User:Zzyzx11/Archive4

707:. You can easily check it. And the new site which I did put online two weeks ago already reached 1738 visitors. The Desktop Search topic is one of the hottest topics of the moment. Windows and Mac OSX have their own Desktop Search Tools. Four months ago I understood that Linux did not have a Search Tool, and that it would take a couple of years before the official KDE team could complete such a solution. Therefore I started this project and now, after 4 months of really hard work, Kat is available for general use. It will be included in the major distribution of Linux in the last trimester of this year, so you will surely hear about it :-) Thanks for you attention 863:, who went ahead and blocked both the User name and IP for 24 hrs. As for the school IP: From what I can tell, Ronald20 is the only one editing Knowledge articles from that IP (and the six others that I have listed on his talk page), so I think that the IPs are allocated either on a per school or per computer basic at LAUSD, and are probably static IPs. I see nothing wrong with a 24 hr. block on a single IP, although blocks timed to coincide with his 7am-12 noon editing at LAUSD would also work. 398:) Never was a truer word spoken. I feel empowered, yes, but not in the "oooh cool delete button!" way I was kind of expecting. Already I feel the weight of the responsibility I have now been entrusted with, a weight that will no doubt reduce given time. Perhaps I am ready for it, or perhaps, as you say, I am not. I hope that in the coming weeks and months I can prove you wrong, but no matter what I thank you for giving your honest opinion, it is really important to me. Thank you. :) 52: 435:. Here's why: it is not necessary for you to type, "A1: Article does not appear to contain sufficient information to warrant an article. If you can correct this, please do so and remove this notice." First, you can just say, "there is little or no context". That is sufficient for us admins. Secondly, the speedy tags already say that if you "you intend to fix it, please remove this notice." 200: 835:). Since I have no response from official channels, I've finally made my very first appeal to an admin for a personal favor. Something has to be done about this user. Since he also has a dialup home account that he sometimes edits under as an anon, it may come down to protecting the couple of dozen articles that he regularly edits. :-( 1917:

to get your bearings on what is appropriate and what is not. 2) I'm not disputing that Mr Garrett should have his own article. It's obvious from his accomplishments that he should. However, when someone comes to a certain fame, they must accept all of it, not just the good. When you coin a technology

1710:

Hey Zzyzx11, (not sure how to pronounce that) thank you for reverting those childish edits on my user page. Ironically, the anon ip of the miscreant responsible is shared by multiple people, including myself, when I dont log on, anyway. Thanks again for clearing up the first incidence of vandalism on

1275:

I agree. Given his age, I was trying to be generous... but edits like adding the text "poop" to pages, while saying that "I didn't vandalize Knowledge" seems to me just an act of bad faith. Regardless, until he does something blatantly troll-like, I'm going to just try to run damage control (like I

968:

Wow, you guys at RC patrol are fast. Good job. :) However, {{vfu}} and {{TempUndelete}} are different. The former is meant to be placed at the VFD page for an article, while TempUndelete is meant to replace an article while it is under undeletion. This idea came during a horribly long discussion

755:

I've had a few conversations go off the rails here in the last few hours. I'm well aware that it's quite hard to see you own faults, so I'd like some objective input on my behavior. I see from your contributions you're doing real work, so if you're too busy or don't want to, just say so. In the event

702:

has survived your request for deletion and I want to thank the people who voted for keeping it. I presume that you are not a computer specialist (I don't have the time to read all of your user talk) so I want to reassure you that you will surely hear about Kat in the (near) future. I don't know if it

261:

Would you please expain this to me. I have extensive experience with the EMB-120 Brazillia aircraft, which is actually powered by two Pratt 100 series Turboprop engines. The first aircraft I believe came out with Pratt 118 engines but at the aircraft progress other model, higher horseposer engines,

257:

I just fell onto this Knowledge deal this morning and it just so happened to be featured on the Today Show. I am writing a piece for my company regarding the PT6 turboprop engine manufactured by Pratt& Whitney. In my researching I found your article or submission of facts, what ever you want to

1384:

Well, it's preferable because it's a 💕, and our face to the world (the Main Page) should be absolutely free to exemplify this. As to policy, this is something I was informed of as a young admin in the halcyon days of late 2004, but I can't seem to find a policy page that explains this explicitly.

350:

revert my talk/user pages. Alarmingly, a quary on Google for my username will return my user/talk pages as the first two results (in quotations, a quary without quotations will still show my user/talk page on the first page of results). This will lead to certian security and personal problems for me

1846:

I attempted to add links to bolster criticism but was ousted from doing so. I even created a seperate topic about a farcical competing technology that was VfD. I have links to blogs from much criticism on these items and they have all be removed. I didn't get into an editor war over them, I simply

593:

on an article without reading the art and considering if there seems a claim; and I have commented on several VfDs where people suggested speedy that there *was* a claim of notability, albiet an implausible or minor one. I don't belive in streaching the CSD -- I do belive in defining them clearly.

1074:

vandals have discovered that the only way to keep on inserting their Book 6 spoilder information is to enter it into the edit summary. (Don't loook if you don't want to have the ending spoiled), but is there a way to delete parts of the edit history, so that people won't have that part of the book

1057:

446:

That's fine by me. The reason I added the text the way that I did is that I hope that it will encourage people to expand the articles, and avoid deletion. In other words, I added the extra text for the potential benefit of regular non-admin editors who might stumble upon the article, and choose to

1504:

Hello, Zzyzx11! I'd already blocked BunkyBoopy indefinitely after he did another personal attack after the one week block. However, if you look at his talk page, he calmed down and promised to be good. Being lenient, I have unblocked him- I only ask you to let him be unblocked as long as he stays

553:

where it says "An article about a real person that does not assert that person's importance or significance." which i think covers both the cases above. (Please note that the word "vanity" was not included in the policy voted on.) I am trying to get agreement on a list of examples that illustrate

506:

Just what statement in this article do you think should be considerd an assertion of notability, however disputed? I have several times placed on speedy articles that were already on VfD becuse the people who nominated them for VfD were not clear about the CSD, particualrly A7, since it is new. A

1928:

Thanks a million for turning the attitude around from vandalism to cooperation. Its not always possible to get that cooperation. Thank you for that. In the mean time, start with that tutorial I pointed you to, and ask questions. I'll be glad to help you around if you ask me on my talk page. I'm

1939:

There were various names. XmlHttpRequest, XmlHttp, DHTML, XML Data Islands, REST, etc. In fact the capabilities that Jesse claims were "new" were actually in existence in Internet Explorer since 1998. Books were published on how to use them since then as well. If you want to IM, tell me what IM

621:

Actually, someone else had called it the "one of the greatest games" and I altered that into "one of the greatest, most dramatic games". Maybe that was overkill. I left it out of the introduction and instead used it to describe John Facenda's narration. One "dramatic" per article is probably

554:

what this does and does not mean more clearly so we will all be on the same page. Note than when i see soemthign on VfD that seems to me to qualify i fairly automatically put a speedy tag on it -- after considering the article and whether anything in it seem to me to be a claim of signifigance.

1885:

Your friend is most likely you. It wouldn't suprise me if someone like Jesse would vent his anger from an anonymous IP. Additionally, criticism about George Bush can be found all over wikipedia. Read the article about Bush and you'll find criticism sprinkled throughout the article as well. -

1162:

I've been on wikipedia a while but I haven't started writing articles until recently. You blocked me from editing a page I was writing on a band called Masters of the Blacksides. I would like to finish writing it. This is probably not the right place to put this so I apologize in advance.

1526:

Guess I was wrong. I have reinstated BunkyBoopy's indefinite block after he blanked the September 11, 2001 articles twice and uploaded a mocking image of Bush (I have already reverted all his edits). I had hoped he would reform and change his ways, but it seems he didn't.

974: 327:

reminds me of a secret word in a computer game of long long ago called "Advent". That was short for "Adventure" and was way before user interface graphics. The secret word was "XYZZY" I think. Anyway, Thanks for any more help with the article that you can provide.

1828:

And just look at the section... there is nothing worthwhile there! There is no proof... there are no links... its pure, unadulterated crap. Just what was Ajax called before the word was coined? The section claims there was a name... but doesn't tell us what it is!

1954: 582:

I can understand your reasoning, while I disagree with it. There are many many thousands of web fora, and simply being a moderator on one is not, IMO, a claim of significance. If you see a tag from me in future, please check the actual article -- I will not put

1258:

I do? His page makes him out to be a misguided, well-intentioned youth. I don't know if this is true. His edits sure seem to be unilateral, and he seems to be willfully ignoring warnings on his talk page. Could you block/ban him? Leave one; thanks again.

703:

is possible to know how many hits a Knowledge page gets, but it would be interesting also for me to know that number (and its evoluton in time). As I mentioned in the discussion related to you request for deletion, Kat reached 13,609 downloads on

540:

criterion for speedy deletion. That said, the policy states that "articles where there is no remotely plausible assertion of notability should be considered." Otherwise, "If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to VFD

674:

I'm extremely confused. Are you saying that I had previously deleted the article or voted on an Votes For Deletion for it? I can assure you that I have done neither. Is it a different article you are referring to? Are you referring to

374:

Thanks, and I enjoyed working with you as well. I have read that section already, but please discourage recreation of these pages or recreate it under a different name if at all possible. (Also, is it possible to cancel my Wiki

1874:

My friend is just a bright individual that is just trying to make a living! He is not deceiving anyone into believing falsehoods. He has nothing to gain from coining a word... other than the credit he is due. Please back off.

521:

Again exactly which statement in this article do you consider to be an assertion of notability? Nothing in the CSD says anything about "blatant" or "vanity" it says "no asserion of notability". Please talk with me about this.

1144:

regarding foreign artists. What I mean is does a band qualify if it has been prominently featured in the mainstream media in its home country? Same applies to top 100 lists and so forth... Thx btw for keeping me in check :D

1912:

1) Why are we discussing this on Zzyzx11's talk page? I think we should move this discussion to our own talk pages and leave this guy alone. He's busy enough. As far as your personal attacks, please start off with the

1505:

good. One sign of personal attack or vandalism, and he will be blocked indefinitely again. Just wanted to let you know, so you can keep an eye on him. I hope that he has truly reformed... Thanks for your understanding.

634:

I spotted one of 65.94.129.105 's contributions and reverted it, I see you spotted a bunch of others. Thanks! I put this user's IP on the vandalism in progress page. hope that's the right thing to do, I'm a wikinovice.

355:

I deleted both your user page and your talk page since I saw no abuse. However, please keep in mind that Google's cache might not change for several days. Furthermore the pages might be re-created in the future. See

491:

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. I'm afraid that more can probably be expected as I seem to have run afoul a certain vandal with an odd fixation on Cheerios and human sexuality. :)

1235:

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. I was surprised and humbled by the number of positives votes. I'll be monitoring RfA regularly from now on and will look for a chance to "pay it forward". Cheers,

1961:

I only have about a half hour or so before I just have to get down to the river and enjoy this unbelievable sun... but once we are added to each other's lists... I guess we can keep going in the future

414:

for a while. If the earlier edits hadn't clearly been vandalism, I wouldn't be so bothered, but the user didn't start with the "look at my good edits" until he was on the verge of being blocked.

719:, not including yourself. Because there was not enough voters to form a true consensus of the Knowledge community, it automatically is kept, regardless if it is truly important or significant. 716: 1899:

I live near Blacksburg, VA. Jesse lives out west... I am not using a proxy, nor have I tried to hide my IP. This crap has just come to my attention, and I haven't had time to create a login.

1250:

Hey; Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage by this user. I've been watching his edits for a little while, now, and they've been pretty out-and-out vandalism. He also created

1125:

Hi Zzzyzx11, thanks for all the helps. For the lastest incident, I have no intention to be administrator, and that was a totally lame attempt from GrandCru. Again, thanks for the helps.

1301:

There MUST be some mistake! I keep getting messages saying that I have vandalized Knowledge but I haven't! Honestly! I mean I didn't vandalize Knowledge when you sent me that message!

571:

is different because Fedoralounge.com and Lottaliving.com are real web sites and being a moderator on those forums could still be debatable whether or not they are significant.

1254:, which crashes my browser (Firefox) whenever I try to open it. I've seen you around a bit, and I respect your opinion on things, so: What should I do about this user? What 282:

Actually the "Jerseys-Are-Tight" pic is being used on the 2 Live Stews entry on this site and on the entry for the Stews, the picture is in focus so the picture is relevant.

1936:

Look, I'm not sure I have time for this sort of thing... IMing would be so much easier, less time consuming... And... What was the technology called before it was Ajax?

1349:

Hello. It was discussed a while ago, but I can't find the talk page right now. Basically, it's considered 'bad form' to use {{fairuse}} pics on the MainPage. Maybe

262:

were installed. This information is easily varifiable by viewing the Type Certificate Data sheet for the aircraft. Which can be accessed through the FAA web site.

1624:, adding nonsense, creating pages that are immediately speedied - and I have warned him several times. He has responded by vandalising my user page three times 739:. I was quite surprised by the amount of support I received, and wish to extend my thanks to you for taking the time to support my nomination for adminship. -- 1557:

personally feel as though he's been acting in bad faith, but I'm open to accepting that I could simply be biased against him. I'd like a second opinion about

1908:

The forces of the universe will always take care of individuals such as yourself. What goes around, comes around. You can't stop it. You're totally screwed.

1224: 1723:

Hey Zzyzx11, cool username btw. Just writing to thank you for the vote of support on RfA. Be sure to pull me up if/when I'm ever acting stupid. Cheers,

1425: 1791:

These so called "Criticism" sections are not adding anything worthwhile to the wiki, and there is nothing of substance available on the Web about them.

659:

Not sure entirely how this works, but you don't beleive there is a russian baritone named Alexander Podolkhov? Google the name. See how wrong you are.

736: 1448:

P.S. Am I missing something? Where is the revert button supposed to be? Can't seem to find it, so I reverted your talk page the old-fashioned way...

651:

page, Zzyzx. Actually I quite enjoyed the surreal aardvark piece, but I wish he'd just created an 'Aardvarkophilia' page instead of deleting mine!

1748:

was actually maintained (and paid for?) by the Port until relatively recently. I'd like to be able to add some of that background to the article.

1115:

Bobbybuilder has every right to be an admin just like you. And when he becomes one, he can better protect himself against other vandals as well.

465: 258:

call it, and you mentioned the EMB 121 aircraft being powered by the PT6 engien then corrected yourself by saying it is powered by a -42 engine.

769: 546: 537: 868:

I see that you also nominated a bunch of sound files that he uploaded. He also uploaded a bunch of images that were obviously copyrighted.

1369:, where "bad form" was mentioned. There has to be a longer discussion somewhere. I remember reading about it.... You may also want to ask 388:

From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked.

1878: 1832: 1805: 832: 1740:

Since you seem to be adding info to the LA-area freeways, I was wondering if you knew where I could get some good info on some of the

1209:

I haven't had much time for wiki recently b/c of my job and schoolwork. I hope to be able to get back to it soon though. Thank you!

1187: 1174: 977:. I'll make the proposal for use of the template, but I wanted to have the template first. Give me a few days before nominating it on 239: 1338: 1653: 1637: 1570: 1289: 1268: 1929:

fairly new myself. I've only been here a couple months. But I know a good bit so far and will be glad to share the knowledge. -

1558: 1983:. He is an employee of 24SevenOffice. He's placed links about his product all over Knowledge and I've had to remove them. - 1847:

let it go. I agree that there needs to be more evidence listed, but it appears that we are not allowed to actually list it. -

809: 286: 472:

Hi, Zzyzx11. Thanks for supporting my RfA! I am honored to have your endoresment and hope to make good use of the mop.

896: 606:

Please check out my revisions and see if they are less POV, more factual, and more to your liking. Ironically, I'm a

1940:

software and what username I should contact and I'll be glad to discuss this with you as long as it remains civil. -

1581:

That's two straight Users whose Talk pages you've added test templates to and given me edit conflicts on. :)

1553:

If you'll recall, we had some trouble with this fella before. He's been making some questionable edits again, so...

699: 1679: 1227:

there is an ongoing debate about U.S. Interstate Highway Stub and US Highway stub... --00:41, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

757: 1794:

I think you should start warning whomever is adding these worthless sections that stalking is a crime. Thank you.

1366: 1119: 1109: 1102: 1095: 1088: 767: 399: 1156: 1170: 1141: 825: 662: 411: 386:

Hello, just a quick note to say thank you for voting, even though you were not convinced of my experience. "

292:

Hello. I saw that you had been involved with this article and I noticed that there is little mention of the

199: 418: 1902:

He is not the Second Coming... He is just a dude I know, have known for decades. He's never hurt anyone.

1683: 232: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 1698:

Thank you for paroling me Zz, I will endeavour to follow a straighter and more narrow path in future. --

676: 536:

First of all, let me be honest and preface this by mentioning that I was not totally in favor of the new

1335: 821: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 69: 65: 61: 1166: 1126: 1017: 1006: 51: 1797:" If you see something incorrect with a page just click edit this page at the top of each page." from 1613: 415: 1788:

Hello, I am attempting to prevent a SINGLE person from a spurious campaign against a friend of mine.

1763: 1727: 1699: 1668:

Please never hesitate to let me know if you have concerns with any administrative action I may make.

1649: 1633: 1566: 1540: 1533: 1518: 1511: 1489: 1482: 1469: 1462: 1441: 1434: 1285: 1264: 1043: 1012:

Howdy. If you're around, could you do something about the persistent addition of nonsensical tags to

914: 883: 850: 762: 1307: 1244: 425: 1026: 431:

Since you created this template, I would like to notify you that I am thinking about putting it on

357: 614:

game was one of a kind. Thankfully I was watching from the warmth of my living room at the time.

568: 515: 447:

expand it. In either case, however, I see your point, and will not be offended if it is listed on

1914: 1745: 1370: 981:(I'm a regular there, so I know how it works). Check the templates and tell me what you think. -- 939: 802: 744: 507:

number of such articles have been duly speedied. I really think this qualifes for speedy delete.

478: 930:

did you see him impersanating you? I think he's mental. Why did you edit his talk page though?--

704: 1976: 1744:

history. If I remember correctly, the section from Willow Street in Long Beach through to the

1194: 954: 723: 686: 575: 452: 439: 364: 270: 228: 193: 37: 304:

a couple of years ago. The article should, I think, make note of the distinction between the

1984: 1941: 1930: 1919: 1918:

as "new" that has been around for 7 years, you are bound to draw more than a few critics. -

1887: 1848: 1825:

I am not trying to censor criticism, but an encyclopedia is not a forum for such a thing...

1777: 1332: 1277: 975:

Knowledge talk:Votes for deletion/Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - Full Plot Summary

817: 786: 332: 1958: 1749: 1724: 1645: 1629: 1562: 1528: 1506: 1477: 1457: 1453: 1429: 1281: 1260: 1251: 1076: 1059: 1040: 970: 900: 869: 836: 708: 587: 782:

Like, thanks for your radical support on my RFA. Totally. (Translated per your Babel.)

567:

that I automatically assumed it was borderline without reading them carefully. However,

1741: 1675: 1601: 1401: 1237: 1149: 1021: 1013: 1002: 931: 623: 615: 564: 500: 464: 391: 1980: 1212: 1190:, this message that you left on my talk page was the very first thing you did today. 990: 978: 860: 813: 798: 740: 648: 607: 595: 555: 550: 549:

had not been created, as I think it misrepresets the policy, the actual policy is at

523: 508: 473: 448: 432: 1118:

and you are a vandal because you removed my comment on Bobbybuilder's talk page. --

1191: 1071: 1054: 962: 951: 720: 683: 667:

Thankyou, you presumptuous git. Check things before you assume they are incorrect.

572: 493: 436: 361: 267: 215: 17: 1905:

You, sir, are a complete ... (deleted) ...(as if that were the measure of a man).

1405: 1386: 1374: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1320: 994: 982: 783: 652: 610:

fan. But I enjoy stuff about the "old days" of football, for any team, and the

329: 1665:

Zzyzx11, thank you for your support of my adminship, much appreciated! :)

820:(where nothing has been done so far), plus his talk page, and the talk page at 1712: 1357:

04:39, 2005 August 8 (UTC) Sorry to keep you waiting, I am a slow typist. --

1671: 1373:

when he comes back from his vacation. He is another expert on the issue. --

1456:(who vandalised this talk page) for one week after reading his talk page. 1428:. I will do my best to serve the Knowledge community as an administrator. 1865:

A criticism section doesn't belong in an encyclopedia... its asinine...

1589: 1582: 1094:

Anybody can nominate someone to be an admin and he's been very helpful.--

663:

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=alexander+podolkhov&meta=

636: 611: 301: 1798: 351:

that I cannot discuss in detail. Please, allow them to be deleted. --SV

1971:

I wasn't the one who removed the dubious markup. This was removed on

679:? Currently there is no record that that article ever being deleted. 211: 1979:. Sleepyhead81 has also been using Knowledge to market his product 32:

STOP! This is an archive page. All new messages posted here will be

1621: 1617: 1416:

who's ramon akanni? i read, nigeria fraudster. www.cat-center.com

1140:

Hey. I was just wondering. I didn't see anything mentioned under

1972: 1600:

Couldn't have done it without you. I can't thank you enough. -

812:) revert patrol. You can read all the gory details about him at 358:

Knowledge:User page#How do I delete my user and user talk pages?

219: 715:

For your information, there were only two people who voted on

395: 1871:

Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh have MILLIONS of critics...

463: 1859:

Why bother putting a "Criticism" section? What a bad idea.

1182:

I have no idea what you are talking about. For the record,

717:

Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Kat Desktop Search Environment

320:

which you could add? If not, I'll do some digging around.

1186:

shows that I never touched it before. Secondly, according

545:

The above is not the policy voted on, and i wish the page

1957:--- you can user AOLs software... or iChat... or, I like 1819:

Who else has an entire section dedicated to "Criticism?"

25: 750: 1687: 1625: 1616:

has been vandalising various pages - changing links to

1183: 947: 943: 680: 1862:

Your blog is as good a forum as any for such things.

1628:. Might I ask for some assistance from you? Thanks. 1087:

Why did you remove the nomination for Bobbybuilder?--

36:. If you wish to leave me a message, please visit my 46: 1385:I think we may have to go to Jimbo on this one.-- 1822:Not even George Walker Bush has such a section! 735:Thank you for your vote of support on my recent 1588:Yeah, both of those are peeves of mine, too. 563:I will admit that since I saw the VFD tag on 8: 1799:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Contact_us 1225:Knowledge:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals 751:I'm looking for some advice, or something... 1925:2) I am learning as I go... tell me how... 316:. Do you happen to know anything about the 1868:You are the only one who wants it there. 1108:I am wanring you that you are a vandal.-- 1319:Thank you for your vote of confidence.-- 1039:Hey Zznyzx, thanks for letting me know. 206: 1424:Thank you for leaving your opinion at 1367:Talk:Main Page/Archive 40#Scotland map 1776:Thanks for the help on the vandal. - 547:Knowledge:Deletion of vanity articles 538:Knowledge:Deletion of vanity articles 7: 1690: ) 22:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC) 1608:Having some trouble with 82.35.34.24 1402:Talk:Main Page#Image use on MainPage 594:Thanks for discussing this with me. 410:Zzyzx11, I've temporarily protected 382:thank you for your opinion on my RfA 312:and give some perspective about the 1219:US Interstate highway stub problems 266:What article are you referring to? 24: 1353:can give you a better answer. -- 756:you do have the time and desire: 1711:my page. Sincerely appreciated. 1280:), and keep a watchful eye out. 198: 50: 1764: 1761: 1755: 915: 912: 906: 884: 881: 875: 851: 848: 842: 227:March 31, 2022, 11:46 (UTC) by 700:Kat Desktop Search Environment 285: 1: 1987:17:29, August 13, 2005 (UTC) 1933:17:39, August 13, 2005 (UTC) 1851:17:08, August 13, 2005 (UTC) 1780:16:49, August 13, 2005 (UTC) 1750: 1592:07:14, August 10, 2005 (UTC) 1585:07:06, August 10, 2005 (UTC) 1535: 1513: 1484: 1464: 1436: 1400:I've started a discussion at 938:I have the same comment that 901: 870: 837: 758:User:Aaron Brenneman/Feedback 1944:17:49, August 13, 2005 (UTC) 1922:17:33, August 13, 2005 (UTC) 1890:17:23, August 13, 2005 (UTC) 1768:04:18, 13 August 2005 (UTC) 1732:21:46, 11 August 2005 (UTC) 1715:18:15, 11 August 2005 (UTC) 1702:17:15, 11 August 2005 (UTC) 1640:17:38, 10 August 2005 (UTC) 1626:(check the revision history) 1604:08:09, 10 August 2005 (UTC) 1341:04:20, August 8, 2005 (UTC) 1045:01:53, August 5, 2005 (UTC) 1031:23:20, August 4, 2005 (UTC) 630:added user to vandalism page 455:| 09:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC) 56: 1656:17:41, 10 August 2005 (UTC) 1573:19:25, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 1522:16:44, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 1473:21:20, 8 August 2005 (UTC) 1445:21:11, 8 August 2005 (UTC) 1404:. Wanna chime in ? -- 1361:04:41, 2005 August 8 (UTC) 1323:09:49, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 1297:There must be some mistake! 1271:03:52, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 1240:02:21, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 1215:20:48, 6 August 2005 (UTC) 1184:that article's page history 1152:05:26, 6 August 2005 (UTC) 1129:02:31, 6 August 2005 (UTC) 1122:23:52, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 1112:23:45, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 1105:23:42, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 1098:23:42, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 1091:23:41, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 1079:22:04, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 1062:22:04, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 985:01:50, 4 August 2005 (UTC) 934:22:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC) 897:User:BlankVerse/RonaldWatch 855:19:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC) 789:05:10, 3 August 2005 (UTC) 771:01:01, 3 August 2005 (UTC) 747:12:21, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 483:01:33, July 27, 2005 (UTC) 421:04:34, July 24, 2005 (UTC) 249: 197: 2001: 1772:Ajax / Jesse James Garrett 1544:20:06, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 1493:00:07, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 1408:05:45, 2005 August 8 (UTC) 1389:05:16, 8 August 2005 (UTC) 1377:04:55, 2005 August 8 (UTC) 1292:04:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 1197:12:31, 6 August 2005 (UTC) 997:01:59, 4 August 2005 (UTC) 957:23:23, 3 August 2005 (UTC) 919:08:45, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 895:For more info, please see 888:09:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC) 726:15:56, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 711:19:54, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 689:15:44, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 655:22:28, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 639:15:58, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 626:02:34, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 618:02:23, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 598:16:54, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 558:16:54, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 526:16:34, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 511:16:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 496:06:16, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 442:04:24, 26 July 2005 (UTC) 402:10:56, 22 July 2005 (UTC) 335:22:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 1177:) at 08:49 6 August 2005) 1082: 643:Thanks for reverting page 578:16:39, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 367:21:01, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 287:Hellmann's and Best Foods 273:18:00, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 1157:Masters Of The Backsides 1101:Please change it back.-- 1083:Bobbybuilder's Adminship 647:Thanks for reverting my 360:for details. Take care. 300:, which was acquired by 1816:OK, here is my beef... 1231:Thanks for your support 1142:Knowledge:Autobiography 698:Hi Zzyzx11, my page on 693: 412:User talk:63.18.182.244 339:User/talk page deletion 1660: 1452:P.P.S. I have blocked 469: 1842:Let me have my say... 1784:I am not vandalizing! 1345:Image use on MainPage 1136:The Notability Factor 926:Vanadlizer2 is wierd. 797:Welcome to the daily 467: 1327:Peterjenningspic.jpg 622:sufficient. :) 1276:noticed you did on 1173: • 1075:ruined for them? -- 1058:ruined for them? -- 774: 677:Alexander Podolkhov 459: 1915:Knowledge tuturial 1812:Criticism section? 1746:Port of Long Beach 1706:Thank you for that 1661:Func's RfA :) 1371:User:MacGyverMagic 948:this edit of yours 470: 278:Jerseys -Are-Tight 1977:User:Sleepyhead81 1881: 1835: 1808: 1730: 1644:I appreciate it. 1543: 1521: 1492: 1472: 1444: 1310: 1178: 1150:Laugurinn sjálfur 1120:He's very helpful 1110:He's very helpful 1103:He's very helpful 1096:He's very helpful 1089:He's very helpful 1066:Editing Talk Page 1049:Editing Talk Page 1018:User:70.150.36.30 1007:User:70.150.36.30 247: 246: 45: 44: 1992: 1876: 1830: 1803: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1754: 1728: 1614:User:82.35.34.24 1537: 1532: 1515: 1510: 1486: 1481: 1466: 1461: 1438: 1433: 1305: 1278:Backward message 1164: 1029: 1024: 993:'s talk page. -- 917: 913: 910: 905: 886: 882: 879: 874: 853: 849: 846: 841: 765: 592: 586: 561:You also wrote: 530:Speedy deletions 481: 476: 202: 54: 47: 26: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1969: 1897: 1857: 1844: 1838: 1814: 1786: 1774: 1738: 1721: 1708: 1700:Oobideedoobidee 1696: 1663: 1610: 1598: 1579: 1551: 1502: 1454:User:BunkyBoopy 1422: 1347: 1331:Sure thing. -- 1329: 1317: 1299: 1252:Knowledge:Babel 1248: 1233: 1221: 1204: 1160: 1138: 1132: 1085: 1068: 1051: 1037: 1027: 1022: 1010: 989:I did. It's at 966: 928: 795: 777: 763: 761: 753: 733: 696: 658: 645: 632: 604: 590: 584: 532: 519: 504: 489: 479: 474: 462: 429: 408: 384: 341: 290: 280: 255: 223: 60: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1998: 1996: 1968: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1953:AjaxOK at AIM 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1923: 1896: 1895:I am not Jesse 1893: 1892: 1891: 1856: 1853: 1843: 1840: 1813: 1810: 1785: 1782: 1773: 1770: 1742:Interstate 710 1737: 1736:Interstate 710 1734: 1720: 1717: 1707: 1704: 1695: 1692: 1662: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1609: 1606: 1597: 1594: 1578: 1575: 1550: 1549:User:Flarn2005 1547: 1546: 1545: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1421: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1379: 1378: 1365:I found this: 1346: 1343: 1328: 1325: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308:User:Flarn2005 1298: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1247: 1245:User:Flarn2005 1242: 1232: 1229: 1220: 1217: 1206:Aw thank you! 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1159: 1154: 1137: 1134: 1084: 1081: 1067: 1064: 1050: 1047: 1036: 1033: 1014:George W. Bush 1009: 1003:George W. Bush 1000: 999: 998: 965: 960: 959: 958: 927: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 890: 889: 865: 864: 794: 791: 776: 773: 752: 749: 732: 729: 728: 727: 695: 692: 691: 690: 644: 641: 631: 628: 603: 600: 565:Brandon Barnes 531: 528: 518: 513: 503: 501:Brandon Barnes 498: 488: 485: 461: 458: 457: 456: 428: 426:Template:Db:a1 423: 407: 404: 383: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 369: 368: 340: 337: 289: 284: 279: 276: 275: 274: 254: 251: 245: 244: 204: 203: 196: 55: 43: 42: 29: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1997: 1988: 1986: 1982: 1981:24SevenOffice 1978: 1974: 1966: 1960: 1956: 1955:register_here 1952: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1935: 1934: 1932: 1927: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1894: 1889: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1880: 1879:24.53.131.244 1872: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1860: 1854: 1852: 1850: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1833:24.53.131.244 1826: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1811: 1809: 1807: 1806:24.53.131.244 1801: 1800: 1795: 1792: 1789: 1783: 1781: 1779: 1771: 1769: 1767: 1760: 1758: 1753: 1747: 1743: 1735: 1733: 1731: 1726: 1718: 1716: 1714: 1705: 1703: 1701: 1693: 1691: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1607: 1605: 1603: 1596:Thanks, Zizz. 1595: 1593: 1591: 1586: 1584: 1577:Speedy finger 1576: 1574: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559:his behaviour 1556: 1548: 1542: 1538: 1530: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1520: 1516: 1508: 1500:Re:BunkyBoopy 1499: 1491: 1487: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1431: 1427: 1419: 1417: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1388: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1344: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1334: 1326: 1324: 1322: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1296: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1239: 1230: 1228: 1226: 1218: 1216: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1201: 1196: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1151: 1146: 1143: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1123: 1121: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1106: 1104: 1099: 1097: 1092: 1090: 1080: 1078: 1073: 1070:Recently the 1065: 1063: 1061: 1056: 1053:Recently the 1048: 1046: 1044: 1042: 1034: 1032: 1030: 1025: 1019: 1015: 1008: 1004: 1001: 996: 992: 988: 987: 986: 984: 980: 976: 972: 964: 961: 956: 953: 949: 945: 941: 940:Fernando Rizo 937: 936: 935: 933: 925: 918: 911: 909: 904: 898: 894: 893: 892: 891: 887: 880: 878: 873: 867: 866: 862: 861:User:Grutness 858: 857: 856: 854: 847: 845: 840: 834: 831: 827: 823: 822:204.108.96.10 819: 815: 811: 808: 804: 800: 792: 790: 788: 785: 780: 772: 770: 768: 766: 759: 748: 746: 742: 738: 730: 725: 722: 718: 714: 713: 712: 710: 706: 701: 694:Kat's 9 lives 688: 685: 681: 678: 673: 672: 671: 668: 665: 664: 660: 656: 654: 650: 649:Galanthophile 642: 640: 638: 629: 627: 625: 619: 617: 613: 609: 608:Chicago Bears 601: 599: 597: 589: 580: 579: 577: 574: 570: 566: 559: 557: 552: 548: 543: 542: 539: 529: 527: 525: 517: 514: 512: 510: 502: 499: 497: 495: 486: 484: 482: 477: 466: 454: 450: 445: 444: 443: 441: 438: 434: 427: 424: 422: 420: 417: 413: 406:Page blanking 405: 403: 401: 397: 393: 389: 381: 373: 372: 371: 370: 366: 363: 359: 354: 353: 352: 349: 344: 338: 336: 334: 331: 326: 321: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 288: 283: 277: 272: 269: 265: 264: 263: 259: 252: 250: 243: 241: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222:, 23:18 (UTC) 221: 217: 213: 210: 209:Current time: 205: 201: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 53: 49: 48: 41: 39: 35: 30: 28: 27: 19: 1970: 1907: 1904: 1901: 1898: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1845: 1837: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1802: 1796: 1793: 1790: 1787: 1775: 1756: 1751: 1739: 1722: 1709: 1697: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1620:to point to 1611: 1599: 1587: 1580: 1554: 1552: 1503: 1447: 1423: 1415: 1348: 1330: 1318: 1300: 1255: 1249: 1234: 1222: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1202:Re: barnstar 1167:Pimpalicious 1161: 1147: 1139: 1131: 1127:Bobbybuilder 1124: 1117: 1114: 1107: 1100: 1093: 1086: 1072:Harry Potter 1069: 1055:Harry Potter 1052: 1038: 1011: 967: 963:Template:Vfu 929: 907: 902: 876: 871: 843: 838: 829: 806: 796: 781: 778: 775:kmccoy's RFA 754: 734: 697: 669: 666: 661: 657: 646: 633: 620: 605: 591:}} 585:{{ 581: 569:Matt Deckard 562: 560: 544: 535: 533: 520: 516:Matt Deckard 505: 490: 471: 453:Blu Aardvark 430: 409: 387: 385: 347: 345: 342: 324: 322: 317: 313: 309: 305: 297: 293: 291: 281: 260: 256: 248: 236: 229:MalnadachBot 224: 216:September 27 208: 207: 73: 57: 33: 31: 18:User:Zzyzx11 1985:Sleepnomore 1942:Sleepnomore 1931:Sleepnomore 1920:Sleepnomore 1888:Sleepnomore 1849:Sleepnomore 1778:Sleepnomore 1351:User:Pharos 1333:Merovingian 946:concerning 779:Hey, dude, 705:SourceForge 534:You wrote: 460:Sango's RfA 1529:Flcelloguy 1507:Flcelloguy 1478:Flcelloguy 1458:Flcelloguy 1430:Flcelloguy 1188:your edits 1077:jonasaurus 1060:jonasaurus 1041:SlimVirgin 1020:? Thanks. 971:zen master 709:Rcappuccio 541:instead."' 323:BTW, Your 298:Best Foods 253:Correction 225:Last edit: 1855:SO What!! 1729:speak up! 1602:Lucky 6.9 1238:MarkSweep 944:about you 932:Spiderfan 818:WP:AN/3RR 764:brenneman 670:Kaine800 624:Wahkeenah 616:Wahkeenah 375:account?) 38:talk page 1612:IP user 1476:Thanks. 1213:atanamir 1175:contribs 1165:(msg by 859:I asked 833:contribs 810:contribs 799:Ronald20 793:Ronald20 741:Longhair 612:Ice Bowl 602:Ice Bowl 325:Username 308:and the 302:Unilever 240:contribs 58:Archives 1967:Dubious 1877:Msg by 1831:Msg by 1804:Msg by 1765:∅ 1682:, 1678:, 1674:( 1306:msg by 1192:Zzyzx11 1035:WP:AN/I 1023:android 952:Zzyzx11 916:∅ 885:∅ 852:∅ 824: ( 801: ( 721:Zzyzx11 684:Zzyzx11 573:Zzyzx11 468:Thanks! 437:Zzyzx11 416:Joyous 400:Garrett 394:12:48, 362:Zzyzx11 346:Please 343:Zzyzx, 318:company 314:company 306:company 294:company 268:Zzyzx11 231: ( 34:ignored 1719:My RfA 1694:Parole 1688: 1536:note? 1514:note? 1485:note? 1465:note? 1437:note? 1426:my RfA 1406:PFHLai 1387:Pharos 1375:PFHLai 1359:PFHLai 1355:PFHLai 1321:Jondel 1195:(Talk) 995:Titoxd 983:Titoxd 955:(Talk) 828: 814:WP:VIP 805: 787:(talk) 784:kmccoy 731:Thanks 724:(Talk) 687:(Talk) 653:SiGarb 588:nn-bio 576:(Talk) 551:WP:CSD 487:Thanks 440:(Talk) 419:(talk) 365:(Talk) 348:do not 330:hydnjo 271:(Talk) 235: 212:Friday 1962:there 1959:Adium 1757:Verse 1752:Blank 1713:Banes 1622:pussy 1618:vulva 1541:Desk 1519:Desk 1490:Desk 1470:Desk 1442:Desk 969:with 908:Verse 903:Blank 877:Verse 872:Blank 844:Verse 839:Blank 494:Loren 475:Sango 310:brand 16:< 1973:Ajax 1725:Slac 1672:Func 1646:jglc 1630:jglc 1563:jglc 1282:jglc 1261:jglc 1171:talk 1005:and 942:had 826:talk 816:and 803:talk 745:Talk 451:. -- 392:Luke 333:talk 233:talk 220:2024 1975:by 1590:Zoe 1583:Zoe 1420:RfA 1339:(c) 1336:(t) 1315:RFA 1256:can 1223:At 1016:by 991:VFU 979:TFD 973:at 737:RfA 637:Lar 596:DES 556:DES 524:DES 509:DES 480:123 449:TFD 433:TFD 396:NIV 390:" ( 1652:| 1648:| 1636:| 1632:| 1569:| 1565:| 1561:. 1539:| 1534:A 1517:| 1512:A 1488:| 1483:A 1468:| 1463:A 1440:| 1435:A 1288:| 1284:| 1267:| 1263:| 1236:-- 1148:-- 1028:79 950:. 899:. 743:| 682:. 635:++ 296:, 242:) 218:, 214:, 194:34 192:| 190:33 188:| 186:32 184:| 182:31 180:| 178:30 176:| 174:29 172:| 170:28 168:| 166:27 164:| 162:26 160:| 158:25 156:| 154:24 152:| 150:23 148:| 146:22 144:| 142:21 140:| 138:20 136:| 134:19 132:| 130:18 128:| 126:17 124:| 122:16 120:| 118:15 116:| 114:14 112:| 110:13 108:| 106:12 104:| 102:11 100:| 98:10 96:| 92:| 88:| 84:| 80:| 76:| 72:| 68:| 64:| 1686:, 1684:e 1680:c 1676:t 1654:c 1650:t 1638:c 1634:t 1571:c 1567:t 1555:I 1531:| 1509:| 1480:| 1460:| 1432:| 1290:c 1286:t 1269:c 1265:t 1169:( 830:· 807:· 760:. 492:- 237:· 94:9 90:8 86:7 82:6 78:5 74:4 70:3 66:2 62:1 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index