway lesson as being "never use lists for anything that could conceivably be forced to be prose" and "Using lists is the wrong way to write that only people who don't know any better engage in." This pedantic distortion happens over and over with just about any point that writing-advice authors ever take up. There is no action to take in this case; I was too tired when I wrote that comment last night, and I wasn't being careful enough in my reading. However, I will say, as someone who deals with the problem professionally, that you're better off writing a rule or guideline that's phrased to seem obviously, painstakingly self-aware of its limitations (i.e., "use your brain, and don't follow this rule off a cliff") than to write any rule that's straightforward but can easily be twisted by a pedantâbecause it inevitably will be. Half my job is un-mis-educating 2 generations of Americans who were taught in their formative years that writing and editing are about enforcing pedantry (as opposed to being about communication and damn the trivialities, which is what it's really about for the people of the world who get things done, e.g., physicians, surgeons, firefighters, EMTs, military personnel). Anyway, this is a mere musing, and not a direct reflection on the piece, which is very good and which I shouldn't have commented on. Regards,
315:
many. Judgment is required to decide how best to present an image in the larger context of the whole article. To avoid blankness on the one hand and clutter on the other, a good rule of thumb is to aim for one image per main text section and to place each image entirely within the section it illustrates. Generally, directional images such as eyes looking one way, or horses running left or right, should be placed so that "following" an image goes into the text of the page rather than away from it.
724:
124:
114:
168:
1305:
dangerous thing." As Arthur
Plotnik riffed on that, "A little Strunk and White is a dangerous thing." Don't give writing advice without acknowledging some exceptions. For every 5 readers who don't need to be told that there are limits to the generalization, there are 5 who do. The advice that, in paraphrase, "you shouldn't use lists unless you're making a "List of " article" is misguided/misguiding.
40:
134:
94:
144:
104:
520:
to direct readers to other articles in the encyclopedia. The usefulness of such links is reduced if there are too many links in the article. Only link to articles which would help increase the reader's understanding of the topic. Avoid links to common terms and generally avoid repeating the same link
1277:
Ahh, light bulb clicks on. Image files are one possible form of media, but so are videos or animations or sound files. Basically it is saying you can't just grab a copyrighted picture (or whatever) and put it in an article for decoration. The article has to discuss the picture (or sound file or ...)
477:
Quotations should be within double quotes ("like this"). Single quotes ('like this') are used only for a quotation within a quotation: "John asked Mary 'Are you going too?', but she was not interested." Knowledge uses logical quotation, so unless it is a complete sentence or thought, the punctuation
439:
Section and subsection headings should be uniquely named within an article, and should not contain links. These headings should avoid repeating the name of the article if at all possible (so in an article on
Chicago, the section would not be "Chicago parks", but just "Parks"âthe reader already knows
329:
Images must be properly licensed either as free-use or fair-use, and the image description and license page should include the "who, what, when, where" of the image itself, the license, the categories, and the author, original source, date, and any other information needed to verify that the license
232:
an article's claims. A good rule of thumb is to provide at least one source for each paragraph as well as sources for all quotations, all statistics, and any claim that is challenged or likely to be challenged. Each source should clearly support the text it is used for. Blogs, personal websites, and
196:
While the lead is the first section our readers see, it is usually the last section in an article to be written (or at least finalized). This is because the lead should be a summary of the whole article. A good rule of thumb is to mention every section in the lead in some way, even if only through a
246:
tags. These should be placed inline directly after the end punctuation of the text that is being supported. Editors can format citations in a variety of ways, by hand or by using templates such as those of the "cite" family. A good rule of thumb for
Internet sources is to include, if available, the
203:
While the lead can have references, most articles do not include them there (again since it is a summary, all information in the lead should be mentioned and referenced elsewhere in the article). The main exceptions to this are direct quotations and contentious claims, which should be referenced no
1304:
Numbered and bulleted lists, including nested ones, have usefulness in organizing information for easy parsing. The trouble with most writing advice is that pedants latch onto it and turn it into a fetish. I'm just putting in a plug for common sense. The aphorism goes that "a little knowledge is a
679:
Be aware that peer review is a place to identify problems, but not necessarily to receive fixes for them. The reviewers at PR generally do not have time to do copyedits or other large scale fixes. Peer review is a good place to help out; even a single comment can be very useful. More reviewers are
1245:
Good point. Sorry to be so slow to respond, but I've been traveling and often off-wiki of late. "Fair use media must be mentioned in the article in which they appear, and must add significantly to the reader's understanding of the topic." - The fair-use media must be mentioned in the text of the
582:
There are almost always more peer review (PR) requests than reviewers, which has led to limits and restrictions. Editors are limited to one peer review request per day, and no more than four open peer reviews at one time. Peer review is for more developed articles, which must be free of any major
382:
Paragraphs should be neither too long nor too short. Giant paragraphs put readers to sleep, while a succession of tiny ones clutters the page and turns prose articles into lists. Do not use lists if a passage reads easily using plain paragraphs. If an article's essence is a list, it should have a
337:
clause of United States copyright law must follow
Knowledge's policy on non-free content, which stipulates (in part) that fair use images must have no free equivalent, be used minimally, and must have contextual significance in the article in which they appear. So, for example, fair use images of
314:
Common image problems that are easily fixed involve size and spacing. "Thumb" is the preferred size for most images, though the lead image, maps, galleries, and panoramas are notable exceptions. It is possible to make images too small or too large, and it is possible to have too few images or too
207:
A good way to write the lead is to wait a few days, then reread the whole article except for the lead, then try to summarize it as a lead section. Another way is to imagine that a reader is restricted to reading only the lead: what points are essential and what can be omitted in that situation?
1065:
Note: Section headers which represent arbitrary time frames do not each need to (in fact, should not) be represented in the lede (using the traditional spelling). This is especially true of biographical articles which often have such section headings to avoid excessively long sections. Im my
270:
Editors who use citation templates should take care not to mix the "cite" family with the "citation" family or other families. Dates in the citations of any particular article should be formatted in the same way; i.e, m-d-y or yyyy-mm-dd for US-centric articles and d-m-y or yyyy-mm-dd for most
379:
Abbreviations generally need to be spelled out on first use. Slang, which can be bewildering to readers living in various places around the world, should be avoided. To the extent possible, technical material should be written in plain
English and technical terms either explained or linked.
330:
is legal and appropriate. Licensing is fairly straightforward with self-made photos but can be quite complicated in the case of images scanned from books, or obtained via Flickr, government web sites, or other sources. In these cases, great care must be taken to avoid violating copyright law.
975:
The MOS is descriptive, not proscriptive (it generally tells us what we can do, not what we cannot or must). There are many academic disciplines where parenthetical footnotes are the standard and I think it makes perfect sense to allow them here. They do not need to be popular to be allowed.
1081:
My thought is that the content of each section should be in the lead, even if the arbitrary dates in the header are not. I have changed it to "A good rule of thumb is to mention every section in the lead in some way, even if only through a word or phrase." (dropped the word header). Thanks,
392:
Editors are often very familiar with the subjects they write about. If the article omits useful background information, this can cause problems for general readers who are less familiar with the topic. Be sure to provide context for the reader in all articles, and to write from a real-world
378:
Although good prose styles can vary considerably, it is helpful to keep in mind the encyclopedia's diverse audience. A good rule of thumb is to imagine a readership of ordinary adults fluent in
English but unfamiliar with the material being presented. Jargon needs to be explained or linked.
822:
Knowledge articles use what are called "inline citations", each of which is added to the main text. Editors can format citations in a variety of ways, by hand or by using templates such as those of the "cite" family. No matter the format, the citation details go between a pair of <ref:
278:
In addition to making
Knowledge's text verifiable, an article's citations provide readers and researchers, including other Knowledge editors, quick access to sources that may be useful in other ways, such as when doing academic research. References add greatly to the encyclopedia's value.
664:, where they will still receive a review. As this can take time, editors who submitted articles are encouraged to look at the links in the Toolbox on the peer review page for their article, and then fix any problems found using the various tools. These toolbox links include
338:
living persons or existing buildings are almost never allowed, as they could conceivably be replaced with free images. Fair use media must be mentioned in the article in which they appear, and must add significantly to the reader's understanding of the topic.
1246:
article and not added as a disconnected aside or decoration. Would it be more clear to say "Fair use media must be mentioned in the main text of the article in which they appear and must add significantly to the reader's understanding of the topic"?
447:(SI) units, except for articles on the US, where United States customary units may be given first, and with a partial exception for the UK. Except for some scientific articles, units should be converted so that they are given in both systems; the
97:
1006:
I didn't say that they shouldn't be allowed, only that template citations should be preferred. It's bothering me that people are taking the MoS as an unbreakable code of law: something is changed nearly every other day.
1261:
Media is plural for medium, which I assume means media of communication -- like radio, television, motion pictures, newspapers, magazines, etc. Well, anyway, no; I don't understand. Sincerely, your friend,
1109:
in a BLP is quite sufficient, and in line with newspaper practice. Recall that immediately following the lede is a list of section titles - having each referred to in the lede is effectively redundant.
464:( ) between numbers and units or symbols such as $ 3 million or State Route 43, or between dates and months to avoid awkward line breaks. The convert template does this automatically, and the
525:
386:
Good sentence structure can vary widely, but most sentences in an article should be neither extremely long nor extremely short. Exceptions can be delicious if clear; readers do enjoy variety.
758:
509:
Do not use italics to show that something is being quoted. Italics are used for names of genera, court cases, vehicles, works of art, foreign words, and to show words as words as in "the word
768:
753:
773:
200:
Because it is a summary, the lead should contain no material that does not appear elsewhere in the article. For the same reason, the lead should be brief â not more than four paragraphs.
799:
657:
unsuccessfully, cannot be listed at PR until at least two weeks after the archive of its previous review, to allow time for the comments from the previous PR or FAC to be addressed.
748:
80:
1364:
It is a good point - thanks for making it. At peer review we tend to see articles where the opposite problem applies - things which should be prose are instead forced to be lists.
741:
711:
702:
694:
367:
362:
293:
288:
1130:
The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article.
421:
1140:
article has a much more reasonable structure and Table of
Contents now, which would be much simpler to summarize in the article lede or lead. Thanks for you comments,
735:
303:
59:
48:
905:
Yeah, they may be uncommon, but they're definitely still around. Remember that it's the policies that matter, not what your personal feelings on the issue are.
254:
A "References" or "Notes" section must be added to the article to make the citations fully functional. This section must contain either the <references/: -->
1340:
Do not use lists if a passage reads easily using plain paragraphs. If an article's essence is a list, it should have a title such as 'List of rivers in Asia'.
1449:
440:
the article is about
Chicago). Only the first letter of the first word and proper nouns are capitalized. Avoid very short sections or subsections.
21:
1424:
298:
1419:
1414:
241:
357:
318:
Images need captions, and it is good practice (although not explicitly required) to add alt text for readers who cannot see the images.
237:
1409:
845:
Well, I think they should be standard to tell you the truth. Can you point me to an article using "true" parenthetical citations...?
416:
689:
389:
Embrace the active voice. For example, instead of "Cat was chased by Mouse," write "Mouse chased Cat". Three words beats five.
177:
exposes an article to a wider degree of formal scrutiny than it normally receives, and offers significant help on the journey to
406:
673:
661:
444:
236:
Knowledge articles use what are called "inline citations", each of which is added to the main text. One option is to use
1404:
723:
53:
39:
17:
1320:
I don't see that advice in the dispatch above. Can you point out the exact sentence and suggest an alternate wording?
182:
1178:
Thanks very much - I had not noticed. Agreed that the work is great and the workers are few. Still, we perservere.
352:
347:
1347:
1310:
185:
status. While each article is unique, a number of similar issues are frequently seen in articles reviewed in the
1379:
1351:
1329:
1314:
1293:
1271:
1255:
1239:
1219:
1193:
1173:
1155:
1119:
1097:
1075:
1054:
1035:
1020:
991:
970:
952:
927:
914:
Policies are are based on editor consensus; any less and they are no more then dead weight. No, they do matter.
909:
898:
878:
858:
840:
669:
1430:
1395:
1213:
1014:
964:
933:
921:
852:
665:
1105:(not the only article with this many sections, to be sure). I consider that having the lede cover only the
513:". Italics can be used for emphasis, though this is rare; bold face is never used in this way on Knowledge.
178:
825:
tags. These should be placed inline directly after the end punctuation of the text that is being supported.
948:
894:
836:
411:
217:
1267:
1235:
1031:
617:
174:
1343:
1306:
1206:
Speaking of which, the
Signpost is short on manpower. You may notice we had to drop ITN this week...
937:
883:
1369:
1325:
1283:
1251:
1208:
1183:
1145:
1087:
1009:
981:
959:
916:
868:
847:
189:
process. Below we discuss these issues and provide some recommendations on how to deal with them.
637:
571:
556:
541:
461:
319:
1169:
1115:
1071:
941:
887:
829:
795:
566:
561:
394:
127:
1041:
All styleguidesâallâno matter how they might spin it, are both descriptive and prescriptive.
521:
in an article, unless the second one is much further down and it seems important to link it.
436:(MOS) covers many topics, there are some MOS issues that are frequently seen at peer review.
1263:
1231:
1027:
587:
451:
259:
660:
Peer reviews that have received little or no feedback after four days are placed on the PR
653:. An article that has had a peer review, or gone through the substantial review process at
107:
1049:
597:
546:
496:
468:
137:
265:, which will automatically display the citation details, what is inside the <ref: -->
1365:
1321:
1279:
1247:
1179:
1141:
1133:
1125:
1083:
977:
864:
551:
486:
161:
157:
27:
863:
I have changed the article - thanks Sandy (and please feel free to tweak my changes).
1443:
1137:
906:
654:
627:
607:
516:
One of the most useful features of Knowledge is the ability to use internal links or
433:
323:
248:
251:
includes lists of desirable data, such as ISBN numbers, for other kinds of sources.
1230:"Fair use media must be mentioned in the article in which they appear." Sincerely,
1165:
1111:
1067:
647:
186:
167:
117:
1300:
Avoidance of list elements should not be carried to the extreme of being a fetish
147:
479:
229:
1042:
1026:
In journalism we have a saying: "Follow the stylebook out the window." Yours,
503:
1132:") I also note that the example you give is from 2008 and does not follow
1164:
did the pruning :). Alas - a lot of BLPs still contain kitchen sinks.
517:
334:
271:
non-US-centric articles. Page ranges in the citations and elsewhere take
244:. For the latter, the citation details go between a pair of <ref: -->
828:
Parenthetical citations are acceptable, and they don't use ref tags.
247:
author, title, publisher, date of publication, URL, and access date.
532:", unless it is so well-known that this seems unnecessary ("BBC").
1102:
Admirable inconcept - unworkable in practice. Vide an article like
166:
1338:
I'm sorryâyou're right. The advice given in the piece is sound: "
233:
other self-published materials are not usually reliable sources.
529:
58:
457:
template is useful for doing this for almost any conversion.
526:
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
722:
38:
482:
are generally three or more lines long, and should use the
1128:'s Provide an accessible overview section says (in part "
1278:
and it has to add to add to the reader's understanding.
524:
Spell out abbreviations on first use; for example, "the
1103:
811:
804:
784:
171:
Don't worry: peer review is not as daunting as this!
1124:Well I think of it as just another way to say what
809:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
393:perspective in articles about works of fiction.
695:Interview with Ruhrfisch, master of peer review
583:cleanup banners, including, but not limited to
267:tags, in the "References" or "Notes" section.
8:
289:Reliable sources in content review processes
443:Measurements are generally given first in
1393:Make sure we cover what matters to you â
422:The problem with in-universe perspective
383:title such as "List of rivers in Asia".
812:
788:
228:Citing reliable sources is critical to
74:
299:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources
7:
1450:Knowledge Signpost archives 2010-10
397:has more on writing about fiction.
358:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria
478:goes outside the quotation marks.
60:
35:
957:And I repeat: consensus changes.
794:These comments are automatically
75:Common issues seen in Peer review
690:Knowledge:Peer review/guidelines
255:tag or a small template such as
142:
132:
122:
112:
102:
92:
528:(DCNR)", rather than just "the
407:User:Tony1/Writing exercise box
294:Sources in biology and medicine
1226:Not sure what this means . . .
805:add the page to your watchlist
474:template has the same effect.
417:Provide context for the reader
1:
445:International System of Units
275:dashes rather than hyphens.
1380:01:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
1352:00:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
1330:22:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
1315:23:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
1294:00:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
1272:00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
1256:21:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
1240:05:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
1220:21:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
1194:15:04, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1174:14:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1156:14:27, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1120:10:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1098:01:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1076:00:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1055:07:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
1036:05:51, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
1021:00:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
992:21:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
971:21:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
953:14:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
928:21:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
910:01:57, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
899:01:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
879:00:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
859:00:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
841:23:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
680:always needed and welcome!
1466:
502:template is used only for
492:or related templates. The
353:Knowledge:Picture tutorial
348:Knowledge:Image use policy
322:has more on captions, and
304:Tutorial: adding citations
368:Reviewing non-free images
204:matter where they occur.
668:, as well as checks for
240:, and another is to use
238:parenthetical references
1136:. I also note that the
819:This needs to be fixed:
578:The peer review process
28:User:Ruhrfisch/Dispatch
827:
802:. To follow comments,
727:
623:, or large numbers of
412:User:AndyZ/Suggestions
333:Images used under the
218:Knowledge:Lead section
172:
43:
820:
726:
363:Reviewing free images
170:
42:
1066:opinion, of course.
938:Taiwanese aborigines
936:. Another sample:
932:It's not a policy--
884:Battle of Red Cliffs
798:from this article's
670:disambiguation links
759:Features and admins
326:explains alt text.
242:clickable footnotes
1396:leave a suggestion
789:Discuss this story
769:Arbitration report
754:WikiProject report
728:
572:Knowledge:Overlink
557:Knowledge:MOSQUOTE
542:Knowledge:Headings
462:non-breaking space
432:While Knowledge's
173:
49:â Back to Contents
44:
1376:
1290:
1190:
1152:
1107:most major points
1094:
988:
875:
813:purging the cache
774:Technology report
676:in the article.
567:Knowledge:MOSBOLD
562:Knowledge:Italics
54:View Latest Issue
26:(Redirected from
1457:
1433:
1398:
1374:
1288:
1218:
1216:
1188:
1150:
1092:
1052:
1047:
1019:
1017:
986:
969:
967:
945:
934:it's a guideline
926:
924:
891:
873:
857:
855:
833:
816:
814:
808:
787:
746:
738:
731:
714:
706:
684:More information
652:
646:
642:
636:
632:
626:
622:
616:
612:
606:
602:
596:
592:
586:
536:More information
501:
495:
491:
485:
473:
467:
456:
450:
401:More information
342:More information
283:More information
264:
258:
212:More information
197:word or phrase.
164:
146:
145:
136:
135:
126:
125:
116:
115:
106:
105:
96:
95:
66:
64:
62:
31:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1429:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1412:
1407:
1400:
1394:
1390:
1389:
1373:
1344:Quercus solaris
1307:Quercus solaris
1302:
1287:
1228:
1214:
1207:
1187:
1160:You might note
1149:
1091:
1063:
1050:
1043:
1015:
1008:
985:
965:
958:
943:
922:
915:
889:
872:
853:
846:
831:
818:
810:
803:
792:
791:
785:+ Add a comment
783:
779:
778:
777:
739:
736:18 October 2010
734:
732:
729:
718:
717:
712:
709:
704:
650:
644:
640:
634:
630:
624:
620:
614:
610:
604:
600:
594:
590:
584:
580:
547:Knowledge:Units
499:
493:
489:
483:
471:
465:
454:
448:
434:Manual of Style
430:
428:Manual of Style
376:
312:
262:
256:
226:
194:
165:
155:
154:
153:
152:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
87:
84:
73:
69:
67:
61:18 October 2010
57:
56:
51:
45:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1463:
1461:
1453:
1452:
1442:
1441:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1392:
1391:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1370:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1333:
1332:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1284:
1259:
1258:
1227:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1184:
1146:
1088:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1024:
1023:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
982:
903:
902:
901:
869:
793:
790:
782:
781:
780:
776:
771:
766:
761:
756:
751:
749:News and notes
745:
733:
721:
720:
719:
715:"Dispatches" â
710:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
692:
686:
685:
674:external links
666:automated tips
579:
576:
575:
574:
569:
564:
559:
554:
552:Knowledge:NBSP
549:
544:
538:
537:
429:
426:
425:
424:
419:
414:
409:
403:
402:
375:
372:
371:
370:
365:
360:
355:
350:
344:
343:
311:
308:
307:
306:
301:
296:
291:
285:
284:
225:
222:
221:
220:
214:
213:
193:
190:
151:
150:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
89:
88:
85:
79:
78:
77:
76:
71:
70:
68:
65:
52:
47:
46:
37:
36:
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1462:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1432:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1397:
1381:
1378:
1377:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1291:
1281:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1211:
1205:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1143:
1139:
1138:Joseph Widney
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1108:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1048:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1005:
993:
990:
989:
979:
974:
973:
972:
968:
963:
962:
956:
955:
954:
950:
946:
939:
935:
931:
930:
929:
925:
920:
919:
913:
912:
911:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
885:
882:
881:
880:
877:
876:
866:
862:
861:
860:
856:
851:
850:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
826:
824:</ref: -->
815:
806:
801:
797:
786:
775:
772:
770:
767:
765:
762:
760:
757:
755:
752:
750:
747:
743:
737:
730:In this issue
725:
716:
708:
696:
693:
691:
688:
687:
683:
682:
681:
677:
675:
671:
667:
663:
658:
656:
649:
639:
629:
619:
609:
599:
589:
577:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
560:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
539:
535:
534:
533:
531:
527:
522:
519:
514:
512:
507:
505:
498:
488:
481:
475:
470:
463:
458:
453:
446:
441:
437:
435:
427:
423:
420:
418:
415:
413:
410:
408:
405:
404:
400:
399:
398:
396:
390:
387:
384:
380:
373:
369:
366:
364:
361:
359:
356:
354:
351:
349:
346:
345:
341:
340:
339:
336:
331:
327:
325:
321:
316:
309:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
286:
282:
281:
280:
276:
274:
268:
266:</ref: -->
261:
252:
250:
245:</ref: -->
243:
239:
234:
231:
223:
219:
216:
215:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
198:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
169:
163:
159:
149:
141:
139:
131:
129:
121:
119:
111:
109:
101:
99:
91:
90:
82:
63:
55:
50:
41:
29:
23:
19:
1368:
1339:
1303:
1282:
1260:
1229:
1209:
1182:
1161:
1144:
1129:
1106:
1086:
1064:
1044:
1025:
1010:
980:
960:
917:
867:
848:
821:
763:
742:all comments
707:"Dispatches"
678:
659:
618:unreferenced
581:
523:
515:
510:
508:
480:Block quotes
476:
459:
442:
438:
431:
391:
388:
385:
381:
377:
332:
328:
317:
313:
277:
272:
269:
253:
235:
227:
206:
202:
199:
195:
1431:Suggestions
1264:GeorgeLouis
1232:GeorgeLouis
1028:GeorgeLouis
796:transcluded
504:pull quotes
320:WP:CAPTIONS
187:Peer review
175:Peer review
764:Dispatches
395:WP:MOSFICT
224:References
86:Share this
81:Contribute
72:Dispatches
22:2010-10-18
1425:Subscribe
1372:<: -->
1366:Ruhrfisch
1322:Finetooth
1286:<: -->
1280:Ruhrfisch
1248:Finetooth
1186:<: -->
1180:Ruhrfisch
1148:<: -->
1142:Ruhrfisch
1090:<: -->
1084:Ruhrfisch
984:<: -->
978:Ruhrfisch
871:<: -->
865:Ruhrfisch
800:talk page
638:clarifyme
518:wikilinks
511:bumblebee
230:verifying
162:Ruhrfisch
158:Finetooth
1444:Category
1420:Newsroom
1415:Archives
705:Previous
335:Fair use
183:Featured
128:LinkedIn
108:Facebook
20: |
1166:Collect
1134:WP:HEAD
1126:WP:LEAD
1112:Collect
1068:Collect
944:Georgia
890:Georgia
832:Georgia
662:backlog
588:cleanup
452:convert
260:reflist
118:Twitter
1051:(talk)
643:, and
598:wikify
497:cquote
469:nowrap
460:Use a
324:WP:ALT
310:Images
249:WP:CIT
138:Reddit
98:E-mail
1410:About
1371:: -->
1285:: -->
1185:: -->
1147:: -->
1089:: -->
983:: -->
942:Sandy
888:Sandy
870:: -->
830:Sandy
487:quote
374:Prose
16:<
1405:Home
1348:talk
1326:talk
1311:talk
1268:talk
1252:talk
1236:talk
1170:talk
1116:talk
1072:talk
1061:Lead
1045:Tony
1032:talk
949:Talk
895:Talk
837:Talk
713:Next
672:and
628:fact
608:NPOV
530:DCNR
192:Lead
179:Good
160:and
148:Digg
1215:Mar
1210:Res
1162:who
1016:Mar
1011:Res
966:Mar
961:Res
940:.
923:Mar
918:Res
854:Mar
849:Res
823:-->
655:FAC
648:huh
181:or
156:By
83:â
1446::
1350:)
1328:)
1313:)
1270:)
1254:)
1238:)
1172:)
1118:)
1074:)
1034:)
951:)
907:Ed
897:)
886:.
839:)
703:â
651:}}
645:{{
641:}}
635:{{
633:,
631:}}
625:{{
621:}}
615:{{
613:,
611:}}
605:{{
603:,
601:}}
595:{{
593:,
591:}}
585:{{
506:.
500:}}
494:{{
490:}}
484:{{
472:}}
466:{{
455:}}
449:{{
273:en
263:}}
257:{{
1399:.
1375:°
1346:(
1324:(
1309:(
1289:°
1266:(
1250:(
1234:(
1189:°
1168:(
1151:°
1114:(
1093:°
1070:(
1030:(
987:°
947:(
893:(
874:°
835:(
817:.
807:.
744:)
740:(
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
