45:
Keep in mind that referees used were selected in consultation with a paleoclimatologist. Five referees were selected based on the guidance I received. All are reputable paleoclimatologists, respected for their expertise in reconstruction of past climates. None (none at all) were from
39:... four referees sent their detailed comments to me. None suggested the manuscript should be rejected. S&B were asked to respond to referees comments and make extensive alterations accordingly. This was done.
46:
what Hans and Clare have referred to as "the other side" or what Hulme refers to as people well known for their opposition to the notion that humans are significantly altering global climate."
49:
De
Freitas goes on to summarize, evaluate and defend the S&B paper against the attacks from Mann et al.
17:
31:
33:
Some of this may have already been quoted in 2ry RS's. Highlights:
8:
26:This is included in his long email to the
30:publisher, copied to Mike Hulme at CRU:
42:On selection of reviewers for S&B:
7:
24:
1:
63:
36:On review of S&B:
54:
28:Climate Research
62:
61:
57:
56:
55:
53:
52:
51:
47:
40:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
60:
58:
44:
38:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
59:
50:
43:
37:
34:
32:
29:
19:
48:
41:
35:
27:
25:
18:User:Tillman
16:<
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.