Knowledge (XXG)

User:Worldedixor

Source 📝

40: 240: 64: 203: 390:
One of many examples is when it is a well known fact at the UN, that the Islamic State (and Al Qaeda before it) is regularly referred to as a terrorist organization in U.N. communiqués. Yet " a couple of editors" revert well sourced content because they are incompetent to read correctly and click on
709:
It is my opinion that one should communicate with others on Knowledge (XXG) as if he or she is talking "face to face" to Queen Elizabeth with all the video cameras recording everything that is being said. Then re-read what he or she writes before communicating with others. This will go a long way
448:
Knowledge (XXG) to IMMEDIATELY fire admins and reviewers etc. who "choose" to be nasty and engage in defamation, personal attacks, or worse enable editors to engage in personal attacks against editors they don't like, and refuse to remove personal attacks brought to them. I reserve ALL my rights...
278:
This is my opinion and factual observations on MY user page. Some user pages even have cartoons. My user page is maintained in the best interest of Knowledge (XXG) and its "continuous improvement". By reading my User page, you must agree NOT to use any of my opinions against me nor "assume that you
738:
If you disagree with my edit, or I inadvertently violate WP Principles, use my "private" Talk page to let me know in a respectful manner and I will be willingly responsive, as long as you provide me with the exact provision in WP policy that I violated, as well as state the policy. Let me explain:
563:
3. What I try to do is, instead of DEMANDING editors to perfectly adhere to WP policy in 24 hours after they create an article, I allow new and experienced editors to create and add new content and I assume good faith. I patiently wait 4-6 months so they and other interested editors can build the
539:
3. Unfortunately, the culture that made me feel uncomfortable 6-7 months ago is still here, and a (very) small number of such admins used the "very" small time I spent as a pretext to instigate me. I can raise these issues with Jimmy Wales or one of the good stewards but I don't have neither the
764:
I am respectful and enjoy a civil, mutually empowering debate. I don't deal well with a hostile, chauvinist, pompous and patronizing approach. So, those who can't help it are better off asking someone decent to contact me on your behalf if you disagree with my edit. You will get what you want,
689:
of our (generally quite useful) notion of assuming good faith. Many editors (and admins) have focused so much on this that they have come to believe that good faith is all that is required to be a useful contributor (and challenge the content of your edits). Sadly, this is not the case at all.
528:
1. Without providing a list of names, last year, I was dismayed by the culture of a (very) small number of admins and their darling pets that are incompetent to understand what I write and misinterpret the correct definition of my words. They then apply rules selectively to instigate and also
447:
that Knowledge (XXG) will start suffering from a number of lawsuits against it and against some of its admins and reviewers "personally"... IMO, this will be extremely life changing to the accused defendants and very bad for Knowledge (XXG). The solution is very simple... ALL it takes is for
597:
acting in an adversarial manner towards an unsuspecting editor that they misunderstood, and try to negatively impact the good image of a good, knowledgeable editor who is contributing to WP in good faith, with accurate content and reliable sources, in areas most editors do not, then this is
582:
1. When an editor does not know WP policy, it is understandable. I personally take time to correct their behavior assuming good faith, sometimes add a reliable source when I know their information is accurate, and, at times, I leave them a friendly message guiding them when I know how
559:
2. It is my opinion that the biggest problem in Knowledge (XXG) are anti-social editors who, through their impatience and "selective" violations of Knowledge (XXG)'s core principles drive good editors away, and rob them from any joy and incentive to "volunteer" their time and
651:
It is widely known that the only way to restrain a bully is to stand up to them. It takes courage!... However, after they flex their internet muscles and throw their tantrums in front of a computer screen, they realize that they have no option but to learn how to act like a
609:
4. You are not allowed to misinterpret the intent of another editor or misrepresent other editors. You are also not allowed to threaten editors with "admins you know" or threaten to have them blocked for misinterpreting their intentions or for disagreeing with
700:
Respectfully pointing out to another editor that they do not have sufficient knowledge about the subject of an article or their command of the language of the subject is insufficient to challenge your edits should not be taken as an insult.
386:
Utter incompetence plague WP. Impatient reverts of well sourced content and incompetence to do a very simple research make it tedious for "competent" editors to add well sourced content. What adds insult to injury is the 1RR restriction.
433:
In this journey of a thousand miles, my words have started to make a difference on WP. Even one of the grumpiest editors has started improving and "welcoming" new editors rather than removing their joy of editing Knowledge (XXG).
613:
5. Millions of editors edit on WP. I made hundreds of edits. My accurate and well supported edits are seen by hundreds if not thousands of editors. I personally do not willfully nitpick on good, contributing and knowledgeable
760:
is seen as "helpful". It only takes few seconds to "copy and paste" the exact provision in the humongous policy but it makes a world of difference in "human interaction" and "fostering cooperation between editors".
442:
As explained below, according to WP Rules, admins, reviewer, etc... should NEVER EVER engage in bias, ganging up, vendettas, alienation, instigation, defamation, and willful malicious conduct. It is my very strong
656:
not just revert edits in a condescending manner, but instead assume good faith, ask for citations, perhaps add quick missing content, and, if needed, revert an edit with a respectful, non-patronizing explanation.
513:
Do not discourage other editors from enjoying Knowledge (XXG) and editing articles by making threats to report them, going on a power trip, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, intimidation or instigation.
555:
1. Knowledge (XXG) desperately, and I mean desperately, needs fresh minds to add content and complete the millions of articles created and are still incomplete. Otherwise, its credibility will continue to
300:. "My mature way" of handling such antics, as an adult, is to simply ignore them and swiftly delete their inappropriate conduct. It appears that "other", more mature admins, are watching "their" behavior. 721:
This is my opinion on MY Talk page. By reading my Talk page, you must agree NOT to use any of my opinions against me nor "assume that you know my intent". Otherwise please do not read my talk page.
619:
This is my opinion on MY Talk page. By reading my Talk page, you must agree NOT to use any of my opinions against me nor "assume that you know my intent". Otherwise please do not read my talk page.
564:
article they are all interested in and have knowledge in BEFORE I come with a little hard on and start reverting non-sourced content and bark at them WP policy codes to make them feel stupid.
534:
2. In short, with my wealth of knowledge, I have not made edits in many months until recently when I made a couple of quick and necessary edits backed up by reliable and verifiable sources.
529:"fabricate" instigating rules along the way. Some admins are excellent and follow Knowledge (XXG) rules and try to keep people like me interested in donating time and money. 718:
by others are exactly the same. My biggest disappointment with Knowledge (XXG) is the level of incivility and aggression on the part of some established editors and admins.
351:
aren't the police, and they aren't anyone's mom. If you want to keep watching the talk page, it's not up to us to send some message because you don't like what you see.
341:
I came across a very positive change within the Knowledge (XXG) culture, when a good admin solves a chronic problem in Knowledge (XXG) by assertively instructing:
590:
understandable but when they do not act on their misunderstanding against contributing editors or maliciously talk about them, then their is absolutely no harm.
321:(which was the case in what another editor (not me) offered and was in no way disruptive to the article), two editors, sometimes with differing viewpoints, 540:
time nor the energy. It is my very strong opinion that Knowledge (XXG) is paying the price for the action of these (very) few admins and their puppets.
794:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge (XXG):Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=578772290&oldid=578772135
329:
with Knowledge (XXG)'s core content. Editors may revert article changes that violate Knowledge (XXG)'s core content policies;
758:"comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent in the content that it provides or excludes", please see 729:
I envision an improved Knowledge (XXG) where everyone strictly adheres to Knowledge (XXG) Principles without favoritism.
495:
This quote about whiners hits the nail on the head even when I don't edit any articles and have no contact whatsoever!...
714:
to say to someone in good faith, in a silent medium where the tone of voice and non-verbal cues are non-existent, and
629: 399:
Also, a 2 seconds search returned this one of many reliable and verifiable sources, directly from the UN website:
697:
Clearly, every editor is incompetent for some subjects, so it is important to know or discover your limitations.
391:
the hyperlink that leads to the UN list of terrorist organizations that included Al Qaeda and the Islamic State.
479: 297: 498: 367: 785:
have a "one inline citation per sentence" or "one citation per paragraph" rule, even for featured articles.
675: 669: 522: 463: 316: 770: 569: 633: 363: 462:
Also, to those "perfect" people who ask me to be perfect like them when I edit, they need to read
423: 824: 819: 814: 809: 456:
When editing an article, – — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · § Sign your posts on talk pages and
181: 152: 123: 100: 239: 47: 593:
3. HOWEVER, when an admin does not know WP policy and does not educate themselves on WP policy
217: 749:
to show your superiority is very often seen as patronizing and "intentionally provocative".
545:
4. I will end this opinion and return to enjoying my happy and stress-free life in paradise.
254: 187: 158: 144: 129: 115: 94: 39: 173: 86: 508: 374:
Opinion 15 August 2014 – Improving Knowledge (XXG) - Standing up to flagrant injustice
803: 394: 378:“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” ― Martin Luther King Jr. 732:
Assuming good faith is at the core of "el calor humano" between human beings.
681:
Where we very often see big controversies, though, is with editors (admins too)
415:“The Secretary-General is deeply appalled at today's reports of attacks by the 250: 499:
http://deborahtindle.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/deborah-tindle-42.jpg?w=420
202: 21:
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds
664:
Competence is Required to Edit Knowledge (XXG) - Opinion - 1 November 2013
429:
Opinion 14 August 2014 - My words are starting to make a difference on WP
304: 777:
Important Explanation to Self - Citation density according to WP:MINREF
478:
I don't have time to show more evidence on systematic and repeated
224: 362:
I am opting to go back to editing, and Knowledge (XXG) has admin
438:
Opinion 14 August 2014 - Instigating, Bias and Malicious Conduct
424:
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=48439#.U-x-2Jp0y00
403:
7 August 2014 – As Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)
765:
conflict will be avoided, and Knowledge (XXG) will benefit.
279:
know my intent". Otherwise please do not "read" my User page.
370:) and the other "unbiased" and well-meaning admins to thank. 382:
Opinion 14 August 2014 - Baseless Reverts and Incompetence
796: 793: 647:
Bullies on Knowledge (XXG) - Opinion - 1 November 2013
634:
Why does Knowledge (XXG) keep pestering you for money?
628:
This is revealing!... Reflecting on these articles...
486:"Quick to judge, Quick to anger... Slow to understand" 482:, so I will just share my favourite quote of the day: 474:
Opinion 10 August 2014 - My Favourite Quote of The Day
288:
In my observations, (very) few admins and their pals
735:I am well-meaning and I contribute in good faith. 746:, deleting or changing an edit and just leaving a 789:Requesting a permanent block of user AndyTheGrump 307:is formed when two editors coordinate their edits 586:2. When an admin does not know WP policy, it is 395:http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/AQList.htm 705:Assume Good Faith - Opinion - 28 October 2013 407:continue to overrun areas of northern Iraq... 72:18 years, 8 months and 15 days 8: 458:Cite your sources: < ref>< /ref> 303:To further explain a recent observation, a 150:Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel 491:6 August 2014 My Favorite Quote of the day 70:This user has been on Knowledge (XXG) for 309:in a way that is disruptive to an article 683:who are disruptive while trying to help 419:group Islamic State (IS) in Kirkuk,... 7: 234: 197: 169: 140: 111: 82: 58: 34: 710:as to increase the likelihood that 756:, assuming good faith and saying: 14: 685:. This is where we sometimes see 323:work together to craft an article 292:WP rules as a passive-aggressive 238: 201: 121:This user can contribute with a 62: 38: 781:Knowledge (XXG) certainly does 773:) 09:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 572:) 16:54, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 48:does not understand mean people 692:Competence is required as well 630:The decline of Knowledge (XXG) 1: 639:I Feel Good - 1 November 2013 624:Reflections - 2 November 2013 347:Just unwatch the talk page. 296:to justify their relentless 602:and the admin must be held 841: 678:asserts what amounts to: 550:Opinion - 15 November 2013 468:Perfection is not required 577:Opinion - 2 November 2013 273:User Page for Worldedixor 672:to edit Knowledge (XXG) 331:this is not tag-teaming 670:Competence is Required 518:Opinion - 30 July 2014 504:3 August 2014 WP Rules 337:Opinion 29 August 2014 284:Opinion 30 August 2014 245:This user has visited 212:This user has visited 92:Cet utilisateur parle 687:a harmful side effect 668:I just love this!... 470:in Knowledge (XXG). 255:District of Columbia 716:what is perceived 266: 265: 231: 230: 194: 193: 166: 165: 137: 136: 108: 107: 79: 78: 55: 54: 51:. Please be nice. 832: 262: 242: 235: 205: 198: 170: 141: 112: 83: 75: 66: 65: 59: 42: 35: 840: 839: 835: 834: 833: 831: 830: 829: 800: 799: 791: 779: 727: 707: 666: 649: 641: 626: 579: 552: 520: 506: 493: 480:WP:Wikihounding 476: 454: 440: 431: 384: 376: 360: 350: 339: 317:consensus-based 298:WP:Wikihounding 286: 275: 269: 267: 260: 232: 206: 195: 167: 138: 109: 80: 69: 63: 56: 31: 28: 27: 25:Albert Einstein 16: 12: 11: 5: 838: 836: 828: 827: 822: 817: 812: 802: 801: 790: 787: 778: 775: 726: 723: 706: 703: 665: 662: 648: 645: 640: 637: 625: 622: 616: 615: 611: 607: 591: 584: 578: 575: 574: 573: 561: 557: 551: 548: 547: 546: 542: 541: 536: 535: 531: 530: 519: 516: 505: 502: 492: 489: 475: 472: 466:and learn why 453: 450: 439: 436: 430: 427: 383: 380: 375: 372: 364:Anna Frodesiak 359: 356: 355: 354: 348: 338: 335: 325:that is fully 285: 282: 274: 271: 264: 263: 258: 243: 233: 229: 228: 210: 196: 192: 191: 177: 168: 164: 163: 148: 139: 135: 134: 119: 110: 106: 105: 90: 81: 77: 76: 67: 57: 53: 52: 43: 33: 18: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 837: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 807: 805: 798: 797: 795: 788: 786: 784: 776: 774: 772: 768: 762: 759: 755: 750: 748: 745: 744:As an example 740: 736: 733: 730: 724: 722: 719: 717: 713: 712:what you mean 704: 702: 698: 695: 693: 688: 684: 679: 677: 676:WP:Competence 673: 671: 663: 661: 660: 655: 646: 644: 638: 636: 635: 631: 623: 621: 620: 612: 608: 605: 601: 596: 592: 589: 585: 581: 580: 576: 571: 567: 562: 558: 554: 553: 549: 544: 543: 538: 537: 533: 532: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523:WP:ADMINABUSE 517: 515: 511: 510: 503: 501: 500: 496: 490: 488: 487: 483: 481: 473: 471: 469: 465: 464:WP:PERFECTION 460: 459: 451: 449: 446: 437: 435: 428: 426: 425: 421: 420: 418: 412: 409: 408: 406: 400: 397: 396: 392: 388: 381: 379: 373: 371: 369: 365: 357: 353: 352: 344: 343: 342: 336: 334: 332: 328: 324: 320: 318: 312: 310: 306: 301: 299: 295: 291: 283: 281: 280: 272: 270: 259: 256: 252: 248: 244: 241: 237: 236: 226: 222: 221: 215: 211: 209: 204: 200: 199: 190: 189: 184: 183: 179:هذا المستخدم 178: 175: 172: 171: 161: 160: 155: 154: 149: 146: 143: 142: 132: 131: 126: 125: 120: 117: 114: 113: 103: 102: 101:professionnel 97: 96: 91: 88: 85: 84: 73: 68: 61: 60: 50: 49: 44: 41: 37: 36: 32: 29: 26: 22: 792: 782: 780: 766: 763: 757: 753: 751: 747: 743: 741: 737: 734: 731: 728: 720: 715: 711: 708: 699: 696: 691: 686: 682: 680: 674: 667: 659:WP benefits! 658: 653: 650: 643:That's all! 642: 627: 618: 617: 603: 599: 594: 587: 565: 521: 512: 507: 497: 494: 485: 484: 477: 467: 461: 457: 455: 452:Note to self 444: 441: 432: 422: 416: 414: 413: 410: 404: 402: 401: 398: 393: 389: 385: 377: 361: 346: 345: 340: 330: 326: 322: 315: 314:However, in 313: 308: 302: 293: 289: 287: 277: 276: 268: 246: 219: 213: 207: 186: 180: 157: 151: 128: 124:professional 122: 99: 98:à un niveau 93: 71: 46: 30: 24: 20: 15: 767:Worldedixor 754:By contrast 654:human being 604:accountable 566:Worldedixor 251:U.S. states 153:profesional 804:Categories 560:knowledge. 405:terrorists 249:of the 50 45:This user 825:User ar-5 820:User es-5 815:User en-5 810:User fr-5 417:terrorist 327:compliant 220:countries 127:level of 614:editors. 556:plummet. 305:tag team 290:misquote 253:and the 95:français 445:opinion 358:Opinion 319:editing 294:pretext 223:in the 216:of the 188:العربية 159:español 130:English 725:Vision 595:BEFORE 349:Admins 600:wrong 509:WP:HA 225:world 182:محترف 771:talk 632:and 610:you. 606:!... 570:talk 411:and 368:talk 218:205 23:" - 783:not 752:2. 742:1. 588:NOT 583:to. 311:. 185:في 156:de 806:: 694:. 333:. 261:44 247:44 214:82 208:82 176:-5 174:ar 147:-5 145:es 118:-5 116:en 89:-5 87:fr 769:( 568:( 366:( 257:. 227:. 162:. 133:. 104:. 74:. 19:"

Index


does not understand mean people
fr
français
professionnel
en
professional
English
es
profesional
español
ar
محترف
العربية

205 countries
world

U.S. states
District of Columbia
WP:Wikihounding
tag team
consensus-based
Anna Frodesiak
talk
http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/AQList.htm
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=48439#.U-x-2Jp0y00
WP:PERFECTION
WP:Wikihounding
http://deborahtindle.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/deborah-tindle-42.jpg?w=420

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.