Knowledge

User talk:18adamfish

Source 📝

101:: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Knowledge) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). 46:: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Knowledge) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). 107:. Knowledge is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine. 52:. Knowledge is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are. 151:
information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Knowledge may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that
113:. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims. 260: 168: 223:
If you came here to maim, bash and troll: be gone! If you came here to edit constructively and learn to abide by policies and guidelines: you're welcome.
160: 143:
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Knowledge operates off of
93:
A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
220:
pseudoscience, extremism, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say.
152:
subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf.
268: 202: 147:
information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include
276: 75:, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable). 271:
applies to giving the lie to those universities, especially when they all toe the same line. I oppose
284: 228: 272: 210: 206: 183: 86: 82: 264: 120: 28:
with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments.
280: 224: 172: 153: 116: 198: 179: 104: 66: 49: 22: 217: 194: 110: 92: 78: 37: 190: 132: 98: 43: 263:. Read it slowly and carefully and you'll find out why is it of application. If 148: 136: 60: 31: 187: 144: 128: 61:"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required 40:. We merely summarize reliable sources without elaboration or interpretation. 164: 191:
professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources
111:
Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited
124: 261:
Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 244#Gospel of John
17:
A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful
121:
topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia
32:"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is 267:
say that the Bible is wrong something, so says Knowledge.
79:
We do not publish original thought nor original research
38:
We do not publish original thought nor original research
105:
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view
50:
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view
275:
in our articles. You may read the full rationale at
255:
No original research of Ancient or Medieval sources
178:Knowledge is an encyclopedia. All we do here is 8: 67:Always cite a source for any new information 211:nor a place for you to "spread the word" 239: 87:we're not here to promote any ideology 246:I'm not saying that you do, but if... 74:reference tags like this</ref: --> 7: 161:User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV 287:) 01 February 2021 13:18:36 (UTC) 231:) 01 February 2021 13:18:36 (UTC) 99:Reliable sources typically include 44:Reliable sources typically include 14: 69:. When adding this information 173:heavily biased for the academia 123:. For example, our article on 1: 117:We do not give equal validity 301: 159:You may also want to read 137:the center of the universe 23:Please sign your posts on 127:does not pretend it is 163:. We at Knowledge are 203:We're not a directory 216:If you are here to 292: 269:WP:EXTRAORDINARY 247: 244: 195:without addition 83:We're not a blog 73:use <ref: --> 300: 299: 295: 294: 293: 291: 290: 289: 257: 252: 251: 250: 245: 241: 154:Indigo children 19: 12: 11: 5: 298: 296: 256: 253: 249: 248: 238: 237: 233: 199:nor commentary 141: 140: 114: 108: 102: 96: 90: 76: 64: 56:Reformulated: 54: 53: 47: 41: 35: 29: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 297: 288: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 254: 243: 240: 236: 232: 230: 226: 221: 219: 214: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 185: 181: 176: 174: 170: 166: 162: 157: 155: 150: 146: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 103: 100: 97: 94: 91: 88: 84: 80: 77: 72: 68: 65: 62: 59: 58: 57: 51: 48: 45: 42: 39: 36: 33: 30: 27: 26: 21: 20: 16: 273:WP:PROFRINGE 259:Please read 258: 242: 234: 222: 215: 177: 158: 142: 71:to articles, 70: 55: 24: 277:WP:NOBIGOTS 207:nor a forum 281:Tgeorgescu 235:References 225:Tgeorgescu 188:paraphrase 149:subjective 25:talk pages 265:WP:CHOPSY 184:summarize 145:objective 135:, and/or 165:highbrow 218:promote 186:, and 169:snobby 133:hollow 125:Earth 285:talk 229:talk 180:cite 129:flat 201:. 175:. 171:), 156:). 119:to 81:. 279:. 213:. 209:, 205:, 197:, 193:, 182:, 131:, 85:, 283:( 227:( 167:( 139:. 95:. 89:. 63:. 34:.

Index

Please sign your posts on talk pages
"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is
We do not publish original thought nor original research
Reliable sources typically include
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required
Always cite a source for any new information
We do not publish original thought nor original research
We're not a blog
we're not here to promote any ideology
A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Reliable sources typically include
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view
Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited
We do not give equal validity
topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia
Earth
flat
hollow
the center of the universe
objective
subjective
Indigo children
User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV
highbrow
snobby
heavily biased for the academia
cite
summarize
paraphrase

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.