850:. I am not sure that is the best thing to do. I've read somewhere in Knowledge's many policies and guidelines that an article which is a target of a redirection should use the redirected word somewhere in the first paragraph. The logic of this is so the person who went to the redirected word can quickly see why they were redirected. I would object to using Hubbertism in the intro to Hubbert peak theory because Hubbertism is a neologism that I don't think should be afforded that sort of prominence. I ask you to consider outright deletion instead. Thanks!
284:. He's now tried to add copyright content to the page and its getting out of hand. I have no problem with a dubious claim as long as he is following the guidelines in doing so -- providing his argument in a talk page where it can be discussed rationally. He will not accept the fact that criticism against Mr Garret or Ajax are valid and refuses to find a compromise. Help again would be appreciated. I sincerely appologize for dragging you into this. -
52:
534:
518:
496:
200:
697:
1223:
1199:
1001:, it's a little of both. I mostly realized that a lot of the summary articles are at odds with each other, with their titles, their links, etc. I figure it's more than I'm going to accomplish solo, thus starting to check out the wikiproject idea. Thanks for the references along those lines. —
1785:
Greetings! Regarding the removal of the NN-Bio notice on that article, was it because there was already an AfD in progress, or because it does not meet CSD:A7? I am asking because I don't see any assertion of notability (so I am sure it qualifies for CSD:A7), and in the recent
Snowspinner discussion,
1816:
Thank you very much for your support on my nomination for adminship. Now that I have been made an admin, I will do my best to live up to the truest you and the community have placed in me. If you ever see my doing something you think is incorrect or questionable, or does not live up to the standards
884:
Why isn't stacymariekeibler.com shown on the fan sites of Stacy
Keibler's profile but yet others are. Stacy-k.org isn't even around anymore and stacy-vibe is a new site not even with 10,000 hits yet. To me that's unfair. Im sure the site owner will appreciate that considering they plug this site all
594:
Hi, I think you were a bit hasty with this deletion. I checked out the claims and they're all kosher and so I added a bit of explanatory text for people unfamiliar with
Brazilian literature, and a bibliography for those who can handle Portuguese (not difficult, it's a very simple language). He's a
1216:
Thank you for your feeback. This may be an interesting issue to explore further. If the solution for avoiding controversy is to avoid engaging editors and call them in their POV pushing and attempts to advocate a POV, WP will be poorer. I would prefer not being promoted to be an admin than to allow
1494:
I drew that off the top of my head, actually. Seems I was wrong. I have just seen that when e.g. admins have left in a huff and deleted their talk pages they are invariably restored in case they are needed in future (TBSDY just recently, for example). Perhaps that's just admins because their pages
275:
I've tried talking to our friend from the anonymous IP in chat and he still fails to understand the concept. I'm trying to get him to add some reasonable argument to his claim of dubiousness in the talk section and he refuses to do so -- instead relying on personal attacks against anyone who would
1475:
I understand. I don't think there are any violations I just thought it would be good to clean the books. I may come back but it's a real time sink and not that much fun trying to discuss issues with hardliners. No one instance precipitated this feeling but a gradual build up of frustration with
1207:
I do not fault you for trying to maintain NPOV in very controversial subjects. But the fact of the matter is that however controversial the subject may be, at least someone will want to put a bullseye on your head. That is unavoidable and so there are no easy answers on "the right way" to do this
1168:
Thanks for the support on my RfA. I was very pleasantly surprised to see so much support throughout the week. There's something about janitorial tasks isn't there? They're sort of...releasing...to do. Maybe that's not healthy! Anyway, please do keep an eye on me and my logs, especially while I'm
651:
I submitted a report about vandalism last night and the user that submitted the vandalism continued to update the vandalizing wiki. Mintues ago I retaliated by writing an article about the user and I was warned not to do so again. I find it puzzling that while one form of vandalism is allowed
1495:
are likely to contain useful conversations. I concerns me that the contents of a user talk page could be needed in a future arbitration or something, but I suppose as long as the deleter is sure that that kind of material is not there, then deleting per the page you cited is fine. Sorry. -
572:
I fully comprehend the reasons for not having diagrams as jpg files. I spent a small amount of time converting this particular jpg file to a 2 colour(1bit) png image, only to find someone had done it before me. So I removed the cleanup notice and marked it for deletion as per
1449:
Could you delete my talk page too? I suppose I can't delete my whole profile? I need a break from this place, it's there are just too many people who are not willing to discuss or compromise. I'm going to focus my energy in other areas. I hope you understand.
1394:
Thanks for your support in my recent RFA! All those extra buttons might not be a big deal, but getting all this positive feedback sure is, please let me know if you have any problems or comments regarding how I use all these shiny new levers and cranks!
1898:
in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects.
760:
article was vandalized again yesterday and the work that was so carefully discussed previously was removed. Feel free to leave it how it is or revert it. I just don't care anymore. I just thought you might want to know. Good luck with wikipedia. -
1465:, it will be deleted after I make sure that the page's history does not contain evidence of policy violations that may need to be kept. But remember, others may request undeletion if they feel there was in fact a need to retain the page. Take care.
755:
As someone who was formerly involved with one of my disputes, I thought you would like to know that I'm no longer editing on
Knowledge after yet another hotly contested debate over another article. In the mean time, you might want to know that the
426:
I couldn't quite find what I was suppposed to put on an image that had been stolen off of a website. I saw you were a participant in the "Image
Tagging Club", as I like to call it, and thought you could help me. The image: PIC1.jpg is clearly from
316:
if you believe a google image is copyrighted, a lot of us spend a lot of time on those articles, and then ya'll come along and delete them, I am serious, I am not too happy a this moment, next time, don't be so conscious about a google image.
858:
Hi Zzzyzx11, thanks for your reply. I have in fact been working down the steps in dispute resolution. In addition to attempts to discuss the topic at the
Article/Talk page, I have also attempted to engage other outside opinions by listing
1796:
Thanks for the link to the CSD:A7 discussion. But as I understand it, that is still a proposal, and is not in effect yet? And as I understand CSD:A7, what is important is not whether the person is actually notable, but whether the article
676:
My profuse apologies, I felt that nothing was being done about the vandalism and the user continued to harass me over various means (e-mail, instant messengers, etc.) so I sunk to his level and did the same thing to him. It won't happen
1671:
Thanks for clarifying the difference between League
Champion and Super Bowl Champion for that year. Perhaps there should be another row for Super Bowl championships?, as the League Championships category seems to be misleading .
1104:
Postscript: Disregard the above - out of respect for your position on the matter,I've opened a talk-page discussion proposing the move. I note, however, that a supporter in the AfD also suggested this move in the article
1962:
Well, part of it is cut n pasted. The part about the mop was not (which maybe makes it more emberassing :)). I was thinking of someone else with a very similar username when I said that :). Anyway, take care!
1185:
Is being an editor with a passion for NPOV and factual accuracy that edits articles in the "controversial" realm and that has to deal as a result of that involvement with a tremendous amount of animosity, being
1760:
Seemed a bit hasty. It certainly was not an attack page. Sure, it read like an advertisement, but would it have hurt to just let it sit with a speedy for a little bit so it could at least be disputed?
1745:
546:
Hi I am not quite sure why this image was not a candidate for a speedy. I have re-read the policy but do not follow your reason for changing. Anyway, no big deal, I was just following the advice of
1833:
Hi. I think I understand why you moved this article, but I have explained on the "Talk" page why it was an incorrect move, particularly without achieving consensus first. Hope you understand.
903:
Thanks for supporting my request for adminship. If you have any concerns, please get in touch with me. Incidentally, thanks for using this username- I learned something new! --
1361:
Thank you very kindly for your support of my nomination. I promise your trust hasn't been misplaced; I will only be slightly buzzed with power, but never drunk. ;) ·
411:... for helping clean up the latest WoW vandalism. That was done quick. (And I got listed on Vandalism in progress for moving the pages back! Made my day ... sort of ... )
1660:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
923:
Greetings: pawing through the SuperShadow edit history, I noticed you've edited the page in question before. I thought you'd want to know it is now the subject of a
1713:
Thank you very much for your vote on my RFA, it is now the 8th most supported RFA ever, and it couldnt have happened without your vote. I look forward to serving
1579:
Thanks for contributing to the discussion on my recent RfA. Your comments are appreciated and I'll endeavour to use these new powers wisely and productively....
1694:
will be doing all of the real work. He would have responded to you directly, but he is currently out of town, and wanted to thank you asap. Thanks again. --
928:
467:
I appreciate the rollback. Seems some little nancy boy over on AOL didn't like my blocking his proxy. :) Nice to know I hit him where it hurt. -
737:
Issues that have previously arisen have now subsided and I am now once again able to edit
Knowledge under this name. I would like to thank you for your
504:
577:. The advice in the article on preparing images is perfectly fine, it is the wording in the criteria for speedy deletion that I think is ambiguous. --
452:
Should I go back through all the people I welcomed and insert the "subst:"? Won't this look funny to everyone who get a message note? Thanks again. --
356:
You are quite right. I was clearing out copyvio's from a user's contribs and I forgot to do it. I'll do it in the future. Thanks for the reminder.
791:
Kek has reverted three more times. Despite a warning on his talk page he continues unabbated and refers to me as a nazi. Requesting a 24 hour block.
1339:
1044:
943:
When I use four tildes, I get my user name and date. Can you tell me how to get user name, user name talk and date like you sign with??? Thanks, --
1657:
1420:
1047:. I'm an administrator now, and I hope that I'll live up to the community's expectations as one. Your vote of confidence is much appreciated. -
1591:
Just so you're aware, there's another attempt being made to remove the term "Conspiracy theory" from
Knowledge. You'll find the discussion at
1181:
Thanks for your neutral vote on my RfA. The questions that I am asking myself in reading your comment about me being "too controversial" is:
1539:
1871:
891:
400:
331:
Ok, I understand what you mean, in a sense. But, don't think I'm going out easy (for right now anyway)! I doubt you are a mergist anyway.
1923:
313:
1919:
975:
1089:
is essentially a mis-spelling (at least relative to the spelling used by those accorded credit for inventing the term). Cheers! --
1416:
1342:
has not quite completed yet, but either way, I'd like to thank you for your vote and your support, regardless of the outcome. --
1926:!! I was surprised at the turnout and support I got! If you ever have any issues with any of my actions, please notify me on my
1189:
If so, how an editor can edit these type of articles without such animosity being engendered? Is there a "right" way to do this?
1081:
I don't think the keep/delete debate in the AfD is directed towards whether the article should be moved, but rather whether the
312:
I assure you Zzyzz, that image had no copyright whatsoever! Especially if it were on google, which it were, you should join the
1738:
924:
441:
Thanks. I tried using {{subst:..., but it wasn't working. I'll do it from now on. And thanks for the info on tagging images. --
383:
Oh yeah. Almost as much fun as when speedied articles get re-created by someone trying to place a speedy tag on them :/ .
239:
1514:
828:
978:
Thanks for support and your confidence in me in my recent RFB nomination. I'm now WP's newest bureaucrat. :) Regards,
783:. Several users have reverted his edits but he persists. I'm requesting a 24 hour block on this user until he stops rving.
1592:
1529:
I appreciate your vote in my successful RfA. If you every need anything just ask. I hope I can live up to expectations. -
1952:
Your faux pas is forgiven. Kinda hard to keep track when you are cutting and pasting your thank you note to 50+ users...
1883:
1690:
RfA. He appreciates your support and comments and looks forward to better serving
Knowledge the best he can. Of course
558:
Thanks for your reply. Fair enough, but the policy is definitely not clearly worded, some improvement required I feel.
1653:
1638:
1281:
1510:
1619:
Thanks for your support in my RfA. I'm glad some see my activity at VfD as a positive thing rather than negative. -
1786:
most participants agreed that it was okay to speedy an article with an active AfD if CSD are met. Best regards. --
257:
I didn't realize there was a particular order. Most of the lists I've been working with have been alphabetical.
1535:
1867:
1315:
456:
445:
435:
1280:
as an example of how some users create their own "Tool" page, or a collection of tools on their user page. So
1564:
529:
513:
491:
199:
1265:, who seems to have crudely copied your userpage in an attempt to hide the newness of his account. –
1217:
WP to be hijacked with the unfortunate result of losing the integrity and protection of NPOV. Take care. --
350:
1244:
599:
372:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
1863:
661:
1887:
1424:
1408:
1284:
concerning those edits to that page. But of course, that user cannot hide from his/her contributions...
738:
93:
89:
85:
81:
73:
69:
65:
61:
1051:
742:
526:
510:
488:
480:
51:
1311:
1075:
776:
1801:
notability, which this one does not. Nevermind. What will be will be, thanks for your explaination.--
1762:
1729:
1530:
792:
784:
779:. He is reverting to an outdated version of the page and on the talk page he is personally attacking
710:
1428:
1412:
1909:
Can you please Let the Jeff Snell Article stay. It really makes me feel good about myself. Please.
1895:
1462:
1396:
1381:
1277:
860:
847:
757:
503:
453:
442:
432:
415:
281:
232:
1086:
1048:
726:
1821:
1805:
1790:
1552:
1262:
932:
916:
907:
622:
574:
547:
428:
1879:
1237:
Hi, thanks for voting for me in my RFA. I was really touched at how many people voted for me! --
868:
843:
836:
562:
also seems to be a bit of an authority on image management, here and in the Commons. Regards --
1956:
1903:
1891:
1848:
1842:
1773:
1676:
1551:
Can you done exception ? Otherwise i will have to reupload same picture to en wikipedia.
1469:
1435:
1415:
that are still linked to articles and thought to be copyright violoations should be listed at
1346:
1288:
1156:
984:
957:
668:
639:
596:
384:
264:
193:
37:
1350:
1117:
1098:
1069:
762:
588:
334:
320:
285:
1882:
may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Knowledge community
1128:
Hey Zzyx11, thanks for your vote on my recent RFA, your support was appreciated :) --
1749:
1718:
1580:
1480:
1454:
1300:
1270:
1258:
1141:
1068:
Thanks for reversing the bad edit. Florian Jesse is new; I hope I haven't scared him off.
805:
769:
578:
563:
551:
301:
696:
871:, if neologisms are not candidates for Speedy Deletion, I will list it at VfD instead.
1376:
1242:
1145:
1032:
1007:
468:
412:
228:
1509:
Did not know that. I've seen a few templates that are full of red links. For example:
1818:
1802:
1787:
1620:
1518:
1362:
1327:
1011:
904:
705:
619:
559:
1973:
1953:
1927:
1900:
1845:
1827:
1770:
1608:
1568:
1466:
1432:
1343:
1285:
1153:
979:
954:
944:
872:
851:
665:
636:
613:# 12:38, August 25, 2005 Zzyzx11 restored "User:Willy on wheels for President 2008"
215:
17:
1517:. That's fine, however. I'll revert it back after I've put in all the articles. --
1023:
It seems that the AFC Logo was altered in such a way that it is now blurry on the
864:
533:
517:
495:
1699:
1691:
1632:
1496:
1218:
1194:
1170:
1109:
1090:
1028:
867:. If that fails, I guess the next step will be a request for mediation. As to
357:
1278:
Knowledge:Help desk#Experienced user, so why can't I find out how to do things?
1043:
Hi Zzyzx (however you pronounce that :) ), and thanks for your support of
1596:
1477:
1451:
1296:
1266:
1129:
809:
780:
1860:
Why did you delete the Biography of Jeff Snell? It was a very good article.
1714:
1238:
1002:
1942:
OK - I see you've already got a mop.... *smacks self in face with own mop*
1878:
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
625:
371:
btw, what command is it to include the reason in the {{del}} box? Thanks -
1643:
368:
Cool, sorry about that, will make sure to list the replacement next time.
1834:
1695:
1687:
1683:
1024:
816:
1978:
1965:
1944:
1935:
1918:
1062:
974:
1208:(other than to completely stop participating in editing those pages).
211:
1222:
1198:
808:
block so much that I appropriated it for my own purposes. Thanks! --
32:
STOP! This is an archive page. All new messages posted here will be
1476:
some other users who are non communicative. Thanks for the advice
1276:
Thank you for your concern. However, my user page was mentioned on
653:
720:
I created the maps myself and I am releasing them to the planet!!
664:
to retaliate. Please go somewhere else for your personal attacks.
1375:
Thank you for your support on my RfA and for your kind comments.
842:
Hello, thank you for acting on my request for Speedy Deletion of
1463:
Knowledge:User page#How do I delete my user and user talk pages?
277:
219:
1746:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of California State Routes
1744:
Someone wants to convert this to a template so it wound up at
1085:
should be kept. If it is kept, it really should be moved, as
822:
Mate its true look it up. I have no idea what sources to use
379:
List of phytochemicals and foods in which they are prominent
931:. If you want, you could stop in there and cast a vote. --
635:
My mistake, I was not paying close attention at the time.
1817:
that should be expected of an admin, please let me know.
431:. I just thought I'd point it out to someone. Thanks. --
25:
1326:
Thanks for your support on my RfA...I'll try to be good
1169:
learning the ropes with the new buttons. Thanks again! -
692:
I am having difficulty figuring out how to insert this:
660:
It does not help you when you upload another image like
1769:
Whoops, misread the wrong article. I have restored it.
1431:
as a film-screenshot, which is what I believe it is. --
1106:
1193:
Your comments on my dilemma, would be appreciated. --
618:
Not that it's a big deal, but out of curiosity, why?
36:. If you wish to leave me a message, please visit my
1976:... that's kind of similar I guess :). Thanks!
1932:
Hopefully you'll get your own mop soon too :).
487:for having 13,000+ edits and still running strong!
46:
1152:If you insist, I added an External links section.
395:so what /I shall do to creat this item ling chao?
1607:Hi Zzyzzzz - thanks for the RfA support :)
1140:What is the source for the remaining content at
349:Sorry about forgetting ot put the other one on
775:This page has been persistently vandalized by
260:How are things, and what are we working on?
8:
1631:Thank You. It's been updated with a source.
1461:Sorry to see you go. Anyway, as detailed at
929:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SuperShadow
846:. However, you have made it a redirect to
717:for the images I created...how do I do it?
1563:Hello, I thank you for your support to my
550:who nominated it for cleanup. Regards. --
1702:?¿? 21:06, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
654:http://en.wikipedia.org/image:Tybron.jpg
314:m:Association of Deletionist Wikipedians
206:
1658:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
1421:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
1310:What do you think of the newly-created
595:prize-winning writer and journalist. --
703:This image has been released into the
1686:'s RfA== Thank you for supporting my
1652:An image or media file you uploaded,
1593:Wikipedia_talk:Words_to_avoid#Summary
300:msg left at 23:09, 14 August 2005 by
7:
1505:Redlinks on template= bad etiquette?
741:and I am glad I can return. —
1567:. We shall surely interact more. --
1913:Thanks for your support on my RfA!
24:
1892:starting an account or logging in
1654:Image:Ministry of Silly Walks.png
1639:Image:Ministry of Silly Walks.png
1917:
1886:, and encourages them to become
1417:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images
1386:22:22, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
1367:21:33, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
1221:
1197:
1177:On becoming less "controversial"
1031:pages. Any way to fix this? --
973:
713:holder. This applies worldwide.
695:
532:
525:That's fine I'll do it anytime.
516:
502:
494:
198:
50:
1739:List of California State Routes
1734:23:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
1679:03:49, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
1623:17:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
1611:06:27, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
1599:02:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
1583:17:15, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1571:10:19, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1555:05:34, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1543:12:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
1521:05:28, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
1501:00:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
1472:23:45, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
1457:23:32, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
1438:15:39, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
1399:00:36, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
1353:18:35, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
1330:10:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
1318:00:36, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
1302:14:27, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
1272:09:29, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
1249:22:47, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
1202:18:45, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
989:20:06, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
804:Just so you know, I loved your
685:Copyright for images I uploaded
345:OK, sorry, I'll behave ;)
1922:Thanks for your support of my
1515:Template:CONCACAF Associations
1511:Template:CONMEBOL Associations
1483:00:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
1291:11:06, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
1226:02:03, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
1173:23:46, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
1148:19:51, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
1132:11:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
1100:20:23, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
1058:16:06, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
1035:15:27, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
1015:04:47, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
947:05:30, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
935:22:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
909:17:09, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
829:Special:Contributions/Mattwilk
1:
1959:04:18, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
1948:04:15, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
1939:04:14, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
1906:00:21, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
1894:, each user is entitled to a
1837:17:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
1159:23:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
1119:20:56, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
960:13:30, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
787:01:15, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
765:20:53, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
747:19:27, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
631:12:34, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
288:21:43, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
253:Sorry about the order of list
227:May 31, 2023, 00:52 (UTC) by
1982:04:39, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
1969:04:34, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
1851:20:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
1823:15:45, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
1792:09:41, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
1765:06:21, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
1752:05:25, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
854:19:01, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
812:07:26, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
795:01:15, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
729:20:16, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
603:17:06, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
566:15:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
554:15:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
521:23:05, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
499:23:05, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
471:23:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
437:19:38, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
418:16:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
387:03:59, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
375:11:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
360:04:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
337:23:12, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
323:04:33, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
267:20:51, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
56:
1807:19:17, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
1776:06:24, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
1756:Deletion of Municipal Waste
1314:? Am I being too paranoid?
1295:Ah, I see, thanks. –
1261:, probably a sockpuppet of
875:19:40, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
671:08:22, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
642:12:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
581:16:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
537:23:07, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
458:21:01, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
447:20:55, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
249:
197:
1999:
1627:CBS Television City Image
1257:You may be interested in
296:Thanks for your support!
1812:Thanks for your support
1525:Thank you for your vote
1306:Objectionable Usernames
733:Thank you for your help
483:, hereby give you this
327:re:re:Grievousrosto.jpg
1667:Minnesota Vikings edit
485:Working Man's Barnstar
351:Image:Mnulargelogo.gif
1781:Vince F. Postell, PhD
1656:, has been listed at
1648:File deletion warning
1731:>>talk<<
800:The Babel Code Block
662:Image:Kiddylover.jpg
1870: •
1425:Image:Steph hof.jpg
1409:Image:Steph hof.jpg
1370:
1333:
1123:
1038:
898:
861:Hubbert peak theory
848:Hubbert peak theory
758:Jesse James Garrett
739:previous assistance
647:Regarding vandalism
542:Image:Odalrune2.jpg
282:Jesse James Garrett
1972:I was thinking of
1884:welcomes newcomers
1427:to PUI and tagged
1390:Another thank you!
1263:User:Zephram Stark
656:) another is not.
364:Secret of Evermore
1981:
1968:
1947:
1938:
1875:
1843:Talk:Jane Seymour
1717:. Again, thanks.
1664:
1663:
1587:Conspiracy theory
1542:
1500:
1490:Speedy user talk:
1282:assume good faith
1055:
1014:
999:don't have a clue
993:American football
925:Vote for Deletion
894:
865:Wikiquette Alerts
831:
751:Leaving Knowledge
601:
308:Grievousrosto.jpg
304:
247:
246:
45:
44:
1990:
1977:
1964:
1943:
1934:
1930:! Thanks again!
1921:
1861:
1732:
1727:
1724:
1721:
1644:
1609:The curate's egg
1533:
1499:
1384:
1379:
1351:HOWS MY DRIVING)
1312:User:MikeHunt411
1246:
1225:
1201:
1115:
1096:
1076:Frisbeetarianism
1056:
1053:
1006:
987:
982:
977:
953:Got it Thanks --
889:
826:
745:
699:
629:
600:
589:Claudio Tognolli
536:
520:
506:
498:
299:
202:
54:
47:
26:
1998:
1997:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1915:
1858:
1831:
1814:
1783:
1763:Citizen Premier
1758:
1742:
1730:
1725:
1722:
1719:
1711:
1705:
1669:
1642:
1629:
1617:
1605:
1589:
1577:
1561:
1549:
1531:Trevor MacInnis
1527:
1507:
1492:
1447:
1441:
1429:Image:Punkd.jpg
1413:Image:Punkd.jpg
1405:
1392:
1382:
1377:
1373:
1371:Android79's RfA
1359:
1336:
1324:
1308:
1259:User:Go Cowboys
1255:
1247:
1235:
1179:
1166:
1142:Super Bowl XLII
1138:
1136:Super Bowl XLII
1126:
1110:
1091:
1079:
1066:
1052:
1041:
1021:
995:
985:
980:
972:
969:
941:
921:
912:
901:
882:
840:
820:
802:
793:freestylefrappe
785:freestylefrappe
773:
770:Avraam Benaroya
753:
743:
735:
715:
689:Hello, friend!
687:
681:
649:
627:
609:
592:
544:
477:
465:
424:
409:
393:
381:
373:UnlimitedAccess
366:
354:
343:
329:
310:
302:User:Briangotts
294:
273:
271:Vandalism Again
255:
223:
60:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1996:
1994:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1970:
1914:
1911:
1864:69.219.178.122
1857:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1830:
1825:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1782:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1757:
1754:
1741:
1736:
1710:
1707:
1668:
1665:
1662:
1661:
1650:
1641:
1636:
1628:
1625:
1616:
1613:
1604:
1601:
1588:
1585:
1576:
1573:
1560:
1557:
1548:
1545:
1526:
1523:
1506:
1503:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1446:
1443:
1404:
1401:
1397:Rx StrangeLove
1391:
1388:
1372:
1369:
1358:
1355:
1335:
1332:
1323:
1320:
1307:
1304:
1293:
1292:
1254:
1251:
1243:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1211:
1210:
1191:
1190:
1187:
1186:controversial?
1178:
1175:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1137:
1134:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1078:
1073:
1065:
1060:
1040:
1037:
1020:
1017:
994:
991:
968:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
940:
937:
920:
914:
900:
899:Scimitar's RfA
897:
896:
895:
892:24.147.154.118
881:
878:
877:
876:
839:
834:
833:
832:
819:
814:
801:
798:
797:
796:
772:
767:
752:
749:
734:
731:
701:
686:
683:
679:
678:
673:
672:
648:
645:
644:
643:
616:
615:
608:
605:
591:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
570:
543:
540:
539:
538:
476:
473:
464:
461:
460:
459:
454:Lord Voldemort
449:
448:
443:Lord Voldemort
433:Lord Voldemort
423:
422:Untagged Image
420:
408:
405:
404:
403:
401:128.113.228.39
392:
389:
380:
377:
365:
362:
353:
347:
342:
339:
328:
325:
309:
306:
293:
290:
272:
269:
254:
251:
245:
244:
204:
203:
196:
55:
43:
42:
29:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1995:
1980:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1961:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1946:
1940:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1920:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1876:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1855:
1850:
1847:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1836:
1829:
1826:
1824:
1822:
1820:
1811:
1806:
1804:
1800:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1791:
1789:
1780:
1775:
1772:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1764:
1755:
1753:
1751:
1747:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1733:
1728:
1716:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1680:
1678:
1673:
1666:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1645:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1634:
1626:
1624:
1622:
1614:
1612:
1610:
1602:
1600:
1598:
1594:
1586:
1584:
1582:
1574:
1572:
1570:
1566:
1558:
1556:
1554:
1546:
1544:
1541:
1537:
1532:
1524:
1522:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1489:
1482:
1479:
1474:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1402:
1400:
1398:
1389:
1387:
1385:
1380:
1368:
1366:
1365:
1356:
1354:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1341:
1334:Bmicomp's RfA
1331:
1329:
1321:
1319:
1317:
1313:
1305:
1303:
1301:
1298:
1290:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1252:
1250:
1248:
1240:
1232:
1224:
1220:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1200:
1196:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1176:
1174:
1172:
1163:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1135:
1133:
1131:
1118:
1116:
1114:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1099:
1097:
1095:
1088:
1084:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1071:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1057:
1050:
1046:
1039:ulayiti's RfA
1036:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1010: /
1009:
1005: |
1004:
1000:
992:
990:
988:
983:
976:
966:
959:
956:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
946:
938:
936:
934:
930:
926:
918:
915:
913:
910:
908:
906:
893:
888:
887:
886:
879:
874:
870:
866:
862:
857:
856:
855:
853:
849:
845:
838:
835:
830:
825:
824:
823:
818:
815:
813:
811:
807:
799:
794:
790:
789:
788:
786:
782:
778:
771:
768:
766:
764:
759:
750:
748:
746:
740:
732:
730:
728:
724:
721:
718:
714:
712:
708:
707:
706:public domain
700:
698:
693:
690:
684:
682:
675:
674:
670:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
655:
646:
641:
638:
634:
633:
632:
630:
624:
621:
614:
611:
610:
606:
604:
602:
598:
590:
587:
580:
576:
571:
568:
567:
565:
561:
557:
556:
555:
553:
549:
541:
535:
531:
528:
524:
523:
522:
519:
515:
512:
507:
505:
500:
497:
493:
490:
486:
482:
474:
472:
470:
462:
457:
455:
451:
450:
446:
444:
440:
439:
438:
436:
434:
430:
421:
419:
417:
414:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
390:
388:
386:
378:
376:
374:
369:
363:
361:
359:
352:
348:
346:
340:
338:
336:
332:
326:
324:
322:
318:
315:
307:
305:
303:
297:
291:
289:
287:
283:
279:
270:
268:
266:
261:
258:
252:
250:
243:
241:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:, 23:18 (UTC)
221:
217:
213:
210:
209:Current time:
205:
201:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
53:
49:
48:
41:
39:
35:
30:
28:
27:
19:
1974:User:Zxcvbnm
1941:
1931:
1916:
1908:
1877:
1859:
1841:Answered on
1832:
1828:Jane Seymour
1815:
1798:
1784:
1759:
1743:
1712:
1704:
1681:
1677:Brian Howard
1674:
1670:
1647:
1630:
1618:
1606:
1603:Brookie here
1590:
1578:
1562:
1550:
1528:
1508:
1493:
1448:
1440:
1407:Images like
1406:
1393:
1374:
1363:
1360:
1337:
1325:
1309:
1294:
1256:
1236:
1206:
1192:
1180:
1167:
1139:
1127:
1112:
1093:
1087:Frisbetarian
1082:
1080:
1070:David Brooks
1067:
1042:
1022:
998:
996:
970:
942:
922:
911:
902:
890:msg left by
883:
841:
821:
803:
774:
754:
744:Short Verses
736:
725:
722:
719:
716:
704:
702:
694:
691:
688:
680:
650:
617:
612:
597:Tony Sidaway
593:
545:
527:D. J. Bracey
511:D. J. Bracey
508:
501:
489:D. J. Bracey
484:
481:Dbraceyrules
478:
475:WikiChampion
466:
429:this website
425:
410:
399:msg left by
394:
385:Niteowlneils
382:
370:
367:
355:
344:
333:
330:
319:
311:
298:
295:
274:
265:ChrisBradley
262:
259:
256:
248:
236:
224:
216:September 27
208:
207:
77:
57:
33:
31:
18:User:Zzyzx11
1979:Ryan Norton
1966:Ryan Norton
1945:Ryan Norton
1936:Ryan Norton
1888:Wikipedians
1675:Regards, --
1124:Joolz's RFA
1029:AFC Central
971:Hi Zzyx11:
917:SuperShadow
777:Kekszakallu
763:Sleepnomore
509:Take care,
335:Kinneyboy90
321:Kinneyboy90
286:Sleepnomore
1880:Jeff Snell
1856:Jeff Snell
1750:Rschen7754
1581:dave souza
1423:. I moved
1419:(PUI) not
1403:PUI Images
939:Signatures
885:the time.
869:Hubbertism
844:Hubbertism
837:Hubbertism
579:Cactus.man
564:Cactus.man
552:Cactus.man
413:Antandrus
276:criticize
225:Last edit:
1928:talk page
1924:adminship
1896:user page
1715:wikipedia
1565:adminship
1559:Thank you
1540:Contribs)
1146:WAS 4.250
1144: ??
1033:Cholmes75
711:copyright
628:>|<
469:Lucky 6.9
391:ling chao
229:Zinnober9
38:talk page
1872:contribs
1621:R. fiend
1547:deletion
1519:Howcheng
1478:David D.
1452:David D.
1364:Katefan0
1328:Lectonar
1025:AFC West
1019:AFC Logo
981:=Nichalp
905:Scimitar
817:Aunt flo
575:Dbenbenn
560:Dbenbenn
548:Dbenbenn
341:KerBlamb
240:contribs
58:Archives
1954:Zzyzx11
1901:Zzyzx11
1862:msg by
1846:Zzyzx11
1799:asserts
1771:Zzyzx11
1688:masters
1569:Bhadani
1467:Zzyzx11
1433:Nv8200p
1378:android
1344:BMIComp
1286:Zzyzx11
1245:tɔktəmi
1154:Zzyzx11
1105:itself.
1083:content
1063:Aviator
1049:ulayiti
997:As for
986:«Talk»=
955:Nv8200p
945:Nv8200p
873:Johntex
852:Johntex
827:msg by
727:Mikeetc
723:Thanks
709:by the
666:Zzyzx11
637:Zzyzx11
607:Restore
231: (
34:ignored
1957:(Talk)
1904:(Talk)
1849:(Talk)
1774:(Talk)
1709:My RFA
1633:Xm2631
1615:My RfA
1597:Jayjg
1553:Rafikk
1497:Splash
1481:(Talk)
1470:(Talk)
1455:(Talk)
1445:Favour
1436:(talk)
1357:My RFA
1340:my RfA
1338:Well,
1289:(Talk)
1233:My RFA
1219:ZappaZ
1195:ZappaZ
1171:Splash
1164:Thanks
1157:(Talk)
1113:BD2412
1111:
1094:BD2412
1092:
1054:(talk)
1045:my RfA
967:Thanks
958:(talk)
880:Unfair
677:again.
669:(Talk)
640:(Talk)
623:adiant
530:(talk)
514:(talk)
492:(talk)
463:Thanks
416:(talk)
407:thanks
358:JesseW
235:
212:Friday
1890:. By
1347:(talk
1297:Smyth
1267:Smyth
1253:Clone
1130:Joolz
927:, at
810:T-Boy
806:Babel
781:Sysin
16:<
1868:talk
1803:inks
1788:inks
1726:list
1723:urna
1536:Talk
1513:and
1411:and
1239:Angr
1027:and
1008:Talk
1003:Lomn
933:Maru
278:AJAX
233:talk
220:2024
1835:Deb
1819:DES
1720:→Jo
1700:mop
1698:'s
1696:Who
1684:Who
1575:RfA
1322:RfA
1012:RfC
919:VfD
863:at
569:LOL
479:I,
292:RFA
280:or
1748:--
1682:==
1595:.
1538:|
1383:79
1349:,
1316:DS
1108:--
263:--
242:)
218:,
214:,
194:34
192:|
190:33
188:|
186:32
184:|
182:31
180:|
178:30
176:|
174:29
172:|
170:28
168:|
166:27
164:|
162:26
160:|
158:25
156:|
154:24
152:|
150:23
148:|
146:22
144:|
142:21
140:|
138:20
136:|
134:19
132:|
130:18
128:|
126:17
124:|
122:16
120:|
118:15
116:|
114:14
112:|
110:13
108:|
106:12
104:|
102:11
100:|
98:10
96:|
92:|
88:|
84:|
80:|
76:|
72:|
68:|
64:|
1874:)
1866:(
1692:I
1534:(
1299:\
1269:\
1241:/
652:(
626:_
620:R
237:·
94:9
90:8
86:7
82:6
78:5
74:4
70:3
66:2
62:1
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
