1215:
ugly on their own I've not been told to this day). 2. Your post is partially unclear and in fact @Fbergo has been told not to violate WP:BITE by others who thought he was which I'm saying because I think you're saying what he said is valid under WP:BITE. In fact he seemed to exaggerate how bad it is to not bother signing in and edit
Knowledge (XXG) to such a degree that the truth will never come close to the exaggeration. 3.If you continue this discussion here (even if I get an account which won't be for at least a few years no matter what), someone else will think that it was them who you're accusing. 4. I remember saying that my edits assumed that nobody would prematurely resign the match. This is rather difficult to figure out in advance (the last time this happened was over 10 years ago), not to mention how easy it is to change the article accordingly. Having said that, whether the tie-breaks would be played is something the Knowledge (XXG) article alone is enough to figure out (however it's best that citations come from non-Knowledge (XXG) sources. 5. Until I can find which IP I was changed to this discussion should be continued at the talk page of the IP from which this message is coming from (regardless of which person in real life sent it).
612:
viewing other articles, etc.) 3. Before formally taking away from any of my edits (incl. planned edits), please message me here. If at least one of us disagrees to the original edit, and only then, will it be reverted such that the general public can see that (for planned edits, it's rather making the edit formally than reverting it because it wouldn't be even made. 4. Only the listed edits and related discussion will be signed (sorry if that can't be done according to the rules but it's what makes sense to me). The edits (asterisk means it's planned, and especially this part of the subject will be updated):
1131:) that there might be some residual hostility toward you left over from the November incident. While this might be unfair to you, there's not much to do about it, except continue to grovel. Knowledge (XXG) is anarchic in some ways. If you worked in the same office with someone and had a dispute with them, you could shake hands and make up, and indeed, you would probably have to. But your fellow editors here are distant total strangers. This makes it extra important to avoid crossing the line from disagreement to dispute.
894:
228:
592:
when I've been effectively blocked ever since - not that a 3RR was reversed for this account after that post on the talk page of another user)? 2. Blocks that end earlier than when a user wants to restart allowing a fellow user to edit somewhere are illogical. At time of posting, I'll be unblocked in under 12 hours yet a user doesn't want me to edit that page whilst the match is yet to end (which will take about 1.5 weeks).
857:
811:
314:
679:
24:
1264:
201:
166:
552:"It was just one edit so it shouldn't be an edit war": From my notifications alone I see you reverted my edits 10 times in the past 7 days. "it doesn't matter which articles I broke consistency": it does, and if you edit without consistency in mind you will be relentlessly reverted and get loads of warnings and blocks in the process.
621:). You are continuously disrupting a high visibility article (ongoing event). There are enough qualified editors updating and maintaining that article, your so-called help is not needed nor desired. If you return to editing it, it will only give us more work to revert your crap and get the article protected from such edits.
1214:
The IP who edit warred on the article has since changed location however this post was made by the same person (only from another IP). Here's a few things to point out: 1. I wasn't trying to be disruptive and I think I haven't been given enough reasoning to stop (in particular why the headers looked
656:
Besides, what we're talking about here is for another subject on this talk page, and the article you're talking about is not the only one. If editing this one isn't an option, will you make sure all the others get no future edits from me? If my edits here were reverted only once in total, would this
635:
I did say I don't want an account, but not so I could continue under this IP address. Why I don't want to create an account isn't related. I've had this view and for the same reason (which I'm not comfortable in saying) no matter where Z was or when it was, on multiple IP addresses, for more than 3
611:
Things to know relating to this section or relates stuff: 1. You can go to my contributions for an alternative to this talk page on the edits I've done. 2. Probably more than 9.5 out of every 10 edits from here have no bad intention (including consistency of which I'm no big fan of checking through
1086:
I am flattered that you asked me to get involved, but I would be entirely starting from scratch, as I did not participate in the editing of the article about the 2018 World
Championship, and I would have to read and digest quite a lot to catch up. Also, that was months ago, and the conversations
1027:
Thanks for trying to help. You'll get the hang of things (like checking edit history). And before the anon that complained there (and the one in
England) accuse me of using you as a sockpuppet myself, I already see you're from Australia and I'm in Canada, so we're not jetting around the planet to
591:
1. Am I forbidden from reverting even 1 edit in the time
Knowledge (XXG) will not be shut down even with a very large discussion related to the edit before and after the edit itself was made? I said I learnt a lesson that relates here but was told I lied because of 1 revert made later (especially
1182:
I'm saying I think @Fbergo was too harsh with the retraction whether or not the retraction was reversed. In fact the harshness is too much to comply with WP:BITE (an example is when he relates people not bothering to sign in to edit on
Knowledge (XXG) to hell when in fact it's never going to be
1090:
I see that you have taken some flak for not having created an account. Is there anything I can do to help with that? One can do some amount of useful editing without an account, but as you have probably noticed, it puts you at a psychological disadvantage when arguing with others over various
616:
Regardless of intention, your edits are disruptive and you have spent the last few days telling admins how you should or should not be punished, edit-warring on consistency and style with more experienced editors, denying the obvious edit war, lying about understanding wikipedia policies, and
519:
I didn't realize about the lesson learned thing I posted when I reverted something. It was just one edit so it shouldn't be an edit war or a reason to add more time to the blocked period (I think, maybe I'm wrong about this). It wasn't intentional and it doesn't matter which articles I broke
1197:
You edit warred at the World
Championship 2018 article and remained defiant in the face of criticism from multiple editors, and to attribute the retraction to WP:BITE is nothing short of apportioning yourself a victim when you have been the clear aggressor time and time again.
568:
I meant after I said lesson learnt which was less than 2 days ago I did 1 revert, not how many I did before (which is already way too many). Speaking of what articles I broke consistency with, how does it matter when they were all about previous world chess
636:
years back. I know nobody who edits
Knowledge (XXG), so a block on this IP or any from which I as the same real life person edit will not lose their editing priveleges assuming strangers aren't a around or maybe they are but don't edit Knowledge (XXG).
520:
consistency. Besides, if I've been told not to edit the article until after the match concludes, why have I not been blocked until that time? Lastly, I wasn't trying to unfairly increase my chances of having a lesser block or none at all at any stage.
617:
explictly mentioned you do not want a username (so you can keep causing trouble with a hard-to-remember number that can change at any time and where sanctions won't be as harsh as deserved as they could be punishing other people using the same IP;
572:
10 reverts in 7 days can probably be done without breaking 3RR (obviously doesn't apply in this case) which from my memory states 3 edits is the maximum to be done in 1 edit war in 24 hours (sometimes slightly longer) or something similar if I'm
974:. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see
640:
I know I feel lazy to check consistency but when did I lie about edit warring or understanding policies which inmfact I didn't? Plus, why have my original specifically original) edits been called crap?
1152:
Please look for the post starting with apology retracted. @Fbergo probably will never un do the retraction and some of his reasons why he retracted in the 1st place are not true or over exaggerated.
869:
861:
823:
815:
501:
to break the consistency with the 2016, 2012, and 2006 matches. Stop the bald-faced lies and don't edit the match article until after the match conclusion on 29 November.
836:) 20:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC) I am no longer trying to edit war, can this please be removed? PS when you removed empty headers recently they were commented out anyway.
477:
So you'll be the judge of whether the other party has a 'good reason'? That does not sound like much of a negotiation. I fixed your unblock request so it would show up.
993:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
912:. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Knowledge (XXG). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
455:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
354:
909:
733:
1108:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive379#User:211.27.126.189_reported_by_User:CaradhrasAiguo_(Result:_Blocked)
1028:
edit, and I am not aware of you. You appear to have been reported to that board and are now trying to help there. Keep it up, and Merry
Christmas.
1183:
nearly as bad even at its worst on
Knowledge (XXG).) I think the retraction needs to be fixed but @Fbergo is not intrested even in the slightest.
951:
440:
275:
1004:
1243:
1216:
1184:
1153:
1111:
1044:
905:
837:
790:
724:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
658:
642:
593:
574:
535:
521:
464:
400:
349:
58:
1282:
975:
778:
106:
956:
256:
936:
941:
729:
695:
264:
146:: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
268:
607:
Edits I plan/have done (after a 31hr block for 3RR violation plus important into which is related (come back for updates).
220:
1242:
Hi. I'm the former owner of 211.27.126.189 and the discussion is best continued at 211.27.115.246's talk page. Thank you.
368:
1124:
I assume that you aren't asking for me to intercede (it's way too late for that), but are only looking for some advice.
870:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:211.27.126.189 reported by User:CaradhrasAiguo (Result: )
824:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:211.27.126.189 reported by User:CaradhrasAiguo (Result: )
739:
327:
236:
147:
774:
1033:
1017:
998:
945:
321:
155:
143:
1107:
1325:
326:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
399:
Even if I don't have positive view on my edits later, I won't edit war if something gets reverted for good reason
534:
It's called looking at the edit summary (responding to the 1st post after the templates about blocks not by me).
123:
916:
901:
865:
819:
725:
683:
249:
245:
1277:. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
1247:
1220:
1204:
1171:
1143:
1096:
1072:
1063:
878:
832:
761:
687:
507:
52:
986:
789:
Apparently sending a talk page for an article to a user talk page is spam. The edit war wasn't meant to start.
1313:
1043:
I don't need this template on my talk page regardless of how far back in time I've been editing. thank you.
990:
98:
1029:
1013:
994:
699:
691:
332:
260:
119:
48:
110:
68:
931:
893:
860:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
814:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
1344:
1291:
482:
303:
127:
1339:
1167:
1139:
1092:
1068:
702:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
207:
Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the
151:
23:
1138:. More of that, less of the weird stuff that happened in November, that's all I can suggest.
1278:
963:
782:
1349:
169:
Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can
626:
557:
449:
281:
83:
1270:
721:
478:
426:
299:
227:
170:
134:
747:
1263:
102:
1135:
1128:
926:
754:
insist on reinstating threads when the messaged user has intentionally removed them.
921:
138:
130:
1329:
1297:
1334:
622:
553:
1274:
1251:
1224:
1209:
1192:
1175:
1161:
1147:
1119:
1100:
1076:
1052:
1037:
1021:
979:
883:
845:
798:
766:
666:
650:
630:
601:
582:
561:
543:
529:
512:
486:
472:
430:
422:
408:
307:
94:, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.
77:
1303:
1318:
274:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
174:
710:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
278:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
200:
165:
66:
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to
Knowledge (XXG)?
1258:
864:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
818:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
720:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
195:
15:
892:
312:
226:
158:
may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
263:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
1087:
about what happened then ought to have died down by now.
437:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
862:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
816:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
457:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1308:
985:
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
969:
498:
494:
382:
378:
372:
363:
359:
345:
341:
337:
295:
208:
185:
179:
35:
267:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
320:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
141:so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
1091:issues -- as if you somehow carried less weight.
982:(211.27.126.189) is used to identify you instead.
715:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
248:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
154:. In response to vandalism from this IP address,
126:or network administrator and request it contact
1281:to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
1166:Like I said, there's not much to do about it.
1134:I can't complain about your recent activity at
1064:User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Userboxes on your page
587:For some reason, 2 things seem confusing to me.
851:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
805:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
8:
962:You are welcome to continue editing without
785:so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
101:, keep track of articles you've edited in a
777:, and you did not make the edits, consider
732:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
686:according to the reverts you have made on
255:During a dispute, you should first try to
1273:for an IP user, identified by the user's
682:You currently appear to be engaged in an
910:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
619:You are willingly evading accountability
978:. If you edit without a username, your
1127:I also guess (from the interaction on
1001:, or ask your question and then place
966:, but many editors recommend that you
748:policy on blanking on user talk pages
7:
736:. If you engage in an edit war, you
657:whole thing of blocking have arisen?
92:and may be shared by multiple users
1009:before the question on this page.
917:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
783:logging in with an existing account
904:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
734:request temporary page protection
1262:
942:How to create your first article
855:
809:
677:
199:
164:
22:
908:, such as the one you made on
694:with others, to avoid editing
1:
1053:19:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
1038:19:29, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
1022:19:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
846:20:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
799:08:48, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
767:21:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
667:20:10, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
651:20:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
631:13:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
602:12:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
583:11:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
562:11:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
544:09:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
530:08:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
513:22:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
497:to Abelmoschus, you reverted
487:22:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
473:08:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
431:23:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
409:20:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
308:15:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
257:discuss controversial changes
240:from editing for a period of
221:World Chess Championship 2018
1285:also hides your IP address.
1252:10:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
1225:07:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
1210:04:09, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
1193:20:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
1176:19:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
1162:19:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
1148:17:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
1120:08:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
1101:19:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
937:How to write a great article
884:15:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
296:the edit warring noticeboard
107:a few other special features
46:10:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
1279:create an account or log in
1077:09:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
324:, who declined the request.
40:
1372:
952:Simplified Manual of Style
1082:Dispute with another user
995:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
441:guide to appealing blocks
276:guide to appealing blocks
250:make useful contributions
124:Internet service provider
122:repeatedly, contact your
1188:
1157:
1115:
1048:
841:
794:
700:try to reach a consensus
690:. Users are expected to
688:User talk:CaradhrasAiguo
662:
646:
597:
578:
539:
525:
468:
404:
1350:Latin America/Caribbean
1110:for a start. Thank you.
726:appropriate noticeboard
177:of this page in either
897:
421:This is insufficient.
317:
294:The full report is at
231:
113:! It's fast and free.
111:registering an account
957:Recent changes patrol
896:
495:pled "lesson learned"
369:change block settings
316:
286:Your reason here ~~~~
230:
105:, and have access to
1319:Global contributions
137:HTTP headers on its
779:creating an account
88:, is registered to
991:sign your comments
922:How to edit a page
906:your contributions
898:
730:dispute resolution
493:Shortly after you
318:
265:dispute resolution
232:
152:Template:Anonblock
109:, please consider
69:Create an account!
1359:
1358:
1207:
970:create an account
881:
835:
775:shared IP address
764:
510:
216:
215:
194:
193:
97:To have your own
1363:
1266:
1259:
1203:
1201:
1012:Again, welcome!
1008:
972:
877:
875:
868:. The thread is
859:
858:
831:
829:
822:. The thread is
813:
812:
781:for yourself or
760:
758:
705:Points to note:
681:
680:
506:
504:
454:
448:
388:
386:
375:
357:
355:deleted contribs
315:
289:
219:Edit warring at
203:
196:
190:
168:
160:
159:
93:
86:
72:
32:
26:
16:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1355:
1286:
1271:discussion page
1257:
1255:
1199:
1084:
1060:
1002:
968:
891:
873:
872:. Thank you.
856:
853:
827:
826:. Thank you.
810:
807:
756:
678:
675:
609:
502:
460:
452:
446:
445:, then use the
434:
412:
376:
366:
352:
335:
328:blocking policy
313:
292:
291:
279:
272:
269:page protection
253:
224:
163:
142:
135:X-Forwarded-For
133:about enabling
117:
82:
76:
65:
63:
62:
44:
28:
27:
12:
11:
5:
1369:
1367:
1357:
1356:
1354:
1353:
1347:
1342:
1337:
1332:
1322:
1316:
1311:
1309:Current blocks
1306:
1301:
1295:
1287:
1267:
1256:
1244:211.27.115.246
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1217:123.243.100.66
1205:leave language
1185:211.27.126.189
1168:Bruce leverett
1154:211.27.126.189
1150:
1140:Bruce leverett
1132:
1125:
1112:211.27.126.189
1093:Bruce leverett
1083:
1080:
1069:Anna Frodesiak
1062:Replied here:
1059:
1056:
1045:211.27.126.189
1041:
1040:
1030:Walter Görlitz
1014:Walter Görlitz
960:
959:
954:
949:
946:Article Wizard
939:
934:
929:
924:
919:
890:
887:
879:leave language
852:
849:
838:211.27.126.189
833:leave language
806:
803:
802:
801:
791:211.27.126.189
787:
762:leave language
744:
718:
717:
712:
674:
671:
670:
669:
659:211.27.126.189
643:211.27.126.189
638:
637:
633:
608:
605:
594:211.27.126.189
589:
588:
585:
575:211.27.126.189
570:
569:championships?
566:
565:
564:
547:
546:
536:211.27.126.189
532:
522:211.27.126.189
516:
515:
508:leave language
490:
489:
475:
465:211.27.126.189
435:
419:
415:Decline reason
401:211.27.126.189
397:
393:Request reason
390:
333:211.27.126.189
311:
273:
254:
234:You have been
233:
225:
223:
217:
214:
213:
204:
192:
191:
162:
144:Administrators
115:
84:211.27.126.189
49:211.27.115.246
47:
45:
41:Last edited by
39:
34:
33:
21:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1368:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1304:Proxy Checker
1302:
1299:
1296:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1136:Bobby Fischer
1133:
1130:
1129:Bobby Fischer
1126:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1088:
1081:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1057:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1006:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
983:
981:
977:
973:
971:
965:
958:
955:
953:
950:
947:
943:
940:
938:
935:
933:
930:
928:
925:
923:
920:
918:
915:
914:
913:
911:
907:
903:
895:
888:
886:
885:
880:
871:
867:
863:
850:
848:
847:
843:
839:
834:
825:
821:
817:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
786:
784:
780:
776:
773:If this is a
771:
770:
769:
768:
763:
755:
753:
749:
743:
742:from editing.
741:
735:
731:
727:
723:
716:
713:
711:
708:
707:
706:
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
673:November 2018
672:
668:
664:
660:
655:
654:
653:
652:
648:
644:
634:
632:
628:
624:
620:
615:
614:
613:
606:
604:
603:
599:
595:
586:
584:
580:
576:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
549:
548:
545:
541:
537:
533:
531:
527:
523:
518:
517:
514:
509:
500:
496:
492:
491:
488:
484:
480:
476:
474:
470:
466:
462:
461:
459:
458:
451:
444:
442:
433:
432:
428:
424:
418:
416:
411:
410:
406:
402:
396:
394:
389:
384:
380:
374:
370:
365:
361:
356:
351:
347:
346:global blocks
343:
342:active blocks
339:
334:
329:
325:
323:
322:administrator
310:
309:
305:
301:
298:. Thank you,
297:
287:
283:
277:
270:
266:
262:
258:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
229:
222:
218:
212:
210:
205:
202:
198:
197:
188:
187:
182:
181:
176:
172:
167:
161:
157:
156:abuse reports
153:
149:
145:
140:
139:proxy servers
136:
132:
129:
125:
121:
114:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
90:VOCUS PTY LTD
87:
85:
79:
73:
71:
70:
60:
57:
54:
50:
42:
37:
31:
25:
20:
18:
17:
1340:Asia-Pacific
1269:This is the
1241:
1089:
1085:
1067:
1061:
1042:
1011:
999:my talk page
997:, ask me on
984:
967:
961:
948:if you wish)
899:
866:edit warring
854:
820:edit warring
808:
772:
751:
745:
737:
719:
714:
709:
704:
696:disruptively
676:
639:
618:
610:
590:
456:
438:
436:
420:
414:
413:
398:
392:
391:
364:creation log
331:
319:
293:
285:
246:edit warring
241:
235:
209:page history
206:
184:
178:
116:
96:
89:
81:
74:
67:
64:
55:
29:
1283:Registering
1106:Please see
944:(using the
900:Hello, and
692:collaborate
131:XFF project
128:Wikimedia's
120:autoblocked
118:If you are
36:Last edited
1275:IP address
987:Wikipedian
980:IP address
964:logging in
927:Help pages
750:, you may
479:EdJohnston
360:filter log
300:EdJohnston
148:soft block
99:user pages
78:IP address
1298:Geolocate
1200:Caradhras
989:! Please
976:this page
874:Caradhras
828:Caradhras
757:Caradhras
722:talk page
698:, and to
573:mistaken.
503:Caradhras
499:yet again
463:How come?
439:read the
379:checkuser
338:block log
261:consensus
259:and seek
171:subscribe
103:watchlist
932:Tutorial
889:Welcome!
728:or seek
684:edit war
350:contribs
284:|reason=
242:31 hours
175:web feed
59:contribs
30:Welcome!
1335:America
1202:Aiguo (
902:welcome
876:Aiguo (
830:Aiguo (
759:Aiguo (
740:blocked
738:may be
505:Aiguo (
450:unblock
373:unblock
282:unblock
237:blocked
189:format.
1345:Europe
1330:Africa
1314:XTools
1300:
1294:
1005:helpme
623:Fbergo
554:Fbergo
150:using
1292:WHOIS
443:first
423:Yamla
173:to a
75:Your
1326:RIRs
1248:talk
1221:talk
1189:talk
1172:talk
1158:talk
1144:talk
1116:talk
1097:talk
1073:talk
1058:Ping
1049:talk
1034:talk
1018:talk
842:talk
795:talk
746:Per
663:talk
647:talk
627:talk
598:talk
579:talk
558:talk
540:talk
526:talk
483:talk
469:talk
427:talk
405:talk
304:talk
244:for
186:Atom
53:talk
752:not
383:log
330:).
183:or
180:RSS
1328::
1250:)
1223:)
1208:)
1191:)
1174:)
1160:)
1146:)
1118:)
1099:)
1075:)
1051:)
1036:)
1020:)
1007:}}
1003:{{
882:)
844:)
797:)
765:)
665:)
649:)
629:)
600:)
581:)
560:)
542:)
528:)
511:)
485:)
471:)
453:}}
447:{{
429:)
417::
407:)
395::
377:•
371:•
367:•
362:•
358:•
353:•
348:•
344:•
340:•
306:)
290:.
288:}}
280:{{
252:.
80:,
1352:)
1324:(
1321:)
1290:(
1246:(
1219:(
1187:(
1170:(
1156:(
1142:(
1114:(
1095:(
1071:(
1047:(
1032:(
1016:(
840:(
793:(
661:(
645:(
625:(
596:(
577:(
556:(
538:(
524:(
481:(
467:(
425:(
403:(
387:)
385:)
381:(
336:(
302:(
271:.
211:.
61:)
56:·
51:(
43::
38::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
