User:Wikidemon/Obama articles arbitration

1195:

ChildofMidnight was grandstanding by championing the problem editor, saying the editor was right to criticize the Obama article and its editors, and refusing to let other editors close the unproductive discussion that resulted. In my judgment at the time, and now, the best thing to do was to calm everyone down, explain to the newbie exactly why there were rough waters on the talk page, close the discussion, and proceed elsewhere with any content proposals or behavioral complaints. And the worst possible response was to whip up the flames by endorsing the new editor and showing him that getting into arguments and revert wars on the talk page is a legitimate response to the perceived Obama censorship cabal. I would have made a friendly request to cut this out on ChildofMidnight's talk page, but ChildofMidnight had already reverted comments there as "trolling"

1152:

specifically directed to me. Several other editors had made far-reaching observations on how we were managing the talk page and article in the wake of the Aaron Klein incident, and the discussion had turned towards the question of how relevant Obama's past association with unsavory individuals from Chicago was to his biography. I took a step back to put these biographical details into the context of the article. That response took me quite a while to write. I was taken aback and quite puzzled when ChildofMidnight deleted my comment. In light of ChildofMidnight's already long history of attacking me as a bad faith editor, this seemed like stalker-ish harassment in continuation of a grudge. Rather than challenging ChildofMidnight on it and starting yet more Wikidrama, I simply reinstated my comment, noting the "weird disruption".

1206:

we were firm with newbies who criticize other editors, and the background on why there is an everpresent concern over sockpuppetry. Scjessey was wrong to be sarcastic, but dressing him down in front of an impressionable newbie (assuming good faith rather than sockpuppetry here, an open question) was not the way to go. I restored my comments once because I was, again, taken aback by ChildofMidnight's seemingly unwarranted deletion of my comments - but when ChildofMidnight deleted them a second and third time I refused to join in, instead asking

1348:

article probation, this is an Obama-related issue because the currency of allegations against Khalidi is almost entirely a child of partisan tactics during the recent election cycle to draw connections between Obama and various individuals, while claiming those individuals were former terrorists. Calling Khalidi a PLO official who lied about his past was a way of disparaging Obama as (to use Sarah Palin's words) "palling around with terrorists."

1115:

beginning "this is a blatant whitewashed version of Mr. Obama" to the end of a closed discussion. I politely acknowledged the post, and moved the archive end template from just above it to just below it. Surely no new discussion was required on whether Knowledge (XXG) is a whitewash or not, particularly when there were many other threads simultaneously open at the time on this complaint.

878:, the poster, was acting suspiciously to begin with and it looked more like trolling than an invitation to discussion. The subject was a complaint that Knowledge (XXG) editors were censoring the truth that Obama is a British rather than a US citizen and therefore ineligible to be President. Anyone who wanted to discuss this 1155:

The more common "Don't you dare delete my comments, you troll" approach would have been a little incendiary so I kept it simple. It was weird, and it was disruption - and both comments served a purpose: "weird" to indicate that I did not understand it and considered it inexplicable, and "disruption"

1114:

I fail to see how "Thanks for your comment - it has been assimilated" is aggressive. I was actually trying out a supportive approach to dealing with unhelpful comments as a way of calming editors incited by Aaron Klein's complaints. The IP editor, in its only known edit, had added a short complaint

1102:

it, in hopes that would settle the matter. I believe that is a correct way to handle this. ChildofMidnight's championing Likwidshoe over this incident and defending Likwidshoe's name-calling as "pointing out inappropriate hostility" after the matter was settled and apologized for suggests a problem

925:

Retitling threads is common practice. As shown on the evidence page consolidating, retitling, and moving a large number of threads kept things orderly on the Obama talk page. In this case I retitled a thread from "Editors and administrators are suppressing dissent....this is a very troubling trend"

898:

ChildofMidnight has the wrong editor. The AN/I report was a request for help to calm an edit war ChildofMidnight fomented on the Obama talk page - exactly what AN/I is for. I was not "advised to be respectful and civil to other editors". Scjessey was. The comment by QueenofBattle in CoM's diff is

1322:

I also don't get the "uses provocative thread titles to smear me like 'BLP'" reference - that seems to be a tit-for-tat counter-accusation picked up from this case. I'm normally very careful to use short, neutral section titles, but if there is a BLP concern on a talk page or warning note, I would

1243:

Regarding other AN/I threads I certainly did not start them all. If anyone cares to review Childofmidnight's record in detail they will find frequent AN/I reports because he/she engaged often in blockable disruptive conduct, and got off only through some combination of mudslinging and blind luck.

1205:

My second comment was addressed to administrator Mfield who, despite the best of intentions, was interrupting a talk page conversation to criticize the article patrollers. Mfield, unfortunately, had put talk page management and managers at issue on the talk page, so I explained there in detail why

1010:

It's funny to have to defend a self-reverted edit. ChildofMidnight's assertion of what goes on in my mind notwithstanding, I was coming to realize that closing and archiving disruptive material, rather than deleting it, tends to calm things faster and preserves a better archive record. The actual

992:

contention that a Knowledge (XXG) cabal was censoring material in defense of Obama. I let most of them stand so that we could explain, but consolidated them and improved the headings, and closed some after everyone had their say. I believe the process and my edit comments and summary are textbook

384:

who only edited Obama-related articles. Posted a series of trollish proposals that in hindsight seemed to be for purposes of incitement: Obama is not a US citizen, bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, one of the FAQs is a "lie", Obama's half-brother was accused of a sex assault, Obama unpopular in

1423:

and socks. When an editor who is the subject of a noticeboard case launches false accusations against other people on the notice board, as here, it diverts attention from the real issue and bogs the process down to the point of paralysis. Jumping in to make accusations tangential to a case, as

1347:

The BLP vio comes because the sources are partisans, editorials, and blogs, and the disparaging claims that Khalidi is a former PLO official material and printed "fabricated quotations" in his political writings is not faithful even to those sources. Although the Khalidi page itself is not under

1314:

1194:

Again, ChildofMidnight documents his/her own tendentious editing as a claim against me. The reason I made the post in the first place is that Scjessey had been inappropriately sarcastic and harsh with a newbie editor who had made a mildly inappropriate new post, and the editor was now inflamed.

1164:

That is a logical fallacy, expressed (it seems) as gratuitous sarcasm. Many editors archive, move, close, and retitle comments on the Obama talk page to keep the page orderly, among other things to remove copyright violations, and calm free-for-all insult wars. If you look at the talk page this

882:

claim on the page at the time had two threads where discussion had already started on that topic. In my judgment adding a third, more combative, fork to the other two was likely to create a talk page mess and was unlikely to further any discussion. Soon after, Axmann8 was blocked four times in

1352:

If anyone cares to review Childofmidnight's record in detail they will find frequent AN/I reports because he/she engaged often in blockable disruptive conduct, and got off only through some combination of mudslinging and blind luck. Each time I seem to be the diversionary scapegoat. Adding a

799:

This has been going on for five months! I'm skipping a bunch of intermediate accusations but shortly after joining the project, Childofmidnight was already dcoaching another difficult editor how to insert a BLP violation on an Obama-related page, declaring that I am a "tyrant" and "bully" who

1151:

policy applies to that at all, but on an intuitive level, a long discussion of the article page becomes soapboxing only if it advances a personal opinion without trying to improve the article. However, here I was responding in a conversational way to friendly questions and comments that were

983:

ChildofMidnight has his/her editors wrong again. This is the same as complaint #4, above. The editor was clearly using the Obama talk page, in the middle of the Aaron Klein fiasco, to make Klein's point that Knowledge (XXG) editors were engaging in whitewashing and censorship. There was no

912:

ChildofMidnight misunderstands the phrase "off Knowledge (XXG)". I was studiously careful there, as usual, to be civil to my fellow editors. My reference is to partisanship "off" wikipedia (i.e. people other than Knowledge (XXG) editors) and cast no stones about anyone on Knowledge

1356:

to separate the portion of an AN/I thread dealing with ChildofMidnight's behavior from the inevitable accusations against me and others is, counter to ChildofMidnight's claim, helpful organization, not refactoring. Dealing with ChildofMidnight's frequent accusations of bad

1247:

765:

Outside of Arbcom's earshot ChildofMidnight declares me a "disgrace" and a "joker" plotting with other editors "off on some IRC channel" for "bullshit and game playing" and "making the latest round of false accousations and trying to block good faith editors" I don't agree

1459:, a proposal Stevertigo wrote (and self-cites in this case) to claim that "Processes are subordinate and deferential to our policies". If accepted the proposal would support his application of IAR to edit war the Obama articles and meta-pages in the name of NPOV. 1082:

made an unprovoked and uncalled-for personal attack, calling Brothejr "nothing more than a sycophantic Obama ass-kisser." I probably would have left that one alone but two other editors had already deleted this attack and Likwidshoe was edit warring to reinstate

753:

Although the disruption stopped, it was not entirely avoided. The editor is an SPA with a suspicious editing pattern that could have been dealt with sooner. No sign that the prior blocks and warnings had an effect, but the editor may have stopped

1368:

made in article talk space and on meta-pages, has been an unwanted chore that sours me on participation in the project. It is also unpleasantly familiar. Attacking me at AN/I, then villifying me for participating there, was a favorite trick of

1259:

1178:

it is possible for talk page deletions to be improper. Many other editors, not just me, have objected at times when ChildofMidnight has deleted good faith attempts at discussion calling them "grandstanding", "soapboxing", and similar

550:("Please stop being so disruptive and keep your biases to yourself") with incivilities ("Knowledge (XXG) seems to attract fanatical leftists who will stop at nothing to intimidate and protect their dear leader PBHO"). 610:

Embarks on long-term campaign to remove questionable content comparing Obama's speaking style to Ronald Reagan, with aggressive edit summaries (e.g. "just liberal fantasy from a few partisan writers").

824:

Deleting this comment was the right thing to do. As documented above, article patrollers regularly remove redundant and fringe discussions from Obama talk pages - this was well within that practice.

1016: 905:

Says, "...Obama has not been President for very long, and there are (despite what partisans would wish to say off Knowledge (XXG)) simply no scandals or controversies of a magnitude com

1019:). Soxwon had opened a topic by calling the Obama page editing "bullshit", "unwarranted", "favoritism", "wrong and irresponsible". Brothejr had implied that Soxwon was a follower of 1424:

ChildofMidnight has done many times, has a similar effect. ChildofMidnight's claim that this or any other AN/I case vindicated ChildofMidnight, or impugned me, is dubious at best.

1315:

ChildofMidnight has done many times, has a similar effect. ChildofMidnight's claim that this or any other AN/I case vindicated ChildofMidnight, or impugned me, is dubious at best.

942:

is an imperative, not an offense. The entire contents of the post I removed were a provocative thread title, followed by a link and then a cut-and-paste (the third that day - see

984:

actionable proposal in the post, it was entirely a criticism of other editors for "blatant censorship". It was duplicative of several dozen other posts that day that voiced the

607:

with incivilities ("Knowledge (XXG) seems to be like the Nazi Regime of Facists to control information, you can't even question their partisan facts of their dear leader PBHO.)

1184:

Here's another long posting that disrupts a discussion of improvements needed in the article while W.D. launches into another lecture unrelated to article improvements.

418:) trying to explain what the problem was and how they could contribute more productively (likely a waste because editor did not seem to be operating in good faith). 810:

ChildofMidnight provides a series of diffs here, which he uses to complain elsewhere on the encyclopedia that I am "one of the main offenders" in this ArbCom case.

1390: 1281: 1323:

normally use that abbreviation. COM has certainly committed and then edit warred over some very serious BLP violations, for example this cascade of edit wars

630:

Responds with screed "that Knowledge (XXG) is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories".

1662: 1231:

Uses provocative thread titles to smear me like "BLP" even though there has never been a serious allegation that I have engaged in any BLP violating edits.

769:

personal attacks, grandstanding, abuse, "obscene" censorship, playing games, vandalism, acting not in good faith, POV pushing partisanship, and harassment.

1629:

Stevertigo has created several new process-related essays, proposals, and templates, some that would favor his position in this case. New pages include

1650: 772:

ChildofMidnight "will not remain silent" in the face of my "ongoing disruption, capital V vandalism, and abuse", all protected by my "powerful friends".

1495:- Stevertigo edit warring to ad link to a proposal he drafted that (by presenting both sides equally) seems to justify criticism sections, attempted 347: 293: 1383: 1274: 1044: 1601: 1530: 711: 517: 1143:

For ChildofMidnight to use his/her own deletion of my good faith comments here as purported evidence against me seems very misguided. Long

1023:. Soxwon complained that Brothejr was pigeonholing him, and Brothejr apologized. That should have resolved this very minor flare-up. But 845: 463: 1169:

has been doing the same. In fact, a number of ChildofMidnight's own deletions of talk page comments were uncontested and uncontroversial.

1658: 1616:- links to his new proposal, attempts to use this guideline to justify criticism sections (the guideline is in fact not about criticism) 996:

That is standard, and proper practice for dealing with redundant unconstructive discussion topics on an extremely high volume talk page.

654: 574: 1611: 130:

Given that it is a featured article, most content proposals are not improvements and are quietly rejected with no ensuing disruption.

800:

chooses to game and disrupt, baits other users to trick them into blockable behavior, and "don't care for the spirit of the project".

340: 286: 1210:

for help. As noted elsewhere, ChildofMidnight revert warred against three others on the Obama talk page to remove the discussion.

1037: 1411: 1302: 926:

to the more neutral and informative "Criticism of Obama", that actually reflected any legitimate topic under discussion there.

704: 510: 1554:

when there was already an active AN/I report on the general matter. Reverts attempt to consolidate two related AN/I reports

1397: 1288: 1147:

posts like mine on the talk page about the main article page are part of the talk page conversation. I don't see how the

838: 456: 1589: 954:

accuses Knowledge (XXG) of censorship for refusing to allow Obama birthplace conspiracy information and for blocking the

943: 647: 567: 1522: 432: 1376: 1267: 1619: 1237:

and let's face it, several editors who didn't share his political viewpoints have recently been banned or blocked.

1633: 368: 314: 1541:(Sceptre edit wars with another editor over closing a discussion about criticism sections; ends up creating RfC) 1065: 1125:

Wow, ChildofMidnight is utterly misreading my tone. I was trying to be utterly straightforward and sincere.

778:

Last month it was "shameful", "disgraceful", "coordinat attacks", behaving like an "animal", and "trolling",

354: 300: 883:

quick succession, banned from politics articles, then indefinitely blocked for racism and other disruption.

333: 1579:

then changes the title of his AN/I report to be a personal attack and reverts a closure of the discussion.

1370: 1261: 1051: 732: 538: 1654: 1474: 1462: 111:

Repeated addition of nonconsensus/fringe (Kenyan nationality, association with "terrorist" William Ayers)

1643: 1011:

personal attack I deleted was brazen and was causing demonstrable disruption that eventually lead to an

866: 484: 279: 95: 1505: 1004:, changes mind (since it was pointing out inappropriate hostility) and collapses it calling it uncivil 907:

parable to those involving Bush, and particularly Clinton... Wikidemon (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

388:

Inaccurate "unpopular in Europe" claim was seriously discussed, creating minor talk forum-like dispute.

1020: 1608:(Sceptre adds Godwin quote, Stevertigo links to his new proposal and to a section he is edit warring) 1439: 1030: 1024: 718: 675: 595: 524: 94:

That is not necessarily a double standard. Knowledge (XXG) exists in a context of real world events.

939: 852: 470: 879: 697: 661: 581: 503: 1166: 831: 449: 1595: 1544: 1456: 1207: 1175: 1148: 1137: 1017:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive520#Personal attacks by Likwidshoe

1012: 82:

with an added incivility ("Please don't edit wikipedia while using recreational substances").

985: 955: 640: 560: 327: 273: 745: 421: 415: 381: 248: 239: 230: 143: 947: 62:

Simple vandalism (e.g. "Barack Obama(A.K.A the retard that is screwing up our country) ").

1496: 1341: 17: 1471:(relates to the attempt to sandbox an Obama criticism article on the Obama talk page) 691: 497: 1161:

Apparently only Wikidemon gets to remove comments and only he's allowed to soapbox.

813:. According to ChildofMidnght's evidence as presented, my offenses are as follows: 825: 443: 1576:

over an issue already raised in this case as the subject of a possible injunction,

1228:...and continues adding new threads even after no wrongdoing on my part is found. 393:"Birth certificate fraud" claim reverted as a "rant" inappropriate to talk pages. 989: 951: 634: 554: 1244:

Each time I seem to be the diversionary scapegoat. Adding a section subheading

891:

Files an ANI report and is advised to be respectful and civil to other editors

1156:

to signal a special kind of reversion for process rather than content reasons.

1077:, a suspicious account that seems to exist only for insulting other editors, 1140:

and is now claiming on this page that his comment was in some way helpful.

1527:(Sceptre and other editors edit war to the point of article protection) 919:

And also some borderline refactoring of another editor's thread title

973:

Wikidemon replies "As I told you, changing talk headings is fine...

1136:

accusing me of disruption despite clear edit summary that it was

403:

Refactored title, and responded to claim, that FAQ #9 is a "lie".

385:

Europe, not enough criticism in article, Obama wears body armor.

1564:

undoes archiving/closure of the discussion four times apparently

1200:

and demanded to be addressed on the article talk page instead.

1108:

Two edits later another dismissive and aggresive edit summary

67:

Editor warned twice then blocked as "vandalism-only account".

1559:, files a fork AN/I thread on the moving of the AN/I thread, 398:

Supposed bow to the King of Saudi Arabia discussed politely.

207:

Several threads on the same subject moved to the same place.

1547:

Filed 3 AN/I reports in one day over same series of issues

1455:- edit warring this widely used template to add a link to 50:

reverted with rude edit summary ("let the trolls eat cake)

496:

reacts to harsh warning during Aaron Klein incident from

72:

Simple vandalism or test edits (e.g. "third homosexual")

1624: 1622: 1614: 1606: 1604: 1592: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1569: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1548: 1539: 1537: 1535: 1533: 1525: 1518: 1516: 1514: 1512: 1510: 1508: 1500: 1493: 1491: 1489: 1487: 1485: 1483: 1481: 1479: 1477: 1469: 1467: 1465: 1453: 1451: 1449: 1447: 1445: 1418: 1404: 1366: 1363: 1360: 1358: 1354: 1345: 1338: 1336: 1334: 1332: 1330: 1328: 1326: 1324: 1309: 1295: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1245: 1224: 1218: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1185: 1172: 1170: 1153: 1134: 1131: 1121: 1109: 1092: 1090: 1088: 1086: 1084: 1080: 1078: 1072: 1058: 1005: 1002: 994: 977: 974: 968: 965: 933: 920: 892: 884: 873: 859: 819: 811: 801: 795: 793: 788: 785: 782: 781:

who "works almost exclusively" on POV political content

779: 773: 770: 767: 755: 751: 749: 739: 725: 688: 682: 668: 631: 628: 625: 623: 621: 619: 617: 615: 613: 611: 608: 602: 588: 551: 545: 531: 491: 477: 425: 412: 409: 404: 399: 394: 389: 375: 361: 321: 307: 261: 252: 243: 234: 218: 213: 208: 196: 191: 179: 174: 169: 164: 147: 140: 135: 119: 116: 114: 112: 107: 92: 89: 83: 80: 77: 75: 73: 68: 65: 63: 57: 54: 51: 48: 43: 1234:

Seems to be trying to intimidate me with these reports

964:

Wikidemon refactor's another editor's section thread:

1626:(seems to relate to splitting off criticism sections) 792:

The month before I should have been topic banned too.

202:

Consolidating and moving redundant or related threads

1427: 1502:Sceptre also involved; dispute predates this case. 178:Inappropriate discussion closed with rude summary. 1598:proposal that would put "process" under "policy". 1428:Stevertigo's edit warring during pendency of case 1130:Very very very long soapbox unrelated to article 195:Section heading retitled to be less inflammatory. 56:Editor apologizes and explains as unintentional. 1663:Knowledge (XXG):Criticism sections and articles 976:Then Wikidemon collapses the discussion thread 1365:and demands that I be blocked or topic banned, 1256:and demands that I be blocked or topic banned, 993:Knowledge (XXG) policy to guide the talk page. 424:filed against editor and three other accounts. 91:often with less fanfare than angry vandalism. 8: 88:Cheerful vandalism reverted without fanfare 42:Reverting vandalism with rude edit summary. 1602:Knowledge (XXG):Criticism sections (essay) 1531:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Neutral point of view 1217:Engages in endless ANI threads against me 414:with long note on editor's talk page (per 106:Simple reversion of nonconsensus material. 163:Inappropriate discussion politely closed. 168:Unproductive discussion politely closed. 1612:Knowledge (XXG):Controversial articles 1362:false statements about edit histories, 1253:false statements about edit histories, 1573:Five days later, files an AN/I report 190:Section heading retitled for clarity. 7: 1344:article indefinitely edit protected. 967:Here's the other's editor's comment 761:Response to ChildofMidnight evidence 553:Rejects article probation notice by 173:Resolved discussion politely closed. 134:Dubious material politely reverted. 24: 217:Similar discussions consolidated. 212:Similar discussions consolidated. 1651:WP:Requesting dispute resolution 1590:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion process 1103:with perceptions and priorities. 431:All eventually blocked as socks. 1594:- Stevertigo links to his new 932:Removes another editor's post 272:Kordon Bleu and Gordon Bleu. 1: 408:Left article probation notice 1133:. He reverted removal of it 970:that seems quite reasonable. 775:All in the last 24 hours! 627:Warned of article probation. 224:Threads and comments deleted 101:Reverting nonconsensus edits 1220:(collapsed at top of page). 1680: 1585:Unopposed changes or BRD: 784:and should be topic banned 744:under article probation / 438:Engaging a didicult editor 59:No significant disruption. 1475:Knowledge (XXG):Criticism 1463:Knowledge (XXG):Workpages 1165:past week, administrator 946:) of the storied storied 687:, and later 24 hour block 142:courteously reverted per 47:Simple apparent vandalism 1506:Knowledge (XXG):Subpages 1223:He refactors discussion 1120:Snarky soapboxy lecture 806:Accusations in this case 27:Page patrol case studies 1659:WP:I just don't like it 32:Article page reversions 267:Sockpuppets identified 118:Editor is warned twice 1391:deleted contribs 1282:deleted contribs 1045:deleted contribs 846:deleted contribs 712:deleted contribs 655:deleted contribs 575:deleted contribs 518:deleted contribs 464:deleted contribs 348:deleted contribs 294:deleted contribs 126:Reverting poor edits 633:72 hour blocked by 85:No further trouble. 37:Reverting vandalism 1523:WP:Content Forking 1353:section subheading 1001:Removes a comment 950:article, in which 818:Removes a comment 158:Collapsing threads 53:and block warning. 1371:BryanFromPalatine 1262:BryanFromPalatine 1167:User:Bigtimepeace 938:Deleting blatant 185:Retitling threads 1671: 1648: 1642: 1638: 1634:article creation 1632: 1620:WP:Summary style 1444: 1438: 1422: 1313: 1076: 1021:World News Daily 986:User:Jerusalem21 956:User:Jerusalem21 877: 743: 686: 606: 549: 495: 379: 328:Gordon Bleu 325: 274:Kordon Bleu 1679: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1646: 1640: 1636: 1630: 1442: 1436: 1430: 1412:block user 1405:filter log 1374: 1318: 1303:block user 1296:filter log 1265: 1066:block user 1059:filter log 1028: 948:World Net Daily 867:block user 860:filter log 829: 808: 763: 733:block user 726:filter log 695: 676:block user 669:filter log 638: 596:block user 589:filter log 558: 539:block user 532:filter log 501: 485:block user 478:filter log 447: 440: 369:block user 362:filter log 331: 315:block user 308:filter log 277: 269: 260:Uncivil delete. 256:Uncivil delete. 226: 204: 187: 160: 155: 128: 103: 39: 34: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1677: 1675: 1667: 1666: 1627: 1617: 1609: 1599: 1583: 1582: 1542: 1528: 1520: 1503: 1472: 1460: 1432:Edit warring: 1429: 1426: 1419:block log 1350: 1349: 1342:Rashid Khalidi 1310:block log 1239: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1221: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1189: 1188: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1073:block log 999: 998: 997: 961: 960: 959: 929: 928: 927: 916: 915: 914: 902: 901: 900: 888: 887: 886: 874:block log 807: 804: 762: 759: 758: 757: 740:block log 683:block log 603:block log 546:block log 492:block log 439: 436: 435: 434: 429: 428: 427: 419: 406: 401: 396: 391: 376:block log 322:block log 268: 265: 264: 263: 258: 254: 245: 236: 225: 222: 221: 220: 215: 210: 203: 200: 199: 198: 193: 186: 183: 182: 181: 176: 171: 166: 159: 156: 154: 151: 150: 149: 137: 127: 124: 123: 122: 109: 102: 99: 98: 97: 86: 70: 60: 45: 38: 35: 33: 30: 28: 25: 23: 18:User:Wikidemon 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1676: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1645: 1635: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1605: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1593: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1549: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1536: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1524: 1521: 1519: 1517: 1515: 1513: 1511: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1494: 1492: 1490: 1488: 1486: 1484: 1482: 1480: 1478: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1458: 1454: 1452: 1450: 1448: 1446: 1441: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1425: 1420: 1417: 1413: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1389: 1385: 1382: 1378: 1372: 1367: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1355: 1346: 1343: 1340:that got the 1339: 1337: 1335: 1333: 1331: 1329: 1327: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1263: 1258: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1209: 1204: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1177: 1174:However, per 1173: 1171: 1168: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1129: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1101: 1097: 1094:I decided to 1093: 1091: 1089: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1079: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1000: 995: 991: 987: 982: 981: 980: 978: 975: 971: 969: 966: 962: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 936: 935: 934: 930: 924: 923: 922: 921: 917: 911: 910: 909: 906: 903: 899:not about me. 897: 896: 895: 893: 889: 885: 881: 875: 872: 868: 865: 861: 858: 854: 851: 847: 844: 840: 837: 833: 827: 823: 822: 821: 820: 816: 815: 814: 812: 805: 803: 802: 797: 796: 794: 790: 789: 786: 783: 780: 776: 774: 771: 768: 760: 756: 752: 750: 747: 741: 738: 734: 731: 727: 724: 720: 717: 713: 710: 706: 703: 699: 693: 689: 684: 681: 677: 674: 670: 667: 663: 660: 656: 653: 649: 646: 642: 636: 632: 629: 626: 624: 622: 620: 618: 616: 614: 612: 609: 604: 601: 597: 594: 590: 587: 583: 580: 576: 573: 569: 566: 562: 556: 552: 547: 544: 540: 537: 533: 530: 526: 523: 519: 516: 512: 509: 505: 499: 493: 490: 486: 483: 479: 476: 472: 469: 465: 462: 458: 455: 451: 445: 442: 441: 437: 433: 430: 426: 423: 420: 417: 413: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 387: 386: 383: 377: 374: 370: 367: 363: 360: 356: 353: 349: 346: 342: 339: 335: 329: 323: 320: 316: 313: 309: 306: 302: 299: 295: 292: 288: 285: 281: 275: 271: 270: 266: 262: 259: 257: 255: 253: 250: 246: 244: 241: 237: 235: 232: 228: 227: 223: 219: 216: 214: 211: 209: 206: 205: 201: 197: 194: 192: 189: 188: 184: 180: 177: 175: 172: 170: 167: 165: 162: 161: 157: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 136: 133: 132: 131: 125: 120: 117: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 104: 100: 96: 93: 90: 87: 84: 81: 78: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 64: 61: 58: 55: 52: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 36: 31: 26: 19: 1655:WP:Processes 1647:}} 1641:{{ 1637:}} 1631:{{ 1584: 1443:}} 1437:{{ 1431: 1415: 1408: 1401: 1394: 1387: 1380: 1351: 1317: 1306: 1299: 1292: 1285: 1278: 1271: 1242: 1240: 1179:accusations. 1144: 1099: 1098:rather than 1095: 1069: 1062: 1055: 1048: 1041: 1034: 972: 963: 931: 918: 908: 904: 890: 870: 863: 856: 849: 842: 835: 817: 809: 798: 791: 777: 764: 736: 729: 722: 715: 708: 701: 679: 672: 665: 658: 651: 644: 599: 592: 585: 578: 571: 564: 542: 535: 528: 521: 514: 507: 488: 481: 474: 467: 460: 453: 372: 365: 358: 351: 344: 337: 318: 311: 304: 297: 290: 283: 249:WP:NOT#FORUM 240:WP:NOT#FORUM 231:WP:NOT#FORUM 129: 79:warned twice 1440:Policy list 990:Aaron Klein 952:Aaron Klein 940:WP:COPYVIOs 121:then stops. 1145:responsive 1025:Likwidshoe 787:or blocked 326:and later 1644:processes 880:WP:FRINGE 247:Friendly 238:Friendly 229:Friendly 153:Talk page 139:Weak edit 1384:contribs 1275:contribs 1096:collapse 1038:contribs 1015:report ( 958:account. 839:contribs 754:editing. 705:contribs 692:CIreland 648:contribs 568:contribs 511:contribs 498:Scjessey 457:contribs 341:contribs 287:contribs 1596:WP:PROC 1545:WP:AN/I 1457:WP:PROC 1208:WP:AN/I 1176:WP:TALK 1149:WP:SOAP 1138:wp:soap 1013:WP:AN/I 826:Axmann8 444:Dalej78 411:and log 382:WP:SPAs 251:delete. 242:delete. 233:delete. 1414: 1407: 1400: 1393: 1386: 1379: 1373: 1357:faith, 1305: 1298: 1291: 1284: 1277: 1270: 1264: 1248:faith, 1100:delete 1068: 1061: 1054: 1047: 1040: 1033: 1027: 913:(XXG). 869: 862: 855: 848: 841: 834: 828: 746:WP:3RR 735: 728: 721: 714: 707: 700: 694: 678: 671: 664: 657: 650: 643: 637: 635:Seicer 598: 591: 584: 577: 570: 563: 557: 555:Seicer 541: 534: 527: 520: 513: 506: 500: 487: 480: 473: 466: 459: 452: 446: 422:WP:SPI 416:WP:AGF 380:, two 371: 364: 357: 350: 343: 336: 330: 317: 310: 303: 296: 289: 282: 276: 144:WP:BRD 1499:fork. 1497:WP:3O 766:with, 16:< 1398:logs 1377:talk 1289:logs 1268:talk 1052:logs 1031:talk 944:here 853:logs 832:talk 719:logs 698:talk 662:logs 641:talk 582:logs 561:talk 525:logs 504:talk 471:logs 450:talk 355:logs 334:talk 301:logs 280:talk 1083:it. 690:by 1661:, 1657:, 1653:, 1649:, 1639:, 1111:. 1007:. 988:/ 1665:, 1421:) 1416:· 1409:· 1402:· 1395:· 1388:· 1381:· 1375:( 1312:) 1307:· 1300:· 1293:· 1286:· 1279:· 1272:· 1266:( 1187:. 1075:) 1070:· 1063:· 1056:· 1049:· 1042:· 1035:· 1029:( 979:. 894:. 876:) 871:· 864:· 857:· 850:· 843:· 836:· 830:( 748:. 742:) 737:· 730:· 723:· 716:· 709:· 702:· 696:( 685:) 680:· 673:· 666:· 659:· 652:· 645:· 639:( 605:) 600:· 593:· 586:· 579:· 572:· 565:· 559:( 548:) 543:· 536:· 529:· 522:· 515:· 508:· 502:( 494:) 489:· 482:· 475:· 468:· 461:· 454:· 448:( 378:) 373:· 366:· 359:· 352:· 345:· 338:· 332:( 324:) 319:· 312:· 305:· 298:· 291:· 284:· 278:( 146:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index