User:Zzyzx11/Archive20

2935:(which has gone through many changes and undos) by putting exit list samples from Santa Ana, Golden State, Hollywood, Ventura, Bayshore, Central, and Eastshore Freeways. The exit lists definitely need to show up on those smaller pages, and the junction lists on infobox should only incorporate most major junctions or large cities. most of time, we should only have about 4 to 6 junctions, although the limit is 6 to 10. most of time the junction lists on infobox should be no more than half of the junctions on intersection tables or exit lists. I-5, I-80, and US 101 articles is at least 40 KB long, so this is list on boss page link to smaller pages which splits exit lists.-- 2117:

Blvd., I-605 Frwy, SR 57 Frwy, and SR-110 Frwy. To me the I-710 extensions seems unlikely, and the CSC codes is only for if they want to maintain routes; but its not mandatory. Caltrans can built it if they want but they don't have to. For example Rte 57 (Orange Frwy) is amrk from SR 1 to I-210; and the part of SR 1 to Orange Crush is still unbuilt, and it is 99% chance to not ever been built. This was plan originally so they want to make Coast Highway a Coast Frwy, same as i-605 CSC code mark it from SR 1 to I-210; but the section from SR 1 to I-405 is still unbuilt and may never been built.--

2019:

built, same as i-605 CSC code mark it from SR 1 to i-210. However the align from SR 1 to I-405 is undevelop, and mau never been develop. Those commands both SR 57 and I-605 was left for a long time, ever snce the 1960s' when they originally propose to make Cast Highway a coast Freeway. SR 241 South extension from i-5 south of San Clemente to Oso Pkwy near Rancho Santa Margarita; we don't even know if we will ever build it or not. The EPA tries to stop it because it destroys natural habitat, luckily it does not go thrigh house.--

345: 31: 63: 414: 2993: 2222: 1912: 1838: 1764: 1690: 1470: 1044: 974: 776: 2721: 586:

users and admins weighed in and ultimately concluded that the seal is allowable in Template Space. It'll be worth your while. I do think this highlights a spot where NFCC is broken, or at least badly cracked, but the wider community will have to decide on it. This goes much further than one image on one template -- we're talking scads of transcluded images, uploads to Commons, etc.

211: 639: 2714: 2707: 612:

contains no original authorship (such as merely printing its company name in Times Roman font), it cannot copyright or register it. Likewise with something that was never registered as a trademark or its copyright has expired without a renewal. I originally assumed that the UC seal was in fact still under copyright because

2649:

AUM seems to me a product of editors more interested in writing rules than in writing templates. The use of metatemplates I find to be an indispensable part of template writing, not something to be avoided. Thanks for your explanation of the connexion with OOP. With respect to the two lines above,

1538:

Do SR 39/19 have a control city?I've cross those on SR 22; 60; I-405; 5 Frwys and I didn't pay much attention; or I forgot. i know SR 39 goes to Huntington Beach; it says SR 39 South to Huntington Beach crossing I-405 Frwy. Rosemead Blvd. I'm not clear about control city. i guess south is Long Beach;

1378:

When someone created something, it is best to let others have a chance with the design. Unless it is wrong or has errors, it should not be changed. Consistency does not mean to be bold. To be bold means allowing others to design and create. If in 1969, they were consitent, the internet would not have

611:

about whether trademarks should be included in the NFCC rules. Of course, there is a difference between a normal trademark and a registered, copyrighted trademark. For example, a company can use a particular logo as its trademark, but if it consists entirely of information that is common property and

2167:

tend to be created by new editors and go nowhere. Second, you need some technical background to understand the actual implications of moving the Main Page to a different namespace. In my experience, nontechnical people tend to distrust things they don't understand, making them seem more fearful than

2018:

The CSC code is only for if Caltrans want to maintain the route, but they don't have to. The alignment do not need to be built. Orange Frwy-SR 57 is mark from SR 1 to I-210; that doesn't mean alignment from SR 1 to Orange Crush Interchange needs to be development, and the alignment seems to never be

1997:

Technically you are wrong about the terminus at Valley Blvd. Under the California Streets and Highway code, the freeway segment in Pasadena between California Blvd and the 134/210 interchange is part of Route 710. In other words, it is still considered the same route, even though that part is marked

2116:

Will I-710 ever been extned? I don't think so because it eliminate and destroys alot of residential areas, and it cause increase levels of carbon monoxide levels. Orange County travelers do not need the I-710 extension because they have alot of alternative routes they can take like Rosemead (SR 19)

1984:

I thoguht I-710 ends at Valley Blvd. in Alhambra. Building a tunnel may not work, in fact the I-710 may never even be extend, because of the strong opposition with Pasadena. I have been on the I-605 handfuls of times; and traffic on it is quite fair, because its a little away from major cities. The

585:

That was the gist of my argument as well. However, there does seem to be a marked difference in how Knowledge treats trademarks versus copyrighted works, and the UC seal's lack of copyright protection is not in doubt. Read through the two threads linked above, in which a goodly number of veteran

2063:

Which maps are you talking about? All the California templates currently have the "Map of California highlighting X County.svg" images, similar to all the other U.S. county templates. Although, I still think the size of the images could be modified per each state, like it appears someone

692:

I really am getting very annoyed and the fact you are deleting the page which IS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GAME. I have permission and have been instruction by the original authors of MARS2025 to RE-CREATE THIS PAGE. which has been removed prior to your deletion/creation war you have

2187:

directly below my post on WP:VPT also can be viewed as some sort of insult, since it would appear to those participating in that discussion (and not knowing that you posted here) that my legitimate question was ignored. I am not sure how to address that issue. Thanks.

2682:

Yeah, its probably better. Ultimately, I personally do not care either way as long it is both understandable and easier to maintain. I have been editing Knowledge before parserfunctions were ever created, and we had to change all of those things manually. Cheers.

1272:

What navboxes are you referring to? There are many on Knowledge – about more than 100,000. If you are referring to all of them, that will take a while, you know. And in many cases, I would not be able to change them all anyway because that will go against

1629:'s 400th wouldn't be on the Main Page. There are reams of information about the history of ville de Québec. It would have been an excellent start for those wanting to know more about the city. And then there is there was the perfectly acceptable article about 1372:-- Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge as you did to Los Angeles County. You seem to be acting in vandalism, but clearly from this talk page, you need to rethink your approach. thanks Buddha24 (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2421:

In retrospect, it was a poor edit summary, made when I was a tired and not thinking straight. Now that you have explained your intentions (thank you for that), and told me you are not familiar with OOP, I will explain what I was thinking at the

326:

seperating the last blurb and the "More events" line. This line is not enclosed in its own DIV tags like the "Wikinews – Recent deaths – More current events..." footer on ITN or the "Archive – Start a new article..." footer on DYK. Cheers.

1441:

What I do see is the phrase, "any changes you make that turn out badly can be reverted, often quite painlessly. It is important not to be insulted if your changes are reverted or edited further." I mean, if those pages and templates are

1431:

Can you point to me (either on that page or another Knowledge policy or guideline) where it says "it is best to let others have a chance with the design" or "Unless it is wrong or has errors, it should not be changed"? I would like to

2131:. If you wish to discuss about improving the I-710 article, you are welcome to post here on my talk page, but I am not particularly interested in your personal opinions or speculations on what CalTrans might or might not do. Thanks. 1345:. Hopefully, you aren't one of those people, and trying to hide behind an anonymous IP address leaving cryptic messages on my talk page instead of being more tolerant to the nature of Knowledge, right? If you are, please either 1162:

makes more sense (despite the fact that it's a stub). But I don't think that emboldening either candidate's link is very appropriate, particularly given the fact that neither article contains much information about the

1617:

of events that could appear on the Main Page's "On This Day". And only 3 days before! Not much chance they were ever going to get the page cleaned up in time to be used. Then again, that might have been the plan.

2880: 2863: 2858: 2853: 2848: 2838: 2833: 2828: 2823: 2807: 2802: 2797: 2781: 2776: 2771: 2766: 2576:

But hey, if you feel that is is more important that users have to deal with the extra code and parameters than create/use a simple shortcut template tag; that newbie users will never figure out how to create a

2318:"Do not 'fix' links to redirects that are not broken", again, I'm not. I replaced a number of templates with another. None of those reasons not to change redirects seem to apply here. What am I missing? 744:

I have been given permission by the authors to re-create this page that has been deleted WITHOUT ANY LOGS! I have there permission to use all material used with the site. We will be sending a e-mail ASAP

1576:

Does SR 57 Orange Frwy have heavily traffic congestion? i know certainly I-405; US-101 has alot of heavily traffic congestions, I wonder if SR 57 Frwy have constant traffic congestion. Some people say it

1391:

I asked this user to clarify that "but clearly from this talk page, you need to rethink your approach" comment because at the time there was no discussion on my talk page relating to Los Angeles County

1636:

If you are looking for perfection you should already know you will not find in in the Knowledge pages. The articles are just too fluid in nature. Instead we got two dates of the Americans at war!

532:, just in the interests of keeping the whole fracas from starting again at 0. If you still think having the trademarked image in the template is a bad idea (as do I), let's discuss it at 1985:

EPA keep denying the I-710 extension ever since the 1960s, a continuos topic for over 40 years. I thgouth the I-710 is unlikely to ever be extend at all even if our economic is good. --

2312:

Generally, yes, I agree that "less code" = "better" but this is mainly due to the fact that less code is typically simpler code and simpler code is usually better ... but not always.

2321:"Object-oriented programming", an interesting article, thanks. I'm not quite sure how OOP applies to this situation nor why it should be applied ... but I'm no computer programmer. 3025:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2254:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1944:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1870:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1796:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1722:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1502:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1076:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1006:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 808:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 377:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2543:

For a user unfamiliar with the complexities of templates (and I have encounter experienced users who are still novices with templates), it is much easier to call and use a basic

3021: