23:
360:
273:
IP editors can start AFDs, but only with the assistance of another editor since IPs can't create non-talk pages, and AFDs sit in the
Knowledge space. The reason I asked for a rationale here was so that I could go complete the nomination - which I have now done. My bit is only procedural - the article
103:
You haven't provided any reasons for deleting that information other than you don't like it being there. Warning you that disruptive editing usually results in blocks is not me abusing my position (such as it is), just a simple statement of fact. If you have any valid reasons why that information
128:
I proposed to delete the
Infonic article and you removed this saying that no rationale for the PROD was provided. In the change note I stated that the PROD was raised because the company no longer exists and also the company website (www.infonic.com) no longer exists. Therefore the article is
325:
I tried looking for some sources but I could not find anything. I also noticed you were the one who de-prodded the article. If you have found any relaible sources could you add them to the article, otherwise I don't see why the article should be kept as it fails
129:
obsolete. Please can you review this article and begin the deletion process again (perhaps as a speedy delete) if you agree that this is appropriate. I will not do this again as I am not sure of the procedure. Thanks.
239:
This is my rationale - Notability is not established whatsoever, only verifiability. Anyone can invent things and win awards. It comes down to third-party significant coverage to determine if this article stays.
254:
I have added references to the two foremost current textbooks in the field, one of which calls Porter's algo "The most common algorithm for stemming
English", so notability has been established. I notice that
209:
And if you knew anything about editing to add significant third-party coverage (which you added wasn't), then we wouldn't be here. At any rate, I have started the AFD process. Can you clean it up for me?
224:
What is your specific "This should be deleted because:" rationale? I see the prod statement, but the article has been edited since then. Let me know and I'll complete the nomination for you.
298:
I have changed the ref for the stemmer to point to cs.odu.edu (an authoratitive source). According to Google
Scholar this article on the Porter Stemmer has 5,369 citations - a huge number !
88:
to decide what is and isn't appropriate content. Deleting informating because you don't personally like it is not appropriate and will land you with a ban if you continue.
169:, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the
256:
299:
136:
280:
241:
230:
211:
378:
63:
186:
I've added some sources to the article to establish the notability of the Porter stemmer, but really, had you known anything about
76:
That information didn't belong according to who, exactly? According to you?? Knowledge is a collaborative effort that relies on
180:
191:
421:
323:"This is a prime example of an article that could be improved by adding the relevant sources. Give it a chance!"
318:
373:. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
105:
303:
140:
409:
187:
132:
85:
440:
387:
77:
435:
274:
was nominated when the IP tagged it. Quertyus - and IP - you'll want to go comment at the debate.
264:
199:
27:
374:
275:
225:
39:
31:
345:
327:
445:
366:
109:
89:
43:
359:
35:
331:
260:
195:
173:
166:
159:
81:
59:
26:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on
Knowledge, as you did to
425:
393:
335:
430:
370:
399:
347:
307:
284:
268:
249:
234:
219:
203:
144:
117:
97:
51:
414:
104:
should not be on the article, I suggest starting a new section at
34:. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
179:
template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at
354:
66:
for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
42:
if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
404:
30:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
108:
and stating them there so that they may be discussed.
377:to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
259:is a red link, so I'm not sure how to proceed.
317:Hi, I noticed you participated in the AfD for
194:, then you would have heard of Martin Porter.
257:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Martin Porter
8:
369:for an IP user, identified by the user's
62:, and you didn't make the edit, consider
80:among its contributors and adherence to
7:
14:
358:
21:
181:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
381:also hides your IP address.
308:11:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
285:13:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
269:11:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
250:01:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
235:20:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
220:18:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
204:18:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
145:11:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
118:18:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
98:17:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
52:23:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
375:create an account or log in
192:natural language processing
468:
348:17:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
319:12 Apostles (record label)
313:12 Apostles (record label)
38:. Please make use of the
245:
215:
106:Talk:Chavo_Guerrero,_Jr.
446:Latin America/Caribbean
188:information retrieval
415:Global contributions
155:I have removed the
64:creating an account
112:
92:
46:
28:Chavo Guerrero Jr.
455:
454:
283:
233:
135:comment added by
110:
90:
60:shared IP address
44:
459:
362:
355:
342:
339:
279:
229:
178:
172:
164:
158:
147:
115:
95:
49:
25:
24:
467:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
457:
456:
451:
382:
367:discussion page
353:
351:
340:
337:
315:
176:
170:
162:
156:
153:
130:
126:
113:
93:
74:
47:
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
465:
463:
453:
452:
450:
449:
443:
438:
433:
428:
418:
412:
407:
405:Current blocks
402:
397:
391:
383:
363:
352:
314:
311:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
152:
149:
125:
122:
121:
120:
73:
70:
69:
68:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
464:
447:
444:
442:
439:
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
423:
419:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
400:Proxy Checker
398:
395:
392:
389:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
357:
356:
350:
349:
346:
344:
343:
333:
329:
324:
320:
312:
310:
309:
305:
301:
300:90.192.132.25
286:
282:
277:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
238:
237:
236:
232:
227:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
184:
182:
175:
168:
167:Martin Porter
161:
151:Martin Porter
150:
148:
146:
142:
138:
137:90.192.132.25
134:
123:
119:
116:
107:
102:
101:
100:
99:
96:
87:
83:
79:
71:
67:
65:
61:
58:If this is a
56:
55:
54:
53:
50:
41:
37:
33:
29:
16:
436:Asia-Pacific
365:This is the
336:
322:
316:
297:
276:UltraExactZZ
242:98.28.12.216
226:UltraExactZZ
212:98.28.12.216
185:
183:. Thanks!
154:
131:— Preceding
127:
75:
57:
32:edit summary
20:
17:January 2012
379:Registering
72:Re: editing
371:IP address
86:guidelines
394:Geolocate
328:WP:NMUSIC
321:you said
165:tag from
78:consensus
261:Qwertyus
196:Qwertyus
133:unsigned
82:policies
36:reverted
431:America
124:Infonic
40:sandbox
441:Europe
426:Africa
410:XTools
396:
390:
332:WP:GNG
111:ŞůṜīΣĻ
91:ŞůṜīΣĻ
45:ŞůṜīΣĻ
388:WHOIS
422:RIRs
330:and
304:talk
265:talk
246:talk
216:talk
200:talk
174:prod
160:prod
141:talk
114:¹98¹
94:¹98¹
84:and
48:¹98¹
341:Jay
338:Jay
281:Did
231:Did
190:or
424::
334:.
306:)
267:)
248:)
218:)
202:)
177:}}
171:{{
163:}}
157:{{
143:)
448:)
420:(
417:)
386:(
302:(
278:~
263:(
244:(
228:~
214:(
198:(
139:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.