116:. The first is basically this guy's case for the idea that the written language has increased patriarchy (by altering the way our brains function) in every culture it's touched. at the same time, it's a rad history of the world, and it's ("major") religions. to add a little more, it kinda goes through the history of religions, and they were changed once they either came into contact with highly literate societies, or how they changed once they were written down. talks about christianity, islam, confucianism, buddhism, and tons of other stuff. i definitely can't feel that every single point is proven to unquestionable lengths, but all of it is very interesting to think about. Snow Crash is a
63:
aren't great options since the society I live in, America, is flooded with those ideas. The Qur'an might be ok, but I still would prefer to get away from a monotheistic view. Perhaps some of the Vedas, or some other
Eastern thing. Any ideas? BTW, this poll is non-binding as I have the right to choose not to read whatever most people think I should. Also, please give reasons as to why you think I should read the text you propose. Thanks!
430:
little too
Christian-focused at the end. But for me (a confirmed atheist) Dostoevsky was a far more interesting Christian than your modern variety of evangelical. It's about the nature and power of suffering (the all-encompassing Buddhist idea of suffering, not just the physical) to redeem, and the way cool but somehow bizarre Christian existenialism. Check out the article.
429:
The greatest narrative about the power of spiritual redemption ever written. Sometimes just hacking though it can be exhausting (especially if you pick a bad translation), but doing so is a calculated and powerful way of bringing about a real empathy for the protagonist's transformation. It may be a
62:
Anyway, this isn't meant to be "find the religious or spiritual text you think will fit my beliefs best." As an anthropologist, I just want to get exposed to some ideas that I may or may not agree with, but that I hopefully haven't had much exposure to yet. In other words, the Bible or Torah probably
475:
Christianity is the largest religion in the world, being dominant on four of the six inhabited continents, and growing on the other two. There are good reasons for that, but chief among them is the fact that Christ really does intervene in people's lives in profound and miraculous ways. C.S. Lewis
297:
Personally, I call myself a
Confuciust (sp?), not heavily though, as the only thing I have to base myself off of is this book; but all it is a collection of quotes and stories, and that along I believe makes it somewhat interesting to read. It basically exhibits the moral code that Confucius tried
483:
BTW, I assume that you have some familiarity with the
Christian Bible. If not, you should probably read a bit of it before diving into Christian apologetics. I'd suggest starting with one or more of the synoptic gospels (Matthew/Mark/Luke), and John, and a couple of Paul's letters (perhaps 1
471:
wrong. But too often people reject the most common viewpoint without proper examination, because of a romantic desire to "take the road less traveled," or an aversion to conventionality. People naturally yearn for significance, and a misapplication of that yearning can manifest itself as a
203:
Despite what the back cover might lead you to believe, it's not a knock-off biopic of the Buddha. This book was one of the formative spiritual experiences of my youth, but it's translated prose might be a bit simplistic for an adult audience.
217:
First, this work associates ideas and attitudes with
Siddhartha which have little (prior) to do with him. If Hesse's ideas had merit, they would not need to be supported by such misappropriation. (He might, of course, have
190:
This book is pretty good at supporting any kind of individualist spirituality. it reads like poetry and is full of symbolism. the basic point in my opinion is that everyone reaches spiritual enlightenment in their own way.
46:
way of thinking. Basically I have trouble believing, and in fact dislike the concept, of God(s/ess/esses) as actual beings with any kind of power that control things. I have less of an issue with "god" defined from a
157:
i suppose i'm kinda neutral on folks reading things like the bible or the koran, as that shit seems to just seep into everybody's psyches whether they like it or not. bleecchhh.
26:
Ok, so I decided to start a page where I can hold straw polls to get people's opinions on various things, either related to wiki or not. Right now, I want to know what
120:
novel that touches on a lot of interesting things having to do with how language and religion have affected the world, and how people function because of them.
131:!) rather than actually being educational beyond showing some relationships between religions and between religious dissemination and other kinds.
165:
hopefully, i'll have some more ideas tomorrow, as i find religions just as fascinating as they are disturbing/unbelievable/mind-numbing/and
71:
352:
Unless you read classical
Chinese, your impression will be at least somewhat based on the translation you choose. I recommend
230:, I found this book to be shallow, middle-aged fantasizing. There are no real insights hereïn, only cheap wish-fulfillment. —
334:
Called '____ of change" I believe. It's the basis for Taoist beliefs, and
Confucius mentions that y'all should read it in
363:
I fourth this motion. I recommend browsing a few different translations to get a feel for them. 80 or so can be read at
64:
17:
96:
356:. It has a break down character by character and his own translation that preserves the beauty of the text.
346:
345:
Coming from an ex-Daoist, I totally support reading this text because it is filled with great ideas.--
417:
94:
ok, i've had a few beers, so i hope i don't make a mess of your poll. i very much recommend reading
454:
249:
353:
222:
engaged in such deceit, but one should be moved to a position of greater distrust.) Second, like
178:
128:
35:
195:
based their awesome song "close to the edge" on the novel, it's not punk but it kicks my ass.
266:
Trite pseudo-spiritualizing mixed with a notion that heterosexual female lust is repulsive. —
489:
31:
170:
113:
394:
375:
267:
231:
146:
132:
103:
27:
431:
364:
339:
299:
205:
322:
285:
196:
145:
meh, i don't oppose reading ANYthing. it's all interesting in some way. even the
485:
56:
39:
476:
is, perhaps, the most influential
Christian apologist of the 20th century, and
370:
If you read no other religious text, let it be this one. I would strongly echo
371:
357:
192:
108:
78:
390:
127:
but as a highly interesting and highly fictional treatment of religion (and
117:
48:
42:
page and that sounded sort of good as well. I also lean towards a somewhat
385:
484:
Corinthians & Galatians), and at least part of
Proverbs and Psalms.
43:
100:
467:
Truth is not determined by polling, and sometimes everyone really
30:
people think I should read. I personally lean towards a mix of
38:, and I just saw the term "spiritual agnosticism" on the
365:http://home.pages.at/onkellotus/TTK/_IndexTTK.html
8:
7:
374:'s caveat on translations though.
24:
383:Although I honestly prefer the
472:prejudice against convention.
1:
492:) 10:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
397:) 05:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
380:23:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
199:23:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
173:10:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
137:23:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
73:07:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
97:The Alphabet vs. The Goddess
84:The Alphabet vs. The Goddess
342:17:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
302:17:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
298:to adhere to in his life.
270:09:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
234:08:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
18:User:The Ungovernable Force
521:
480:is his most famous work.
360:20:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
349:03:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
434:17:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
389:, this one is good too.
208:17:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
418:Crime and Punishment
354:the star translation
247:
123:I'd support reading
179:Siddhartha (novel)
129:anarcho-capitalism
67:Ungovernable Force
36:strong agnosticism
478:Mere Christianity
455:Mere Christianity
512:
378:
250:The Razor's Edge
135:
68:
32:agnostic atheism
520:
519:
515:
514:
513:
511:
510:
509:
508:
503:
498:
465:
460:
457:, by C.S. Lewis
450:
445:
440:
427:
422:
413:
408:
403:
376:
332:
327:
318:
313:
308:
295:
290:
281:
276:
264:
259:
254:
245:
240:
228:Der Steppenwolf
215:
188:
183:
163:
155:
143:
133:
114:Neal Stephenson
92:
87:
66:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
518:
516:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
464:
461:
459:
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
426:
423:
421:
414:
412:
409:
407:
404:
402:
399:
331:
328:
326:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
307:
304:
294:
291:
289:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
263:
260:
258:
255:
253:
246:
244:
241:
239:
236:
214:
211:
210:
209:
187:
184:
182:
175:
162:
159:
154:
151:
147:Book of Mormon
142:
139:
104:Leonard Shlain
91:
88:
86:
75:
59:) viewpoint.
28:religious text
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
517:
505:
500:
495:
493:
491:
487:
481:
479:
473:
470:
462:
458:
456:
452:
447:
442:
437:
435:
433:
424:
420:
419:
415:
410:
405:
400:
398:
396:
392:
388:
387:
381:
379:
373:
368:
366:
361:
359:
355:
350:
348:
343:
341:
337:
329:
325:
324:
320:
315:
310:
305:
303:
301:
292:
288:
287:
283:
278:
273:
271:
269:
261:
256:
252:
251:
242:
237:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
212:
207:
202:
201:
200:
198:
194:
185:
181:
180:
176:
174:
172:
169:influential.
168:
160:
158:
152:
150:
148:
140:
138:
136:
130:
126:
121:
119:
115:
111:
110:
105:
101:
99:
98:
89:
85:
81:
80:
76:
74:
72:
70:
69:
60:
58:
54:
50:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
19:
482:
477:
474:
468:
466:
453:
428:
416:
384:
382:
369:
362:
351:
347:Ghostbear616
344:
336:The Analects
335:
333:
323:Tao Te Ching
321:
296:
286:The Analects
284:
265:
248:
227:
223:
219:
216:
189:
177:
166:
164:
156:
144:
124:
122:
107:
95:
93:
83:
77:
65:
61:
52:
25:
57:panentheist
49:pantheistic
40:agnosticism
220:needlessly
193:yes (band)
171:Murderbike
125:Snow Crash
109:Snow Crash
79:Snow Crash
377:Skomorokh
268:SlamDiego
232:SlamDiego
134:Skomorokh
118:cyberpunk
44:animistic
506:Comments
448:Comments
432:VanTucky
411:Comments
386:Zhuangzi
340:Fephisto
316:Comments
300:Fephisto
279:Comments
243:Comments
206:VanTucky
167:terribly
161:Comments
501:Neutral
463:Support
443:Neutral
425:Support
406:Neutral
330:Support
311:Neutral
293:Support
274:Neutral
257:Support
238:Neutral
197:Amirman
186:Support
153:Neutral
90:Support
55:even a
496:Oppose
486:NCdave
438:Oppose
401:Oppose
306:Oppose
262:Oppose
224:Demian
213:Oppose
141:Oppose
106:, and
372:Ixtli
358:Ixtli
53:maybe
16:<
490:talk
395:talk
391:Owen
226:and
82:and
51:(or
338:.
112:by
102:by
469:is
367:.
149:.
34:,
488:(
393:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.