User:Zzyzx11/Archive22

31: 1836:. I noticed that there was no discussion prior to the edit, and also in you edit summary "See WP:ICONDECORATION - don't confuse readers - they want click on links to the articles, not go to the image description pages of those logos" couldn't the logo just been linked to the agencies them selves, thus keeping the logos and giving more info to the user. Please respond quickly to get this over wit ASAP. - Thank's 63: 1769: 1614: 1490: 1432: 1208: 1087: 1096: 2136:. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Knowledge, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Knowledge, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- 1034: 1043: 211: 1366:

I would prefer to wait until they are officially in the queue. Protecting directly on Commons is not my first choice. I have been around long enough to have encountered several users from other wikipedias and other Wikimedia Foundation projects who don't like us doing that and would prefer to be able

320:

And yet, even after those sources were added, unjustifiable edits were made on the (false) grounds that the sources did not clearly say what they were attributed to as saying. Astonishingly, the CHANGE (a bizarre assertion that officials "ruled" a specific way through a non-call, when such a thing is

948:

This was the first time that the Bronze Statue event appeared on OTD; the event happened only two years ago. So after looking at the heated discussion, and mediation rulings, I would now prefer to wait until something very, very definite is resolved. As stated elsewhere, main page templates defer to

1737:

Hi there. So what exactly are your intentions? why you want to hide some people from the history ???? i have editted correctly and you made it change third time. Nothing is disputed I have given the sources on my articles. "the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto article was hidden back in April because it

777:

many times over the years and have always wondered about the "Unincorporated communities" section. Over the past years, this section has expanded to include former communities that are currently uninhabited and now only exist in name. As a researcher of historic San Bernardino County desert

970:

Hey, did you figure out that I was planning to schedule the Empire State Building photo on May 1, or did you independently pick it? What's funny is that I was just picking it because it was a labor-related picture for May Day; I didn't even realize that it was the anniversary of its opening.

805:

The question may come down to what qualifies a location as "unincorporated" -- from my understanding, it signifies that there is in fact, residents present at the location although their form of local government lacks formal incorporated or census-designated place (CDP) status. I encourage

835: 992:

Yes, I figured out you were planning to schedule it. Because when you take that long to create the POTD, I sometimes wonder what has happened to you and I then start taking a look at your user contributions to see if you have been around recently. And after I noticed your edit on

1952: 1378:

Ok, that works. This is the first time I've heard of others preferring temporary uploads. I can see where they're coming from, but it seems a tad selfish on their part. (And in response I'm sure a few would say that we're being selfish.) Ah well. Thank you for all your help.

1354:

will be moved to 4 and 5, so those images could also be protected. Protecting at Commons is preferred, since there's less load on the servers and the humans. LocalUpdateTimes is a true template that automatically updates itself (take a look at the edit window). Thank you!

321:

mentioned nowhere in the sources nor is it logical) was the violation of these standards. I appreciate you volunteering to help make Knowledge a better place. But in this case, you were in the wrong and overzealous. Regards, and thanks for the lively discussion.

1571:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 663:, I took the liberty of doing it because, as I said, this is currently a highly visble page that is attraching a bunch of readers. I am only going by what Viridae entered in the deletion log, "thats what the talk page iis for, sort it out there" 1877: 1010: 806:

contributors to view County templates of other municipalities to see what the rule of thumb is for including uninhabited settlements/ghost towns in the "Unincorporated communities" section. One contributor has suggested to follow the

2203:

we see that his entry for September 12th states "This morning at our first rode in the Riuer". I have clarified the article and will undo the September 12th deletions. I'll check back here if you want to discuss this further.

721:, and the other admin thought, as you probably do, that high-profile articles are watched too much that they can be reverted more expeditiously and thus do not need to be protected. Well that dispute eventually became an 1974:

Thanks for the additions and suggestions. Unfortunately, I haven't been keeping track of the recent newly promoted GA's. I should though since there is more good articles than at least last year. Much easier to go down

906:

has been removed. Sorry for the delay, but as I have posted on the top of this talk page, I am busy in real life – and unfortunately, it seems that no other admin monitoring the main page wanted to touch this

731:

acknowledged, among others, that the protection of BLPs and other articles of unusual prominence can be controversial, but that any admin such as Viridae, Rootology and myself should avoid wheel warring. Cheers.

723: 885:

Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.

778:

communities, I am very familiar with the history of many of these settlements and can confirm that a good number of the locations listed in this section are completely abandoned. Here are some examples:

931:

page. Dojarca's complaint comes strictly from the Soviet POV and the argument "cannot occupy its own territory" is simply erroneus here. Dojarca's latest actions have spawned an extensive discussion on

1330: 1567:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1016:

It looks like you were not notified of this AfD. Some of these tools below may help you, een though I see you are one of the 24% of editors who has an article deleted who has more than 350 edits.

268:

Please quit rolling back content simply because you are unaware of a common-knowledge controversy and unwilling to spent 10 seconds on a Google search to verify that controversy. For the record:

2390: 1646:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1522:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1464:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1240:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1801:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1335:

seems to have been not updated recently. And yes, I am currently using a terminal where I am only able to protect the commons images directly, not upload them locally to en.wiki.

1642:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1518:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1460:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1236:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2004:

Feel free to restore it in toto if you find it useful, I'd think that would be non-controversial enough. You have to do something about the displayed list though, without the

1797:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1940:

tense and "any particular selected article should only be listed (be an emboldened entry) once" on the SA templates. Don't worry, other people have done that also. Cheers.

2301: 2019: 1108: 1884:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1329:

First, I can only do 4 now since Q4 and Q5 need to updated. Second, I am unfamiliar with the DYK Queue policies so I am unsure if I am setting the expiry times right.

811: 2199:

Hi. The cited sentence in Henry Hudson#1608 to 1609 was overly broad. Going back to the only contemporaneous account of the voyage, first mate's Juet's journal

2175: 1403: 2285: 690:, I cannot help you any further. Viridae has posted comments on both that he is currently opposed to unprotection, and I prefer not to be involved and be in a 2179: 1912:

Sorry about not knowing the single bite rule. I saw the title that said that article quality was the main concern and started sticking the Vietnam FAs on it

1790: